It's fixed. I don't know what changed the /boot spec in lilo.conf,
but when I changed it to the physical location of c0d0p1, it worked.
I'm in SMP heaven now :)
Brad
> Brad Alpert said:
>> This Compaq 1850R server is running RAID 5 in hardware, using a
>> Compaq 221 controller. /dev/md14 appe
Brad Alpert said:
> This Compaq 1850R server is running RAID 5 in hardware, using a
> Compaq 221 controller. /dev/md14 appears to be the boot location.
I'm not famillar with this particular server but on a couple Compaq
DL380s that I have access to they do not use /dev/md* for boot, that
is typic
This Compaq 1850R server is running RAID 5 in hardware, using a
Compaq 221 controller. /dev/md14 appears to be the boot location.
With hardware RAID, the drives appear to the OS as logical devices
as specified in the RAID setup, so that the OS doesn't even know
that there is RAID out there.
/dev
Brad Alpert said:
> Did that right off the bat. As you say, it wasn't hard at all. But
> here's the output from running the lilo command after configuring
> lilo:
>
> [root@ns1 etc]# lilo
> Fatal: Unable to get RAID info on /dev/md14
>
> Any other thoughts?
what kind of raid array is /dev/md14 ?
Did that right off the bat. As you say, it wasn't hard at all. But
here's the output from running the lilo command after configuring
lilo:
[root@ns1 etc]# lilo
Fatal: Unable to get RAID info on /dev/md14
Any other thoughts?
Brad
> Brad Alpert said:
>>
>> How do I install a stock smp kernel wh
Brad Alpert said:
>
> How do I install a stock smp kernel when it can't find the bootloader?
how about manually configuring LILO and running it to overwrite any
grub bootloader since you mentioned your running LILO not grub ?
shouldn't be too hard
I'm not a redhat expert though, so my metho
I added a second cpu kit (factory) to my Compaq 1850R which has been
running fine.
I want to upgrade to the smp kernel and get this error when I run
the smp rpm:
[root@ns1 src]# rpm -Uvh kernel-smp-2.4.18-19.8.0.i686.rpm
Preparing...
### [100
Hi,
I'm experiencing a problem trying to upgrade
an RH7.2 kernel to 2.4.18 on a Dell PowerEdge 2650.
I made sure that kernel-source package exists,
downloaded the 2.4.18 kernel from kernel.org.
make xconfig ran without any problems. I selected
the modules/configs I want, save and exit.
/usr/src
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 07:00:38PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> If you had all of the kernels still installed, why not just choose one
> of the old kernels at boot time?
Installation uses 2.4.7-10, which works fine. But I wanted to have the
box with all errata applied. This one is a production
Gordon:
I haven't tried this yet, but thanks for a tip with pin-point precision.
JT
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 06:11, John Thomas wrote:
>
>
>>Is this what causes a hang on booting a new kernel when "Freeing unused
>>kernel memory..." appears, then init doesn't load (or ex
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 10:50, Javier Gostling wrote:
>
> Thanks. I had to roll back the entire server installation, but will
If you had all of the kernels still installed, why not just choose one
of the old kernels at boot time?
> proceed with it again tomorrow morning. I will then try your sugg
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 06:11, John Thomas wrote:
> Is this what causes a hang on booting a new kernel when "Freeing unused
> kernel memory..." appears, then init doesn't load (or execute)? I have
> that problem on attempting a kernal compile under RH 7.3. There are no
> errors about mounting e
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:50:32PM -0400, Javier Gostling wrote:
> Also, is this bug reported in bugzilla?
Forget I asked. It has been reported tons of times. I found plenty of
info on the subject on the different bugs, in case anyone needs help on
this:
- Use lilo instead of grub. Lilo stores
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:22:08AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> It's a kernel bug. Change your grub.conf to use:
> root=3003
> where 3003 is the hex value of the root device's major and minor number.
>
> In our case, the root device is on /dev/rd/c0d0p3, it's major and minor
> numbers a
Is this what causes a hang on booting a new kernel when "Freeing unused
kernel memory..." appears, then init doesn't load (or execute)? I have
that problem on attempting a kernal compile under RH 7.3. There are no
errors about mounting ext3.
John Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gordon Messmer wrot
I read yesterday that a system hung due to a NIC eepro100
Javier Gostling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
Hi all,I was installing a RH 7.2 server today, and after installing I upgradedall software packages. Finally, I upgraded the kernel packages (kernel,kernel-smp and kernel-headers). All this with
Hi.
I also read yesterday that the NIC eepro100 could
cause hanging on boot.
--- Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > On
Tue, 2002-10-01 at 17:39, Javier Gostling wrote:
> ...
> > which is expected. Now, when I rebooted to apply
> the kernel upgrade, the
> > system hung on startup with
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 17:39, Javier Gostling wrote:
...
> which is expected. Now, when I rebooted to apply the kernel upgrade, the
> system hung on startup with the new kernel. After some investigation, I
> found that the linuxrc script in the initrd image for 2.4.9-34smp was
> getting an error wh
Hi all,
I was installing a RH 7.2 server today, and after installing I upgraded
all software packages. Finally, I upgraded the kernel packages (kernel,
kernel-smp and kernel-headers). All this with up2date. I ended up with
four different kernel packages:
- kernel-2.4.7-10
- kernel-2.4.9-34
- kern
Thanks, Gordon. I'll give it a go tomorrow evening and report back.
