Re: Re : Re:Severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and glibc-common

sting sting said: > Hello , > Thnxs everybody ! > Well , I had tried to follow Chris Purcel FAQ (in Tek Tips) , as he > advised in his post; > I did start linux rescue from RH CD #1 , I did say "yes" to mount the > filesystem, (and > ***NOT*** chose the "read only' option). > and erased glibc rpm

Re : Re:Severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and glibc-common

Hello , Thnxs everybody ! Well , I had tried to follow Chris Purcel FAQ (in Tek Tips) , as he advised in his post; I did start linux rescue from RH CD #1 , I did say "yes" to mount the filesystem, (and ***NOT*** chose the "read only' option). and erased glibc rpms ; but when I tried to install t

Re: Severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and glibc-common

Chris Purcell wrote > I had this same problem a few weeks ago. I was able to fix it and wrote > an FAQ on it at tek-tips.com. > > http://www.tek-tips.com/gfaqs.cfm/lev2/3/lev3/20/pid/54/fid/4094 It's worth noting that the reason you had this problem is that you "upgraded" from the i686 glibc rpm

Re: Severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and glibc-common

On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:33:05PM +0200, sting sting wrote: > I get the follwoing errors at start: > (befor reaching Login) > NIT:Id"1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT:Id"2" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT:Id"3" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes > IN

Re: Severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and glibc-common

> Hello , > Help ! > I have severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and > glibc-common on RedHat 9 ; > I had glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i686.rpm > I wanted to update to glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm. > rpm -Uvh glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm said it needs updated glibc-commo

Severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and glibc-common

Hello , Help ! I have severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and glibc-common on RedHat 9 ; I had glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i686.rpm I wanted to update to glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm. rpm -Uvh glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm said it needs updated glibc-common. I had glibc-common-2.3.2-11.9.i386.rpm

Upgrading/Installing Apache 2.0

Hi everyone, I have been trying to install or upgrade my apache 1.3 (which came by default with Redhat 7.3) to apache 2.0. I tried following two documents - one from tldp.org and another one from the apache website. however i end up getting confused. are there any other good documents around that

Re: Upgrading to Apache 2 on RH 7.3

sh this upgrade? Ideas? > Suggestions? You can approach this three (Red Hat only) ways - one will take personal effort and may not work. The other will take effort in tracking down EVERY package that is affected by upgrading to new libraries. Solution 1) Download the source RPM for httpd. Attempt to build

Upgrading to Apache 2 on RH 7.3

Hi, I'm attempting an upgrade to Apache 2.0.x from 1.3.27 on a Redhat 7.3 box. RHN doesn't appear to offer an rpm for Apache 2 on 7.3. Normally I'd just slap in the RH 9.1 CD and upgrade the installation but the 2 servers I'm working on are about 1600 miles away. So I downloaded the Apache 2.0.40

Re: Upgrading RedHat If Using Custom Kernel

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:32:56PM -0400, Jake Colman wrote: > > I am running RH 7.2 with a custom built 2.4.19 kernel supporting > evms. I'd like to upgrade to RH 7.3 but am concerned that it will > blow away my existing kernel. Will the upgrade leave my kernel > alone or will it put in its own

Re: Upgrading RedHat If Using Custom Kernel

Jake Colman wrote: I am running RH 7.2 with a custom built 2.4.19 kernel supporting evms. I'd like to upgrade to RH 7.3 but am concerned that it will blow away my existing kernel. Will the upgrade leave my kernel alone or will it put in its own (non-evms) kernel? It will probably try and install

Re: Upgrading Mozilla.

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:02:22AM -0400, James Moberg wrote: [...] > software. I have never upgraded Mozilla on my system. Currently I am > running version 0.9.9. I would like to upgrade to version 1.4 but don't > know if it's stable on this version of Linux. From what I read I have > to up

Upgrading RedHat If Using Custom Kernel

I am running RH 7.2 with a custom built 2.4.19 kernel supporting evms. I'd like to upgrade to RH 7.3 but am concerned that it will blow away my existing kernel. Will the upgrade leave my kernel alone or will it put in its own (non-evms) kernel? That concern aside, I am assuming that the upgrade

Re: Upgrading Mozilla.

