On Wed, 09 May 2007 14:29:46 -0700, Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bartek Kania wrote: >> I would really really like it if we don't use 500 numbers in the >> version number. >> As I see it two-number versions-numbers are plenty. >> First version is 1.0. When bugs are fixed it gets to 1.1, 1.2, etc. >> Next version is 2.0. > > Three numbers, X.Y.Z. > > Z is incremented for bug fix and security releases > > Y is incremented for new additional feature releases > > X is incremented for architectural change releases > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > Callweaver-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
That's pretty much it. Starting with 1.0.0 is pretty much standard or even with a 0.1.0. It can always be Callweaver 0.1.0 "911! I lost my cat!" So i'm in favor of "codename" or similar as long it has the version. sup -- Nelson Silva ----------------------- _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
