Re: Update kernel question

2003-09-26 Thread oxfordmusic.net
> This is because by default, the kernel is on the package skip-list. > You can configure the RHN Update Agent (up2date) to install kernel > updates automatically. But normally you would tell the tool > explicitly to install a new kernel when you run the tool manually. In > the graphical user int

Re: Update kernel question

2003-09-24 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:29:42 +0100, oxfordmusic.net wrote: > sorry if this is a very basic question but i'm new to RedHat (ex-Cobalt). > > i have 2 Redhat Boxes (7.2) which both show > # rpm -qa kernel > kernel-2.4.18-18.7.x > > logging into RHN i s

RE: update problem

2003-08-21 Thread Andreas Freyvogel
Is sshd running? Did the sshd_config file get modified? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Redhat Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: update problem I just updated my kernel and can no longer ssh into the mac

Re: update problem

2003-08-21 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
> I just updated my kernel and can no longer ssh into the > machine from outside the machine. however I can ssh out > directly from this machine to other machines. > > I also tried the old kernel but it still doesn't work. > > Any ideas? Outgoing ssh is the ssh client, incoming ssh is handled by t

Re: Update Kernel, Breaks Boot

2003-03-10 Thread Kent Borg
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 12:18:49PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > What is think happened is that your initrd images became corrupted for > some reasion. So the boot was hanging when trying to access them. Thanks, that makes sense, but it seems strange that two newly installed initrd's wou

Re: Update Kernel, Breaks Boot

2003-03-07 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Kent Borg wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 04:28:49PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > > Well, it apears the system boots just fine without the initial > > ramdisk, so what I would try is commenting out the initrd lines, and > > see if that helps. > > Yes, that fixes it. S

Re: Update Kernel, Breaks Boot

2003-03-07 Thread Kent Borg
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 04:28:49PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > Well, it apears the system boots just fine without the initial > ramdisk, so what I would try is commenting out the initrd lines, and > see if that helps. Yes, that fixes it. So what happened? Why did rpm-ing in the new kerne

Re: Update Kernel, Breaks Boot

2003-03-06 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Kent Borg wrote: > I installed yesterday's kernel update for RH 7.3, and then my Sony > notebook wouldn't reboot. After various futzing, I can get it up > manually, but not with my grub.conf. > > Manually I can get it to boot this way: > > - At grub screen hit "c" for comma

Re: 'update' process takes control of port 80. Apache looses port80

2003-02-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:17:08 -0700, Kapil Khanna wrote: > I recently ran the Redhat network agent. It downloaded 340+ errata, a couple > of them affected apache. > I noticed some strange behavior. A few of the errata failed to be applied. > There were

Re: Update activation problem

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21 Jan 2003 15:02:18 +0100, Sebastian Eriksson wrote: > I installed Red Hat 8 for a couple of days ago, and updated it via the > superb auto update feature. But I got into some real problems with > partition integrity that I have solved now, so I h

RE: Update activation problem

2003-01-21 Thread Rigler, S C (Steve)
You can delete/activate/de-activate systems from the RHN area on RedHat's site. I don't remember *exactly* the steps to get to where the "delete" button is, but if you start from the "systems" area you should be able to find it easily. -Steve -Original Message- From: Sebastian Eriksson [

Re: Update icon disappeared on 8.0 Gui

2002-12-28 Thread Edward Dekkers
> The redhat network update icon in the lower right hand corner of my GUI > screen disappeared in 1100x768 (don't remember the exact numbers but it is > the one just above 1024X???) mode. I did a reinstall and the icon was gone. > It is there but it is so thin I cannot see it. > > Any ideas > > Tha

Re: UPDATE: I HATE my computer!!!

2002-12-01 Thread Edward Dekkers
> That's interesting. I just tried upgrading a 7.3 machine to 8.0 with a > FireWire card. The upgrade seemed to go OK, but then the machine > wouldn't boot up. The boot stalled at the FireWire controller. After > reomving the FireWire hardware, the machine boots up fine now. Are you guys us

Re: UPDATE: I HATE my computer!!!

