On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:40 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:58 AM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Feb 13, 2014, at 9:18 AM, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > [ clip ] > > >> >> > However, to be honest, I'm not that interested in playing the ancient >> history game -- I find the whole exercise pointless and boring. I am, >> however, interested in what policy changes you believe it will take to get >> ARIN to accurately reflect reality in its registry database. What's it >> going to take? >> >> I have been attempting to follow up on your suggestion to poll the >> community, but we seem to have reached an impasse because ARIN is >> keeping the registry accurate and your formulation would suggest >> otherwise. Hence, my attempt at a more balanced phrasing, i.e. that >> we should "survey the ARIN community regarding the prioritization of >> needs-based transfers vs operational usefulness of registry data." >> If we can come up with acceptable language, we'll figure out how to >> poll the ARIN community on this topic. >> >> > How about polling resource holders instead? A much larger audience. > > > It's possible, although we also need to always use caution when reaching > out via the Whois contact information, since there is significant > variation in > what folks think of as "spam", even if related to the registry itself. > > > Thinking about it further, a poll would be more tail chasing. David's question above is probably the best one in this thread. You guys can have at it. Best, -M<
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
