What we are trying to do is - we upgraded the Solr Master machine to 5.4.1, and the slave is 5.3.1. When it replicates to the slave, it says "incompatible types". That seems like a valid use case to me?
BIll On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > The Lucene54 is the codec name. The luceneVer in solrconfig.xml is the > compatibility version which is used by some analyzers/tokenizers/token > filters to provide defaults or behaviour compatible with older versions. It > has no relation to the indexing codec being used and once an index has been > written to by a newer version of Lucene, going back to an old version is > not possible in most cases. > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:00 AM, William Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > When I index 5.4.1 using luceneVer in solrlconfig.xml of 5.3.1, the > > segmentsw_9 files has in it Lucene54. Why? Is this a known bug? > > > > #strings segments_9 > > > > segments > > > > Lucene54 > > > > commitTimeMSec > > > > 1459374733276 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Bill Bell > > billnb...@gmail.com > > cell 720-256-8076 > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076