On Friday 05 September 2003 10:02 am, James Moberg wrote: > Hi. I am running RH Linux 7.3. I am not new to using UNIX but am new > to doing system admin tasks such as installing and uninstalling > software. I have never upgraded Mozilla on my system. Currently I am > running version 0.9.9. I w

Re: Upgrading Mozilla.

On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 08:02, James Moberg wrote: > Hi. I am running RH Linux 7.3. I am not new to using UNIX but am new > to doing system admin tasks such as installing and uninstalling > software. I have never upgraded Mozilla on my system. Currently I am > running version 0.9.9. I would l

Upgrading Mozilla.

Hi. I am running RH Linux 7.3. I am not new to using UNIX but am new to doing system admin tasks such as installing and uninstalling software. I have never upgraded Mozilla on my system. Currently I am running version 0.9.9. I would like to upgrade to version 1.4 but don't know if it's sta

Upgrading RH 7.2 to 9

I've got several servers running Redhat 7.2 with a mix of RAID1 and RAID5 partitions. When I try to upgrade them to Redhat 9 the install utility tells me that it can't detect any valid installation devices. If I select the option to manually tell it where to find the partition it shows only the

Re: Help - Upgrading system libraries

72-6 > libdb.so.3(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by sendmail-8.9.3-20 > The last thing mentioned on each line listed by rpm is a package that you will have to upgrade at the same time as you upgrade glibc. By the way, you're right that you'll need glibc-common as well. To make it

RE: Help - Upgrading system libraries

GLIBC_2.1) is needed by perl-5.00503-10 libdb.so.3(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by pam-0.72-6 libdb.so.3(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by sendmail-8.9.3-20 Thinking that upgrading glibc-common will help: rpm -U glibc-common-2.2.93-5.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: rpmlib(PartialHar

Re: Help - Upgrading system libraries

Hi Raj, On a Redhat system, it's best to let rpm do the upgrade for you with the -U option. Now, no commands will work on your system because they were linked against the old libraries and can no longer find them. You'll need to boot from the CDROM and restore the old libraries.

Help - Upgrading system libraries

Hello, I have a RedHat 6.2 installation that I would like to upgrade with the RedHat 8.0 system libraries (glibc etc.). I tried the following steps: o Saved the existing RedHat 6.2 /bin, /sbin. /lib to the following directories respectively: /RH62/bin, /RH62/sbin. /usr/i486-linux-l

Re: Upgrading to Redhat 9 from 7.2 probems (apache and linuxconf)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:55:16 -0500, Paul F. Williams wrote: > I recently upgraded a redhat 7.2 system to redhat 9 and ran into a few > problems. > > 1) The apache upgrade seems to be a problem. > I see both >apache-1.3.27-1.7.2 >h

Re: Upgrading to Redhat 9 from 7.2 problems (apache and linuxconf)

I was able to remove both apache and linuxconf modules by restoring the particular files they were flagging and then rerunning rpm -e on each package. paulw Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:55:16 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Paul F. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Upgra

Upgrading to Redhat 9 from 7.2 probems (apache and linuxconf)

I recently upgraded a redhat 7.2 system to redhat 9 and ran into a few problems. 1) The apache upgrade seems to be a problem. I see both apache-1.3.27-1.7.2 httpd-2.0.40-21.3 when I run the rpm -qa command. I have incorporated the changes to the httpd.conf file according to

Re: Upgrading OpenLDAP on 7.3

Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: What is the best procedure to upgrade OpenLDAP on a RH7.3 server. The rpm package (openldap-2.0.27-2.7.3) is installed now and from my experience, I am trying to remove it before building a new version. However, many dependencies :( Should I go ahead and build with the ot

Upgrading OpenLDAP on 7.3

What is the best procedure to upgrade OpenLDAP on a RH7.3 server. The rpm package (openldap-2.0.27-2.7.3) is installed now and from my experience, I am trying to remove it before building a new version. However, many dependencies :( Should I go ahead and build with the other version there making p

Re: Upgrading Glib advice needed..

> > * and then Matthew Saltzman declared > > > I'm trying to upgrade glib on RH9. I run ./configure make make install > > > and then when I try to configure pango, it tells me it needs glib 2.1.3 > > > or better. > > > > > > I noticed that glib was installed in /usr/local/lib/glig not > > >

Upgrading Glib advice needed..

