You need to check out DynDNS.org. I have a friend doing this very thing.
http://www.dyndns.org
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: Dali Islam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: redhat list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: How to Setup
Also, forgot to mention, I use HORDE and IMP as my webmail interface
http://www.perfectnetusa.com/mail also a product that I recommend
highly.a little rocky to setup at first, but once I got the hang of it,
the modular"ability" of it is very cool.Mine now looks pretty
ove is http://google.com/linux
Brett
- Original Message -
From: "Dali Islam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "redhat list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:38 PM
Subject: How to Setup Mailserver??
> My domain name is bangali.info
Dali Islam wrote:
My domain name is bangali.info. I am hosting that site
on somebodies server. I want to have a mail server
running on my linux box(red hat 9.0) at home and
send/receive my mail from my own server.
I am behind a router and I have cable modem for my
internet connection which runs on
My domain name is bangali.info. I am hosting that site
on somebodies server. I want to have a mail server
running on my linux box(red hat 9.0) at home and
send/receive my mail from my own server.
I am behind a router and I have cable modem for my
internet connection which runs on Dynamic IP addres
I am sorry but I haven't received your mail
directed to me so I'll disregard any information from the mail that I'm viewing
now from mr. Paul Rushing.
I do believe that load balancing is a
false problem for a network made out of 50 computers. I have seen LANs made out
of 100 comps and served
oblem is I don't the option to set an image directory on any of the
> > tabs. Does anyone know what that option will read and which one of the
> > tabs will give me the option? Or do I need to setup at the Operating
> > System level before I start the setup program?
>
> On
Does anyone know what that option will read and which one of the tabs
> will give me the option? Or do I need to setup at the Operating System level
> before I start the setup program?
On the HD Settings tab
There should be a box labeled "Path:". You put the directory path
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 03:19 pm, John P Verel wrote:
> On 10/01/03 14:15 -0400, damovand wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I am using X-CD-Roast GUI to set it up. When I press SETUP button I go
> > to a page with five tabs. On the first tab both my CD-ROM and CD-RW are
> &
On 10/01/03 14:15 -0400, damovand wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am using X-CD-Roast GUI to set it up. When I press SETUP button I go to a
> page with five tabs. On the first tab both my CD-ROM and CD-RW are listed on
> the first tab. But going forward on the subsequent tabs (C
Hello all,
I am using X-CD-Roast GUI to set it up. When I press SETUP button I go to a
page with five tabs. On the first tab both my CD-ROM and CD-RW are listed on
the first tab. But going forward on the subsequent tabs (CD Setting/HD
Setting/ Miscellaneous/ and Options) there'
eed to know from me ?Pls let me Know, I will try to
> explain.
>
squid sounds like a good idea. I'd setup squid with transparent proxying,
along with NAT for other traffic. Since your ISP link is 128K, I see no
purpose in dividing your lan into multiple segments. The 128K link wi
. Weiss
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
>
> > > This is not quite always the case. Ethernet's CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense
> > > Multiple Access with Collision Detection) was invented during
> > This is not quite always the case. Ethernet's CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense
> > Multiple Access with Collision Detection) was invented during a time when
> > a hub or bus were the primary method of connection. Collision was indeed
> > a problem then, and keeping the LAN small was a way to ensure net
Know, I will try to explain.
Thanks
Harish
- Original Message -
From:
Crucificator
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:04
PM
Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion
Needed
Hy Harish,
1. Why NAT and Squid? You should use NAT
OR
]
Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion
Needed
Thank you Ben/Bjorn for your responses,well the
truth is that I will be swtiching from a Windows Environment, to Linux,my
exising server is a PIII with 1GB of RAM.
All the 50 Nodes are connected thru three
Cisco 2500 Switches, so colission may as
Setup Opinion
Needed
In all Bjorn is
probably correct depending on the traffic, but I think he is describing 50
users and not 50 computers, because the problem occurs with the amount of
traffic on the network, that is when the collisions will
occur.
-Original
if i am
wrong, I dont want complications as well.
Thanks
Harish
- Original Message -
From:
Enroth
Björn
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:00
PM
Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion
Needed
Harish,
The Linux box is
absolutely
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Enroth Björn
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003
9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion
Needed
Harish,
The Linux box is
absolutely able to handle 50 clients. In fact it would have to any way with the
second option. I also saw someone
Hy Harish,
1. Why NAT and Squid? You should use NAT OR
Squid. If you have say a internet cafe where the users will want to use every
software that needs every port you should use pure transparent NAT. On the other
hand if you want things a little more tightened you should use
Squid.