2002-12-01 Thread Hidong Kim
That's interesting. I just tried upgrading a 7.3 machine to 8.0 with a FireWire card. The upgrade seemed to go OK, but then the machine wouldn't boot up. The boot stalled at the FireWire controller. After reomving the FireWire hardware, the machine boots up fine now. Christopher Henders

Re: update: I HATE my computer!!!

2002-11-27 Thread Carey F. Cox
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Christopher Henderson wrote: > I've tried using the non-smp kernel and changing my SMP Protocol to 1.1 from > the default 1.4 and nothing helps. Thnx anyways folks and again I apologize > for my initial frustration induced rant. > > ~Christopher > > btw - stability aside th

Re: Update Apache 1.3.23 to 1.3.27

2002-11-21 Thread Juan Nin
MensajeFrom: Claudio Delgado >Hi to everybody, somebody knows some document that explain howto update Apache 1.3.23 to 1.3.27 , thanks # rpm -Uvh apache-1.3.27.i386.rpm # /etc/init.d/httpd restart :) regards, Juan -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=uns

Re: update group

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:50:39 +0800, Brad Ching wrote: > > > When i update redhate7.2 to redhat8.0,i find i can not use group > > > method to modify floders or files group.And show me"chgrp: invalid > > > group name'ituser'",in fact i use chgrp command

Re: update group

2002-11-12 Thread Brad Ching
ROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:34 PM Subject: Re: update group > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:17:54 +0800, Brad Ching wrote: > > > When i update redhate7.2 to redhat8.0,i find i

Re: update group

2002-11-12 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:17:54 +0800, Brad Ching wrote: > When i update redhate7.2 to redhat8.0,i find i can not use group > method to modify floders or files group.And show me"chgrp: invalid > group name'ituser'",in fact i use chgrp command very well i

Re: Update

2002-10-29 Thread blkline
Greg Klofa wrote: > > Just recently installed Red-Hat Linux, and know nothing about linux in > general. When I go to the up2date service, there was a number of > patches and updates. All installed o.k., except the kernel files. They > just freeze, and do nothing. Are these not updateable throu

RE: Update

2002-10-29 Thread Ismael Touama
> Just recently installed Red-Hat Linux, and know nothing about linux in > general. When I go to the up2date service, there was a number of > patches and updates. All installed o.k., except the kernel files. They > just freeze, and do nothing. Are these not updateable through the auto > feature

Re: Update kernel

2002-07-27 Thread Johannes Franken
* Putu-Sentana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-26 23:37 +0200]: > Please help me step by step to update kernel in Redhat 6.2. > I'm a newbie in Linux and I want to tray setting samba > connection in my office but my Lan Card didn't work Better start off with RH 7.3, which comes with kernel 2.4 and

Re: Update Error code 31

2002-07-10 Thread Bret Hughes
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 02:25, Laszlo Saska wrote: > I am able to go to the Internet. I was able toregister the product. > I have an ISA (Intenet Security Acceleration) Microsoft Proxy/firewall. Http > port is 8080. > In the RedHat Netwoprk configuration I enable the http proxy: "IP > address":808

Re: update kernel, no X, and slow nautilus

2002-07-01 Thread Price Technology
I don't use Nautilus, I'm using KDE rather than Gnome, but Package Manager is incredibly slow and somewhat buggy. If installing from CD, I have to "open folder" before the installation of the last chosen package will begin. Joebewan On Sunday 30 June 2002 04:10 am, Jay Daniels wrote: > I th

Re: update kernel

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 12 June 2002 06:44 pm, ebinc wrote: > COULD YOU SHOW ME HOW, OR GIVE AN EXAMPLE Here's the users guide page from the 7.1 distribution. First one I found: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.1-Manual/ref-guide/s1-boot-init-shut

Re: update kernel

2002-06-12 Thread ebinc
COULD YOU SHOW ME HOW, OR GIVE AN EXAMPLE - Original Message - From: Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: Re: update kernel What it means is to edit the lilo configuration file (/etc/lilo.conf) to put in th

