Re: faceting is unusable slow since upgrade to 5.3.0

Same question here Wondering if faceting performance is fixed and how to take advantage of it ? On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote: > Hi all, > > given that solr 5.4 is finally released, is this what's more stable and > efficient version of solrcloud ? > > I have a webs

Re: faceting is unusable slow since upgrade to 5.3.0

Can we add method=uif back when not using the JSON Facet API too? That would help a lot of people. On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > given that solr 5.4 is finally released, is this what's more

Re: faceting is unusable slow since upgrade to 5.3.0

would probably be more aligned with not adding unexpected > changes to people that are currently using fc. > > -Jamie > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:03 PM, William Bell > wrote: > > > Can we add method=uif back when not using the JSON Facet API too? > > > >

Re: Best practices on monitoring Solr

Sematext.com has a service for this... Or just curl "http://localhost:8983/solr//select?q=*:*" to see if it returns ? On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Tiwari, Shailendra < shailendra.tiw...@macmillan.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Last week our Solr Search was un-responsive and we need to re-boot the >

Re: How to check when a search exceeds the threshold of timeAllowed parameter

I agree that when using timeAllowed in the header info there should be an entry that indicates timeAllowed triggered. This is the only reason why we have not used timeAllowed. So this is a great suggestion. Something like: 1 ?? That would be great. 0 1 107 *:* 1000 On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 6

Re: API accessible without authentication even though Basic Auth Plugin is enabled

Why would someone stay on 5.3.x instead of upgrading to 5.4? Why backport when you can just upgrade? On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Noble Paul wrote: > A 5.3.2 release is coming up which will back port the fixes introduced in > 5.4 > On Dec 17, 2015 10:25 PM, "tine-2" wrote: > > > Noble Paul

Re: How to check when a search exceeds the threshold of timeAllowed parameter

Great I must have missed that. On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jeff Wartes wrote: > Looks like it’ll set partialResults=true on your results if you hit the > timeout. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5986 > > > > > > > On 12/22/15

Issue with Join

I have having issues with {!join}. If the core have multiValued field and the inner join does not have a multiValued field it does not find the ones... Solr 5.3.1... 5.3.1 Example. PS1226 is in practicing_specialties_codes in providersearch core. This field is multiValued. in the autosuggest co

Re: Issue with Join

Thoughts? I can duplicate it at will... On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:02 PM, William Bell wrote: > I have having issues with {!join}. If the core have multiValued field and > the inner join does not have a multiValued field it does not find the > ones... > > Solr 5.3.1... 5.

Re: Memory Usage increases by a lot during and after optimization .

Question: does anyone have example good merge settings for solrconfig ? To keep the number of segments small like 6? On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Some people also want to control when major segment merges happen, and > optimizing at a known time helps prevent a major me

Re: Issue with Join

pec_code > to=practicing_specialties_codes > fromIndex=autosuggest}*:* as a q and look at debug output. > Also there was a trick for dealing with pure negative queries q=*:* > -foo:bar though it might be obsolete. > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:02 AM, William Bell wrote: > &

SOLR 5.4.0?

How is SOLR 5.4.0 ? I heard there was a quick 5.4.1 coming out? Any major issues? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Issue with if() statement

We are getting weird results with if(exists(a),b,c). We are getting b+c!! http://localhost:8983/solr/providersearch/select?q=*:*&wt=json&state=state:%22CO%22&state1=state:%22NY%22&fq=if(exists(query($state1)),{!lucene%20v=$state1},{!lucene%20v=$state}) I am getting NY and CO! I only want $state1

Re: Issue with if() statement

Sure. If the state:NY returns results filter by state:NY, if it does not, then use state:CO. If we have results in NY, use it, otherwise use CO. OK? On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015, at 11:50 PM, William Bell wrote: > > We are gettin

Re: Issue with if() statement

22NY%22&fl=ss,score&q=*:*&fq={!lucene%20v=$state} This returns 10,000 I want to put an IF statement around which v to use. On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 1:52 PM, William Bell wrote: > Sure. > > If the state:NY returns results filter by state:NY, if it does not, then > use s

Re: Issue with if() statement

, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:07 PM, William Bell wrote: > Example. > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/providersearch/select?wt=json&state=state:%22CO%22&state1=state:%22NY%22&fl=ss,score&q=*:*&fq={!lucene%20v=$state1} > <http://localhost:8983/solr/providersearch/select?wt

