version numbers also helps find the sequence of versions: ie. 2.0 is after 1.0. More difficult with: is apple after or before banana?
marc. Le 07-05-09 à 15:15, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk a écrit : > > Den 9.5.2007 kl. 19:56 skrev CtRiX: > >> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >>> Petnames are nice, along with a version number, as in ubuntu and >>> debian. Debian Etch == 4.0 etc. But that's another discussion. IMO >>> the first release shouldn't be 1.2 or 3.14 or anything but 1.0 >>> >> My vote goes to Callweaver $some_nice_name (svn rev: XXXX) >> >> and you have both the number and the version > > I get the point, but IMHO a version number should be used for > userfriendliness, such as in virtually all other software projects > around. The revision number should be there as well (as in Windows' > build number), but it should not be used alone. People _want_ a > version number, so sticking to revisions alone is far too nerdish, > and will make it harder to get new users, and thus developers into > the project > > roy > _______________________________________________ > Callweaver-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev ----- IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley, 2006, http://www.ipv6book.ca _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