Re: update kernel

2002-06-12 Thread Mike Burger
What it means is to edit the lilo configuration file (/etc/lilo.conf) to put in the parameters for the new kernel you installed, and then run lilo (lilo ) to update the boot record to see the new kernel. On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, ebinc wrote: > Hi I'm really new! > I just updated the kernel with a

Re: Update: 7.3 Install Problem - AIC-7XXX Kernel panic - for safety

2002-05-17 Thread Samuel Flory
You need to make sure that the alias in /etc/modules.conf references the correct module, and that the initrd contain the correct driver. Try switch to the console after the install/upgrade completes, and recreate the initrd with the correct module. Something like this: -ctrl-alt-F2 -chroo

Re: Update kernel with reiserfs' problem

2002-04-04 Thread Nick Urbanik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Does anybody have the experience to successfully update kernel with root > partition on reiserfs in Redhat 7.2? When I installed Redhat 7.2, I put > my root partition on reiserfs. Today I want to update kernel from 2.4.7 to > 2.4.9, I got failed. It said "all m

Re: update wu-ftpd

2001-11-30 Thread EdwardSPL
Martín Marqués wrote: > > Trying to update wu-ftpd from rpm I get this error: > > [root@math /root]# rpm -Uvh > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.21.i386.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > /etc/pam.d/system-auth is needed by wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.21 > [root@math /root]# > > Wha

Re: update wu-ftpd

2001-11-30 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 13:40, Brian Ashe wrote: > On Friday, November 30, 2001, 2:27:31 PM, you babbled something about: > > MM> Trying to update wu-ftpd from rpm I get this error: > > MM> [root@math /root]# rpm -Uvh > MM> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.21.i386.rpm > MM> error: fa

Re: update wu-ftpd

2001-11-30 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Nov 30, 2001, 16:27 (-0300) Martín Marqués wrote: > Trying to update wu-ftpd from rpm I get this error: > > [root@math /root]# rpm -Uvh > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.21.i386.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > /etc/pam.d/system-auth is needed by wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.21

Re: update wu-ftpd

2001-11-30 Thread Martín Marqués
On Vie 30 Nov 2001 19:22, you wrote: > anon-ftp. Nop. had to update pam as well. > >>> Martín Marqués <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/30/01 11:27AM >>> > > Trying to update wu-ftpd from rpm I get this error: > > [root@math /root]# rpm -Uvh > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.21.i386.rpm > erro

Re: update wu-ftpd

2001-11-30 Thread Richard Pruitt
anon-ftp. >>> Martín Marqués <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/30/01 11:27AM >>> Trying to update wu-ftpd from rpm I get this error: [root@math /root]# rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.21.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: /etc/pam.d/system-auth is needed by wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.2

Re: update wu-ftpd

2001-11-30 Thread Martín Marqués
On Vie 30 Nov 2001 16:40, you wrote: > Hi Martín, > > On Friday, November 30, 2001, 2:27:31 PM, you babbled something about: > > MM> Trying to update wu-ftpd from rpm I get this error: > > MM> [root@math /root]# rpm -Uvh > MM> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.21.i386.rpm > MM> error: f

Re: update wu-ftpd

2001-11-30 Thread Brian Ashe
Hi Martín, On Friday, November 30, 2001, 2:27:31 PM, you babbled something about: MM> Trying to update wu-ftpd from rpm I get this error: MM> [root@math /root]# rpm -Uvh MM> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/wu-ftpd-2.6.1-0.6x.21.i386.rpm MM> error: failed dependencies: MM> /etc/pam.d/system-a

Re: Update

2001-02-02 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I've got up2date, and it's installed in KDE, but it won't connect... the server > is "updates.redhat.com". Any ideas? > John HHmm. It looks like in my 'up2date --configure' the server is set to ftp.redhat.com. Wanna give that a shot? -- Edward Dekkers (Director) Triple D Computer Services Pty

