it used to support fl=*,-field
Does that not work now? On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have yet to find any workaround so far.Still have to list out all the > remaining fields one by one. > > Does anyone else has any suggestions? > > Regards, > Edwin > > > On 18 February 2016 at 17:07, Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am looking for the same. please do let me know just in case you find > > workaround. > > > > On 18 February 2016 at 14:18, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Would like to find out, is there already a way to exclude field from > the > > > Solr response. I did came across SOLR-3191 which was created about 4 > > years > > > ago, but could not find any workable solutions from there. > > > > > > As my collections can have more than 100 fields, and I would need to > > return > > > the majority of then except for one or two, so if there is a way to > > exclude > > > the fields would be good, if not I have to list all the remaining > fields > > > (which can be more than 100 for each collections). > > > > > > I am using Solr 5.4.0. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Edwin > > > > > > -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076
