hi all first of all, we've just put CW into production, and it works well. not a lot of users yet, but they're moving over slowly
and then to the point. http://callweaver.org/milestones sets a 1.2.0 release date to 1. june, which is ok. However, the version number 1.2.0 looks somehow wrong to me. The arguments for this (as from ctrix) are mainly "it was based on asterisk 1.2" and "noone wants to run 1.0". IMHO naming the first release of a project for something > 1.0 will be a lie. Some companies, like IBM, do this (The first AIX 4 was 4.1), but then this is probably anti-1.0-marketing. I would like to suggest the first release of CW should be named either 0.1.0 (the coppice way), 0.9.0 (as in 'it's stable but it's not yet finished') or 1.0, but nothing > 1.0, since this is indeed a new project, and although based on openpbx, openpbx neither had any official releases regards roy _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
