up2date not up to date? (sorry about the wrapping on the other one)

I have a question about up2date. I recently noticed that the most recent version of OpenSSL available on their website was version 0.9.7c (which purportedly contains important bugfixes) but the most recent version available on RHN was version 0.9.7a. Same thing with BIND (version 9.2.2 on the

Re: imap question again...sorry if u replied before

it works now...i tried using another account and it worked like a charm...thanks anyways...i wonder why it doesnt work with the root account...security issues i bet"R.E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i posted yesterday with another address but i dont have access to my old email so im using this one

imap question again...sorry if u replied before

i posted yesterday with another address but i dont have access to my old email so im using this one now imap problem...im using the imap that came with red hat 9i get this message in my /var/log/maillog   Sep 29 00:25:18 linuxbox imapd[3274]: imap service init from 192.168.0.1Sep 29 00:25:27 l

Sorry about the weird dates on a couple of emails I just sent...

f. Anyway, Matthew Galgoci helped me figure it out, and after re-directing my outgoing email to go through my ISP's smtp server, those emails that I had sent and had gotten queue'd up just now got sent to the list. Sorry for any confusion... Ben -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mai

Sorry about the HTML

While I had changed the option in Outlook Express to not send HTML, I hadn't unchecked the box that "replied in the same format as the sender". I've just done so, so there should not be any more html email coming from me. Sorry once again, Ben -- redhat-list mailing lis

Sorry bout the HTML : root user telnet problems

When I log onto my lunix box as a user and use su root to change to the root account, I can't use commands like chkconfig, services, etc ... to start and stop services. Is there any way I can change the way I am doing things so I will be able to use these commands over a telnet session? - Jas

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

I had an earlier email to you to this effect - I'll try to dig it up. Basically, it looks like the problem is that your program is calling the exit function before all of the output is flushed to Apache. You see, just saying "print" doesn't actually print anything. In order to speed things up, P

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

How to do "removing the exit call and setting autoflush on" ? Jonathan Bartlett wrote: > Did you do my suggestions about removing the exit call and setting > autoflush on? > > Jon > > On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > About my setting : > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]$ ls -l > >

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

NO. Jonathan Bartlett wrote: > Those settings all look good. Can you get any CGIs working? > > Jon > > On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > About my setting : > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]$ ls -l > > total 8 > > drwxr-xr-x7 x x 4096 Jun 20 22:38 public_html >

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Did you do my suggestions about removing the exit call and setting autoflush on? Jon On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > About my setting : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]$ ls -l > total 8 > drwxr-xr-x7 x x 4096 Jun 20 22:38 public_html > ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Those settings all look good. Can you get any CGIs working? Jon On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > About my setting : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]$ ls -l > total 8 > drwxr-xr-x7 x x 4096 Jun 20 22:38 public_html > ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]$ > > [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I know, but I want contact with you via email... > Would you mind to give me your email address ? > > Very thank for your help ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] I won't be home today though. -- Wielder of the mighty +1 LARTsaber of Unsubscribe Instructions At End of Message, the

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

I know, but I want contact with you via email... Would you mind to give me your email address ? Very thank for your help ! Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > About my setting : > > > As this is off topic, please contact me via AIM (pres CTHULHU) or ICQ > (18115568) > > -- >

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > About my setting : As this is off topic, please contact me via AIM (pres CTHULHU) or ICQ (18115568) -- Wielder of the mighty +1 LARTsaber of Unsubscribe Instructions At End of Message, the +3 Clue-by-Four of No Attachments to a Mailing List, and the -4 Shield of No S

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

About my setting : [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]$ ls -l total 8 drwxr-xr-x7 x x 4096 Jun 20 22:38 public_html ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ ls -l total 28 drwxr-xr-x2 xx 4096 Jun 20 22:54 cgi-bin ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would you mind to give me a sample for reference ? Very thank for your help ! Sure, but more can be found in the Apache Manual. ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /home/xxx/public_html/cgi-bin/ AllowOverride None Optio

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

About my setting : [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]$ ls -l total 8 drwxr-xr-x7 x x 4096 Jun 20 22:38 public_html ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] x]$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ ls -l total 28 drwxr-xr-x2 xx 4096 Jun 20 22:54 cgi-bin ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Please provide permissions to testcgi.cgi and all directories leading up to it. Thanks, Jon On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just test again : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ ./testcgi.cgi > Content-type: text/html > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ > > But http://www

