How is performance on XFS when compared to ext4? >From Otis: noatime, nodiratime
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201306.mbox/%3CCACtzgz1YwM5HDQO1R=2CdGxFmJnXcs4pyWRuaPJkKRc=eb8...@mail.gmail.com%3E Large file systems seem to work well in both. I think the underlying hardware does actually matter too. SSD vs HDD vs Y. Several people love XFS at Amazon: http://java.dzone.com/articles/tips-check-and-improve-your On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Bill Bell <billnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is the an advantage for Xfs over ext4 for Solr ? Anyone done testing? > > Bill Bell > Sent from mobile > > > > On Mar 27, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > > > >> On 3/27/2015 12:30 AM, abhi Abhishek wrote: > >> i am trying to use ZFS as filesystem for my Linux Environment. > are > >> there any performance implications of using any filesystem other than > >> ext-3/ext-4 with SOLR? > > > > That should work with no problem. > > > > The only time Solr tends to have problems is if you try to use a network > > filesystem. As long as it's a local filesystem and it implements > > everything a program can typically expect from a local filesystem, Solr > > should work perfectly. > > > > Because of the compatibility problems that the license for ZFS has with > > the GPL, ZFS on Linux is probably not as well tested as other > > filesystems like ext4, xfs, or btrfs, but I have not heard about any big > > problems, so it's probably safe. > > > > Thanks, > > Shawn > > > -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076