Re: Update

2001-02-02 Thread Adam Sleight
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 17:20:08 +0100 Tomás García Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:| | Have a look at There must be instructions | for setting this up under RH 7 and RH 6.2, I guess. http://www.redhat.com/network/service/faq_whatisrhn.html#cost How much will

RE: Update

2001-02-02 Thread John Aldrich
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001, you wrote: > "rpm -q up2date" > > Assuming that it finds up2date and gives you a version, you then do a > > "which up2date" or a > "find / -name up2date" to find the program on your system. > > You can then "/path/to/up2date -l" > I've got up2date, and it's installed in KD

Re: Update

2001-02-02 Thread Mike Burger
Depends on whether or not it's actually installed...he could just have a bad path configuration in his bashrc. On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Tomás García Ferrari wrote: > > bash: up2date: command not found > > You have to install the up2date packages: > rhn_register-1.0.2-0.6.x.noarch.rpm > up2dat

RE: Update

2001-02-02 Thread Mike Burger
TED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 8:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Update > > > Log in as root (or su to root) and run "up2date -l" > > At Fri, 2 Feb 2001 19:49:34 +0100 , [EMAIL PROT

Re: Update

2001-02-02 Thread Tomás García Ferrari
> bash: up2date: command not found You have to install the up2date packages: rhn_register-1.0.2-0.6.x.noarch.rpm up2date-2.1.7-0.6.x.i386.rpm up2date-gnome-2.1.7-0.6.x.i386.rpm rhn_register-gnome-1.0.2-0.6.x.noarch.rpm (and in my situation I had to install as well these:) pyth

RE: Update

2001-02-02 Thread NDSoftware
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 8:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Update Log in as root (or su to root) and run "up2date -l" At Fri, 2 Feb 2001 19:49:34 +0100 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Where i can find a software for check the Redhat Upda

Re: Update

2001-02-02 Thread mburger
Log in as root (or su to root) and run "up2date -l" At Fri, 2 Feb 2001 19:49:34 +0100 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Where i can find a software for check the Redhat Update ? >Thanks > >Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware >http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fa

Re: update my x2 56k modem?

2000-03-27 Thread Zaigui Wang
On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Adrian Walters wrote: Hi, good news! I got on the internet using freewwweb and eznet. I key step actually was to make sure the user name is [EMAIL PROTECTED] After that, everthying is fairly easy. It is as simple as this: eznet add service=isp_name [EMAIL PROTECTED] p

RE: update my x2 56k modem?

2000-02-26 Thread Greg Wright
Hi Juha *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 27/02/00 at 9:33 Juha Saarinen wrote: >%-> FWIW , at 33.6k, you should still get 4kbps approx, and this is all most >%-> 56k modems will get as well > >Bah! Humbug! ;-) > >A properly set up 56K modem, like my USR Sportster, gets 5-7KBps on >co

RE: update my x2 56k modem?

2000-02-26 Thread Juha Saarinen
%-> FWIW , at 33.6k, you should still get 4kbps approx, and this is all most %-> 56k modems will get as well Bah! Humbug! ;-) A properly set up 56K modem, like my USR Sportster, gets 5-7KBps on compressed files, and up to 13KBps on compressible stuff like text. -- Juha -- To unsubscribe: m

Re: update my x2 56k modem?

2000-02-26 Thread C Heath
Greg Wright wrote: > Hi > > *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > > On 26/02/00 at 0:38 Zaigui Wang wrote: > > >My modem is a 56k using the X2 technology. I bought this from onsale for > >$29. Now I know why it was that cheap! The manufacture NCI (new com, inc) > >has long gone out of busine

Re: update my x2 56k modem?

2000-02-26 Thread Adrian Walters
this should do the trick. you will have to boot up in windows for this to work though.an several reboots might be required. :) browse on over to http://www.windrivers.com/script/info.asp?id=316 click on driver page then click on v.90 modem upgrades from there you shoul be good to go just make su

Re: update my x2 56k modem?

