microcai wrote: > 2012/8/4 Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>: >> On Tue, 24.07.12 22:45, Jonathan Callen ([email protected]) wrote: >> >>> In the x32 ABI, syscall numbers start at 0x40000000. Mask that >>> bit on x32 for lookups in the syscall_names array and >>> syscall_filter and ensure that syscall.h is parsed correctly. >> Hmpf, can't say I find this patch particularly beautiful? >> >> Can we solve this differently? For example, I'd be open to replace >> the direct seccomp code in systemd by some code based on libseccomp >> (now that libseccomp actually fixed its static global state >> issues). That way we should get this portability for free? > > looks like some source-based distro will blame you again :)
libseccomp uses pkg-config, so it's much less of a problem IMO; SECCOMP_CFLAGS=" " SECCOMP_LIBS=" " will allow configure to at least finish properly if the library is not present. (Whether the system builds at all in this case is of course an issue that anyone sending those params to ./configure will have to deal with.) _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
