cool,
thanx guys.
Jenny
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:28, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:37:05 +1000
> Ms Jenny Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > when i boot into rescue mode, and run fsck it gives
> > fsck 1.32 (09-NOV-2002)
> > warning; couldn't open
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:37:05 +1000
Ms Jenny Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when i boot into rescue mode, and run fsck it gives
> fsck 1.32 (09-NOV-2002)
> warning; couldn't open /etc/fstab: No such file or directory...
>
Hi,
If you don't tell fsck which driv
Hi,
I'm having problems booting to linux.
It crashed a couple of times, and checked root file system, and was ok. now it fails,
and gives
/:Unattached inode 997
/: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY... [failed]
when i boot into rescue mode, and run fsck it gives
fsck 1.32 (09-NOV
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 01:14, Linux Tard wrote:
> Regis
>
> did you ever try to specify a backup superblock? That
> might have solved it for you. This would have been
> the '-b' option.
>
> lt
>
>
Yup lt, sure did. Even went through archives to find different backup
superblocks. Like I sa
Regis
did you ever try to specify a backup superblock? That
might have solved it for you. This would have been
the '-b' option.
lt
>
> Perhaps so Cameron, but I spent a good deal of time
> Saturday running
> various combinations of fsck, and e2fsck with
> various
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 18:25, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 12:29 16 Jun 2003, rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Just to complete this thread. I solved this problem in a much simpler
> | way. After some additional searching on Googly Groups, I tried running
> | fsck -A /dev/hda2 a
On 12:29 16 Jun 2003, rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Just to complete this thread. I solved this problem in a much simpler
| way. After some additional searching on Googly Groups, I tried running
| fsck -A /dev/hda2 and answered yes to all the questions. When I exited
| and reboot
chille,
Thanks so much for your input.
Just to complete this thread. I solved this problem in a much simpler
way. After some additional searching on Googly Groups, I tried running
fsck -A /dev/hda2 and answered yes to all the questions. When I exited
and rebooted, it started - good as new!
On Saturday 14 June 2003 23:49, rm wrote:
> Thanks again for your help, any other suggestions?
>
> regis
Try changing in your fstab this lines:
LABEL=/ / ex2 defaults1 1
with
/dev/hda2 / ex2 defaults1 1
and
LABEL=/boot
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 15:58, achillemiele wrote:
> On Saturday 14 June 2003 22:44, rm wrote:
>
> > This could be a problem. The complete line when I do cat /etc/fstab
> >
> > dev/hda5swapswapdefaults0 0
> >
> > does this mean I'm still fscking with the wrong device?
> >
> > T
right answer to your e2fsck since it's
> not ant ext2 fs but a swap partition.
and while this won't help you much, and undoubtedly sounds harsh, if you
don't appreciate that "fsck" is not meant to be used on a swap partition,
you really aren't qualified to be mess
On Saturday 14 June 2003 22:44, rm wrote:
> This could be a problem. The complete line when I do cat /etc/fstab
>
> dev/hda5 swapswapdefaults0 0
>
> does this mean I'm still fscking with the wrong device?
>
> The complete output looks like this:
>
> LABEL=/ /
On Saturday 14 June 2003 21:24, rm wrote:
> Any ideas on how to correct the corrupt superblock, or otherwise
correct
> this?
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> regis
What's your complete recorf i /etc/fstab?
/dev/hda5 ???
Is it a ext2 or ext3 filesystem?
Achille
Thanks again,
This
On Saturday 14 June 2003 21:24, rm wrote:
> Any ideas on how to correct the corrupt superblock, or otherwise correct
> this?
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> regis
What's your complete recorf i /etc/fstab?
/dev/hda5 ???
Is it a ext2 or ext3 filesystem?
