On Feb 13, 2014, at 9:07 AM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:58 AM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 13, 2014, at 9:18 AM, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > > [ clip ] > > > > However, to be honest, I'm not that interested in playing the ancient > > history game -- I find the whole exercise pointless and boring. I am, > > however, interested in what policy changes you believe it will take to get > > ARIN to accurately reflect reality in its registry database. What's it > > going to take? > > I have been attempting to follow up on your suggestion to poll the > community, but we seem to have reached an impasse because ARIN is > keeping the registry accurate and your formulation would suggest > otherwise. Hence, my attempt at a more balanced phrasing, i.e. that > we should "survey the ARIN community regarding the prioritization of > needs-based transfers vs operational usefulness of registry data." > If we can come up with acceptable language, we'll figure out how to > poll the ARIN community on this topic. > > > > > How about polling resource holders instead? A much larger audience. > Not sure how you figure that… ARIN Community: Anyone with an email address who wishes to participate. Resource Holders: Anyone with an object registered in the ARIN database. While it is true that the latter is a larger group, in reality, the poll would effectively involve only the “Resource holders who choose to participate”, which I would argue is a subset of “those with an email address who wish to participate”. Owen
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