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Would you mind to give me a sample for reference ? > > > > Very thank for your help ! > > > > > > > > Sure, but more can be found in the Apache Manual. > > ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /home/xxx/public_html/cgi-bin/ > > AllowOverride No

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Just test again : [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ ./testcgi.cgi Content-type: text/html [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ But http://www.mydomain_name.com.mo/~x/testcgi.cgi : Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Jonathan Bartlett wrote: It depends if you are using ScriptAliases, or just have Option +ExecCGI. In the latter case, the extension is necessary. That actually appears to have been the problem since he just got perl text rather than actual output. Jon Perhaps. I don't use ExecCGI so I don't really

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

It depends if you are using ScriptAliases, or just have Option +ExecCGI. In the latter case, the extension is necessary. That actually appears to have been the problem since he just got perl text rather than actual output. Jon On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > Jonathan Bartlett wro

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Jonathan Bartlett wrote: I just do the test : [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ perl ./textcgi That is not the correct test. The test is [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ ./textcgi However, the file name needs to be text.cgi not textcgi. Jon Technically, the file doesn't need an extension. --

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

> I just do the test : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ perl ./textcgi That is not the correct test. The test is [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ ./textcgi However, the file name needs to be text.cgi not textcgi. Jon > Content-type: text/html > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] public_html]$ > >

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Would you mind to give me a sample for reference ? > > Very thank for your help ! > > > Sure, but more can be found in the Apache Manual. ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /home/xxx/public_html/cgi-bin/ AllowOverride None Options None Order allow,deny

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Nick Lindsell wrote: > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > About my Apache Server ( 1.3.27 ) : > > > > > > UserDir public_html > > > > > > > > AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes > > Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Includ

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > About my Apache Server ( 1.3.27 ) : > > > > > > UserDir public_html > > > > > > > > AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes > > Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Includes ExecCGI > > Order allo

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear All, > > About my Apache Server ( 1.3.27 ) : > > > UserDir public_html > > > > AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes > Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Includes ExecCGI > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > > > Log file ( erro

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear All, > > About my Apache Server ( 1.3.27 ) : > > > UserDir public_html > > > > AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes > Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Includes ExecCGI > Order allow,deny > Allow fro

Re: User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

The problem is with the script. Some things to check: 1) is the script executable? 2) Is the first line of the script a path to a valid interpretter (e.g. - many people have #!/usr/local/bin/perl, but perl is stored in /usr/bin/perl on RH systems) 3) Is the script a DOS or UNIX file

User's CGI / SSI ( Sorry, I can't post to apache )

Dear All, About my Apache Server ( 1.3.27 ) : UserDir public_html AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Includes ExecCGI Order allow,deny Allow from all Log file ( error messages ) : [Wed Jun 18 19:54:38 2003] [error] (13)Pe

test - sorry

I've had some problems sending to this list before, so I'm testing to see if I've fixed it -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Whoops! Sorry for inadvertant test message

Sorry! I accidently sent a test message to the list. I was testing a mail scanner and didn't clear the "To:" field. Mike Watson -- Registered Linux - 256979 NRA Life ARS: W0TMW -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is belie

RE: [OT] Apparently on orisusoft's relay list - how do I fix this? (sorry long!)

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Pelley > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 6:42 AM > Subject: [OT] Apparently on orisusoft's relay list - > how do I fix this? (sorry long!) > > > Hi all, > > I've apparently been put on osirusoft's relay li

[OT] Apparently on orisusoft's relay list - how do I fix this? (sorry long!)

Hi all, I've apparently been put on osirusoft's relay list and I'm a unranked-amature when it comes to sendmail. I've run my site past the abuse.net's relay test and don't have any problems there. I'm including my sendmail.cf file for the sendmail experts to peruse. Obviously, I want to fix thi

Re: ppp problems...HELP!! PLEASE!!:-(((( sorry, now in plain text

On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 17:22, Andrew Pasquale wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 05:29:52PM -0500 or thereabouts, und3rGr0und wrote: > > > > Hi. > > I'm using RH7.2 > > my server has a registered IP at internet i need to connect win9x and XP > > clients via ppp so they can use internet > > through my

