Ed Wilts wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:20:34PM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
I disagree with you too :-)If the software update is distributed under the GPL (or similar), then
Original post says that one want to buy subscription to one server
and then install updates from sources to several servers.
This is impossible according to Service Agreement.
You must pay for service for all servers.
If you can't read this is not my problem ;-)
you can legally distribute those updates to your other systems or to the
world if you so chose. Distributing outside your organization, however,
mandates that you also be able to provide the source, but since your
re-distributing SRPMS, that shouldn't be an issue.
Yes, but if you have a binary. You have a right to
Morally, it's another story. You should by a subscription for all yourI'm missing me the moral point here. The orginal creators of most of the programs in question wanted their program to be used freely. Otherwise why use the gpl? For the most part RH is simply packaging these programs in an rpm.
systems, but you don't have to legally do it as long as the packages you
redistribute are GPL'd.
Besides the whole point of AS is the support, and certifications.
--
There is no such thing as obsolete hardware.
Merely hardware that other people don't want.
(The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
