Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

t: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 01:21:23 -0600 Subject: Re: troubleshooting cpu performance > Edward Dekkers wrote: > > > It's a safety feature not a lot of people know about. > > It's called throttling, which has been around for a while now. > The CPU will effective

Re: Troubleshooting CPU Performance

On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 09:46, Steve Gonzales wrote: > I followed Dumbledore's lead and got a pensieve :-D. > Have they released the encrypted version yet? I love those books. Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-l

Re: Troubleshooting CPU Performance

I followed Dumbledore's lead and got a pensieve :-D. Steve Gonzales, RHCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] > H| I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. > + > Ashley M. Kirchner . 303.442.641

Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

Edward Dekkers wrote: It's a safety feature not a lot of people know about. It's called throttling, which has been around for a while now. The CPU will effectively cut its power down to 50% first, and will continue to do so till it reaches a point where it can stay cool enough, while still

Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

David Barkman wrote: It might be worth it to crack open the case and make sure your fans are working newer cpu's would probably immediately fry without a fan, but older ones may run for a while at degraded performance. Just want to correct you on one point. Newer INTEL CPUs (I notice t

Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 20:11, David Barkman wrote: > It might be worth it to crack open the case and make sure your fans are > working > newer cpu's would probably immediately fry without a fan, but older ones > may run for a while at degraded performance. > Good point. do

Re: troubleshooting cpu performance

It might be worth it to crack open the case and make sure your fans are working newer cpu's would probably immediately fry without a fan, but older ones may run for a while at degraded performance. - Original Message - From: "John Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <

troubleshooting cpu performance

Is there a way to troubleshoot where performance bottlenecks may be occurring with httpd? Such as some module such as mod_rewrite? Can you print out what files httpd is currently serving? Starting a couple days ago, it's as if my CPU has been replaced with one far less powerful. Just

performance problems while copying large data

me is experiencing a lot of disconnects on MSN messenger and performance problems with the network. i tried pinging the box and noticed a large packet loss: 29 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 27% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 49.4/230.7/604.9 ms i understand that the box is doing a fair amou

System Performance

27;s thing. If I replaced the cgi with a perl script and use mod-perl then I was able to run about 700 instances of the application being tested before the performance problem reappeared. It seems like some kind of system resource or system table is getting full and when I add the one extra inst

Re: performance tests

http://ltp.sourceforge.net/tooltable.php On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 16:28, nishu bhutani wrote: > hi, > > what are the tools available to run stress/performance tests > for memory, disk and ethernet? > > Thanks, > > >

performance tests

hi,   what are the tools available to run stress/performance tests for memory, disk and ethernet?   Thanks, Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

how to increase the samba performance?

machine Win98 installed , i don't have any problem like this. - what can i do to increase the samba performance? thanks for help? Fatih Olcer. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Performance Monitoring in RH9

Robert Denton wrote: > Hello, I am trying to set up a system in linux. One area in which I am > having difficulty is performance monitoring. What I would like to do is > collect perf counters at 15 sec intervals throughout the day and then have > them emailed to me in a log in the

Performance Monitoring in RH9

Hello, I am trying to set up a system in linux. One area in which I am having difficulty is performance monitoring. What I would like to do is collect perf counters at 15 sec intervals throughout the day and then have them emailed to me in a log in the evenings. A few ways I have already tried

NPTL Performance?

I'm curious if there have been any extensive benchmarks for NPTL beyond the thread creation test that everyones seen. Have there been any application performance tests for it yet? Apache 2.0 is threaded, so is MySQL - isn't VSFTPd? I'd be very curious to see how these apps per

Re: Visual Performance Monitor

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, David Busby wrote: > Is there a tool (or tools) that will allow me to watch my system > performance? xosview -- Guvf gntyvar jnf rapbqrq jvgu gur ebg13.fu fpevcg, ninvynoyr ng uggc://jjj.pbqrtabzr.bet/fpevcgvat/fubjfpevcg.cuc?fpevcg=ebg13.fu be sebz n furyy-fpe

Re: Visual Performance Monitor

David Busby wrote: List, Is there a tool (or tools) that will allow me to watch my system performance? I want to have one box on my network keep performance tabs on a few others. Where do I start looking, my attempts on Google have given me nothing (yet). David Busby Systems Engineer [EMAIL