Achille
--
redhat-list mail
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 13:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Saturday 14 June 2003 19:46, rm wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply. Obviously I'm not so sharp on picking up which
> > drive is which. I ran e2fsck -f -c /dev/hda5
> > and got the following response:
> >
> > "WARNING!!! Running e2fsck on
On Saturday 14 June 2003 19:46, rm wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. Obviously I'm not so sharp on picking up which
> drive is which. I ran e2fsck -f -c /dev/hda5
> and got the following response:
>
> "WARNING!!! Running e2fsck on a mounted filesystem may cause SEVERE
> filesystme damage.
>
> Do y
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 11:08, regis wrote:
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 10:51, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 10:40:09AM -0500, rm wrote:
> >
> > LABEL=/
> > LABEL=/boot
> > /dev/fd0
> > none
> > none
> > /dev/hda5
> > /dev/cdrom
&g
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 10:40:09AM -0500, rm wrote:
>
> LABEL=/
> LABEL=/boot
> /dev/fd0
> none
> none
> /dev/hda5
> /dev/cdrom
>
> Then I did: fsck -y /dev/fd0
>
> and it responded:
>
> fsck 1.26 (3-Feb-2002)
> Could not determine filesystem t
Last night a storm knocked out power for a couple hours, and shut down
two Redhat 7.1 systems on a small network. One booted up fine, the
other, after reaching 93% "forced check" reported: FAILED
and said to: "RUN fsck MANUALLY"
After checking the archives of several Linux l
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 00:58, Ramesh .T.S wrote:
> Andrew what about ext2? I have ext2 and nfs mounted partition. is there
> a way to clean only ext2 by making ne changes in rc.sysinit without
> checking the nfs.
>
> Ramesh
> grep fsck *
rc.sysinit:# Mount /proc (done here so
day, May 28, 2003 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: fsck
> On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 13:17, Vano Beridze wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I've got RedHat Linux 8.0
> >
> > If I shutdown the system abnormally, the system promps to start fsck
> > after reboot. How can I tell the
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 13:17, Vano Beridze wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've got RedHat Linux 8.0
>
> If I shutdown the system abnormally, the system promps to start fsck
> after reboot. How can I tell the system to start fsck without a 'Y'
> confirmation at startup?
Hello
I've got RedHat Linux 8.0
If I shutdown the system abnormally, the system promps to start fsck
after reboot. How can I tell the system to start fsck without a 'Y'
confirmation at startup? I don't want to confirm fsck run, I just want
fsck to start automatically.
Thank
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 23:49, Gary Nielson wrote:
> Is there a file I can look into that will tell me how many more reboots
> before the filesystems are checked with fsck? I know my system checks
> every six months or every 20 reboots, but how is that set and where
> can you see
Is there a file I can look into that will tell me how many more reboots
before the filesystems are checked with fsck? I know my system checks
every six months or every 20 reboots, but how is that set and where
can you see the counter?
Also, if you have a bad shutdown and when you boot up fsck
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Webmaster wrote:
> Hi, got a very severe problem. I have two hard drives in my RS server
> and I am getting the secondary drive removed. Here's the problem.
> After the secondary drive is removed, the server fails to bootup
> completely, crashing at fsck
Webmaster said:
> Hi, got a very severe problem. I have two hard drives in my RS server and
> I am getting the secondary drive removed. Here's the problem. After the
> secondary drive is removed, the server fails to bootup completely,
> crashing at fsck.
sounds like the system
Hi, got a very severe problem.
I have two hard drives in my RS server and I am getting the secondary drive
removed. Here's the problem. After the secondary drive is removed, the server
fails to bootup completely, crashing at fsck. The server boots up fine
when the secondary drive i
Title: Message
But i want to make use of the options in
rc.sysinit. How should i go about
- Original Message -
From:
santosh
kumar
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:54
AM
Subject: RE: Auto Fsck without
restart
U
can do auto
Hi,
I would like to know whether if we can do auto
filesystemcheck and fixes. with out a restart and without entering a password
when the machine is switched off and on.
Ramesh
Abuse sent to hotmail.com, quoting all mails sent by this individual.