2. On
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Benjamin J. Weiss
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
>
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Otto Haliburton
30 september 2003 10:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion
Needed
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for ar
advice,but you think that it will be able to handle all the requests from 50
odd terminals effictively? Also any suggestion on the additional Host IPs that
I have been
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> Again the problem is not the 50 ip addresses, but how they are connected.
> If they are all in the same area you have the problem of collisions and the
> problem of increased traffic due to updating the routing tables for all 50
> nodes. Where as if y
not solve the routing table problem.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Paul Rushing
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed
>
> >
specs on the linux box, so it's difficult to say if
that machine will handle the traffic for 50 clients or not.. Linux can
certainly do it, if you have a reasonable box with adequate ram this setup
should not be a problem. To utilize your extra ip addresses you can
assign them as aliases to et
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:44
AM
Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion
Needed
Remember that
Ethernet is a collision based system i.e. the more collisions the less
performance. Hence large networks are typically have low performance
because
hence fewer collisions, also there are fewer route table
updates. So while the second is more complicated it is actually a better
setup. Token ring would be better for your option 1. That’s my 0.02
cents.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
: Network Setup Opinion
Needed
Hi Ed,
Thank you for taking interest in my queries,I
need a suggestion from you on the way I should set up my network,I had posted
this mssg on the mailing list but had no response,hence I am mailing this to
you,your suggestion will be highly appreciated
Hi Ed,
Thank you for taking interest in my queries,I
need a suggestion from you on the way I should set up my network,I had posted
this mssg on the mailing list but had no response,hence I am mailing this to
you,your suggestion will be highly appreciated.
Hi All,I have set up a Linux Box wi
Hi All,
A big thanks to all of them on the RH network for
helping me in my day to day problems with Linux.I had succesfuly set up my Linux
box internet server with NAT/MASQ and used the default firewall2.4 script
thats there on the tldp.org site,everything is superb and all my application
dedicated Ips that I am not utilising at
all, is there a better way to utilise these in the NAT?I will be very
greatful?Pls dont suggest me a Webserver as its a hassel to
maintain.
Thanks and Regards
Harish
Network Setup options.ppt
Description: MS-Powerpoint presentation
how i can use uucp as like i use in solaris
that is : i can put a string "fetex Any TCP 1006 202.41.75.45" in
/etc/uucp/systems file ,and when i do " cu fetex " it will take me to
tcp port 1006 of 202.41.75.45 over ethernet
how i can accomplish the same in linux ,i use RH8 and Taylor uucp
any
At 11:01 9/4/2003 -1000, you wrote:
> An Epson printer is connected to that host computer,
How? Parallel or USB? Configured how? LPD or CUPS? Give details.
> I tried to set it up as a remote printer on another computer.
How? Details!
> Also, what are the actual configuration files
> involved in t
* Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-01 17:11]:
> I've setup a LAN with one computer set up as a file server using NFS and
> it works fine. An Epson printer is connected to that host computer, and
> I tried to set it up as a remote printer on another computer. However,
Islam wrote:
> Anyone knows!
>
> As I am new in Linux, How do I setup path in Linux for users?
>
> Thanks
> ..
> Khademul Islam ( Dali )
> Software Engineer -- Integrated Supply Chain
> Customer Solution Center
> IBM Roches
Anyone knows!
As I am new in Linux, How do I setup path in Linux for users?
Thanks
..
Khademul Islam ( Dali )
Software Engineer -- Integrated Supply Chain
Customer Solution Center
IBM Rochester
Tel: 507 253 8281
Fax: 507 253 8243
E-mail: [EMAIL
I've setup a LAN with one computer set up as a file server using NFS and
it works fine. An Epson printer is connected to that host computer, and
I tried to set it up as a remote printer on another computer. However,
on the "Queue type" tab in printconf-gui the Path: line reads
/
make tidy
make makefiles CCARGS="-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -I/usr/include/sasl" \
AUXLIBS="-L/usr/lib -lsasl2"
make upgrade (assumes existing postfix installation)
create /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf
pwcheck_method: auxprop
sasldb2 must have r/w permissions to Postfix
Create user_name/password entri
ge: http://www.robbe.com
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Peram's List
Gesendet: Montag, 11. August 2003 04:32
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Help with sendmail setup
Hi,
I've a Redhat 9 box and an application running which g
Hi,
I've a Redhat 9 box and an application running which generates mail. I'm
using the the default mail program from the OS (Sendmail). I've been
able to send mail to yahoo but not to my domain to any mail servers
which check for the validity of the orginating server.
