On 2/12/14, 5:43 PM, David Conrad wrote:
And by the way, continuing to try to associate transfers between mutually agreeable parties as theft or illegal activity isn't really helping the conversation.
+1. Especially when the transfers involve addresses for which no RSA has been signed. Either ARIN should stop maintaining a registry of pre-ARIN-assigned no-RSA-associated addresses altogether, or ensure that such a registry is relatively accurate.
I understand that ARIN *can* decide to pretend that it somehow prevents the transfers from happening by refusing to record changes in "ownership" that are done outside of policy (and certainly has the right to refuse to record the changes, what with there being no agreement with the parties and all), but I don't see how that furthers the goal of maintaining an accurate registry, which I presume is why ARIN includes legacy addresses in its registry at all.
Matthew Kaufman _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
