they set for subscriptions of Fedora
systemsand the choice of apt-get or
yum for 3rd-party free repositories. Personally, I like apt-get cause I find it easy
to use, but Up2date is probably
the best bet all around concidering it isn't necessarily good to have to wate for a
3rd-party repository to pi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:02:23 -0700, Mike McMullen wrote:
> Does anyone have an idea when the demo accounts are no longer functional?
Where did you read that it would happen?
- --
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)
> Up until Monday Up2Date was free for filling out a questionaire every
> two months. The $60 provided you with convenience and earlier access
> to binary downloads and free binary downloads of RHEL.
>
> Up2Date Demo
> Up until Monday Up2Date was free for filling out a questionaire every
> two months. The $60 provided you with convenience and earlier access to
> binary downloads and free binary downloads of RHEL.
>
> Up2Date Demo was free for 2 months for each installation with a unique
> email address. At th
Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:59:39PM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
>> I know it's a lot, but if someone could kernelize it for me, I'd be
>> really happy.
>
> Read the FAQ at http://rhl.redhat.com.
>
Actually I was just there reading what it said, but it mostly looks to
me like typical
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:59:39PM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> I know it's a lot, but if someone could kernelize it for me, I'd be
> really happy.
Read the FAQ at http://rhl.redhat.com.
Everything beyond what's at the link above is pure speculation. There
is even confusion as to whether or not up
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:37:42 -0400
> "Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Up until Monday Up2Date was free for filling out a questionaire every
> > two months. The $60 provided you with convenience and earlier access to
> > binary downloads and free binary downloads of RHEL.
> >
> > Up2Date Dem
than to attract financial support from those of us willing and able
>> to pay the $50 - 60 per year.
>>
>> That's my $.02 worth
>>
>
> Hey Buck,
>
> You'll get _at least_ the functional equivalent of up2date with
> Fedora. apt-get and yum access
>
> That's my $.02 worth
>
Hey Buck,
You'll get _at least_ the functional equivalent of up2date with Fedora.
apt-get and yum access is already part of the Fedora Project. But RedHat
will not be maintaining updates as long as they were for previous
offerings or making any SL
48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)
Marc Adler wrote:
>Let me get this straight: I paid RH for update support
>for a year on two machines when I could've gotten the exact same thing
>for free?
>
>
Yes, that's correct.
Thanks for helping
Marc Adler wrote:
Let me get this straight: I paid RH for update support
for a year on two machines when I could've gotten the exact same thing
for free?
Yes, that's correct.
Thanks for helping support Redhat, a company who has done a lot of good
work for us all. I did my part by buying a bo
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:37:02PM -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> I've followed this thread with interest, especially the references to
> yum and apt-get. Let me get this straight: I paid RH for update support
> for a year on two machines when I could've gotten the exact same thi
I've followed this thread with interest, especially the references to
yum and apt-get. Let me get this straight: I paid RH for update support
for a year on two machines when I could've gotten the exact same thing
for free?
--
Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:33:59 -1000
Linux 2.4.20-20.9
Mutt 1.4.1
On 08 Sep 2003 21:50:18 -0500
Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 19:35, TK wrote:
> > Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> >
> > > I want to hold back certain packages prior to running apt-get upgrade.
> > > Can't seem to find the
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 19:35, TK wrote:
> Curtis Vaughan wrote:
>
> > I want to hold back certain packages prior to running apt-get upgrade.
> > Can't seem to find the answer in the man pages.
> >
> > Curtis
>
> Latest Debian APT has a feature called pin
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I want to hold back certain packages prior to running apt-get upgrade.
Can't seem to find the answer in the man pages.
Curtis
Latest Debian APT has a feature called pinning:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-apt-get#s-pin
However, if you are using apt-g
I want to hold back certain packages prior to running apt-get upgrade.
Can't seem to find the answer in the man pages.
Curtis
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 17:50, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > I don't know if apt-get gets you non-Red Hat apps though. Never
> > checked. Never needed to.
>
> Yes it does. freshrpms.net and other apt repositories provide quite a
> wealth of otherwise difficult to install packa
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 13:34, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
> > up2date gives you updates very fast (mirrors update quite a few days after
> > the update is availably through up2date).
