On Feb 13, 2014, at 3:24 PM, Morizot Timothy S <[email protected]> wrote:
> Interesting. So you believe it's in the interest of those of us who have > signed RSAs and LRSAs to subsidize (through our annual fees) those who want > free registry services even though they refuse to adhere to the number > resource policy in our region. That policy, in part, requires that the > recipient of a legacy resource transfer, who by definition cannot be a > legacy allocation recipient, sign an RSA and contribute toward the cost of > providing those registry services. > > That's an interesting perspective, but I'm not sure I agree. ARIN can't > really control use and advertisement of resources, but if someone who isn't a > pre-ARIN legacy recipient expects to receive registry services, I'm okay with > requiring them to sign an RSA and pay for those services. Just FYI - the ARIN Board of Trustees has consistently indicated that ARIN should provide the same basic services to legacy resource holders without charge, so that they may make use of the number resources with minimal effort. We do encourage them to enter into an LRSA both to share in costs and receive clear contractual rights, but there is no obligation for them to do in order to continue to receive registry systems (and this is similar to the RIPE 605 section re "No Relationship") /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