RE: Visual Performance Monitor

ECTED] Subject: Visual Performance Monitor List, Is there a tool (or tools) that will allow me to watch my system performance? I want to have one box on my network keep performance tabs on a few others. Where do I start looking, my attempts on Google have given me nothing (yet). David Busby Sy

Re: Visual Performance Monitor

On Monday 31 March 2003 05:08 pm, David Busby wrote: > List, > Is there a tool (or tools) that will allow me to watch my system > performance? > I want to have one box on my network keep performance tabs on a few others. > Where do I start looking, my attempts on Google have g

Visual Performance Monitor

List, Is there a tool (or tools) that will allow me to watch my system performance? I want to have one box on my network keep performance tabs on a few others. Where do I start looking, my attempts on Google have given me nothing (yet). David Busby Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED

Sent again: Re: swap performance.

Original Message Subject: Re: swap performance. From: "Distribution Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, March 18, 2003 11:03 am To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Out of interest I assume that much of this discussion in based on the use of SCSI, rather than IDE

Re: Ext3fs/ReiserFS Performance Enhancing

> I have been doing some research to find a method to increase the > performance of writes to the hard drives in my servers. I am running > Samba and all writes to the server hard drives are taking at least 3 to > 10 times (It varies) the amount of time it took to write such files on

RE: Ext3fs/ReiserFS Performance Enhancing

Me said: > I am getting the maximum speed I can over a 100Mb network (switched)... > That means SMB incurs an almost 30% performance hit as compared to FTP. > The only real way for me to make sure though is to go to gigabit. It's > not that important to me right now. ye

Re: Ext3fs/ReiserFS Performance Enhancing

> SO_RCVBUF=32768 SO_SNDBUF=32768 > 3/22/03 nyonker /dev/hdc2,026 294 413.42 6.89 > > The speedtest directory has 416 files in 29 directories. > > According to these results, I'm getting the same performance on reads AND > writes. Combine this with th

RE: Ext3fs/ReiserFS Performance Enhancing

same performance on reads AND writes. Combine this with the data I got from upgrading my CPU and switching to 2.2.8 leaves me with only one conclusion: I am getting the maximum speed I can over a 100Mb network (switched)... That means SMB incurs an almost 30% performance hit as compared to FTP.

RE: Ext3fs/ReiserFS Performance Enhancing

er be stuck with a long fsck that may require you to manually rebuild inodes. Sure performance could be better without journaling, but I would sacrifice performance EVERYTIME if I got better reliability, quicker recoveries and fewer potential data loss events. Regards, Robert Adkins II IT Manager/

Re: Ext3fs/ReiserFS Performance Enhancing

Have you posted this information on the Samba list? I've currently got a thread going where I have posted benchmark results after making various changes. So far I have been concentrating on read performance but I'll start getting some write benchmarks today. I'm currently using

Ext3fs/ReiserFS Performance Enhancing

Hello All, I have been doing some research to find a method to increase the performance of writes to the hard drives in my servers. I am running Samba and all writes to the server hard drives are taking at least 3 to 10 times (It varies) the amount of time it took to write such files on

Re: swap performance.

would be pointless load balancing partitions on 2 IDE disks on the same channel ? Do you agree ? When I mean pointless, I mean you don't get no performance gain. Nearly all motherboard have a least 2 IDE channels, then am I right in saying that you can load balance partition over 2 IDE channel

Re: swap performance.

On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 16:05, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: > Wondering what views are out there regarding the benifits in performance, if any, in > specifying the swap partition to be on a different physical disk from the / > partition? > I've always set my SWAP to be on a d

Re: swap performance.

On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote: > Wondering what views are out there regarding the benifits in > performance, if any, in specifying the swap partition to be on a > different physical disk from the / partition? Generally speaking it is a good idea to optimize your disk pe

swap performance.

Wondering what views are out there regarding the benifits in performance, if any, in specifying the swap partition to be on a different physical disk from the / partition? -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: slowdowns in performance - one problem solved

On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 19:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I've grumbled occasionally, without providing a lot of information, > about sporadically abysmal response times, especially when background > cron jobs such as slocate, tripwire-check and makewhatis were running. > Symptoms shown

slowdowns in performance - one problem solved

Hi, I've grumbled occasionally, without providing a lot of information, about sporadically abysmal response times, especially when background cron jobs such as slocate, tripwire-check and makewhatis were running. Symptoms shown by top were load averages of 3-6 while cpu was 95-98% idle. In

