On 08/06/2012 01:19 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 04.08.12 10:50, Bryan Kadzban ([email protected]) wrote: > >> >> microcai wrote: >>> 2012/8/4 Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>: >>>> On Tue, 24.07.12 22:45, Jonathan Callen ([email protected]) wrote: >>>> >>>>> In the x32 ABI, syscall numbers start at 0x40000000. Mask that >>>>> bit on x32 for lookups in the syscall_names array and >>>>> syscall_filter and ensure that syscall.h is parsed correctly. >>>> Hmpf, can't say I find this patch particularly beautiful?
Why? Patch is mostly self-contained, shouldn't affect other architectures, and actually changes just a few lines. Even if the implementation is later on changed to use libseccomp, I don't see why we shouldn't apply this now to make life easier for the x32 porters. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
