> Well I thought of squid bcos of caching abilities,I am sure I would not want to > tighten anything as all ports will have to be open and hence NAT is very good at > that,as I have tried it on my small network (one Linux Box,with one winXP Cleint). > The Idea of having three networks is to divide the load on the Network as all > requests from 50 Nodes on one network will come at Eth1 which will get NATTed thru > Eth0(the Public Interface or the ISP).By having three networks the load will get > dividded between Eth1,Eth2 and Eth3. > Is there anything else you need to know from me ?Pls let me Know, I will try to > explain. >
squid sounds like a good idea. I'd setup squid with transparent proxying, along with NAT for other traffic. Since your ISP link is 128K, I see no purpose in dividing your lan into multiple segments. The 128K link will be your limiting factor, the 100 mbit lan will always be waiting on that. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