RE: cycle of sudden slowdown in performance

>> [...] complaints about slocate.cron > > Every Linux box I've ever had did the same thing, so I'm not sure the > rant on Red hat is warranted. Besides, it happens at 4:00am when even > my public Internet servers don't have much of a load. > > And, given the fact that it runs at an extremely l

Re: cycle of sudden slowdown in performance

On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 05:40, Jan wrote: > Mifsud Raymond at MITTS wrote: > > Have implimented redhat linux advanced server 2.1 on two P3 Xeon servers. > > Occassionally the servers goes into a cycle of sudden slowdown in performance. Is there any pattern to this? Does it happen

Re: cycle of sudden slowdown in performance

On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:02:00AM +0100, Mifsud Raymond at MITTS wrote: > Have implimented redhat linux advanced server 2.1 on two P3 Xeon servers. > Occassionally the servers goes into a cycle of sudden slowdown in performance. > An indication is that this may be connected to the

Re: cycle of sudden slowdown in performance

Mifsud Raymond at MITTS wrote: Have implimented redhat linux advanced server 2.1 on two P3 Xeon servers. Occassionally the servers goes into a cycle of sudden slowdown in performance. An indication is that this may be connected to the number of processors on the machine. This is being said because

cycle of sudden slowdown in performance

Have implimented redhat linux advanced server 2.1 on two P3 Xeon servers. Occassionally the servers goes into a cycle of sudden slowdown in performance. An indication is that this may be connected to the number of processors on the machine. This is being said because one of the machines has two

cycle of sudden slowdown in performance

Have implimented redhat linux advanced server 2.1 on two P3 Xeon servers. Occassionally the servers goes into a cycle of sudden slowdown in performance. An indication is that this may be connected to the number of processors on the machine. This is being said because one of the machines has two

cycle of sudden slowdown in performance

Have implimented redhat linux advanced server 2.1 on two P3 Xeon servers. Occassionally the servers goes into a cycle of sudden slowdown in performance. An indication is that this may be connected to the number of processors on the machine. This is being said because one of the machines has two

Re: linux performance monitoring

Todd A. Jacobs wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a list of performance monitoring tools for linux? I am fighting sar? xosview? procinfo? top? iostat? Define what you want to monitor, *then* pick a tool. Doing it the other way around makes no sense. look at

Re: linux performance monitoring

On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there a list of performance monitoring tools for linux? I am fighting sar? xosview? procinfo? top? iostat? Define what you want to monitor, *then* pick a tool. Doing it the other way around makes no sense. -- "Of course I'm in s

linux performance monitoring

Is there a list of performance monitoring tools for linux? I am fighting with "cacti" and I do not want to take this exercise much further. I eveluated Spyn's "Uptime" which was great but I would like to look primarily at open source options. Any and all leads app

RE: Performance Monitoring Tools

PROTECTED]' Subject: Performance Monitoring Tools Dear Friends, Please tell me about Performance Monitoring Tools on linux and unix systems. It should have the following features and free : 1. Daily report of Average CPU utilazation. 2. Daily report of Disk usage , VM usage. 3. Weekly report

Performance Monitoring Tools

Dear Friends, Please tell me about Performance Monitoring Tools on linux and unix systems. It should have the following features and free : 1. Daily report of Average CPU utilazation. 2. Daily report of Disk usage , VM usage. 3. Weekly report of Average CPU utilazation. 4. Weekly report of Disk

Re: iptables and performance issues

rsion of iptables, nothing else. Doing "iptables > > -nL" gave a much quicker response. > > > > The main problem is that everything is slow after loading the rules ( > > examples: webmin, vnc, opening a shell, smtp ) Once I disable the > > rules the perfor

Re: iptables and performance issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 13:21:53 -0500, Hal Burgiss wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:51:51PM -0500, James Pifer wrote: > > Every takes longer to run. With iptables loaded webmin takes 30 > > seconds load a page. With iptables off it's immediate. > >

Re: iptables and performance issues

On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:51:51PM -0500, James Pifer wrote: > Every takes longer to run. With iptables loaded webmin takes 30 seconds > load a page. With iptables off it's immediate. You are not blocking localhost connections are you? Just a thought ... I don't know what that would do, but worth

Re: iptables and performance issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23 Dec 2002 12:51:51 -0500, James Pifer wrote: > Every takes longer to run. With iptables loaded webmin takes 30 > seconds load a page. With iptables off it's immediate. > > Same with applications in x windows. With iptables loaded xterm takes >