The mails are generated of th
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 09:12, elechen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have two PC here. PC1 is used as dhcp server and PC2 as client.
> PC1 have one NIC and config as eth0; PC2 have two NICs and
> named as eth0 and eth1.
>
> I just want to install Rh9 via PXE and kickstart file and PC2 eth1 on PC2. So dhcp
Hello,
I have two PC here. PC1 is used as dhcp server and PC2 as client.
PC1 have one NIC and config as eth0; PC2 have two NICs and
named as eth0 and eth1.
I just want to install Rh9 via PXE and kickstart file and PC2 eth1 on PC2. So dhcp
will get PC2 subnet,gateway and netmask info by sending
Helo!
I'm trying to setup the Bridge on Basic Setup following the How To:
http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/HOWTO/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/set-up-the-bridge.php3
I've two NICs on Red Hat Linux 9, and, after setup I only ping 192.168.1.45 (the IP that I associated with mybridge) bu
have ip forwarding enabled? On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Judson S. Nascimento wrote:> Helo!> I'm trying to setup the Bridge on Basic Setup following the How To:> http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/HOWTO/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/set-up-the-bridge.php3> > I've two NICs on Red Hat Linu
I vaguely seem to remember that you need to enable ip forwarding, but I don't see
it mentioned anywhere in this howto. Do you have ip forwarding enabled?
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Judson S. Nascimento wrote:
> Helo!
> I'm trying to setup the Bridge on Basic Setup following th
Helo!
I'm trying to setup the Bridge on Basic Setup following the How To:
http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/HOWTO/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/set-up-the-bridge.php3
I've two NICs on Red Hat Linux 9, and, after setup I only ping 192.168.1.45 (the IP that I associated with mybridge) bu
d non local
> email to another server, I regularly got a spam relayed out through
> SMTP2. Once I close the relaying and had SMTP2 be the only recipient
> of mail like:
>
> originator -> SMTP2
>
> the spam relaying stopped
>
> So here is a description of my setup that h
pient
> of mail like:
>
> originator -> SMTP2
>
> the spam relaying stopped
>
> So here is a description of my setup that had the open relay going:
>
> System 1
> -name: msvr1
> -accepts email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -relays all mail with domain name thisdomain.c
Use mailertable
---
Trond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Devon Harding - GTHLA
Sent: 28. juli 2003 17:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SpamAssissin Setup?
How do I get Sendmail to Relay/Forward all mail to a particular IP
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 12:43, MKlinke wrote:
> > be careful of this setup. You can turn on an open relay if your not
> > configured correctly.
> >
> > Originator -> SMTP1 -> relay -> SMTP2
> >
> > What can happen is that because SMTP accepts relays f
>
> > # make
> >
> > Obviously, you need to substitute mydomain.com with your domain
> > name. The left and right brackets following the : ARE NEEDED to
> > stop MX lookups.
>
> be careful of this setup. You can turn on an open relay if your not
> configur
your domain name. The
> left and right brackets following the : ARE NEEDED to stop MX lookups.
>
be careful of this setup. You can turn on an open relay if your not
configured correctly.
Originator -> SMTP1 -> relay -> SMTP2
What can happen is that because SMTP accepts relays fr
Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
> How do I get Sendmail to Relay/Forward all mail to a particular IP
> address in my network?
>
use sendmail's mailertable feature. i.e.
# cd /etc/mail
# cat mailertable
mydomain.comesmtp:[ip or fqdn of internal mail server]
# make
Obviously, you need to subst
How do I get Sendmail to Relay/Forward all mail to a particular IP
address in my network?
-Devon
-Original Message-
From: Chris W. Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SpamAssissin Setup?
Devon Harding - GTHLA
> chkconfig does it for you. Xinetd services are the only thing (I've
> noticed) that this applies to.
>
> -Steve
>
While chkconfig does it the easiest way you can manually edit the specific
service within xinetd.d directory and then do a "service xinetd restart".
Gerry
--
redhat-list mailing
MAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:30 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Rehat 8 - How to Setup FTP ServerIt shows vsftp on when I did the chkconfig --listBut I still can't connect to the server thorugh !
ftp,
telnet, web, nothing - and I installed with firewall off... and I really d
it is enabled or not. To enable a service, do
> "chkconfig on". If it is xinetd based, it will change
> to "disabled" to "no" and restart xinetd for you. Naturally xinetd
> should also be enabled to run at boot "chkconfig --list xinetd".
