Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk ha scritto: > hi all > > first of all, we've just put CW into production, and it works well. > not a lot of users yet, but they're moving over slowly > > and then to the point. http://callweaver.org/milestones sets a 1.2.0 > release date to 1. june, which is ok. However, the version number > 1.2.0 looks somehow wrong to me. The arguments for this (as from > ctrix) are mainly "it was based on asterisk 1.2" and "noone wants to > run 1.0".
Sorry but i didn't say this. When we were openpbx, 1.2 had the following reasons: 1) opbx was from * 1.2 2) opbx jumped over 1.0 release (there was an old branch meant to do 1.0 so 1.2 was the best choice 3) no one uses 1.0 software Now we are going to release not what was meant to be opbx1.2 but was going to be opbx 1.4 so it's a new branch. For CW i have proposed to get rid of the numbering scheme which is useless and silly. We already have a SVN revision number and that's enough. I proposed to call each CW version with some fancy name, like debian or ubuntu does. Max _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
