On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:01:00PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
[...]
> > Then add every user that's supposed to build RPMs to "src". :-)
>
> That's a nice and quite simple setup as well. Too elaborate for my
> user pool though ;-) .
I have a user pool of, er, two. ;-)
> Did you neve
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Julian Opificius wrote:
> Thanks Russ,
> "Don't use a variable". Yep, as Ian Mortimer also suggested, I replaced
> "$HOME" with the real absolute path "/home/julian" and it worked perfectly,
> thanks.
> Thanks also for the links.
> Could you tell me (and anyone else followin
Hi Thomas,
> - make a new group called "src"
> - chgrp -R src /usr/src/RedHat
> - chmod -R g+w /usr/src/RedHat
>
> Then add every user that's supposed to build RPMs to "src". :-)
That's a nice and quite simple setup as well. Too elaborate for my
user pool though ;-) .
Did you never come acro
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 22:17, Julian Opificius wrote:
> I'm trying to rebuild postfix and cyrus-sasl RPMS from SRPMS to add SMTP auth.
>
I have it working with the bin SASL rpm. I'm not sure why you feel the
need to compile it. The trick is to match your (postfix) "make&quo
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:58:26PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Another simple way to do this is to just chown -R /usr/src to the user
> that builds the rpm's. Works like a charm.
I've done that in a slightly more refined way:
- make a new group called "src"
- chgrp -R src /usr/src/Re
Hi Julian,
> >Replace %HOME with the actual directory path /home/ and it
> >should work.
> Sure enough, worked like a charm!
Another simple way to do this is to just chown -R /usr/src to the user
that builds the rpm's. Works like a charm.
Bye,
Leonard.
--
How clean is a war when you shoot ar
use your
script ?
Thanks,
jules.
=
At 09:40 PM 7/23/03, you wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Julian Opificius wrote:
> I'm trying to rebuild postfix and cyrus-sasl RPMS from SRPMS to add
SMTP auth.
>
> Following instructions on the postfix site, I'm trying to build
Ian,
Sure enough, worked like a charm!
Thanks!
jules.
=
At 09:37 PM 7/23/03, you wrote:
> I've created .rpmmacros in my "/home/" containing "%_topdir
> %HOME/rpm" as instructed. Is it something to do with the build root, or
> file/dir permissions, maybe?
Replace %HOME
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Julian Opificius wrote:
> I'm trying to rebuild postfix and cyrus-sasl RPMS from SRPMS to add SMTP auth.
>
> Following instructions on the postfix site, I'm trying to build as a
> regular user, not as root. However, whenever I run "rpm -ivh
>
> I've created .rpmmacros in my "/home/" containing "%_topdir
> %HOME/rpm" as instructed. Is it something to do with the build root, or
> file/dir permissions, maybe?
Replace %HOME with the actual directory path /home/ and it
should work.
--
Ian
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mai
I'm trying to rebuild postfix and cyrus-sasl RPMS from SRPMS to add SMTP auth.
Following instructions on the postfix site, I'm trying to build as a
regular user, not as root. However, whenever I run "rpm -ivh
blah.blah.4.17.11.src.rpm" on a source RPM I get this error
Thanks for the info regarding rebuilding the Red Hat's AS2.1
I tried it but, I get an error in the process of rebuilding the SRPMs. The error is:
snip
rkc.c:57:25: sglobal.h: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [rkc.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/r
Hi all,
Roger:
> This is the procedure I used to build my own version of Advanced Server
> from the SRPMS. I would be interested to know what potential problems can
> be encountered and the difference between the end result and the actual AS2.1
> from RH.
and how about this:
creat
Thanks very much for your help!
I will try, if I should find problem can I write you?
Alessandro
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 04:52, Roger wrote:
This is the procedure I used to build my own version of Advanced Server
from the SRPMS. I would be interested to know what potential problems can
be
This is the procedure I used to build my own version of Advanced Server
from the SRPMS. I would be interested to know what potential problems can
be encountered and the difference between the end result and the actual AS2.1
from RH.
- Install RH7.2 on a machine, install all packages.
- Download
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Dmitry Melekhov
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Advanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
Dan Bar Dov wrote:
BTW, I talked directly with a SuSE distributor regarding their SLES
product, same concept as
003 11:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Advanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
>
> Dan Bar Dov wrote:
> >
>
> > BTW, I talked directly with a SuSE distributor regarding their SLES
> > product, same concept as AS, and he confirmed my ideas. You pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:33:50 +0200, Dan Bar Dov wrote:
> However, the issue at hand is the license agreement.