Re: ppp problems...HELP!! PLEASE!!:-(((( sorry, now in plain text

. > but once connected at the windows terminal. if I click the continue button > the connection drops. > > why? what's the problem here? > > thx in advance > Sorry I don't have the solution to your problem. I did notice that your system time is a year off. Pe

ppp problems...HELP!! PLEASE!!:-(((( sorry, now in plain text

- Original Message - From: und3rGr0und To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:32 PM Subject: ppp problems... Hi. I'm using RH7.2 my server has a registered IP at internet i need to connect win9x and XP clients via ppp so they can use internet through my server but cli

Re: ssh / https problems (sorry lost replies)

On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 05:09, Mike Whorley wrote: > Sorry for the inconvenience but could those people who were kind enough to > reply to my post please forward the reply to me again. > > I've have some trouble with mail and lost all your replies. > > Thanks in anticipation

ssh / https problems (sorry lost replies)

Title: ssh / https problems (sorry lost replies) Sorry for the inconvenience but could those people who were kind enough to reply to my post please forward the reply to me again. I've have some trouble with mail and lost all your replies. Thanks in anticipation, Mike. -Ori

Problem with script... SORRY!!

hello forum, I am programming a script and it arises me a problem, I need that the script throws a combination of keys, alt+F1, and I don't remember like one makes. Can somebody help me? I have looked for information in the web, but I don't find anything. Thank you Greetings --

Re: Sorry :converting ext3 to ext2 on the root partion

   "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Juan Martinez wrote:> Change /etc/fstab, reboot and remove the journal.> > You could also change /etc/fstab, remount / and remove the journal.since this is the root filesystem, you can't "remount" -- as in,use mount with the "-o

Re: Sorry :converting ext3 to ext2 on the root partion

On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Juan Martinez wrote: > Change /etc/fstab, reboot and remove the journal. > > You could also change /etc/fstab, remount / and remove the journal. since this is the root filesystem, you can't "remount" -- as in, use mount with the "-o remount" option -- to do this, as the rem

Re: Sorry :converting ext3 to ext2 on the root partion

PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Sorry :converting ext3 to ext2 on the root partion > > > I'm converting back my redhat 7.3 to ext2. I converted all my partitions, but didn't >succeed to convert the / partition any ideas !!! > > > >

Sorry :converting ext3 to ext2 on the root partion

I'm converting back my redhat 7.3 to ext2. I converted all my partitions, but didn't succeed to convert the / partition any ideas !!!Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more faith.yahoo.com

rsh host command problem - long (sorry)

I need to temporaly enable the rsh commands on a RedHat 7.1 box as root. I can rsh to the box, but I can't run a command remotely. For example: # rsh host Last login: Wed Oct 9 10:18:29 from host # # rsh host ls host: Connection refused I think I hav

Grub APM Problem - OK with Lilo - (Sorry, forgot to switch to plain text for previous post)

Hi I sent a message yesterday regarding the same problem, but I don't think I explained it very well (c'mon, it was late!) Anyway, I've installed Red Hat 8.0 (clean install, on second hard disk, first disk has WinXP) I mostly selected the defaults during setup, including the default settings fo

Re: CVS Config problem - "Gordon Messmer sorry for delay"

Sorry... last few days I didn't come to work. Yes Gordon, /usr/local/bin/cvs is there ! (I think I have copied it there) And also I tried putting /usr/bin/cvs (this is also there), but it still doesn&#

Re: Sorry I know you have done this but

il.cf service sendmail restart That's it. Remove all relays from /etc/mail/access -- Brad On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 11:23, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote: > Sorry I know you have done this but I am e newbie I want to start testing >authentication of > sendmail.I decided to use plain tex

Sorry I know you have done this but

Sorry I know you have done this but I am e newbie I want to start testing authentication of sendmail.I decided to use plain text by now How can I do this ? I have sendmail 8.10 and olso SASL. Thanks Pozo - Mensaje enviado usando SquirrelMail

Sorry 'bout that

I'll do more better in the future. :) Jim Hale - Jim & Kathy's Website Collection http://hale.dyndns.org > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Patrick Beart > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: W

Re: test (sorry)

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:54:23AM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote: > I would. I recently setup gpg on my machine and am in the process of > testing and learing everyth

Re: test (sorry)

I would. I recently setup gpg on my machine and am in the process of testing and learing everything I can. I am especially interested in any compatability issues with other platforms' mailers. Bret On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 09:03, Vimol wrote: > Hi Martin: > > I got your test mail for PGP. > I wou

Re: test (sorry)

Hi Martin: I got your test mail for PGP. I would like to know some detail in PGP and S/MIME. How they work? Which one is more secure? Vimol ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

test (sorry)

--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is a test to check for msg acceptance with an attachment that is a gpg signature. --=20 - Martin J. Brown, Jr. -

Re: HOW TO INSTALL REDHAT 7.1 FROM HARD DISK?????????????? -Sorry But.........