>
> -Stev
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rehat 8 - How to Setup FTP Server
It shows vsftp on when I did the chkconfig --list
But I still can't connect to the server thorugh ftp, telnet, web, nothing - and I
installed with firewall off.
inetd for you. Naturally xinetdshould also be enabled to run at boot "chkconfig --list xinetd".-Steve-Original
Message-From: Real Cucumber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:58 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Rehat 8 - How to Setup FTP ServerDisable is
chkconfig does it for you. Xinetd services are the only thing (I've
noticed) that this applies to.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rehat 8 - How to Setup FTP Serve
to "disabled" to "no" and restart xinetd for you. Naturally xinetd
> should also be enabled to run at boot "chkconfig --list xinetd".
>
> -Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Real Cucumber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursda
Real Cucumber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rehat 8 - How to Setup FTP Server
Disable is already set to no.
When I do:
service xinetd stop or start - it works
When I do:
service vsftpd stop or start - it says "unrecog
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Rehat 8 - How to Setup FTP Server
It won't let me... it just says I need to enable xinetd - but that is already enabled
Wendell MacKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
did you enable the vsftp service?
- Original Message -
From:
I concur. This the quickest and best setup you could use to filter out Spam.
I use it and Mailscanner/Spamassassin has filtered out almost 90% of the
Spam while also stopping the spread of possible infected e-mail attachments.
I owe a thank you to Michael W. for that perfect solution.
James D
Devon Harding - GTHLA <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:47 AM said:
> How can I setup Spamassassin to go in front of my Exchange Server then
> Tag spam messages and relay to the Exchange server. Is there easy
> tool to use?
This is pretty easy to do.
Y
On Thursday 24 July 2003 11:47, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
> How can I setup Spamassassin to go in front of my Exchange Server
> then Tag spam messages and relay to the Exchange server. Is there
> easy tool to use?
>
> _
> Devon Harding
> System Admini
How can I setup Spamassassin to go in front of my Exchange Server then
Tag spam messages and relay to the Exchange server. Is there easy tool
to use?
_
Devon Harding
System Administrator
Gilat Latin America
954-858-1600
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail is intended for the above
/
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Real CucumberSent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 7:24
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Rehat 8 - How
to Setup FTP Server
It won't let me... it just says I need to enable xinetd - but that is
al
PM
Subject: Rehat 8 - How to Setup FTP Server
Hi,
I'm a linux n00b and I've just installed a fresh server install of Redhat 8.
I see that it installed 2 FTP packages:
-vsftp (secure/full featured ftp)
-anonftp (anonymous/read only)
So I wanted to get vsftp working, however when
did you enable the vsftp service?
- Original Message -
From:
Real
Cucumber
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:10
PM
Subject: Rehat 8 - How to Setup FTP
Server
Hi,
I'm a linux n00b and I've just installed a fresh serv
e hard drive related to "vsftp"
If anyone has some kind of a user's guide or quick-start manual it would be appreciated.
I'd like to be able to setup user accounts and limit their access to specified directories etc... as well as use SSH FTP and normal FTP connectoins...
I recently set up a RedHat 9 box to test on our network and yesterday
resolved a printing issue. Now today I am trying to install the rdesktop
software but running up against a wall. First, the machine was set up
using the default option for Personal Desktop. Okay, here's what I'm doing
-
Ope
POST / HTTP/1.1
> > D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] ProcessIPPRequest: 5 status_code=1
> > D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] CloseClient() 5
> >
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 12:12:44 PM:
> >
> > > Yea
44 PM:
>
> > Yeah look in the "/etc/cups/printers.conf"
> > DeviceURI socket://192.168.1.226:9100/
> >
> > That's the URI for jetdirect card you should see something like that. Or
> try
> > http://127.0.0.1:631 from your web browser should brin
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared
> Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on
> an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the
> print queue just s
rote on 07/16/2003 12:12:44 PM:
> Yeah look in the "/etc/cups/printers.conf"
> DeviceURI socket://192.168.1.226:9100/
>
> That's the URI for jetdirect card you should see something like that. Or
try
> http://127.0.0.1:631 from your web browser should bring up the we
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Network printer setup with CUPS
I don't know what you mean by the right backend or the web front end to
CUPS. I am using the RedHat printer configuration gui from the GNOME men
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Network printer setup with CUPS
>
>
> I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers
(shared
> Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a H
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network printer setup with CUPS
I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared
Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on
an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the
print
I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared
Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on
an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the
print queue just shows unable to print, will retry in 15 seconds, and it
Jul 2003, John-Paul Delaney wrote:
> Hello List... I'm trying to setup bind9 on rh9. I get an error on startup of named
> - cannot open pid file /var/run/named.pid: Permission denied.