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.ribbrock.org | ICQ#: 15839919
"You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true
At 20:27 04/12/2002 +0800, you wrote:
Looks like Micro$ofts FUD squad are getting desperate..
fsck you all again!
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
It's time for the sign...
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please do not |
/ O O\__feed the Trolls.|
/ \
hongky Michael wrote:
> yes, i am fscking you all!!!
>
> sweat!perfect!!
Wow, you need to try ext3 on for size. ;-)
If you want off this list, simply go here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
Otherwise, cut off access from your pr0n seeking little brother :-)
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 08:31 AM, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
I liked that one... first beer and all. Maybe some sort of filter
could
have blocked this!
Nah, too much like censorship.. Has it occurred to anyone that perhaps
this twit simply forgot to log off from Hotmail and walked aw
hi,
when you receive such a reply from the system.then enter the root passwd.
Next type fsck with individual device name.i mean to say run fsck
/dev/hda1 and so on.for further details go through the man page.it has a
hell lot of information.
Regards,
Balakrishnan Asish
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:03:52 -0500
"Michael Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I execute this command:
>
> fsck /home
>
> does it overwrite what is in /home?
man fsck
The short answer is, no. The long answer is, it doesn't do anything without asking
No it should attempt to check the /home file system.
Michael Hill wrote:
> If I execute this command:
>
> fsck /home
>
> does it overwrite what is in /home?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.red
If I execute this command:
fsck /home
does it overwrite what is in /home?
Do fsck -y "name of partition"
Simple!
regards
Krishna
Krishna Shekhar
Network Administrator
Wiplash Wireless
- Original Message -
From: Brian Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:41 PM
Subject: fsck and Red hat disk
Hi,
I'm running Red Hat 7.1 on an intel. After re-booting from a system crash, I
am prompted to run fsck to repair filesystems manually with no options. For
example,
/: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
(ie without -a or -p options)
**Dropping you into a shell.
(Repair files
Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've asked this question before, but I didn't get any useful answers
> so I'll try again:
>
> Is there a proper disk check utility for Red Hat Linux? I'm not
> talking about fsck or similar, but something that
I've asked this question before, but I didn't get any useful answers so
I'll try again:
Is there a proper disk check utility for Red Hat Linux? I'm not talking
about fsck or similar, but something that will exercise the device at
block level and help me uncover
> From: Toralf Lund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 6:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why full fsck with ext3?
>
>
> On of our hosts will always do a full fsck operation on its root
> filesystem after an unclean shutdown, even though file
If you are getting unwanted/unnecessary fsck run then check out the
tune2fs command.
I found this link to be very simple yet useful:
http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ext3-usage.html
Good luck,
Brian
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
thing else (ditto). I've yet to
>> figure out what the cause is. I'll welcome a discussion on this topic
>> ... no one piped up last time I mentioned it.
>
>Even if the file system is journaled, isn't there a parameter that says to
>fsck dependent on numbe
ned it.
>
Even if the file system is journaled, isn't there a parameter that says to
fsck dependent on number of boots or time since fscked? This would be to
account for the development of bad blocks on the surface of the drive.
Is that not the case here?
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mike wrote:
>Does anyone know why the / partition gets fsckd even though it is ext3
>
>I have recompiled ext3 into the kernel (not modulsr) but no difference
I've seen this effect consistently on my multi-boot laptop (all ext3 for
the Linux partitio
Does anyone know why the / partition gets fsckd even though it is ext3
I have recompiled ext3 into the kernel (not modulsr) but no difference
I have very dodgy power supply where I live so power outage while
running fsck has seriously unwanted effects
anyone know of a reason/solution
Sorry about my last post (I meant to change the subject).
Trevor.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I had a problem with a server, it wanted me to run fsck on boot, so I
fsck'd the problem filesystem and all the others just for good measure.
