On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:53:35PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On 08/06/2012 01:19 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Sat, 04.08.12 10:50, Bryan Kadzban ([email protected]) wrote: > > > >> > >> microcai wrote: > >>> 2012/8/4 Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>: > >>>> On Tue, 24.07.12 22:45, Jonathan Callen ([email protected]) wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> In the x32 ABI, syscall numbers start at 0x40000000. Mask that > >>>>> bit on x32 for lookups in the syscall_names array and > >>>>> syscall_filter and ensure that syscall.h is parsed correctly. > >>>> Hmpf, can't say I find this patch particularly beautiful? > > Why? Patch is mostly self-contained, shouldn't affect other > architectures, and actually changes just a few lines. Even if the > implementation is later on changed to use libseccomp, I don't see why we > shouldn't apply this now to make life easier for the x32 porters.
Hi, I committed this now. systemd seems to work fine with this patch in a x32 chroot. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