Hi all, I'm trying to upgrade glib on RH9. I run ./configure make make install and then when I try to configure pango, it tells me it needs glib 2.1.3 or better. I noticed that glib was installed in /usr/local/lib/glig not /usr/lib/glib - Clearly I am missing somthing vital here. Could somebody

Re: Upgrading Glib advice needed..

* and then Matthew Saltzman declared > > I'm trying to upgrade glib on RH9. I run ./configure make make install > > and then when I try to configure pango, it tells me it needs glib 2.1.3 > > or better. > > > > I noticed that glib was installed in /usr/local/lib/glig not > > /usr/lib/glib - Cl

Re: Upgrading Glib advice needed..

ecreasing desirability). > > Hmmm.. thanks. > > I really need 2.2.2 and there are no rpms for that unfortunately. I > presume it *is* possible to install do this? - I'm trying to upgrade GTK > and I need to do glib, pango then atk then finally gtk but if it's being > ins

Re: Upgrading Glib advice needed..

On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Nick Wilson wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to upgrade glib on RH9. I run ./configure make make install > and then when I try to configure pango, it tells me it needs glib 2.1.3 > or better. > > I noticed that glib was installed in /usr/local/lib/glig not > /usr/lib/glib - Clea

Re: Upgrading the kernel

On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 07:59:55PM +0200, Go, Jeffrey wrote: > Can anyone point me to the docs on how to upgrade the kernel on a RH 7.3 ? # up2date -u kernel --force -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program -- redhat-list maili

Re: Upgrading the kernel

there is a good how to at the linux document project; it is not RH specific, but it showed me enough to get on the right path to greater problems... I am finding that kernel upgrading is tricky. http://www.tldp.org/Kernel-HOWTO/index.html G On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 19:59, Go, Jeffrey wrote: >

Upgrading the kernel

Hi All, Can anyone point me to the docs on how to upgrade the kernel on a RH 7.3 ? Thanks jeff -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Upgrading RedHat RPMs before RedHat Releases Them

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 08:37:18PM -0400, Charles R. Dennett wrote: > When a new version of some software is released, it apparently takes > RedHat a while before they release it. It's more than just "apparently". Unless Red Hat is the package maintainer, by definition they won't release it fi

Re: Upgrading RedHat RPMs before RedHat Releases Them

On Friday 04 July 2003 08:37 pm, Charles R. Dennett wrote: > When a new version of some software is released, it apparently takes > RedHat a while before they release it. For example, Mozilla 1.4 was > recently released and has not yet shown up via the up2date application. > > So, I went explorin

Upgrading RedHat RPMs before RedHat Releases Them

When a new version of some software is released, it apparently takes RedHat a while before they release it. For example, Mozilla 1.4 was recently released and has not yet shown up via the up2date application. So, I went exploring around the RedHat ftp site and came across ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pu

Re: RH9 upgrading to rawhide apache/httpd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:43:03 +0100, billd wrote: > I'm having problems with rpm and trying to upgrade > to an apache >2.0.43 which I apparently need to run > an application under. > > RH9 has 2.0.40-21. So I downloaded httpd-2.0.45 and > did > > rp

RH9 upgrading to rawhide apache/httpd

Hi, I'm having problems with rpm and trying to upgrade to an apache >2.0.43 which I apparently need to run an application under. RH9 has 2.0.40-21. So I downloaded httpd-2.0.45 and did rpm -ivF httpd-2.0.45-10.i386.rpm warning: httpd-2.0.45-10.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 897da07a er

Re: Upgrading Apache to 2.0.44

On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 00:52, Jim Carey wrote: Off-topic, but your system clock is way out. I sort messages by date so you are always top of the pile - a minor irritaion. :) -- -- ttfn, Nick. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/list

Upgrading Apache to 2.0.44

Is there anything I need to watch out for in upgrading to the 2.0.44 apache from my current 2.0.40 (need it to go to the latest PHP it seems) - I see there are RPM's available for both the base and the devel - (note - installed the 2.0.40-devel as per the kind advice from Cameron below and