When I rebooted, I started getting kernel panic's because it couldn't
find ext3 root filesystem. I booted into rescue mode and ran fsck.e
On 17:36 07 Feb 2002, Gilberto Ramírez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| How can I avoid Running fsck after the machine turn off accidentaly o reset.
| Because when I turn it back on, it makes me run fsck command on my partitions
| mannually, and I have like 30 machines with this problem,
How can I avoid Running fsck after the machine turn off accidentaly o
reset. Because when I turn it back on, it makes me run fsck command on my partitions
mannually, and I have like 30 machines with this problem, and is problem because
I onle have access this machines by network (rsh) or
x27;s time for me to learn some more!
Thakns again,
Bob
Quoting Ben Logan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:36:22PM -0600, BobH wrote:
> > The machine is up and after a little reading I gather that I should not
> > even think of running fsck on ext3 partitions. So
Yes, you can run an fsck on the box by typing "shutdown -F -r now" and
you can do it while logged on using ssh or telnet. This forces an fsck
after a reboot However, if fsck finds a problem it will prompt you to
type the root passwd and run fsck manually. If that happens someone has
to
Title: RE: remote fsck
sure...change your init scripts and before you mount, regardless of if the drives were cleanly unmounted, have it run fsck.
There is a flag for non-interactive as well. Then just reboot.
I think the file is /etc/rc.d/rc.sysint (on RedHat Systems) ('man fsch'
Hello all,
I was wondering, is it possible to manually fsck a machine if
you are not at console to actually take the machine down and do the fsck
yourself? The reason I ask is because I need to fsck a machine that I
have in a collocation facility, which is several states away from me. I
quick enough to force
BobH> filesystem check. I'm using grub as my bootloader. How do I force
BobH> fsck of the entire HD that is ext3 format?
I think if you touch a file called forcefsck in your root directory, you'll
get an fsck on reboot...
Ed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 20 January 2002 12:46 pm, john-paul delaney wrote:
> I tried the shutdown being the safer (read easier) of the two, the
> filesystem checked out ok. Therefore I'm left with a full root
> directory but not knowing what's occupying all that
Yes! That was the question to show me what an idiot I am... I had moved the
files mentioned - instead of to a newly partitioned disk /dev/hdc3, to a
directory (created by mistake) on the root called hd3.
Sorry to have wasted your time gentlemen - but you saved me from making more
fatal mistake
On Sun, 2002-01-20 at 11:46, john-paul delaney wrote:
> Thanks, I appreciate your help...
>
> I tried the shutdown being the safer (read easier) of the two, the filesystem
> checked out ok. Therefore I'm left with a full root directory but not knowing
> what's occupying all that space.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 20-01-02 at 15:45
* john-paul delaney said
> Thanks, I appreciate your help...
>
> I tried the shutdown being the safer (read easier) of the two, the filesystem
> checked out ok. Therefore I'm left with a full root directory but not kno
Thanks, I appreciate your help...
I tried the shutdown being the safer (read easier) of the two, the filesystem
checked out ok. Therefore I'm left with a full root directory but not knowing
what's occupying all that space.
I had moved off some directories but still there's no improvement (mc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think 'shutdown -rF now' might help.
* On 20-01-02 at 14:33
* Duncan Hill said
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, john-paul delaney wrote:
>
> > "Running e2fsck on a mounted filesystem may cause SEVERE filesystem damage.."
> >
> > Things are bad enough
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, john-paul delaney wrote:
> "Running e2fsck on a mounted filesystem may cause SEVERE filesystem damage.."
>
> Things are bad enough as it is, so I abort the command.
> However I would like to trigger a manual filesystem check... how can I do so?
man tune2fs
--
Sapere aude
Hello List...
fsck /dev/hda1 output warns:
"Running e2fsck on a mounted filesystem may cause SEVERE filesystem damage.."
Things are bad enough as it is, so I abort the command.