2000-02-26 Thread Greg Wright
Hi *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 26/02/00 at 0:38 Zaigui Wang wrote: >My modem is a 56k using the X2 technology. I bought this from onsale for >$29. Now I know why it was that cheap! The manufacture NCI (new com, inc) >has long gone out of businesss! > >My question is: Can I updat

Re: update agent

2000-01-19 Thread Tim Hager
Jack & Hidong, Have you upgraded to the latest uptodate rpm mentioned in the Errata on the Redhat Website? That solved all of my problems. Tim -- > From: Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: update agent > Date: Monday,

Re: update agent

2000-01-19 Thread jack wallen jr
odate rpm mentioned in the Errata on the Redhat Website? That solved all of my problems. Tim -- > From: Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: update agent > Date: Monday, January 17, 2000 1:09 PM > > jack wallen jr wrote: > &g

Re: update agent

2000-01-19 Thread Hidong Kim
jack wallen jr wrote: > > is anyone else experiencing problems with the update agent? i can't get > it to accept my username and password (which i know is correct cause i had > their system send it to me). > > what is up with this? > > Jack Wallen, Jr. > Editor in Chief of Linux Content > www.

Re: [UPDATE] i686 Redhat compilation

2000-01-03 Thread Allen Bolderoff
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Allen Bolderoff wrote: > > > > > > headerfiles. (It does with the Mandrake development distribution) > > > - util-linux omits several important binaries when compiled for i686, eg login. > > > > hmm interesting. > > > > er, according to MCONFIG in the util-linux package

Re: [UPDATE] i686 Redhat compilation

2000-01-03 Thread Richard KHOO
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Allen Bolderoff wrote: > > > headerfiles. (It does with the Mandrake development distribution) > > - util-linux omits several important binaries when compiled for i686, eg login. > > hmm interesting. > er, according to MCONFIG in the util-linux package, whether login, pas

Re: [UPDATE] i686 Redhat compilation

2000-01-03 Thread Allen Bolderoff
> Good decision, > > I have recently compiled half of the Rawhide-19991229 distribution > with gcc-2.95.2-3, running kernel-2.2.13-0.9 and using glibc-2.1.2-17 > without problems. Please also forward the most recent .src.rpm > packages to RawHide. > > Note: > - glibc still does not compile for

Re: [UPDATE] i686 Redhat compilation

2000-01-03 Thread Svante Signell
Good decision, I have recently compiled half of the Rawhide-19991229 distribution with gcc-2.95.2-3, running kernel-2.2.13-0.9 and using glibc-2.1.2-17 without problems. Please also forward the most recent .src.rpm packages to RawHide. Note: - glibc still does not compile for i686: Complains on

Re: [UPDATE] i686 Redhat compilation

2000-01-03 Thread Gustav Schaffter
Hats off. Happy New Year, Allen. Gustav Allen Bolderoff wrote: > > Upon discussions with a few people more knowledgeable than I, (ie Bernhard > Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) and others. > > I have come to the conclusion that gcc 2.95.2 is necessary for a workable i686 > distribution. >

Re: UPDATE: strange RH5 ip_forwarding problems?

1998-04-24 Thread hartr
On 24 Apr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello > > Does anyone know of any strange IP_forwarding problems with Red Hat 5.0? > > We are having aweful problems trying to get several boxes to route between > private and public networks over multiple ethernet and ppp interfaces. > > Its almost as if

Re: Update from 4.2 to 5.0

1998-04-17 Thread Differential Form
Can you let me know if you get an answer to this. I'd like to do this too, since I don't have the time to fool around and upgrade the distribution, but I'd like to use the glibc as a development library. -- Martin Imrisek "I

Re: Update from 2.0 to 5.0 bind

1998-04-16 Thread Eric L. Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Rick Prince wrote: > I need to update the bind code on my redhat linux. I'm running redhat v2.0 > and checked out the rpm updates on the ftp site and noticed that for > instance, that although the updates for v4.2 are in a different directory > than the updates for 5.0. the bi