Re: Issue with if() statement

h case.all='*:*' case.CO='state:CO' case.NY='state:NY' v=$state1} Obviously Oregon (OR!) is an issue, and it won't work at all plus On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:15 PM, William Bell wrote: > Ano

Re: Issue with if() statement

Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:25 PM, William Bell wrote: > This all started with me trying to use {!switch} to indicate with CO or NY > to use. if we pass state1, that is supposed to take precedence, but if > nothing is returned, then use state Make sense now? > > I could not find a w

Re: Issue with if() statement

Forgot last bit: fq={!switch case.gt.0=$state1 default=$state func=len($state1)} On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:39 PM, William Bell wrote: > Maybe we can add function value on a switch? > > fq={!switch

Re: Issue with if() statement

Also ne: not equal. This is like KSH. On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:40 PM, William Bell wrote: > Forgot last bit: > > fq={!switch case.gt.0=$state1 > default=$state > func=len($state1)} > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016

Re: Issue with if() statement

rates before the > QueryComponent does. > > A simple queryparser of your own would seem like a pretty lightweight > thing - probably 20 lines of code or less. > > Upayavira > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016, at 09:40 PM, William Bell wrote: > > Forgot last bit: > > > > f

Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif

Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow. Please... On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote: > Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and inline > with faceting available in the new js

Re: Issue with if() statement

olr. I've been asked on numerous occasions to publish this > codebase. It is now at: > > https://github.com/upayavira/custom-solr-components > > There's no sample code in there yet. I'll see if I can stick one in > there now, but I'm not sure how much time

Re: Issue with if() statement

ple/files that ships > with Solr, and that might be helpful. Check out how that works. I’m in > the polishing stages of a a collaborative blog post on example/files that > will detail these tricks a bit - will publish that in the next few days. > > — > Erik Hatcher, S

Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif

On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" wrote: > > > Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet > > fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow. > > > > Please... > > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson

Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif

t. > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:18 PM, William Bell wrote: > > > Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the > > difference? > > > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote: > > > > > For those interested I creat

Re: Issue with Join

Can a committer take a look at this please? On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 4:35 PM, William Bell wrote: > Yeah I ran it. It appears to only have an issue if the field for the core > on the outside is MultiValue, and the inside field is single value, and the > order of the field has the co

What search metrics are useful?

How do others look at search metrics? 1. Search conversion? Do you look at searches and if the user does not click on a result, and reruns the search that would be a failure? 2. How to measure auto complete success metrics? 3. Facets/filters could be considered negative, since we did not find th

XX:ParGCCardsPerStrideChunk

Has anyone tried -XX:ParGCCardsPerStrideChunk with Solr? There has been reports of improved GC times. -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: Field exclusion from fl and hl.fl

it used to support fl=*,-field Does that not work now? On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote: > I have yet to find any workaround so far.Still have to list out all the > remaining fields one by one. > > Does anyone else has any suggestions? > > Regards, > Edwin > > > On 18

Re: Field exclusion from fl and hl.fl

.handle(HttpChannel.java:310)\r\n\tat > > org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:257)\r\n\tat > > org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$2.run(AbstractConnection.java:540)\r\n\tat > > org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:635)\r\n\t

Re: DIG issue with SolrEntityProcessor 5.4.1

I will try to see if I can create a use case and fix it. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:00 AM, William Bell wrote: > We are running this inside of another entity in DIH. There appears to be > an issue. We get 2 calls to the survey core if hits > 0. If hits = 0 we get > 1 call. Has anyo

DIG issue with SolrEntityProcessor 5.4.1

We are running this inside of another entity in DIH. There appears to be an issue. We get 2 calls to the survey core if hits > 0. If hits = 0 we get 1 call. Has anyone else seen this? Shall I fix it? Any ideas where this bug may be? http://localhost:8983/solr/survey"; qt="dihsurvey" query="provide

Example Transformer

I wrote a transformer for DIH to get the value from a field using Http call. Since this runs on a SOLR node when indexing, I think I would do it with SOLRJ. How do I take this and convert it to SOLRJ and avoid the network call ? Also, this is pretty cool, and avoids the Entity for the call - sinc

issue with 5.3.1 and index version

When I index 5.4.1 using luceneVer in solrlconfig.xml of 5.3.1, the segmentsw_9 files has in it Lucene54. Why? Is this a known bug? #strings segments_9 segments Lucene54 commitTimeMSec 1459374733276 -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: issue with 5.3.1 and index version

g used and once an index has been > written to by a newer version of Lucene, going back to an old version is > not possible in most cases. > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:00 AM, William Bell wrote: > > > When I index 5.4.1 using luceneVer in solrlconfig.xml of 5.3.1, the > &g