> > apt-get is great for getting aplic
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 17:34, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
> > up2date gives you updates very fast (mirrors update quite a few days
> > after the update is availably through up2date).
> > apt-get is great for getting aplication
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
> up2date gives you updates very fast (mirrors update quite a few days after
> the update is availably through up2date).
> apt-get is great for getting aplications that you don't have installed!
up2date is gre
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 17:12, Tom Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Anyone know if there are any problems with using up2date and apt-get
> together? Do they step on each others toes? Could you possibly use
> up2date to keep up on the system and use apt to just install new
> packages?
Hi all,
Anyone know if there are any problems with using up2date and apt-get
together? Do they step on each others toes? Could you possibly use
up2date to keep up on the system and use apt to just install new
packages?
TIA
--
Tom Wilson
Reg. Linux user# 199331
--
redhat-list mailing
.
But, is there a source yet for RH9 when using apt-get?
thanks
=
Winning an argument on the internet is like getting 1st place at the Special Olympics
*
GAIM ID: cmmiller1973
Please forgive if this has been asked, but I am behind
in my RH Digest due to the volume.
But, is there a source yet for RH9 when using apt-get?
thanks
=
Winning an argument on the internet is like getting 1st place at the Special Olympics
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 19:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm thinking about converting to Red Hat from Mandrake. One extremely
> useful tool in Mandrake, was "urpmi" which is somewhat like apt-get from
> Debian (or apt-rpm from . Both tools allow easy in
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Spend some time examining the rpmdb-redhat package and the
Thanks, I will!
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (en)
Homepage: http://www.iso-top.biz | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iso-top.biz - Die günstige Art an Lin
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:29:48PM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> As all the urpmi tools, urpmf only uses the urpmi database and thus also
> takes non-installed packages into account. But apt also can do this.
Install the rpmdb-redhat package and rpm will know about every package
shipped wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:29:48 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > rpm -qf /usr/include/time.h
>
> [askwar@teich askwar]$ rpm -qf /foo/bar
> Fehler: file /foo/bar: No such file or directory
>
> ;)
>
> As all the urpmi tools, urpmf only uses the urpmi d
I've been having really good luck with the apt-get rpm package.
Check it out here:
http://apt-rpm.tuxfamily.org/
There are other databases out there to get more up to date information,
just look around.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Get apt from http://freshrpms.net/
Ah, good to know.
rpm -qf /usr/include/time.h
[askwar@teich askwar]$ rpm -qf /foo/bar
Fehler: file /foo/bar: No such file or directory
;)
As all the urpmi tools, urpmf only uses the urpmi database and thus also
takes non-installed
Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
I'm not saying anything about whether it's good, or bad. Just warning
you to take a look.
I'm actually converting the other way, from Mandrake, back to Redhat.
That's the way I also wanted to go - Mandrake -> Redhat. Although I
think I really need a tool like urpmi (or wh
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 05:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> I'm thinking about converting to Red Hat from Mandrake. One extremely
> useful tool in Mandrake, was "urpmi" which is somewhat like apt-get from
> Debian (or apt-rpm from . Both tools allow easy installation of
other way, from Mandrake, back to Redhat.
Although, I will miss urpmi. Great tool! It saves you from "Dependancy
Hell".
Ric
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello.
I'm thinking about converting to Red Hat from Mandrake. One extremely
useful tool in Mandrake, was "urpmi" which is s
Hello.
I'm thinking about converting to Red Hat from Mandrake. One extremely
useful tool in Mandrake, was "urpmi" which is somewhat like apt-get from
Debian (or apt-rpm from . Both tools allow easy installation of RPMs.
So, if I wanted to install proftpd, I'd type:
urpmi
format due to volume of traffic on this
> > list.
> >
> > But, did u run it as root or as a end user?
> >
> > I believe that only root can run apt-get.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > -Chris
> >
> >
> > --- [EMAIL PRO
At a command prompt, type:
su -
This gives us root will all environmental settings.
Then try running apt-get and see what happens.
-Chris
>I have run the command again in root ( not as su). It
>seems to start
>then it
>stops with this fuller error message:
I ran the command again as roo and not as su. A more detailed error message.
