Antoine Le Gonidec <vv...@debian.org> writes: > Le Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 08:43:17AM +0300, Henrik Ahlgren a écrit : >> journald is the default on bookworm already (replacing traditional >> rsyslog), so wouldn’t it make sense for it to fall within the scope of >> the logging team? > > Having to handle the documentation of journald would mean giving up on > the documentation of anything else, due to its complexity and how it has > nothing in common with other logging daemons. > > So the only way it could be handled by the Logging Team is if someone > joins the team with this explicit goal, and work on that whemselves. > Until such a person makes themselves known, you can assume that journald > is excluded from our scope.
I think this comes back to the scope being not quite explained yet: If your aim is to have documentation of logging in general then ignoring the default logger in debian seems unlikely to produce something very enlightening. Probably you actualy have something else in mind where this wont actually be an issue. Anyway, im happy to help proof-reading or other things -- especially for logcheck. what are the next steps?