However I would like to trigger a manual filesystem check... how can I do so?
t
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:36:22PM -0600, BobH wrote:
> The machine is up and after a little reading I gather that I should not
> even think of running fsck on ext3 partitions. So.. now that I can boot
> the machine to a new monitor I am seeing for the first time a series of
> module
quick enough to force filesystem check. I'm
> using grub as my bootloader. How do I force fsck of the entire HD that is
> ext3 format?
Hi
I've found the best way to do this is
$ shutdown -Fr now
HTH
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explod
The machine is up and after a little reading I gather that I should not
even think of running fsck on ext3 partitions. So.. now that I can boot
the machine to a new monitor I am seeing for the first time a series of
module load errors scroll past, but when I review with 'dmesg' there
Hi,
I had a flat-panel monitor go out [dead as a doornail] and had to [? but
I did anyway] hard powerdown the PC. Upon rebooting I'm getting a lot of
errors but didn't respond quick enough to force filesystem check. I'm
using grub as my bootloader. How do I force fsck of the
To use fsck you login as root then type fsck/dev then type the name you have
assigned for your
primary hard drive setting that is hda eg. fsck/dev/hda6(depends on what you
have assigned for your
primary partition where linux is installed).
- Original Message -
From: Pieter De Wit <[EM
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Pieter De Wit wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> Yes I am Afrikaans :) Take it you are from South Africa ?
yes, but emmigrated to the US in '86.
> Back to the topic...How do I get fsck to fix the files, from what I can
> remeber it only does a check of t
Hello Charles,
Yes I am Afrikaans :) Take it you are from South Africa ?
Back to the topic...How do I get fsck to fix the files, from what I can
remeber it only does a check of the files. As for the backup, I don't have
any since it's not a mission critical system (only a proxy serv
Hoe gaan dit Pieter?
You will most likely need to make a trip to the site, or instruct someone
there how to do this.
You need to boot off a rescue floppy or cdrom, and run fsck on that
partition.
It may fix the problems, and it may not. I have had a situation
where the file corruption occured
Hello Guys and Gals,
I have a curropted / part. The system doesn't want to boot, and its at my
remote site. I have had this happen before...What can I do to fix this ?
Thanks,
Pieter De Wit
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lis
t: Saturday, January 27, 2001 8:07 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: 'fsck' on a mounted partition
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Chuck Carson wrote:
>
> Is there a way to safely run 'fsck' on a mounted partition? Under Solaris
> you can do this by refferin
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Chuck Carson wrote:
>
> Is there a way to safely run 'fsck' on a mounted partition? Under Solaris
> you can do this by reffering to /dev/rdsk/ and not worry about
> pear shaping anything (I could not find anything resembling this in RH's
> dev
Is there a way to safely run 'fsck' on a mounted partition? Under Solaris
you can do this by reffering to /dev/rdsk/ and not worry about
pear shaping anything (I could not find anything resembling this in RH's
device tree). I have several hard hit web servers with /var patition g
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:55:42AM -0800, D. W. Piper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| We had to reboot the system last night, and on restart fsck failed for
| the RAID device with the error message:
| Block bitmap for group 256 is not in group
| followed by
| /dev/rd/c0d2p1: Unex
es.
We had to reboot the system last night, and on restart fsck failed for
the RAID device with the error message:
Block bitmap for group 256 is not in group
followed by
/dev/rd/c0d2p1: Unexpected inconsistency, run fsck manually
Running fsck manually produced the error message:
e2
The last two times fsck has run (automatically every 20th time I boot
up) it has done some work on the root file system on the /tmp
directory. Why is it needing to work on the /tmp directory with the
following messages noted and is there something I need to do to correct
something so that fsck
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 08:00:57AM -0400, Ward William E PHDN wrote:
> I've got a similar thing happening to a PPro 200 running RH 6.1
> The machine is constantly bellyaching about crash this bad inodes
> that... memtest86 says Nada... nothing wrong with the system. If
> you can eventually figur
if under warranty, just as soon not have the hassle (unless
>necessary).