"apt-get rpm/rpmListparser.cc 240: string rpmListparser: archeture ( ) :
Assertion 'res' failed"
Does anybody have a clue as to what this means
thank you paul taylor
--
redhat-list mailing lis
I have run the command again in root ( not as su). It seems to start then it
stops with this fuller error message:
"apt-getrpm/rpmListparser.cc 240: string rpmListparser: Archetechure ( ) :
Assertion 'res' failed"
Does anybody have any idea what this means??
paul taylor
--
redhat-list maili
On Mié 20 Nov 2002 17:05, paul taylor wrote:
> I have redhat 8.0. I am trying to sue apt-get to keep my box up to date
> the distro only has 7.3. I added 8.0 to the command line. the error
> message: "Assertion 'res' failed"
>
> why is this happening and how
Here is a good website that I point alot of folks to
about this apt-get
http://apt-rpm.tuxfamily.org/
thanks
-chris
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am bad, it does have an 8.o section, sorry...
Gary wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, 9:45 PM, you put
fo
I am bad, it does have an 8.o section, sorry...
Gary wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, 9:45 PM, you put forth, in part, about "apt-get failure":
P> rpm-src ftp://apt-rpm.tuxfamily.org/apt redhat-8.0-i386/redhat os
P> rpm-src ftp://apt-rpm.tuxfamily.org/apt re
The tux family site does not have a 8.0 directory..
CM Miller wrote:
Please forgive if this has already been answered, I
get the digest format due to volume of traffic on this
list.
But, did u run it as root or as a end user?
I believe that only root can run apt-get.
thanks
go..
Paul Taylor wrote:
I have redhat 8.0. I am trying to sue apt-get to keep my box up to date
the distro only has 7.3. I added 8.0 to the command line. the error
message:
"Assertion 'res' failed"
why is this happening and how do I fix it??
thank you
--
http://www.win
Please forgive if this has already been answered, I
get the digest format due to volume of traffic on this
list.
But, did u run it as root or as a end user?
I believe that only root can run apt-get.
thanks
-Chris
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I want to use the apt-get feature to k
Hi Paul,
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, 9:45 PM, you put forth, in part, about "apt-get
failure":
P> rpm-src ftp://apt-rpm.tuxfamily.org/apt redhat-8.0-i386/redhat os
P> rpm-src ftp://apt-rpm.tuxfamily.org/apt redhat-updates-8.0/redhat os
P> rpm-src ftp://apt-rpm.tuxfa
Gary I made the changes at the bottom. Redhat 8.0 sources.list only
has 7.3
I changed it to 8.0.
it isn't working. Does this give a clue??
thank you
paul
# This list is restricted to Red Hat distributions.
#
# signed repositories can have a [sigtag]
# if you remove it, no digital signature
Hi Paul,
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, 7:39 AM, you put forth, in part, about "apt-get
failure":
P> I want to use the apt-get feature to keep Redhat 8.0 in tip top shape.
P> the sources.list file only has references to 7.3 and earlier.
P> I added 8.0 figuring there had t
I want to use the apt-get feature to keep Redhat 8.0 in tip top shape.
the sources.list file only has references to 7.3 and earlier. I added 8.0
figuring there had to be a mistake that the elves did not fix. The error
message is as follows:
" Assertion 'res' failed"
A
I have redhat 8.0. I am trying to sue apt-get to keep my box up to date
the distro only has 7.3. I added 8.0 to the command line. the error message:
"Assertion 'res' failed"
why is this happening and how do I fix it??
thank you
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mai
I have redhat 8.0. I am trying to sue apt-get to keep my box up to date
the distro only has 7.3. I added 8.0 to the command line. the error message:
"Assertion 'res' failed"
why is this happening and how do I fix it??
thank you
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mai
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 06:59, Roger Schmeits wrote:
>
> How does one do a kernel upgrade using apt-get?
apt-get install kernel
apt will give you a list of available kernel packages, appended with
version numbers. Pick one of these, and use the whole string as the
name of the packages yo
How does one do a kernel upgrade using apt-get?
I was digging in the archives of apt-get but did not quite get the
syntax of parameters.
Anybody know?
roger
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 12:57, Ed Wilts wrote:
>
> This isn't always guaranteed to work. If package A splits into A and B,
> and A now has a dependency on B that it didn't before, rpm -F will not
> catch it. up2date will.