Re: iptables and performance issues

Every takes longer to run. With iptables loaded webmin takes 30 seconds load a page. With iptables off it's immediate. Same with applications in x windows. With iptables loaded xterm takes 15 seconds to load, while it load immediately with iptables either unloaded or the rules flushed. My /etc/

Re: iptables and performance issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23 Dec 2002 07:42:30 -0500, James Pifer wrote: > Hi Bret. Yes that is the same thread. Slowness when doing -L just > seems to be a symptom of the same problem. Anyone else have any > information that might help? "iptables -L" does DNS lookups whil

Re: iptables and performance issues

ot; gave a much quicker response. > > The main problem is that everything is slow after loading the rules ( > examples: webmin, vnc, opening a shell, smtp ) Once I disable the > rules the performance picks back up. My intentions are to make this > server my SMTP gateway which wi

Re: iptables and performance issues

Hi Bret. Yes that is the same thread. Slowness when doing -L just seems to be a symptom of the same problem. Anyone else have any information that might help? Thanks, James On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 23:09, Bret Hughes wrote: > On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 21:12, James Pifer wrote: > > Anyone else have anyth

Re: iptables and performance issues

On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 21:12, James Pifer wrote: > Anyone else have anything to add to this or can anyone give more detail > on how this is a DNS issue? I have a very similar problem as the > original poster. > If this is the thread I respondeed to, I thought his issue was that the -L was taking a

Re: iptables and performance issues

opening a shell, smtp ) Once I disable the rules the performance picks >back up. My intentions are to make this server my SMTP gateway which will be >handling thousands of emails on a daily basis and the performance issue after loading >iptables is preventing me from deploying this se

Re: iptables and performance issues

ything is slow after loading the rules ( examples:  webmin, vnc, opening a shell, smtp ) Once I disable the rules the performance picks back up.  My intentions are to make this server my SMTP gateway which will be handling thousands of emails on a daily basis and the performance issue after loading iptab

Re: iptables and performance issues

On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 05:59:23AM -0800, lester lasad wrote: > > I am running redhat 7.3 everything is working properly until loading the iptables >rules. After loading the rules I am taking a big performance hit. It can take >anywhere from 10 - 30 seconds for my server to

Re: iptables and performance issues

I am taking a big performance hit. It can take >anywhere from 10 - 30 seconds for my server to display the results of "iptables -L". >This wasn't happening prior to the rules being loaded. Trying to open a shell has >the same results as well as many other things. >

Re: iptables and performance issues

On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 07:59, lester lasad wrote: > > I am running redhat 7.3 everything is working properly until loading the iptables >rules. After loading the rules I am taking a big performance hit. It can take >anywhere from 10 - 30 seconds for my server to display th

iptables and performance issues

I am running redhat 7.3  everything is working properly until loading the iptables rules.  After loading the rules I am taking a big performance hit.  It can take anywhere from 10 - 30 seconds for my server to display the results of "iptables -L".  This wasn't happening prior to

RE: Re[4]: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 look at recompiling your krenel to match the machine. That can give a significant speed increase over the stock kernel. You might laso look at recompiling some of the other software on the machine, to get some better performance from that, but I&#

Re[4]: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

how much I could improve performance with some simple changes :) Don't take this as a complaint about RH opposed to FreeBSD, because it is not! If I preferred FreeBSD over RH, I would still be using FreeBSD. I had my reasons to make the shift, and I do like RH so far, I just have to learn it

Re[2]: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

I must become better at reading these man pages. I could not understand where I should place the "-", but I guess when the part describe the "-" flag is placed under "Regular File", then the "-" should be placed together with the filaname :) In time I will learn to read those man pages, I'm sure :)

Re: Re[2]: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 15:30, Søren Neigaard wrote: > The reason I'm looking for performance tuning is my hardware :) I have > some very old hardware, an old IBM PC Server 520 with HW SCSI RAID, > but only with 2 P133 CPU's and 256 MB RAM (this is all the RAM it will > take,

Re: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

On 00:27 16 Dec 2002, U/hyZW4gTmVpZ2FhcmQ= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | CS> | Adding a "-" in the syslog.conf? Huh where do you find information on | CS> | this?? What is this, and what does it do? | | CS> "man syslog.conf" should say. | | Yes I found it now (somehow I missed it before), but shou