Re: Unexpected docvalues type error using result grouping - Use UninvertingReader or index with docvalues

You could try stopping SOLR, going into the data directory and rm -rf * and starting SOLR again. Did you use the schema REST api? Residual ? On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Shamik Bandopadhyay wrote: > Hi, > > I'm facing this weird error while running result grouping queries. This > started w

Parameterized values

http://yonik.com/solr-query-parameter-substitution/ This is not working as part of QTs. Cannot load the core, since ${value} is being used for XML parameters for system property substitution. https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#System_property_substitution Can we support both? PS127 hos

Re: Parameterized values

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7846 On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:16 AM, William Bell wrote: > http://yonik.com/solr-query-parameter-substitution/ > > This is not working as part of QTs. > > Cannot load the core, since ${value} is being used for XML parameters for &g

Re: Parameterized values

That would be pretty bizarre. I'll try it. On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Mikhail Khludnev < mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote: > hm. Did you try > PS127 > hosp_quality_spec_boost:${pspec:${pspec}} > ? > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:16 PM, William Bell wr

Why is /query needed for Json Facet?

I tried using /select and this query does not work? Cannot understand why. Passing Parameters via JSON We can also pass normal request parameters in the JSON body within the params block: $ curl "http://localhost:8983/solr/query?fl=title,author"-d ' { params:{ q:"title:hero", rows:1 }

Re: Why is /query needed for Json Facet?

return names; } On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:31 AM, William Bell wrote: > I tried using /select and this query does not work? Cannot understand why. > Passing Parameters via JSON > > We can also pass normal request parameters in the JSON body within the > params block: > $ curl &q

SOLR 5.3

When do we think SOLR 5.3 might come out? It is nearly ready? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

jetty.xml

We sometimes get a spike in Solr, and we get like 3K of threads and then timeouts... In Solr 5.2.1 the defult jetty settings is kinda crazy for threads - since the value is HIGH! What do others recommend? Fusion jetty settings for Threads: * * false T

SOLR 5.3

At lucene.apache.org/solr it says SOLR 5.3 is there, but when I click on downloads it shows Solr 5.2.1... ?? "APACHE SOLR™ 5.3.0Solr is the popular, blazing-fast, open source enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene™." -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: DIH delta-import pk

Send the SQL and Schema.xml. Also logs. Does it complain about _id_ or you field in schema? On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:55 AM, CrazyDiamond wrote: > Now I set db id as unique field and uuid field,which should be generated > automatically as required. but when i add document i have an error tha

Re: Query timeAllowed and its behavior.

As we reported, we are having issues with timeAllowed on 5.2.1. If we set a timeAllowed=1 and then run the same query with timeAllowed=3 we get the # of rows that was returned on the first query. It appears the results are cached when exceeding the timeAllowed, like the results are correct - w

Re: DataImportHandler scheduling

We should add a simple scheduler in the UI. It is very useful. To schedule various actions: - Full index - Delta Index - Replicate On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 9/1/2015 11:45 AM, Troy Edwards wrote: > > My initial thought was to use scheduling built with DIH: > >

Re: solr training

How about in Denver? On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Otis Gospodnetić < otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > A slightly delayed reply ;) > We are running Solr training in NYC next month - > http://sematext.com/training/solr-training.html - 2nd seat is 50% off. > > Otis > -- > Mon

Ideas

We have some Denial of service attacks on our web site. SOLR threads are going crazy. Basically someone is hitting start=15 + and rows=20. The start is crazy large. And then they jump around. start=15 then start=213030 etc. Any ideas for how to stop this besides blocking these IPs? Some

FieldCache?