Sorry but I already have the entire instalation tree in my hard disk. Is there any method to use that without downloding the huge IOS files??? thanks Ed Wilts ,Rodolfo J. Paiz. regards, Sajeewa Chandrasekera

Sorry!

Sorry for sending the whole list in my previous message! It was a mistake! Gabor begin:vcard n:Szemerédy;Gábor x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.srce.net org:Zavod za informatiku i AOP;HW-SW version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Szemerédy Gábor adr;quoted-printable:;;Adolfa

sorry...need help in sendmail :)

hi!.. good day to all!! firstly, have to ask sorry if this posted already. :) can i have a detailed instructions/commands on installing sendmail. i have here sendmail-8.11.3.tar.gz, downloaded from sendmail.org. i already read some notes/documetation?FAQs on some site (sendmail and redhat

Re: Sorry if this is already known

 Samba is the way to go.

Re: Sorry if this is already known

Thornton Prime wrote: > > > 2.) If I am logged on NT machine as "administrator", I get not only the > > stuff under /home/ directory, but 'hidden' stuff as well > > (directories and files beginning with a dot, like .enlightenment or > > .gnome etc.). As long as I know, only the root in Linux has

Re: Sorry if this is already known

On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Miroslav Skoric wrote: > 1.) If I am logged on NT machine as an ordinary , I get a content > of /home/ directory. This is good, right? > 2.) If I am logged on NT machine as "administrator", I get not only the > stuff under /home/ directory, but 'hidden' stuff as well > (dir

Sorry if this is already known

I experiment with two computers in a network. The first machine is running Red Hat 6.2 as Gnome Workstation and Samba 2.0.6 on it. The second machine is running Windows NT 4.0 Server as a PDC. Samba is configured to belong to a workgroup with the same name as domain's name on PDC. Well, from withi

RE: FW: ```Error messgae help Puhleez :) --Error message is in thisone sorry!

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John D. Hardin > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 8:31 PM > To: redhat-list > Subject: Re: FW: ```Error messgae help Puhleez :) --Error message is in > thisone sorry! > > &

Re: FW: ```Error messgae help Puhleez :) --Error message is in thisone sorry!

On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Steve Gulick wrote: > Feb 25 11:38:20 localhost modprobe: can't locate module binfmt-0807 You're trying to execute something somewhere that you think is a program but isn't. When you tell the kernel to execute a file, it looks at the first few bytes to figure out what type

FW: ```Error messgae help Puhleez :) --Error message is in this one sorry!

I keep getting the following error message in my logs. I am not sure what is causing it or what to do to fix it. Could some one please point me in the right direction! TIA Steve Feb 25 11:38:20 localhost modprobe: can't locate module binfmt-0807 ___

Sorry 'bout that..

Hy! Sorry about the enconvenience with the html mail...this shitty Outlook was configured to html style.. but i promise that won't happen anymore! :) Well...about my modem problem..i didn't solve it yet..but I'm still hoping... Bye! And thank

RE: ProFTPD problems again . . . sorry

ecember 8, 2000 7:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ProFTPD problems again . . . sorry > > > Hi all, first let me apologize for my 3rd post about ProFTPD. I > know this is > a RH list, but there is a lot less flaming here :), and I think > the problem > might be wit

ProFTPD problems again . . . sorry

Hi all, first let me apologize for my 3rd post about ProFTPD. I know this is a RH list, but there is a lot less flaming here :), and I think the problem might be with my system too. Well, I'm running RH 7.0 on P3 450, 256Mb, fully patched up :) Anyways, I was wondering if any of you guys use ProF

Sorry: Is the list still alive ?

i didn't receive mail from december 1st. Can anyone be so kind to email me personal if it's me or the list Thanks everyone Hugo ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: SMBMOUNT gives errors... (sorry for double posting: stupid error:send in HTML)

On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, fam. Willemen wrote: > I can access my smb-share (on a remote machine) through " smbclient > '\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' ", but when doing " smbmount > '\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' -c 'mount /home/samba/dir' " it gives a "mount error: > No such device". > > Anybody got a clue?! Try giv

