On 10/01/2008, Mark Hindley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 06:29:21PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > That seems to have done the trick. By the way, some days ago (I don't > > remember exactly when) I gave the new '-p' option a try and failed on > > four files (I use apt-cacher for around 8 mirrors), is there any > > chance that it could have damaged the database?. > > Possibly. I changed to berkeley because I think it is faster than > sqlite. I need to try to make it less error prone. Will look at that. > > I would be interested in what failed using the -p option. If patching > fails, it should revert to the previous operation and just download the > new file complete. Is that what you saw? Do you still have output from > that?
I really don't remember and no, I don't have its output anymore. I think it complained about missing index files. > > Glad you are up and running again though :) > > Mark > Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Say NO to Microsoft Office broken standard. See http://www.noooxml.org/petition -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