So the FieldCache was removed from Solr 5. What is the implication of this? Should we move all facets to DocValues when we have high cardinality (lots of values) ? Are we adding it back? Other ideas to improve performance? >From Mike M: FieldCache is gone (moved to a dedicated UninvertingReader

??

http://www.slideshare.net/lucidworks/high-performance-solr-and-jvm-tuning-strategies-used-for-map-quests-search-ahead-darren-spehr See ArrayBlockingQueue. What would this help with? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

solr-user@lucene.apache.org

What should this be set to? Do you set it with -Dsolr.jetty.https.acceptQueueSize=5000 ? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: AutoComplete Feature in Solr

We want to use suggester but also want to show those results closest to my lat,long... Kinda combine suggester and bq=geodist() On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Salman Ansari wrote: > Hi, > > I have been trying to get the autocomplete feature in Solr working with no > luck up to now. First I rea

Lucene Revolution ?

How did Lucene Revolution 2015 go last week? Also, what about Amazon's release of Elastic Search as a managed service in AWS? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Add replication to http://localhost:8983/solr/#/~cores/extinfo

It would be very useful to add a button to replicate (like we have optimize) on http://localhost:8983/solr/#/~cores/extinfo Also a link to the core would be great too -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

PayloadTermQuery deprecated

Wondering how to change my payload based on example: https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/06/13/end-to-end-payload-example-in-solr/ PayloadTermQuery and BooleanQuery are deprecated in 5.3.x @Override public Query parse() throws SyntaxError { if (qstr == null || qstr.length() == 0) return null;

Re: Lucene Revolution ?

t; > > > Re ES/AWS: what about it? Solr is a first class AWS citizen, > employing > > > Solr folks, and certainly where many of our customers deploy their > > > infrastructure, Solr, Fusion, etc. > > > > > >Erik > > > > > > > &

Re: PayloadTermQuery deprecated

oreQuery psq = new PayloadScoreQuery(sq, new AveragePayloadFunction()); q.add(psq, Occur.SHOULD); } } } // return q; return q.build(); } On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:46 PM, William Bell wrote: > Wondering how to change my payload based on example: >

Re: PayloadTermQuery deprecated

ou could just clone that and change > SimScorer.score()) > > Alan Woodward > www.flax.co.uk > > > On 19 Oct 2015, at 00:39, William Bell wrote: > > > Here is my first stab at it. Thoughts? > > > > Question: > > > > new PayloadTermQuery(new Ter

Get this committed

I can confirm this is working in PROD at 100M hits a day. Can we commit it please? Begging here. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7993 -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: Get this committed

OK I added the test case. On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can review and commit if you add a test. > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:45 AM, William Bell wrote: > > I can confirm this is working in PROD at 100M hits

any clean test failing

It is getting stuck on resolve. ant clean test SOLR 5.3.1 [ivy:retrieve] retrieve done (5ms) Overriding previous definition of property "ivy.version" [ivy:retrieve] no resolved descriptor found: launching default resolve Overriding previous definition of property "ivy.version" [ivy:retrieve]

Re: any clean test failing

OK I deleted /home/solr/.ivy2 and it started working. On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:57 AM, William Bell wrote: > It is getting stuck on resolve. > > ant clean test > > SOLR 5.3.1 > > [ivy:retrieve] retrieve done (5ms) > > Overriding previous definition of property &quo

Looking for SOLR consulting help

Healthgrades is looking for Solr consulting assistance. Rate is negotiable based on skillsets. $125 - $175/hr We are flexible on time. 1. Solr 5.x experience 2. Tuning performance 3. Relevancy and Autosuggest experience 4. Move to Solr Cloud 5. Amazon Linux Debian experience 6. Java experience u

Solr Suggester with Geo?

http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-suggester/ Wondering if anyone has uses these new techniques with a boost on geodist() inverted? So the rows that get returned that are closest need to come back first. We are still using Edge Grams since we have not figured out how to boost the results on geo sp

Re: Solr Suggester with Geo?

; Thanks, > -- > *Sameer Maggon* > www.measuredsearch.com <http://measuredsearch.com/> > Fully Managed Solr-as-a-Service | Solr Consulting | Solr Support > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:18 AM, William Bell wrote: > > > http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-suggester/ > > &

fl=value equals?

We are trying to look at a value, and change another value based on that. For example, for national search we want to pass in radius=national, and then set another variable equal to 0, else set the other variable = to geodist() calculation. We tried {!switch} but this only appears to work on fq/q

Re: fl=value equals?

te a custom SearchComponent > to construct your “b” parameter... > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > > 10. nov. 2015 kl. 23.52 skrev William Bell : > > > > We are trying to look at a value, and change another v

Re: fl=value equals?