> Reading the quotes sent by Dmitry Melekhov [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > The term "Installed Servers" means the number of servers on which
> > C
Dan Bar Dov wrote:
BTW, I talked directly with a SuSE distributor regarding their SLES
product, same concept as AS, and he confirmed my ideas. You pay for the
services, you are allowed to do with the software whatever you want.
Sorry, you are wrong :-(
They also force you to buy "service" on
> -Original Message-
> done.
>
> Red Hat has made, and is continuing to made, an important and
expensive
> contribution to the community. Although you may legally continue to
> distribute your own copies of the AS SRPMs, if everyone does it,
> eventually Red
d from CDs and
other servers that are running your own release put together from the
SRPMS.
Where does it say I cannot take the SRPMS downloaded from RHN and
distribute it to another server that is not one of the licensed servers,
bearing in mind that I have put together my own version of Advanced S
and
other servers that are running your own release put together from the
SRPMS.
Where does it say I cannot take the SRPMS downloaded from RHN and
distribute it to another server that is not one of the licensed servers,
bearing in mind that I have put together my own version of Advanced Server
that is ve
dvanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
Roger wrote:
The reason for wanting to subscribe for the SRPMS is for some level
of
service in receiving the SRPMS as quickly as possible after a
security
release. Although Red Hat makes the SRPMS publicly available on
updates.redhat.com, they may c
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Samuel Flory wrote:
> Actually I was trying to point out how silly it is to use AS outside
> of RH's program. The reason to use AS is not that there is anything
> special about 95% of the AS packages. The reason to use AS is to have
> someone standing behind you when you r
and is continuing to made, an important and expensive
contribution to the community. Although you may legally continue to
distribute your own copies of the AS SRPMs, if everyone does it,
eventually Red Hat will be forced to discontinue the product. If it
doesn't make money and has no prospe
ve and time consuming. Providing patches for
security holes is expensive and sometimes needs to be done on weekends
or evenings depending on the severity. Emergency testing needs to be
done.
Red Hat has made, and is continuing to made, an important and expensive
contribution to the commu
wever,
mandates that you also be able to provide the source, but since your
re-distributing SRPMS, that shouldn't be an issue.
Yes, but if you have a binary. You have a right to
Morally, it's another story. You should by a subscription for all your
systems, but you don't have
Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
I disagree with you too :-)
Original post says that one want to buy subscription to one server
and then install updates from sources to several servers.
This is impossible according to Service Agreement.
You must pay for service for all servers.
If you can't read this is n
tion, however,
mandates that you also be able to provide the source, but since your
re-distributing SRPMS, that shouldn't be an issue.
Morally, it's another story. You should by a subscription for all your
systems, but you don't have to legally do it as long as the packages you
redist
14, 2003 1:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Advanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
>
> Roger wrote:
> >>>The reason for wanting to subscribe for the SRPMS is for some level
of
> >>>service in receiving the SRPMS as quickly as possible after a
securit
Roger wrote:
The reason for wanting to subscribe for the SRPMS is for some level of
service in receiving the SRPMS as quickly as possible after a security
release. Although Red Hat makes the SRPMS publicly available on
updates.redhat.com, they may choose to delay the release of them except
for
> > The reason for wanting to subscribe for the SRPMS is for some level of
> > service in receiving the SRPMS as quickly as possible after a security
> > release. Although Red Hat makes the SRPMS publicly available on
> > updates.redhat.com, they may choose to delay th
ot my problem ;-)
No, the original poster wanted to subscribe one server to get the SRPMS,
which are freely available anyway, then build the RPMS from the SRPMS and
distribute the binaries to the other servers.
No what?
I wrote- from sources to several servers, you write the same thing.
The r
this is not my problem ;-)
>
No, the original poster wanted to subscribe one server to get the SRPMS,
which are freely available anyway, then build the RPMS from the SRPMS and
distribute the binaries to the other servers.
The reason for wanting to subscribe for the SRPMS is for some level o
Roger wrote:
I do not think it is possible to distribute these ISOs outside my
organisation as it will violate Red Hat's trademarks, however it is quite
easy to create your own version, I may publish some instructions on how I
did it if people are interested.
Yes, this is interesting :-)
--
r
Dan Bar Dov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Roger
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Advanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
According to http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhlas_us.html
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Roger
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Advanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
>
> According to http://www.redhat.com/li
Dan Bar Dov wrote:
-Original Message-
If so, I guess I'll have to purchase one subscription just to
^
get
the
SRPMS from RHN, which I then have it automatically build the RPM
and
distributed to my other se
> -Original Message-
> >
> > > >
> > > > If so, I guess I'll have to purchase one subscription just to
get
> > the
> > > > SRPMS from RHN, which I then have it automatically build the RPM
and
> > > > distributed to my
however it is quite
easy to create your own version, I may publish some instructions on how I
did it if people are interested.
