On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 06:29:21PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > That seems to have done the trick. By the way, some days ago (I don't > remember exactly when) I gave the new '-p' option a try and failed on > four files (I use apt-cacher for around 8 mirrors), is there any > chance that it could have damaged the database?.
Possibly. I changed to berkeley because I think it is faster than sqlite. I need to try to make it less error prone. Will look at that. I would be interested in what failed using the -p option. If patching fails, it should revert to the previous operation and just download the new file complete. Is that what you saw? Do you still have output from that? Glad you are up and running again though :) Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