> > > > > > On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:15 AM, Upayavira wrote: > > > > > > > > I concur with Jan - what does b= do? > > > > > > > > Also asking, how did you identify that it worked? > > > > > > > > Upayavira >

Re: Parallel SQL / calcite adapter

How is performance on Calcite? On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > After reading https://calcite.apache.org/docs/tutorial.html, I think it > should be possible to use the Solr's JDBC Driver with Calcites JDBC > adapter. > > If you give it a try and run into any problems, ple

RptWithGeometrySpatialField

David, et al. 2 questions. Is this a good tradeoff for performance? Also, RptWithGeometrySpatialField improved performance on what type of searches? Does it support multivalued lat,lon fields? Does LatLonType support multivalued lat,lon fields or only RPT allows for this? -- Bill Bell bil

Migrating from cores to collections

OK. Been using Cores for 4 years. Want to migrate to collections / Cloud. Do we have to change our queries? http://loadbalancer:8983/solr/corename/select?q=*:* What does this become once we have the collection sharded? Do we need a Load Balancer or just point to one box and run the new query? Or

Re: Migrating from cores to collections

ok. What about using DIH handler? Does it index in a SolrCloud setup ? Or how would I convert a query to use SolrJ ? On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015, at 07:38 PM, William Bell wrote: > > OK. Been using Cores for 4 years. Wan

Re: New leader/replica solution for HDFS

Use DocValues. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Joseph Obernberger wrote: > Thank you! I'm mainly concerned about facet performance. When we have > indexing turned on, our facet performance suffers significantly. > I will add replicas and measure the performance change. > > -Joe Obernberger >

Re: Slow cross-core joins

I agree that join is slow. Adding fq on LocalParams is good. Has this been added to {!lucene} and other calls like join ? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Gopal Patwa wrote: > You could give a try for this join contrib patch > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4787 > > > > On Mon, Ma

Re: copy field from boolean to int

Can you reindex? Just use 1,0. On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > Can you open a jira to add docValues support for BoolField? ... i can't > think of any good reason not to directly support that in Solr for > BoolField ... seems like just an oversight that slipped through

Re: Using G1 with Apache Solr

The issue we had with Java 8 was with DIH handler. We were using Rhino and with the new implementation in Java 8, we had several Regex expression issues... We are almost ready to go now, since we moved away from Rhino and now use Java. Bill On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Daniel Collins wrote:

Re: ZFS File System for SOLR 3.6 and SOLR 4

How is performance on XFS when compared to ext4? >From Otis: noatime, nodiratime http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201306.mbox/%3CCACtzgz1YwM5HDQO1R=2CdGxFmJnXcs4pyWRuaPJkKRc=eb8...@mail.gmail.com%3E Large file systems seem to work well in both. I think the underlying ha

Re: Solr went on recovery multiple time.

How big is your index? -Xmx6g is pretty small in general. On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:20 PM, sthita wrote: > Thanks Erick for the reply. These are the configurations. > > 1.Solr servers count : 4 (1 master , 3 slaves) > 2.My initial and maximum memory allocations to each solr servers are : > -Xms5

Re: Solr went on recovery multiple time.

I would give it 32GB of RAM. And try to use SSD. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:50 AM, sthita wrote: > Hi Bill, My index size is around 48GB and contains around 8 million > documents. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-went-on-recovery-multiple-time-

DOcValues

If I set indexed=true and docvalues=true, when I facet=true&facet.field=manu_exact will it use docValues or the Indexed version? Also, does it help with "*Too many values for UnInvertedField faceting" ?* *Do I need to set facet.method when using docvalues?* -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com c

Facet

We increased our number of terms (String) in a facet by 50,000. Now we are getting an error when we facet by this field - so we switched it to facet.method=enum, and now the results come back. However, when we put it into production we literally hit a wall (CPU went to 100% for 16 cores) after abo

Re: sort on facet.index?