Upgrading to RH 9 from RH 7.2

I'm fixing to update to RH 9 from RH 7.2 (via cd's a friend sent). Is there anything I need to worry about during this upgrade? -- Wielder of the mighty +1 LARTsaber of Unsubscribe Instructions At End of Message, the +3 Clue-by-Four of No Attachments to a Mailing List, and the -4 Shield of No Spe

Please Help!!! upgrading to glibc 2.3.2

Hi All, Whenever I upgrade glibc to 2.3.2... my app starts to crash. Everything works fine until I relink a specific shared library. I am using RH8 but we had the same problem on a new RH9 system. What bugs me is that all the other applications seem very stable. The only app affected by this upg

RE: Upgrading PHP from 4.2.2 to 4.3.2

Peter Peltonen wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 01:28, Chris W. Parker wrote: > > Hello. > > > > This is my first post to the list so please forgive any blatant > > mistakes I might make. > > Well, for starters next you post, make sure that your email has less > than 80

Re: Upgrading PHP from 4.2.2 to 4.3.2

On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 01:28, Chris W. Parker wrote: > Hello. > > This is my first post to the list so please forgive any blatant mistakes I might > make. Well, for starters next you post, make sure that your email has less than 80 characters per line... You asked for it :) > As the subject st

Upgrading PHP from 4.2.2 to 4.3.2

Hello. This is my first post to the list so please forgive any blatant mistakes I might make. As the subject states, I need to upgrade my PHP install. I'm (relatively) new to linux and so unless I can find an RPM I'm pretty much not going to get something installed. The reason I need to upgrade

Upgrading glibc for security paht causes application to crash

Hi, I recently setup a new machine with RH 8 and I've been experiencing weird problems with an application we are currently developing since I've installed a security patch to the glibc package. For your information, RH 8 ships we glibc-2.2.93-5. upgrading glibc to package 2.3.2 wil

RE: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0? > > > Alan, > > Could you be specific about what issues you had/are still

RE: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0?

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Mark Neidorff wrote: > Alan, > > Could you be specific about what issues you had/are still having? I need > to upgrade my 7.3 system to get my new printer working because I have to > install the newest version of CUPS. Have you considered, instead, downloading the cups src.rp

RE: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0?

Alan, Could you be specific about what issues you had/are still having? I need to upgrade my 7.3 system to get my new printer working because I have to install the newest version of CUPS. Thanks, Mark On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have three 7.2/.3 machines, two servers an

RE: Upgrading to 9.0 from 6.0

their passwords??? -Original Message- From: A. Sopicki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 5:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrading to 9.0 from 6.0 Hi, Davy! > 1) What is the process to upgrade the system? > 2) Is it possible to do an upgrade from 6.0

Re: Upgrading to 9.0 from 6.0

Hi, Davy! > 1) What is the process to upgrade the system? > 2) Is it possible to do an upgrade from 6.0 to the most current 9.0 The best way to do an update would be backing up all data from your machine and do a clean install of Redhat 9.0 because there have been a lot of changes between vers

RE: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0? > > > Hello all: > > Any thoughts on whether upgrading a 7.2 system (happily &

Upgrading to 9.0 from 6.0

I am looking for any help or suggestions of where I can find reading material to help me with a server upgrade.  The current server is used to hold student websites for a University.  There are approximately 4,000 user accounts on the system.  My questions include: 1)  What is the process

Re: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0?

James Werkowski wrote: Any thoughts on whether upgrading a 7.2 system (happily functioning as firewall/email/dns server) to 9.0 is a good idea? Is 9.0 considered stable? Most of the improvements in 8 and 9 are developer or desktop related. If your machine isn't serving one of those purposes

RE: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0?

ch that you really do need that won't run on 7.2, I > wouldn't upgrade. > > Just my 2p. > > Andy > > -Original Message- > From: James Werkowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

RE: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0?

t run on 7.2, I wouldn't upgrade. Just my 2p. Andy -Original Message- From: James Werkowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0? Hello all: Any thoughts on whether upgrading a 7.2 system (happily functionin

Re: Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0?