> > >
> > > If so, I guess I'll have to purchase one subscription just to get
> the
> > > SRPMS from RHN, which I then have it automatic
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Bar Dov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: Advanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
>
>
> > >
> > > If so, I guess I'll have to purchase
> >
> > If so, I guess I'll have to purchase one subscription just to get
the
> > SRPMS from RHN, which I then have it automatically build the RPM and
> > distributed to my other servers.
>
> This is impossible :-)
> Accroding to Service Agreement you have
Roger wrote:
I have recently created my own version of Advanced Server 2.1 using the
SRPMS that Red Hat have made available and intend on using it on a few
dozen servers.
I have noticed that so far this year, 8 security packages for AS 2.1 have
been released, but none of the SRPMS have yet
I have recently created my own version of Advanced Server 2.1 using the
SRPMS that Red Hat have made available and intend on using it on a few
dozen servers.
I have noticed that so far this year, 8 security packages for AS 2.1 have
been released, but none of the SRPMS have yet appeared on
My understanding was that in the version of rpm that comes with 8.0, the
--rebuild option is gone, in favor ofusing teh rpmbuild system.
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Riemer Palstra wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2002, Saul Arias wrote:
>
> > rpm --rebuild nc-1.10-16.src.rpm
>
> As he's using Red Hat Linux 8.0, I
Hi all
Please excuse my newbie questions and please don't accuse me of not
RTFMing, I've so far spent four hours trying to install netcat.
Here's what I did, I looked on disk 4 of my RedHat 8.0 CDs and saw
nc-1.10-16.src.rpm. That's exactly what I want. I double click the file
and enter the root
On 17 Oct 2002 13:39:48 -0500, John the Kiwi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here's what I did, I looked on disk 4 of my RedHat 8.0 CDs and saw
>nc-1.10-16.src.rpm.
That contains source code, you'd better look into 1 or 2 or 3 for the
i386.rpm which will install nc ready to use.
>know the source for
On 17 Oct 2002, Saul Arias wrote:
> rpm --rebuild nc-1.10-16.src.rpm
As he's using Red Hat Linux 8.0, I would recommend
rpmbuild --rebuild nc-1.10-16.src.rpm instead.
--
Riemer Palstra // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://palstra.com/
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally re
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 14:39, John the Kiwi wrote:
> Please excuse my newbie questions and please don't accuse me of not
> RTFMing, I've so far spent four hours trying to install netcat.
I don't believe you. Read this: http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/
> Here's what I did, I looked on disk 4 of my RedHa
From: "John the Kiwi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So now I know the source for netcat is somewhere on my system. Think I can
find
> it? No way.
/usr/src/redhat/
it's for building RPMs from the source so you'll have files in
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/
/usr/src/redhat/SPECS
that are used for building a
Hi Ian,
> I have to build imapd with mbx support as a default, so I install the
> -src.rpm and then go into /usr/local/redhat/SOURCES/imap-2001a and I
> see a bz2 file which is the imap source and a bunch of .patch files
>
> are these patch files already applied to the imap source or do I have
I have a question on SRPMS
I have to build imapd with mbx support as a default, so I install the
-src.rpm and then go into /usr/local/redhat/SOURCES/imap-2001a and I
see a bz2 file which is the imap source and a bunch of .patch files
are these patch files already applied to the imap source or
I would like to know the best way to update packages for an old RH7 server.
Currently, I am only interested in rebuilding the Samba 2.2.5-7 package to
work with on my server.
I downloaded the Samba 2.2.5-7 SRPM file from RawHide.
When I did a "rpm --rebuild samba-2.2.5-7.src.rpm", it told me th
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 16:04, LuisMi wrote:
>
> My linux box runs with a Pentium 133 Mhz.
...
> Where I need to add these options?
> Maybe /usr/lib/rpm/i586-redhat-linux/macros?
~/.rpmmacros is probably a better choice.
BTW, how much extra performance do you actually get on a P133? The cpu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have some questions.
My linux box runs with a Pentium 133 Mhz.
I build a lot of binary packages from srpms and I usually use the option '
- --target i586'. I am lazy and I would want that the i586 became the
default platform, wh
or 16 bit processors. So Linux for INTEL
is dependent on the processor family.
Best regards,
-Manuel.