Re[2]: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

Sunday, December 15, 2002, 11:43:28 PM, Cameron wrote: CS> On 21:30 15 Dec 2002, U/hyZW4gTmVpZ2FhcmQ= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CS> | The reason I'm looking for performance tuning is my hardware :) I have CS> | some very old hardware [...] CS> | [...] CS> | How and w

Re: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

On 21:30 15 Dec 2002, U/hyZW4gTmVpZ2FhcmQ= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | The reason I'm looking for performance tuning is my hardware :) I have | some very old hardware [...] | [...] | How and where do I turn off reverse-lookups in Redhat? It's probably not a single switch, but per

Re[2]: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

The reason I'm looking for performance tuning is my hardware :) I have some very old hardware, an old IBM PC Server 520 with HW SCSI RAID, but only with 2 P133 CPU's and 256 MB RAM (this is all the RAM it will take, so no possible upgrade here). And therefore I want to remove everythi

Re: slow performance on RH advanced Srv 2.1

t: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:12 PM Subject: Re: slow performance on RH advanced Srv 2.1 > Hello, > > I'm also running Advanced Server 2.1, except this system is running > Oracle 9i. > I've talked to Redhat several times and been extremely disappointed > with thei

Re: GUI Performance

On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 14:11, Jim Slocomb wrote: > > When comparing the performance of the GIU and related applications Open > Office or Star Office take minutes to load where MS Office 2000 on Win2K pro > will take 10-15 seconds on the same machine. That is unfortunately nor

Re: GUI Performance

eed of > the graphic interface. The platform is my 750mhz laptop with 256 mb ram, > default rh8 personal workstation install. > > When comparing the performance of the GIU and related applications Open > Office or Star Office take minutes to load where MS Office 2000 on Win2K pro >

GUI Performance

ram, default rh8 personal workstation install. When comparing the performance of the GIU and related applications Open Office or Star Office take minutes to load where MS Office 2000 on Win2K pro will take 10-15 seconds on the same machine. It seems as though the Office Productivity applications

Re: slow performance on RH advanced Srv 2.1

Hye, we are using RH AdvSrv 2.1 as a HA cluster for filesharing (samba, nfs) on Dell 1650 (2x1133MHz, 2 GB RAM for each server). We share a 400GB diskunit as filespace. We detected a high cpu-usage in addition with low performance on the clients while accessing the fileshares. We think kswap

Re: slow performance on RH advanced Srv 2.1

luster for filesharing (samba, nfs) on Dell 1650 (2x1133MHz, 2 GB RAM for each server). We share a 400GB diskunit as filespace. We detected a high cpu-usage in addition with low performance on the clients while accessing the fileshares. We think kswap is the reason, because this process consums m

RE: Poor performance, high disk queue on software RAID partition

D configuration on an older box and had no issues with I/O performance. The current system is running Red Hat 2.4.18-17.7.xbigmem; the old system was running vanilla 2.4.18 with LVM 1.0.3 and VFS lock patches. -Original Message- From: nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December

slow performance on RH advanced Srv 2.1

Hye, we are using RH AdvSrv 2.1 as a HA cluster for filesharing (samba, nfs) on Dell 1650 (2x1133MHz, 2 GB RAM for each server). We share a 400GB diskunit as filespace. We detected a high cpu-usage in addition with low performance on the clients while accessing the fileshares. We think kswap is

Re: Poor performance, high disk queue on software RAID partition

Rechenberg, Andrew said: > > Sorry for the cross-post, but I wanted to hit all areas which may be a > contributing factor to my issue. sounds like your situation may be related to this: http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/kt20021202_194.html#6 no way you can do hardware raid10? one thing to try w

Poor performance, high disk queue on software RAID partition

Sorry for the cross-post, but I wanted to hit all areas which may be a contributing factor to my issue. I have a Dell PowerEdge 6600, quad Xeon 1.4GHz, HT enabled, 8GB RAM, with a PERC3/QC attached to two Dell PowerVault 220S disk SCSI disk arrays. The PERC is doing hardware RAID1 across twenty-

Re: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

eep it shutdown except for when you need it. That will free up RAM, keep your caches cleaner, and save CPU cycles. Speaking of RAM, it is cheap these days, if you are lacking performance, adding more RAM can frequently help. *Are* you lacking in performance? What kind of stuff are you going to

Re: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

the syslog.conf, or setting noatime in fstab, you are making a tradeoff in logging or worst case scenario disaster preparedness that you can live with, but in exchange you can get up to a 10 fold increase in performance. 4. Carefully examine the processes that *YOU* write. CGI programs, SQL qu

Re: How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Søren Neigaard wrote: | My Redhat will be a server, and not a workstation, and therefore I | guess I can remove some of the services starting at boot time, or? | | One thing I found in my dmesg was this: "VFS: Diskquotas version | dquot_6.5.0 initializ

How do I increase performance on my Redhat server?