Yonik, Are you supporting enum/fc/fcs? Or native lucene faceting? On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Josal wrote: > > Sorting the result set or the facets? For the facets there is > > facet.sort=index (lexicographically) and facet.sor

Re: DOcValues

Thank you. This is very understandable. I heard the Strings limitation for DocValues goes away in 5.0? On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Toke Eskildsen > wrote: > > > Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > > The

Re: Upgraded to 4.10.3, highlighting performance unusably slow

Has anyone looked at it? On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:18 AM, jaime spicciati wrote: > We ran into this as well on 4.10.3 (not related to an upgrade). It was > identified during load testing when a small percentage of queries would > take more than 20 seconds to return. We were able to isolate it by

JSON

Can we gt this one fixed? If the Body is empty don't through a Null Pointer Exception? Thanks >* >http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/select?wt=json&indent=true&q=foundation"; ;* >* -H "Content-type:appli

Re: JSON

; shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > That sounds reasonable. Please open a Jira issue. > > > > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 9:22 AM, William Bell > wrote: > > > >> Can we gt this one fixed? If the Body is empty don't through a Null > >> Pointer

Re: Applying gzip compression in Solr 5.1

OK I got mine to work with 4.10.4 and it also works on 5.1... mkdir war cp ../solr-4.10.4/example/webapps/solr.war . jar xvf solr.war cd WEB-INF vi web.xmlAdd this above the already there:GzipFilter org.eclipse.jetty.servlets.GzipFilter mimeTypes application/xml,applica

Re: Applying gzip compression in Solr 5.1

r your reply. > Do we still have to use back the solr.war file in Solr 5.1 in order to get > the gzip working? > > > Regards, > Edwin > > > > On 25 May 2015 at 06:57, William Bell wrote: > > > OK I got mine to work with 4.10.4 and it also works on 5.1... >

Re: Applying gzip compression in Solr 5.1

.1.0/server/lib restart On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:42 PM, William Bell wrote: > You need to edit the web.xml as I stated above and put the solr.war file > back. > > Instead of "example" it is "server". Note: 4.10.4 and 5.1.0 uses the same > Jetty. 8.1.10.v201

Re: Running Solr 5.1.0 as a Service on Windows

Why don't we change the bin/run -d to have Common Daemons? This would be a great enhancement to SOLR 5.x. We would switch to this if it was integrated. We currently use RunIt. But love Common Daemons. http://smarden.org/runit/ http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-daemon/ On Thu, Jun 4, 2015

Re: Running Solr 5.1.0 as a Service on Windows

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7644 On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 11:54 AM, William Bell wrote: > Why don't we change the bin/run -d to have Common Daemons? This would be a > great enhancement to SOLR 5.x. > > We would switch to this if it was integrated. We currently use

SolrCloud across Amazon Regions?

Here is a weird architecture... We have a SOLR Master today, next to our database in our local data center. We do Solr replication to Amazon East and West coasts once the index is completed. We would like to deploy Solr Cloud while leaving the master in place. 1. Local has SQL Server, and Solr M

Dataimport failing on SOLR 5.2

1. When I click "DataImport" in the UI on any core.. The UI just spins: 2. 3. http://hgsolr2devmstr:8983/solr/autosuggest/admin/mbeans?cat=QUERYHANDLER&wt=json&_=1433749812067 Here is the response: 200: {"responseHeader":{"status":0,"QTime":1},"solr-mbeans":["QUERYHANDLER",{"allconda

Re: Dataimport failing on SOLR 5.2

Also getting: Uncaught ReferenceError: naturalSort is not defined On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:50 AM, William Bell wrote: > >1. When I click "DataImport" in the UI on any core.. The UI just spins: >2. >3. > > http://hgsolr2devmstr:8983/solr/

Re: Dataimport failing on SOLR 5.2

Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:10 AM, William Bell wrote: > Also getting: > > Uncaught ReferenceError: naturalSort is not defined > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:50 AM, William Bell wrote: > >> >>1. When I click "DataImport" in the UI on any core.

Re: Dataimport failing on SOLR 5.2

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7588 On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:11 AM, William Bell wrote: > Uncaught ReferenceError: naturalSort is not defined > $.ajax.success @ dataimport.js?_=5.2.0:48 > jQuery.Callbacks.fire @ require.js?_=5.2.0:3126 > jQuery.Callbacks.self.fireWith

AngularJS

Finding DIH issue with the new AngularJS DIH section, while indexing... 1,22613/s ? Last Update: 22:50:50 *Indexing since 0:1:38.204* Requests: 1, Fetched: 1,22613/s, Skipped: 0, Processed: 1,22613/s Started: 3 minutes ago -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Performance RptWithGeometrySpatialField ?

Any performance implications for RptWithGeometrySpatialField ? We use simple radius (Circle) using {!geofilt}, and MultiValued fields for Points. Replace it any try? How about caching? Recommendations? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

  1   2   3   4   >