SMBMOUNT gives errors... (sorry for double posting: stupid error: send in HTML)

I can access my smb-share (on a remote machine) through " smbclient '\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' ", but when doing " smbmount '\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' -c 'mount /home/samba/dir' " it gives a "mount error: No such device". Anybody got a clue?! Gr. Rob ___ Re

Re: sorry, the modem is busy [please, help]

First things first.. AT commands = AT (attention)plus a command or string of commands for the modem. like ATDT = ATtention, Dial Tone usually followed by a number to dial. ... Modem connection speed .. most modems will accept baud rates up to 115k, some even to 230 or 25

Re: sorry, the modem is busy [please, help]

Hi, I've checked that I've used the right COM/ttys port. Could it be that I need a special driver/package for the modem? I know for sure that it isn't a winmodem so that shouldn't be a problem. It's a PCI, 56k6, Conexant/E-tech Bullet modem with a Rockwell chipset connected to com3/ttys2 . *The

Re: sorry, the modem is busy [please, help]

n internal > (Rockwell-chipset) modem and it kept failing. > > I tried to dailup to the ISP using Kppp. > (I've installed as a KDE workstation, but I'm using Gnome)(Don't ask, I > don't know how or why) > > anyway, > I keep getting the message: "L

sorry, the modem is busy [please, help]

getting the message: "Looking for modem" and right after that: "Sorry, the modem is busy" What could be the problem? Am I using the wrong dailup-tool or am I missing something else? I hope someone out there can help me. Remo

Traceroute not tracing route-- sorry about no subject message was sent back because outlook express was set to html

- Original Message - From: Terry Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:23 PM Subject: (no subject) > When I run traceroute on my Red Hat 7.0 I get > 1 * * * * > 2 * * * * > 3 * * * * > > Now the catch it used to work, and my machines

Re: Oops, cross-posted a suse messgae sorry.

At 02:39 PM 11/12/2000 -0600, you wrote: >Hee Hee, > >funny, I just gave Suse a try.. installation was nice do they have a >mailing list like this one? Yup: suse-e-linux is the main one. They actually have quite a few. Take a look on suse.com (or .de) for the mailing list page - it gives all

Re: Oops, cross-posted a suse messgae sorry.

On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote: > It's ok, we like SuSE here too. I'm actually using ssh on one of my home Slackware boxes to compose the message on my Mandrake mail server. I like just about any GNU/Linux (I do use Redhat on several boxes that I manage ). I think people make too m

Re: Oops, cross-posted a suse messgae sorry.

Hee Hee, funny, I just gave Suse a try.. installation was nice do they have a mailing list like this one? Ahbaid Jonathan Wilson wrote: > It's ok, we like SuSE here too. > > Right everybody? ;-) > > JW > > > At 08:49 AM 11/12/2000 -0800, you wrote: > > >

Re: Oops, cross-posted a suse messgae sorry.

It's ok, we like SuSE here too. Right everybody? ;-) JW At 08:49 AM 11/12/2000 -0800, you wrote: >___ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list _

Oops, cross-posted a suse messgae sorry.

___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Asking for the second time (LIILO) - Sorry :(

LIILO) - Sorry :( I've made room for the boot partition on hda, below the 1024 barrier, using Partition Magic. This is a LILO issue. You must do this. From what I've read, you'll be better off leaving Windows as the first partition. On 10/20/00, 11:40:24AM -0500, Jamin Collins wrot

Re: Asking for the second time (LIILO) - Sorry :(

PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 11:08 AM > To: Redhat List > Subject: Asking for the second time (LIILO) - Sorry :( > > Hello all... > > This coming weekend I am going to help assimilat... err.. > help some friends set up a dual boot system. They are > us

Re: Asking for the second time (LIILO) - Sorry :(

The 1024 limitation is the result of a BIOS problem, not a Linux problem. There's a new version of LILO out there that doesn't have the 1024 limitation, but you may need a new(er) BIOS to take advantage of it. - Martin J. Brown, Jr. -

Re: Asking for the second time (LIILO) - Sorry :(

I haven't done this in a long time... if I were to do it again, I'd definitely read . Yeah, it's about MS95, but should be close enough. I remember seeing that there is a doc somewhere for installing Linux+Win98, but didn't see it on linuxdoc.

