-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 9 May 2007, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > I would like to suggest the first release of CW should be named > either 0.1.0 (the coppice way), 0.9.0 (as in 'it's stable but it's > not yet finished') or 1.0, but nothing > 1.0, since this is indeed a > new project, and although based on openpbx, openpbx neither had any > official releases
I would really really like it if we don't use 500 numbers in the version number. As I see it two-number versions-numbers are plenty. First version is 1.0. When bugs are fixed it gets to 1.1, 1.2, etc. Next version is 2.0. And instead of saying that "I'm running CW 2.32.4.2.1.4.5.3.1" which just sounds geeky you just say "I'm running CW 2" which sounds a bit less geeky. Sure, this is mostly cosmetic and personal oppinion, but hey. /B - -- * GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text? - -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGQifUckvkFeO3ANARAi7tAKCeaMZdlU3zD13eLKcLMZm+EGy+ewCeMkEY Mjl9PYpEDG6rWj2oBPXMQ1c= =/8Jm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