John.
On 03/03/02, 09:03:45PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 19:45, John P Verel wrote:
> > rpm --test -Uvh on these packages gives a dependency need for
> > libstdc++.so.4. This object is provided by libs
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 19:45, John P Verel wrote:
> rpm --test -Uvh on these packages gives a dependency need for
> libstdc++.so.4. This object is provided by libstdc++-3.1-0.21.i386.rpm,
> according to rpmfind.
>
> If I attempt an rpm --test -Uvh on:
>
> libstdc++-3.1-0.21.i386.rpm
> libstdc+
I'm trying to upgrade mozilla-0.9.2.1-2 to 0.9.8. I've downloaded the
following from rpmfind:
mozilla-0.9.8-2.i386.rpm
mozilla-chat-0.9.8-2.i386.rpm
mozilla-devel-0.9.8-2.i386.rpm
mozilla-mail-0.9.8-2.i386.rpm
mozilla-psm-0.9.8-2.i386.rpm
rpm --test -Uvh on these packages gives a dependency nee
I have a new machine that had 7.1 installed on it. It has a raid 1 mirrored
disk setup. The original installation only installed in text mode and many
other options are missing. So I put the 7.1 installation disk in to Upgrade
and click ok I get the following message: "An error has occurred - no v
Hello,
I did a fresh install of RH 7.2 recently. I decided to make the OS
partitions ext3 (Note mount command below). I had some disks / partitions
from the previous install that I left ext2. I want to migrate some data from
the ext2 partitions to the ext3 partitions using dump / restore.
Devon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 25 January 2002 10:54 am, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
>
>>Hi list,
>> I have a newly installed RH7.2 box that was installed on top of
>>RH6.2. The installation did not upgrade RPM, so I am left to do that.
>>The problem i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 25 January 2002 10:54 am, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
> Hi list,
> I have a newly installed RH7.2 box that was installed on top of
> RH6.2. The installation did not upgrade RPM, so I am left to do that.
> The problem is that when I try to inst
Hi list,
I have a newly installed RH7.2 box that was installed on top of RH6.2.
The installation did not upgrade RPM, so I am left to do that. The
problem is that when I try to install the popt stuff I get:
[root@bohr src]# rpm -Uvh popt-1.6.3-1.03.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
Hi Erik,
Whether you decide to go to 3.0.6 or 4.x, read a message that Jeff
Johnson at Redhat posted to the RPM list a while back Read it a few
times.
http://www.execpc.com/~bgkuhn/linux/upgrade_to_rpm_4.html
I helped me dig myself out of a hole after I screwed up the RPM 4
install.
T
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
> Convert your RPM database to db3 format
Ok,
I did install db3 when I upgraded, it was one of those dependency
issues. Could someone enlighten me on how to convert my rpm database to
db3?
Thanks so much,
Erik
___
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Erik Mathisen wrote:
> Hi,
> I just upgraded to rpm 4 and glibc 2.2 at the same time. I had to
> download a few other rpms to satisfy some dependencies. After the
> upgrade, according to rpm -qa, I do not have any packages installed. I
> tried a rpm --rebuilddb, but
Hi,
I just upgraded to rpm 4 and glibc 2.2 at the same time. I had to
download a few other rpms to satisfy some dependencies. After the
upgrade, according to rpm -qa, I do not have any packages installed. I
tried a rpm --rebuilddb, but it didnt fix the problem, still no packages
install
A while ago, I complained to this list that I was unable to upgrade
one of my machines from 6.0 to 6.1 because I'd get the "no partitions"
message immediately after I selected the "upgrade" option. I got this
complaint even though I had no problem booting the existing 6.0
installation.
I querie
I tried sending this to the newsgroup without much luck.
I have Red Hat 6.0 installed on a 13.5G IDE drive. The drive is one
x0f extended partition with several logical partitions.
The drive was originally partitioned with Partition Magic,
The drive is the second drive in the system and all th
I'm running RedHat 5.0 and had a problem with glint 2.4 (the "Available"
selection problem). I installed glint 2.6 and now it won't even start. I
obtained glint 2.6 from the 5.1 upgrades. Are these upgrades incompatable with
5.0? I went back to glint 2.4 and that runs but I'm back to the original
>Greetings!
>Has anyone had any problems upgrading PAM via rpm with respect >to this
>error message?
>[root@HAL apps]# rpm -Uvh pam-0.64-2.i386.rpm
>failed dependencies:
>libcrack.so.2 is needed by pam-0.64-2
It gives you the cause. Update libcrack. Of, one good hint : Never log out
wh
Greetings!
Has anyone had any problems upgrading PAM via rpm with respect to this
error message?
[root@HAL apps]# rpm -Uvh pam-0.64-2.i386.rpm
failed dependencies:
libcrack.so.2 is needed by pam-0.64-2
Also, I can't login as one of the users I've created and I think it's
because of th
I was here the last couple of weeks asking for advice on how to upgrade some
of my packages. I was having problems with installing/upgrading some rpms.
I burned all the rpms I was having problems with onto a CD and then tried
glint, and everyting worked perfect. I couldn't install from the comm
37 matches
Mail list logo