My Redhat will be a server, and not a workstation, and therefore I guess I can remove some of the services starting at boot time, or? One thing I found in my dmesg was this: "VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.5.0 initialized". I don't need diskquotas so can't I just remove it somehow? Or am I going

PPPoE performance under Linux and BSDs

http://derbian.org/pppoe/   Very interesting read I thought.   ~Christopher  

PS - performance

I have procmail 3.21 and will upgrade to handle the truncated From lines, but still looking at load averages. Thanks, -Scott --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

m home) PGP Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc - Original Message - From: "Andy Elacion, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance > I tried also to rebuild my apache for athlon an

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

you want to be a true performance freak (I am every once in a while) then do software raid 0. Trade redundancy for performance. My favorite setup is to have /boot, /home and /usr/local in raid 1 and the rest in raid 0. That way, my personally generated data is kept redundant, while the system itself

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 14:22, Kent Borg wrote: > Do you (or could you) compile Linux kernels very often? Then go for > it, kernel compiles seem to saturate the CPU pretty well. It sounds > like you have a nice fast machine. Making it faster would be fun. > (And don't listen to those who say you s

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

; athlon-redhat-linux-gnu > noarch-redhat-linux-gnu (which points to i386) > > It's tempting to try this on an older system to see if there's a noticable > performance increase. If anyone else does/has - post the performance > increases to the list - many of us would like t

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

doing the same exact thing. Only reason I went about some of them is that I wanted to use some newer (Rawhite/Red Hat 8.0) packages on some 7.3 machines, so I needed to recompile them w/ GCC 2.9.6. | 1.Will it increase performance significantly ? I've watch the rebuild compile and the comp

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:35AM +, Adam Bowns wrote: > I don't have a performance issue, or at least i don't think i've got > one :-) How do I go about testing this ? Do you (or could you) compile Linux kernels very often? Then go for it, kernel compiles seem to sa

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Bowns wrote: | Thanks for the advice. I dont seem to have a /etc/rpmrc file so i | modified the /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc to make it use -O3 optimization when | compiling for the athlon You can always create one. Add that one line from below. You could

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

on-redhat-linux-gnu > noarch-redhat-linux-gnu (which points to i386) > > It's tempting to try this on an older system to see if there's a noticable > performance increase. If anyone else does/has - post the performance > increases to the list - many of us would like to k

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:35AM +, Adam Bowns wrote: > I don't have a performance issue, or at least i don't think i've got one > :-) How do I go about testing this ? If you don't have a performance issue, your time is probably better spent elsewhere... In an

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

I don't have a performance issue, or at least i don't think i've got one :-) How do I go about testing this ? Its a desktop machine (Athlon-XP 2200, 1GB pc2700, Asus A7v333(VIA KT333) U160 SCSI HDD) thats used for normal everyday tasks with a bit of java and C development thro

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:06:05PM +, Adam Bowns wrote: > I am considering rebuilding all the rpm's in use on my system so they > are optimised for my processor, but I have a few questions I would > really like to know the answer to before i start :-) > > 1.Will it

Re: Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

inux-gnu (which points to i386) It's tempting to try this on an older system to see if there's a noticable performance increase. If anyone else does/has - post the performance increases to the list - many of us would like to know if it's worth the effort. Hope this helps, - -Rick - --

Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

I am considering rebuilding all the rpm's in use on my system so they are optimised for my processor, but I have a few questions I would really like to know the answer to before i start :-) 1.Will it increase performance significantly ? 2.Is rpmbuild fully linked into gcc ? Can i use al

Rebuilding .src.rpm's for performance

I am considering rebuilding all the rpm's in use on my system so they are optimised for my processor, but I have a few questions I would really like to know the answer to before i start :-) 1.Will it increase performance significantly ? 2.Is rpmbuild fully linked into gcc ? Can i use al

  1   2   3   4   >