On Fri, 2025-08-08 at 00:14 +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: > Le Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 10:56:03PM +0100, Richard Lewis a écrit : > > Seems like logcheck should be "involved", or at least "informed" > > I’m adding them as CC to this message so they at least are going to > be aware of the ongoing discussion.
I'd be happy for any assistance with logcheck! It's in the "debian" namespace on salsa, so anyone is welcome to help out under the collaborative maintenance umbrella. logcheck tends to be a "squeaky wheel" package for me -- it does everything I need it to, so it's not high priority until it becomes sufficiently noisy with bug reports/emails/MRs/etc. :) Mathias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