Don´t do it! I upgraded from 7.3 to 9. It is awefull. Nothing works fine anymore. I can´t even read simple manual pages. I takes you weeks to configure your system to your needs again! :-( ! James Werkowski schrieb: Hello all: Any thoughts on whether upgrading a 7.2 system (happily functioning

Upgrading 7.2 to 9.0?

Hello all: Any thoughts on whether upgrading a 7.2 system (happily functioning as firewall/email/dns server) to 9.0 is a good idea? Is 9.0 considered stable? -- Jim Werkowski -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Upgrading from 7.2 to 8.0

Greetings I have a quite old Intel Server that's been running linux for some time. It has dual-scsi on the motherboard, no IDE. The current version is 7.2. I want to upgrade to 8.0. The system is old enough that it doesn't boot from CD. When I try to boot from FDD or the network it doesn't recogni

Re: Stuck with 640x480 Screen after Upgrading to RedHat Linux 9

Edward, If your after a fast ftp in Oz, email me and I'll send you address On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:29:05PM +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote: > > Please guys, it will be at LEAST 2 weeks before people less fortunate > > (that's me in Australia with my 56K modem and only 0-1Kb/s download speed > > fr

Re: Stuck with 640x480 Screen after Upgrading to RedHat Linux 9

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:29:05PM +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote: > OK, first we had the '9 not 9.0' thread, then we had the 'get it early' > thread, and I guess now all the people lucky enough to be able to get their > hands on it are going to be flooding the list with "I've upgraded- this is > bro

Re: Stuck with 640x480 Screen after Upgrading to RedHat Linux 9

The only adive I can give is to run "redhat-config-xfree86 --reconfig". -eric wood David Christensen wrote: > I was happily using a 1280x1024 desktop on my Radeon 8500 under RedHat > Linux 8.0 until I upgraded to RedHat Linux 9. Now, the screen > resolution is stuck at 640x480 but the desktop app

Re: Stuck with 640x480 Screen after Upgrading to RedHat Linux 9

> I was happily using a 1280x1024 desktop on my Radeon 8500 under RedHat > Linux 8.0 until I upgraded to RedHat Linux 9. Now, the screen > resolution is stuck at 640x480 but the desktop appears to be 1280x1024 > (I can pan across the screen). I didn't setup a virtual desktop, but > that seems to

Stuck with 640x480 Screen after Upgrading to RedHat Linux 9

I was happily using a 1280x1024 desktop on my Radeon 8500 under RedHat Linux 8.0 until I upgraded to RedHat Linux 9. Now, the screen resolution is stuck at 640x480 but the desktop appears to be 1280x1024 (I can pan across the screen). I didn't setup a virtual desktop, but that seems to be what I

Re: upgrading your system... my experience

Hello, Regarding the message with this subject on redhat-list: You can normally use epox boards with either Intell or AMD processors. The Asus boards can be a problem as they do not always use the same chipset maker. I do not know where you are, but if you are in Gauteng, you can contact me and w

Re: upgrading your system... my experience

On Stardate : [-29]0032.22 -Tue25Mar03-1240 Tony Preston wrote: > RH 6.2 was a totally different story, it recognized the new stuff, forgot about > the old stuff and booted normally (even recognized the change in video cards!). > I was absolutely amazed (especially after the Win 98 experience

Re: upgrading your system... my experience

I had RH8 installed on a Asus VIA board w/ a 900 MHz Athlon. CPU died. I built a new box using an Asus A7N8X Deluxe and XP 2700+. No more was I using the SoundBlaster Live, the VooDoo3, USB was now OHCI opposed to UHCI, I didn't move the old NIC's over. Only thing that was the same was the hard dr

Re: upgrading your system... my experience

Intresting enought I upgraded my computer which was a 500 Mhz PIII. I got a 1 GZH PIII (new motherboard, added memory). Since neither system was mine (side project) and I had all my stuff on the HD, I pulled my HD and swapped it for the HD on the new machine. The HD has a dual boot of Win 9

RE: upgrading kernal.