-Original Message-
From: "Ismael Touama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:47:06 +0100
Subject: SRPMS
> Hi, in the flow!
Hi, in the flow!
OK I remark that we can download Source of RPMs.
There is just one for many architectures available.
Ok, don't know C language, so I suppose that it's the
compilation which provides all different version.
Is that correct ?
It means one source for differents architecture but I don'
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 17/11/00 at 16:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Howdy,
>
>I think it's possible to open a src.rpm, edit the files inside, then put
it back into a src.rpm and --rebuild the package.
>
>Is this true?
Yes
>
>I looks to me like it should be possible to "o
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> Ok, I found all the -b commands for building one again once it's unpacked into the
>build directory, but I can't find the command to unpack a src.rpm without actually
>building something.
>
> Anyone know?
Installing a src.rpm package (rpm -i ) w
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> Ok, I found all the -b commands for building one again once it's unpacked into the
>build directory, but I can't find the command to unpack a src.rpm without actually
>building something.
>
> Anyone know?
>
>
rpm -i
With a default setup, this w
Ok, I found all the -b commands for building one again once it's unpacked into the
build directory, but I can't find the command to unpack a src.rpm without actually
building something.
Anyone know?
At 04:07 PM 11/17/2000 -0600, you wrote:
>Howdy,
>
>I think it's possible to open a src.rpm, e
Howdy,
I think it's possible to open a src.rpm, edit the files inside, then put it back into
a src.rpm and --rebuild the package.
Is this true?
I looks to me like it should be possible to "open" it into the /usr/src/redhat/RPM
directroy, as is done during the --rebuild process anyway.
Does a
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Ken Kirchner wrote:
> Actually I was mistaken, it compiles for i386 ONLY. That's even worse...
>
Have you tried "rpm --rebuild --target=i686" (I *think* that's the
correct stuff.)
John
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Actually I was mistaken, it compiles for i386 ONLY. That's even worse...
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Ken Kirchner wrote:
>
> And away it compiles... BUT it compiles for every stinking architecture,
> not just the i686 one. How can I tell it to compile for i686 only?
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL
Hello people,
I am trying to compile some patches in to the 2.2.16-3 kernel sources for
both i686 and i686-smp machines.
I've modified the .spec file and put everything in place. I then run the
command:
rpm -bb kernel-2.2.16-3.spec
And away it compiles... BUT it compiles for every stinking
I updated the srpms, one for RH 6.1, one for RH 6.2.
http://www.jasons.org/php4/
See the announcement from last week for more info on the build
process.
http://www.moongroup.com/Redhat11/msg01437.html
--
Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human.
jcostom {at} ja
At 08:11 AM 5/4/00 -0300, Marco Shaw wrote:
>OK so I've installed the kernel SRPMS. Do I just loop through all the
>patches provided, as I didn't see an 'install script'?
>
>Also, I just want to confirm that this does not actually include the linux
>kernel it
OK so I've installed the kernel SRPMS. Do I just loop through all the
patches provided, as I didn't see an 'install script'?
Also, I just want to confirm that this does not actually include the linux
kernel itself, but just RedHat's mods to the release code.
**Pl
for me of the old SRPMS packages against the newer sytle
ones so I can run patch over them and create the new SRPMS.
Just as an after thought, would it be possible to add some feature
in rpm (Red Hat Program Manager) which would patch an existing SRPMS
file with a special diff rpm file to
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Mike Edwards wrote:
> Up until now, I really haven't had the need to custom-compile any
> commands, but I want to look into doing so with nenscript. My question
> is, if I install the src.rpm, will it stomp on the already installed
> nenscript files? I have a feeling it won'
Up until now, I really haven't had the need to custom-compile any
commands, but I want to look into doing so with nenscript. My question
is, if I install the src.rpm, will it stomp on the already installed
nenscript files? I have a feeling it won't until I actually make/compile
it, but should I
-Original Message-
From: Eduardo Egues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: RedHat list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: woensdag 1 april 1998 23:54
Subject: SRPMS question
> Hi all:
> Does anybody know what SRPMS means and what is its use?
> Sorry i'm linux novice and i'd
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Eduardo Egues wrote:
> Does anybody know what SRPMS means and what is its use?
> Sorry i'm linux novice and i'd like know what can i do with it
>
R)edhat
P)ackage
M)anagement,
to grossly oversimplify, it's an archive. However, as Ronco of Red
Hi all:
Does anybody know what SRPMS means and what is its use?
Sorry i'm linux novice and i'd like know what can i do with it
TIA
E.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /R
74 matches
Mail list logo
