John Curran wrote:
>Just FYI - the ARIN Board of Trustees has consistently indicated that ARIN 
>should
>provide the same basic services to legacy resource holders without charge, so 
>that 
>they may make use of the number resources with minimal effort.   We do 
>encourage 
>them to enter into an LRSA both to share in costs and receive clear 
>contractual 
>rights, but there is no obligation for them to do in order to continue to 
>receive
>registry systems (and this is similar to the RIPE 605 section re "No 
>Relationship")

Yes, and I agree with and support that approach. We received registry services 
for years under that provision before signing an LRSA. That was mostly due to 
inattention and a lack of awareness. I'm not even sure when the LRSA option was 
developed. I absolutely support providing registry services to actual legacy 
resource holders whether or not they've signed a resource agreement.

My point was that someone receiving a new allocation now, even if it's a 
transfer from a legacy resource holder, is not a legacy resource holder. Only 
the original holder (or whatever entity the legal chain of acquisition and 
merger indicates is the descendant of that original holder in some cases) can 
be considered the legacy  holder. At least, I've always understood that the 
legacy definition is associated with the holder because they received the 
allocation prior to the formation of ARIN. Someone who obtains an allocation of 
number resources now, whether from the free pool or the transfer market, is not 
a legacy holder. I don't agree with providing free basic registry services to 
that group. I view their refusal to enter into an agreement with ARIN as a 
decision to utilize the numbers without registering them directly. They may 
have an agreement with the registered legacy holder that the legacy resource 
holder will not announce the numbers but that's a private two-party ag
 reement and not an agreement with the registrar. And if they expect direct 
registry services or believe they need it, then caveat emptor would seem to 
apply.

Scott
 
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to