>
> However I want to write the pid to /var/run/named/named.pid instead (creating a
>
Hello List... I'm trying to setup bind9 on rh9. I get an error on startup of named -
cannot open pid file /var/run/named.pid: Permission denied.
However I want to write the pid to /var/run/named/named.pid instead (creating a named
directory) so I can give the named user read/write r
I would go with Postfix. It is the best mail server I've ever used. Very
secure. Also very fast.
Jon
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Håkon Eriksen wrote:
> >
> > Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >
> > > On that note, i want to do the same...
> > >
> > >
>
> Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > On that note, i want to do the same...
> >
> > are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set
> > up, and still reliable?
>
> You could take a look at qmail http://www.qmail.org/top.html
>
> It'
Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On that note, i want to do the same...
>
> are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set up, and
> still reliable?
>
> Anton
You could take a look at qmail http://www.qmail.org/top.html
It's not exact
standard. I haven't come around to
acrtually using it as my sendmail setup works Ok and I got to understand it
by now. Another argument for sendmail is it being a defacto standard in the
*nix world. Any unice flavour has sendmail.
However, it's a pig, some admin's are fed up with its s
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 22:14, Scarletdown wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong here?
>
> I'm trying to get a Linux box set up with Samba so I can share
> files with a pair of Win-98 systems and my FreeSCO router.
>
> Problem is, this system is not showing up in Network
> Neigh
On 16 Jun 2003 at 9:00, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> Scarletdown wrote:
>
> > Would rebooting both 98 machines help, perhaps?
>
> Possibly, you could also tell samba to be the master browser for the
> workgroup. That might help.
>
It did turn out to just be a matter of waiting. Not long after I
half Of Scarletdown
>>>Sent: Sunday, 15 June 2003 11:14
>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Subject: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference
>>>
>>>
>>>Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong here?
>>>
>>>I'm tr
ECTED]
Subject: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference
Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong here?
I'm trying to get a Linux box set up with Samba so I can share
files with a pair of Win-98 systems and my FreeSCO router.
Problem is, this system is not showing up
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference
>
>
> Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong here?
>
> I'm trying to get a Linux box set up with Samba so I can share
> files with a pair of Win-98 systems and my FreeSCO route
Hill, Benjamin W wrote:
What is the best method of setting up JabberD on Redhat?
I have got the source of JabberD, and am building that, but I had a thought
that there may be a more "Redhat" way...
You can try this package (one of mine):
http://www.dragonsdawn.net/ftp/dragonsdawn-packages/7.3/i386
You don't have a period between the 1 and 127 in your hosts.allow line
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scarletdown
Sent: Sunday, 15 June 2003 11:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference
Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong here?
I'm trying to get a Linux box set up with Samba so I can share
files with a pair of Win-98 systems and my FreeSCO router.
Problem is, this system is not showing up in Network
Neighborhood, only the 2 98 boxes and the router.
If it helps any,
-
From: Reuben D. Budiardja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Setup Shared Printer with Samba - guest can't see printers
Hello,
I am trying to set up my RH linux 7.3 as a print server using samba. I want
it
so that even guest user
Hello,
I am trying to set up my RH linux 7.3 as a print server using samba. I want it
so that even guest user that does not have an account in the linux machine
can print to it as well.
I read through the samba configuration from RH 7.3 manual in redhat website,
and looked at the Un-official
They are all Jabber packages, not the JabberD server...
Cheers,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Aróstegui Ramirez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2003 11:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: JabberD Setup on Redhat
Here there some rpm packages
http://rpmfind.net/linux
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 June 2003 10:48
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: JabberD Setup on Redhat
>
>
> What is the best method of setting up JabberD on
> Redhat?
>
> I have got the source of JabberD, and am building
> that, but I had a thought
> th
Why don't you get a rpm for RH9?
--- "Hill, Benjamin W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió: > What is the best method of setting up
JabberD on
> Redhat?
>
> I have got the source of JabberD, and am building
> that, but I had a thought
> that there may be a more "Redhat" way...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben
>
d.
Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Hill, Benjamin W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2003 10:48
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: JabberD Setup on Redhat
What is the best method of setting up JabberD on Redhat?
I have got the source of JabberD, and am building that, but I had a thoug
1 - 100 of 842 matches
Mail list logo