See badblocks(8) and the options to fsck(8) and e2fsck(8) for mapping out
bad blocks on the drive.
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
[EMAIL PROTECTE
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: recipient.list.not.shown; @nswcphdn.navy.mil
>Subject: Re: umounting / for fsck
>
>
>On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:12:55AM -0500, Bill Carlson wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
>> >
>> > Apr 30 04:24:43 localhost k
il
Subject: Re: umounting / for fsck
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:12:55AM -0500, Bill Carlson wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> >
> > Apr 30 04:24:43 localhost kernel: EXT2-fs warning (device ide0(3,4)):
> > ext2_free_inode: bit already cleared for inode 191777
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 12:55:29PM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Mon, 01 May 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I'll give that a shot. Curious that e2fsck does not want to
> > fix this (at least permaneantly), and seems to be the same inodes
> > everytime.
> >
> Perhaps it's a flaky driv
On Mon, 01 May 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'll give that a shot. Curious that e2fsck does not want to
> fix this (at least permaneantly), and seems to be the same inodes
> everytime.
>
Perhaps it's a flaky drive
John
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubs
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:12:55AM -0500, Bill Carlson wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> >
> > Apr 30 04:24:43 localhost kernel: EXT2-fs warning (device ide0(3,4)):
> > ext2_free_inode: bit already cleared for inode 191777
>
> Hal,
>
> I've seen errors like these before, 2 or 3
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:43:34PM -0500, David Talkington wrote:
> >
> > Would passing the "read-only" option to the kernel at the LILO: prompt
> > have the desired effect?
>
> Actually I am a little worried about some disk errors I have gotten,
> and a
On Mon, 01 May 2000, David Talkington wrote:
> Would passing the "read-only" option to the kernel at the LILO: prompt
> have the desired effect?
>
Dunno, it might.
John
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
y cleared for inode 191777
> :On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> :> Trying to fsck my root partition on a running system, and I am now
> :> consistently getting:
> :>
> :> #init 1
> :> (appears to go alright ... )
> :> #umount -a
&
Would passing the "read-only" option to the kernel at the LILO: prompt
have the desired effect?
-d
John Aldrich wrote:
:On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
:> Trying to fsck my root partition on a running system, and I am now
:> consistently getting:
:>
:> #ini
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 07:44:01PM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> > Trying to fsck my root partition on a running system, and I am now
> > consistently getting:
> >
> > #init 1
> > (appears to go alright ... )
> >
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Trying to fsck my root partition on a running system, and I am now
> consistently getting:
>
> #init 1
> (appears to go alright ... )
> #umount -a
> mount: / device busy
>
> (or similar). Trying
>
> #mount -n -o
Trying to fsck my root partition on a running system, and I am now
consistently getting:
#init 1
(appears to go alright ... )
#umount -a
mount: / device busy
(or similar). Trying
#mount -n -o remount,ro /
also fails with same error. What is keeping this busy? Extremely few
processes
: recipient.list.not.shown; @nswcphdn.navy.mil
Subject: Re: Non-fsck disk repair tools?
All that RPM bashing for nothing :)
Have you tried running e2fsck by hand on the partiton(s)? I once had a
machine that did that to me, but once I fscked it by hand, it was fixed.
See /usr/src/linux/Documentati
database get
> corrupted,
> but the filesystem has become corrupted. I can create files, write to them,
> etc.,
> but I cannot create new directories. I've never seen anything like that.
> I've
> tried rebooting, thinking it was some kind of transient error, and f
rupted. I can create files, write to them,
etc.,
but I cannot create new directories. I've never seen anything like that.
I've
tried rebooting, thinking it was some kind of transient error, and fsck has
detected
errors on the disk... repeatedly. Every time I've rebooted, even if I
r
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 12:38:22PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
> I posted a couple of messages about Redhat 6.0 and it's runing of fsck
> after a power fail the otehr day. Never did get a reply.
This is of course normal.
> Could someone please give me some
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