>
> Before you say this is very theoretical, let me point out that I've se
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:45:11AM -0500, Roger Schmeits wrote:
: I have been trying to install apt-get (RH7.2) using the following rpms.
: This is a new install with no updates from RH.
:
: *
: apt-0.3.19cnc55-fr8.i386.rpm
: apt-devel-0.3.19cnc55-fr8.i386.rpm
I am amazed at what happens when a person reads the man pages.
this command works like a charm.
wget -r --level=1
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/7.2/en/os/i386/
one question -- what about md5sum?
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:27, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:16, Rog
Do you have an good suggestions on how I could yank all those updates
down a some odd ball hours?
***
wget -r ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/7.2/
***
I am assuming some type of script running in cron?
Roger
Time to go home for the weekend -- thanks for the info.!!!
On Fri,
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:16, Roger Schmeits wrote:
> Where does redhat keep all its updates? If I want to have a machine to
> keep current updates where does a person find them??
>
I use
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates
Bret
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMA
Where does redhat keep all its updates? If I want to have a machine to
keep current updates where does a person find them??
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 13:58, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 13:19, Roger Schmeits wrote:
> >
> > version 4.0.3
> >
>
> go get the updates from redhat's site
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:58:25PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> I have never used the up2date service but it seems like a good thing for
> a single machine. I keep a directory on the lan with all the updates dn
> go a rpm -F on it occationally from each machine on the network.
This isn't always
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 09:45, Roger Schmeits wrote:
> I have been trying to install apt-get (RH7.2) using the following rpms.
> This is a new install with no updates from RH.
You grabbed the wrong one. Go to http://apt.freshrpms.net/
The third link is to apt for "non-updated Red Ha
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 13:19, Roger Schmeits wrote:
>
> version 4.0.3
>
go get the updates from redhat's site or a mirror. There is an updated
version out there.
seems like you eill need popt and gnorpm updates too IIRC. There are
quite a few updates for 7.2. I would be a good idea to upgrad
version 4.0.3
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 12:40, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 11:45, Roger Schmeits wrote:
> > I have been trying to install apt-get (RH7.2) using the following rpms.
> > This is a new install with no updates from RH.
> >
> > *
>
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 11:45, Roger Schmeits wrote:
> I have been trying to install apt-get (RH7.2) using the following rpms.
> This is a new install with no updates from RH.
>
> *
> apt-0.3.19cnc55-fr8.i386.rpm
> apt-devel-0.3.19cnc55-fr8.i386.rpm
>
-Original Message-
From: Roger Schmeits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apt-get install
I have been trying to install apt-get (RH7.2) using the following rpms.
This is a new install with no updates from RH.
*
apt
I have been trying to install apt-get (RH7.2) using the following rpms.
This is a new install with no updates from RH.
*
apt-0.3.19cnc55-fr8.i386.rpm
apt-devel-0.3.19cnc55-fr8.i386.rpm
**
These are the error messages that I am getting...
[root@localhost root]# rpm
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 14/07/2002 at 1:23 AM Jesse Angell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gregausit/redhat-list] wrote:
>Is it possible to install apt-get on a redhat 7.1 system?
>If so where do I get the source code, or rpm?
>
www.freshrpms.net
Regards
Greg Wrigh
Is it possible to install apt-get on a redhat 7.1
system?
If so where do I get the source code, or
rpm?
--Jesse
AngellPalaceUnlimited.com#1 Palace Host
Ya, I guess this was the crown jewel for Debian for
awhile, and now any system that is RPM based has this
options.
Do they have anything for .tgz files? I still like
these more than the RPMs.
Check out the URL:
http://freshrpms.net/apt/
thanks
-Chris
=
*
een different versions (I
cannot install packages packed with rpm-4 with rpm-3.05) I wonder how does
apt-get fit into this scenario...?
Peter
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
yesterday there were some folks looking for this; finally found my
bookmark:
http://freshmeat.net/news/2000/12/02/975819599.html
--
Michael Jinks, IB // Technical Entity // Saecos Corporation
"No one speaks English and everything's broken." -- T. Waits
"Tom Waits would have made a decent sysad
71 matches
Mail list logo