0 anyway -Original Message- From: Michael Fratoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 3 March 2003 4:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: upgrading kernal. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 02 March 2003 11:32 pm, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: > ok thats cool. &g

RE: upgrading kernal.

bigmem and debug etc. in their names? >will anything bad happen if i install them too? > > > >-Original Message- >From: Michael Fratoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, 3 March 2003 3:27 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: upgrading kernal. > > >--

Re: upgrading kernal.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 02 March 2003 11:32 pm, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: > ok thats cool. > so what are the ones with bigmem and debug etc. in their names? > will anything bad happen if i install them too? Probably not. bigmem is for machines with lots of ram. (m

RE: upgrading kernal.

ok thats cool. so what are the ones with bigmem and debug etc. in their names? will anything bad happen if i install them too? -Original Message- From: Michael Fratoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 3 March 2003 3:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: upgrading kernal

Re: upgrading kernal.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 02 March 2003 11:04 pm, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: > i have installed red hat 8 and upgraded all the update packages. > except for the kernal packages for i686. > now i wish to upgrade the kernal to these rpms. > how do i go about this? > the

Re: Upgrading from Redhat 7.3 (2.4.18) to 2.5.59

Go to http://www.kernel.org - Original Message - From: "Eng Se-Hsieng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:11 AM Subject: Upgrading from Redhat 7.3 (2.4.18) to 2.5.59 > > Dear all, > > I am currently run

Upgrading from Redhat 7.3 (2.4.18) to 2.5.59

Dear all, I am currently running 2.4.18 (Redhat 7.3) but would like to upgrade to 2.5.59. This is because I would like to implement the SCTP transport protocol which comes in the form of .patch. I am confused as to if I should upgrade and install the kernel before applying the patch or do both

RE: Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem

ge- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edward Dekkers Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem > I tried running up2date. It told me my kernel was excluded and I > couldn't update without the

Re: Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem

> I tried running up2date. It told me my kernel was excluded and I > couldn't update without the kernel update. I tried to fix that but > couldn't, I have an email into redhat now about that. No use sending an e-mail to redhat. You didn't look hard enough. All you need to do is edit /etc/syscon

Re: Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:45:12PM -0500, Ernest Ellingson wrote: > I tried running up2date. It told me my kernel was excluded and I > couldn't update without the kernel update. I tried to fix that but > couldn't, I have an email into redhat now about that. By default, the kernel is excluded, bu

RE: Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:30:31PM -0500, Ernest Ellingson wrote: > I'm trying to

RE: Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem

Of Ed Wilts Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:30:31PM -0500, Ernest Ellingson wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade the kernel using 2.4.18-19.7.x.i386.rpm. Silly question...why don't you conf

Re: Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:30:31PM -0500, Ernest Ellingson wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade the kernel using 2.4.18-19.7.x.i386.rpm. Silly question...why don't you configure up2date and let it figure it out for you? If dependencies are missing, they'll be automatically installed. This will save yo

Upgrading 7.1 kernel problem

I'm trying to upgrade the kernel using 2.4.18-19.7.x.i386.rpm. I've got the dependencies down to just 2. 1. filesystem >=2.1.0 is needed by mkinitrd-3.2.6-1 2. libreadline.so.4 is needed by kernel-utils-2.4-8.13.7.2 I've ftped to updates.redhat.com/7.1/en/os/i386 several times today for various

Re: upgrading x

Thanks! Edward Dekkers wrote: I guess what I really need to upgrade is XFree86-4.0.1-1. When I try to install the XFree86-4.2.0-72 RPM, it says that XFree86-4.0.1-1 is needed by XFree86-xdm-4.1.0-3. When I try to install XFree86-xdm-4.2.0-72, it says that it needs XFree86-4.2.0-72. How

Re: upgrading x

> I guess what I really need to upgrade is XFree86-4.0.1-1. When I try to > install the XFree86-4.2.0-72 RPM, it says that XFree86-4.0.1-1 is needed > by XFree86-xdm-4.1.0-3. When I try to install XFree86-xdm-4.2.0-72, it > says that it needs XFree86-4.2.0-72. How do I upgrade X to 4.2.0-72?

