Okay, I'm a bit behind on this discussion because of the lovely OS that is WinBloze and it's billions of holes. I'd easily say one hole per dollar of Mr. Gates net worth.
Let me get this straight, RH started the Fedora project to separate the 'free' ISO builds that are downloadable from it's Enterprise offerings? In turn they won't fully support it with up2date style updates? And it won't be called RH 10? Or will it? Other than up2date/support issues, what's really the difference between what is (with Fedora) and what was (with previous RH releases of non-Enterprise offerings)? I'm a die hard RH user. Moved to RH from Slackware when RH was at 4.2. I've got no problem paying $60/year for up2date access, etc, but what's this about the $300 plus I've been seeing? Will this list be moved to Enterprise only questions? I know it's a lot, but if someone could kernelize it for me, I'd be really happy. Sean Estabrooks wrote: >> >> Hopefully Fedora will pick it up from there. To me, it would make >> sense that Fedora picks up the up2date program if for no other reason >> than to attract financial support from those of us willing and able >> to pay the $50 - 60 per year. >> >> That's my $.02 worth >> > > Hey Buck, > > You'll get _at least_ the functional equivalent of up2date with > Fedora. apt-get and yum access is already part of the Fedora Project. > But RedHat will not be maintaining updates as long as they were for > previous offerings or making any SLA commitments. If this is good > enough for your needs, you'll save the money you were previously > spending each year. > > Sean. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