Re: Asking for the second time (LIILO) - Sorry :(

George, I was in a similar situation last week. What I did was install Windows ME in a 6 GB 'C' partition. I then installed RH 7 into an adjacent region with separate partitions for /boot, /, /usr/local, and /usr/people. This put the /boot partition completely below the 1024 cylinder mark. L

RE: Asking for the second time (LIILO) - Sorry :(

, October 20, 2000 11:08 AM To: Redhat List Subject: Asking for the second time (LIILO) - Sorry :( Hello all... This coming weekend I am going to help assimilat... err.. help some friends set up a dual boot system. They are using a large HD (About 45 Gigs). They want to use 20 for Windows 98, 20

Asking for the second time (LIILO) - Sorry :(

Hello all... This coming weekend I am going to help assimilat... err.. help some friends set up a dual boot system. They are using a large HD (About 45 Gigs). They want to use 20 for Windows 98, 20 for a fat32 data drive, and 14 for RedHat Linux 6.2. I've done dual boot installs before and ha

Re: "Sorry, the modem doesn't respond"

"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote: > A couple of things to check - make sure /etc/rc.d/rc.local is executable, > and check that the symlinks to rc.local are there for the run level you > are booting into. (S99local symlinked to /etc/rc.d/rc.local.) You can > also try putting the complete path to sets

Re: "Sorry, the modem doesn't respond"

On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Miroslav Skoric wrote: > Yesterday I installed RH 6.2 as a fresh installation (over the previous > RH 6.1) and discovered the message from the subject whenever I try to > use KDE's KPPP or RH PPP Dialer (or else). Well, my modem is set by > jumpers to use IRQ 15 and that is

"Sorry, the modem doesn't respond"

Yesterday I installed RH 6.2 as a fresh installation (over the previous RH 6.1) and discovered the message from the subject whenever I try to use KDE's KPPP or RH PPP Dialer (or else). Well, my modem is set by jumpers to use IRQ 15 and that is set by a line: setserial /dev/ttyS2 irq 15 within /et

Re: Sorry guys

Alan it probably drilled his computer... and he was just upset. You'd be upset too if you had to use Windows :) chris On Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:38:04 -0500, Alan Mead wrote: >At 10:09 AM 6/20/00 , Morsal Roudbay wrote: >>Only an idiot can do what you did! > >Was this really necessary? I've visi

Re: Sorry guys

Virus? What virus? OHHH You mean those attachments I keep getting from people. Yah I got about 70 ot 80 of them and just laugh. It must be horrible to be running Windoze on the desktop. I mean it's not a virus but actually a feature that does malicious things to your system. Thanks

RE: Sorry guys

[EMAIL PROTECTED]] %-> Sent: Wednesday, 21 June 2000 6:05 a.m. %-> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] %-> Subject: Re: Sorry guys %-> %-> %-> I'm cool now, but please don't send around a virus again. %-> %-> /Morsal Roudbay -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: Sorry guys

I'm cool now, but please don't send around a virus again. /Morsal Roudbay - Original Message - From: "John Aldrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 6:12 PM Subject: Re: Sorry guys > On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Alan

Re: Sorry guys

Morsal Roudbay wrote: > > Only an idiot can do what you did! Usually, it is not exactly what you say what matters, but the way you say it is pretty important. Anyway, no problem, Jeff, we all make mistakes, and we are pretty sure you will be more careful next time. -Manuel. -- To unsubscrib

Re: Sorry guys

At 10:58 AM 6/20/00 , Morsal Roudbay wrote: >U tell me, is it ok to send a virus in a forum like this one Obviously not. Rather, my point is that I hope we can avoid being nasty to each other. I think nastiness erodes the quality of participation on any list. And I think intolerance of m

Re: Sorry guys

On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Morsal Roudbay wrote: > U tell me, is it ok to send a virus in a forum like this one > No, but I think your response was a bit of an over-reaction. It's not like he did it intentionally. C'mon...haven't you ever accidentally double-clicked on an attachment in an attempt t

Re: Sorry guys

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > U tell me, is it ok to send a virus in a forum like this one > - Original Message - From: "Alan Mead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, > June 20, 2000 5:38 PM Subjec

Re: Sorry guys

On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Alan Mead wrote: > At 10:09 AM 6/20/00 , Morsal Roudbay wrote: > >Only an idiot can do what you did! > > Was this really necessary? I've visited on-line forums where the > participants (or maybe just a couple vocal ones) were pretty nasty and I > appreciate the collegial to

  1   2   3   >