On Tue, 24.07.12 22:45, Jonathan Callen ([email protected]) wrote: > In the x32 ABI, syscall numbers start at 0x40000000. Mask that bit on > x32 for lookups in the syscall_names array and syscall_filter and ensure > that syscall.h is parsed correctly.
Hmpf, can't say I find this patch particularly beautiful? Can we solve this differently? For example, I'd be open to replace the direct seccomp code in systemd by some code based on libseccomp (now that libseccomp actually fixed its static global state issues). That way we should get this portability for free? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