Re: upgrading x

Hidong Kim wrote: Hi, I tried upgrading a 7.2 machine to 8.0. The upgrade aborted with a message saying that X couldn't be upgraded. I'm having problems manually upgrading X using the RPMs on the 8.0 CD. I was able to install some of the 4.2.0-72 X packages. "rpm -qa | grep

upgrading x

Hi, I tried upgrading a 7.2 machine to 8.0. The upgrade aborted with a message saying that X couldn't be upgraded. I'm having problems manually upgrading X using the RPMs on the 8.0 CD. I was able to install some of the 4.2.0-72 X packages. "rpm -qa | grep ^XF" curren

Re: Upgrading between versions via up2date

On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 05:32:42PM -0800, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: > I was wondering, is it possible to upgrade whole Red Hat versions via up2date, No. You can only up2date within the current version. The up2date updates are typically security-only patches, whereas newer versions typically have

Upgrading between versions via up2date

Hello, I was wondering, is it possible to upgrade whole Red Hat versions via up2date, or should one grab all of the RPM's and install them that way? Whats the best option here? Also, an unrelated question: Can up2date be used to install rpm's and their dependencies automatically? -- Jonathan

Re: upgrading mysql

On 2 Dec 2002, [ISO-8859-1] João Borsoi wrote: > I'm trying to update mysql 3.23.49 up to 4.0.5 on a RedHat 7.3 system, > and I'm having some problems. I may be able to solve those problems by > my own, but I'm running out of time and any tip or advice would be > appreciated. I have to solve this t

upgrading mysql

I'm trying to update mysql 3.23.49 up to 4.0.5 on a RedHat 7.3 system, and I'm having some problems. I may be able to solve those problems by my own, but I'm running out of time and any tip or advice would be appreciated. I have to solve this today or I will forget updating mysql at this time. Fir

Re: Upgrading Kernel - Redhat 8

On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 06:47, Dominic Marsat wrote: > Hello, I've just installed Redhat 8 and in order to get my DSL USB > modem working I have to upgrade the kernel, adding various patches. > I'm aware that the i386 kernel is used during the install in order to > support most hardware - but are t

Upgrading Kernel - Redhat 8

Hello,   I've just installed Redhat 8 and in order to get my DSL USB modem working I have to upgrade the kernel, adding various patches. I'm aware that the i386 kernel is used during the install in order to support most hardware - but are the correct kernels for my processor installed after

Upgrading Kernel - Redhat 8

Hello,   I've just installed Redhat 8 and in order to get my DSL USB modem working I have to upgrade the kernel, adding various patches. I'm aware that the i386 kernel is used during the install in order to support most hardware - but are the correct kernels for my processor installed after

Re: Upgrading from 7.3 to 8.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cannon, Andrew wrote: | Very quick reply (don't know much about everything else in your email) but, | if you install Windows after Linux, your master boot record is overwritten, | so you lose the Linux partition. I think this applies even if you have m

RE: Upgrading from 7.3 to 8.0

ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:33 PM To: redhat Subject: Upgrading from 7.3 to 8.0 I have a system with an Athlon 1.2Ghz, 1 Gig of Ram, 40 Gig IDE as the Master, and a 100 Gig IDE as the Slave. Right now I have RH7.3 installed and the 100 Gig drive mounted as disk2. I

Upgrading from 7.3 to 8.0

I have a system with an Athlon 1.2Ghz, 1 Gig of Ram, 40 Gig IDE as the Master, and a 100 Gig IDE as the Slave. Right now I have RH7.3 installed and the 100 Gig drive mounted as disk2. I would like to do two things, install a small Windows partition (for games) and then install RH8.0. One of my conc

Re: Upgrading gcc, cpp, and more.

Because rpm checks dependencies, you can get stuck in this loop. The only consistent way I have seen is Riemer's suggestion. I put all the related rpms in a temp directory, then use rpm -Fvh *.rpm. If I see another dependency check I get that package until all install. Wayne On Sat, 2002-11-09

Re: Upgrading gcc, cpp, and more.

On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, papapep wrote: > How should I do to upgrade gcc, cpp, libgcc, gcc-c++ and binutils? When > I try to upgrade one rpm tells me it needs previously the other ones > upgraded to the same version, and I can't find any one of these packages > that upgrades without the others to be

Upgrading gcc, cpp, and more.

How should I do to upgrade gcc, cpp, libgcc, gcc-c++ and binutils? When I try to upgrade one rpm tells me it needs previously the other ones upgraded to the same version, and I can't find any one of these packages that upgrades without the others to begin work. I'm stuck in a circle. Thanks in

  1   2   3   4   5   >