2012/8/4 Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 24.07.12 22:45, Jonathan Callen ([email protected]) wrote: > >> In the x32 ABI, syscall numbers start at 0x40000000. Mask that bit on >> x32 for lookups in the syscall_names array and syscall_filter and ensure >> that syscall.h is parsed correctly. > > Hmpf, can't say I find this patch particularly beautiful? > > Can we solve this differently? For example, I'd be open to replace the > direct seccomp code in systemd by some code based on libseccomp (now > that libseccomp actually fixed its static global state issues). That way > we should get this portability for free?
looks like some source-based distro will blame you again :) > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. > _______________________________________________ > systemd-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
