Eduardo A. dela Rosa wrote:
So I shutdown Eclipse, MySQL, and JBoss, hoping that it would release
resources that it ate up. Waited for quite a while, I tried to check my
resources. To my puzzle, it just looks the same as it was before those
major apps were properly shutdown.
Show us the resource
lown down? Your PC's responsiveness? Checking
what job
is taking CPU time would be more useful. Use "top" for that.//
Concerning your memory, a list member has already noticed you have still
enough resources free: Cached 195208, Free 76492. That's 271Mb of RAM free
to be used
Title: Re: Memory Resources - Howto Refresh
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 22:15, Zoki wrote:
*** As a list member mentioned, tell us more about the "slowed down"
experience. What has slown down? Your PC's responsiveness? Checking what job
is taking CPU time would be more u
Le 16/10/2003 14:22, « Eduardo A. dela Rosa » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> After days of work, without rebooting my box, it suddenly slowed down. My
> filesystem is just
> 41% of the total size that my hard disk can hold. I executed "free" to ch
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marcel
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 8:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Physical Memory is beeing filled (RH7.1)
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Thank you for your postings. I tried to change the bdflush
> paramet
Hi!
Thank you for your postings. I tried to change the bdflush parameters, but
with no difference in the behaviour of Linux.
I attached a file where I simulated my problem. There you see the memory
status after different actions as well as a "ps -ef".
Could it be that this is
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Harper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: Physical Memory is beeing filled (RH7.1)
> > Marcel,
> >
> > Your problem sounds like the Cache Swap
> > When I check the memory status within "KDE Control Center"
> or just by
> > the command "free" or "top", I can see how the physical memory is
> > beeing
> filled
> > every time something is written onto the harddisk. After
&
- Original Message -
From: "Marcel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:20 AM
Subject: Physical Memory is beeing filled (RH7.1)
> Hi
>
> When I check the memory status within "KDE Control Center" or just by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 06:20:55 -0500, Marcel wrote:
> When I check the memory status within "KDE Control Center" or just by the
> command "free" or "top", I can see how the physical memory is beeing filled
> e
Hi
When I check the memory status within "KDE Control Center" or just by the
command "free" or "top", I can see how the physical memory is beeing filled
every time something is written onto the harddisk. After the writing
process, the physical memory is not beein
ums under "swap". From my own system:
procs memory swap io system cpu
r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy wa id
0 0 19076 227272 92392 23682800 931 218 147 5 6 0 90
0 0 19076 22724
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 10:09, John Nichel wrote:
> Gee, y'all are making me feel bad...damn power outage.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] control]# uptime
> 10:33:30 up 85 days, 15:28, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.11, 0.12
>
I always have mixed emotions about having uptime this long. It is
certainl
Gee, y'all are making me feel bad...damn power outage.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] control]# uptime
10:33:30 up 85 days, 15:28, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.11, 0.12
Bret Hughes wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 07:54, David C. Hart wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 08:22, Eduardo A. dela Rosa wrote:
Hi,
We
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 07:54, David C. Hart wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 08:22, Eduardo A. dela Rosa wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Well, I don't really want to reboot my box. Is there a way that I
> > could refresh (or probably
> > release the unused) resources of my box? After all, some of my
> > pre
38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Memory Resources - Howto Refresh
David C. Hart wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 08:22, Eduardo A. dela Rosa wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Well, I don't really want to reboot my box. Is there a way that I
>>could refresh (or probab
David C. Hart wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 08:22, Eduardo A. dela Rosa wrote:
Hi,
Well, I don't really want to reboot my box. Is there a way that I
could refresh (or probably
release the unused) resources of my box? After all, some of my
previously used
That brings up an interesting question;
> Hi,
>
> After days of work, without rebooting my box, it suddenly slowed down.
> My filesystem is just
> 41% of the total size that my hard disk can hold. I executed "free" to
> check on the available
> memory resources. I found the following information:
>
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 08:22, Eduardo A. dela Rosa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, I don't really want to reboot my box. Is there a way that I
> could refresh (or probably
> release the unused) resources of my box? After all, some of my
> previously used
That brings up an interesting question; Our server
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 07:22, Eduardo A. dela Rosa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After days of work, without rebooting my box, it suddenly slowed
> down. My filesystem is just
> 41% of the total size that my hard disk can hold. I executed "free" to
> check on the available
>
Hi,
After days of work, without rebooting my box, it suddenly slowed down. My filesystem is just
41% of the total size that my hard disk can hold. I executed "free" to check on the available
memory resources. I found the following information:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using a Red Hat 7.2 box as my web server. I am using mod_php and
mod_perl (gallery). I find that after a day or two, the memory
consumption of Apache grows to consume basically all of RAM. The only
fix is to restart httpd.
What can I look into to fix this?
Thanks
Kevin Breit
Sorry, but I'm really kind of inexperienced in this and am admittedly
struggling to catch up.
Have RedHat 6.2 installed, kernel is 2.4.20
Intell machine, 4 gigs ram. "free" command only sees 1. Well, 904672 to be
exact.
Tried the "append=mem=4096M" in lilo.conf. Made sure it was for the defau
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 19:23, Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
> > Not all memory work in all machines. The 128 you added maybe
> > wrong for your machine. Parity, no parity, oem,...etc. Check
> > with the manufacturer to see what kind of memory you need
>
> True. They were clo
if it is a problem, correct it?
> If you need more output, let me know...
>
I remember having this kind of question on SunOS. I've been told by
Sun's guru (not actually from Sun) that when a process terminates, it
stays in memory as long as the memory is not requested by another
proc
Im wondering if this a memory leak of some sort...its weird...havent seen
this before
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated...
Jason
At 12:15 PM 8/28/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Hello everyone...
Im running a RH 7.3 server. It is running Samba 2.2.8a with OpenLDAP
2.0.27 on the backend for
Hello everyone...
Im running a RH 7.3 server. It is running Samba 2.2.8a with OpenLDAP 2.0.27
on the backend for accounts.
Everything is working so far with this server, however I noticed something
today that im not to sure about..
The server specs:
Xeon 2.8ghz
2gig RAM
3 36 320 SCSI drives
Wha
A little more info would be helpful. How about
ps -e -opid,comm,pcpu,vsz,user,group
and
ps afx
Also, check your syslog.
Jon
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Cedric MARSOT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed a RH9 box on a Dual XEON 3Ghz, with 1GB of memory and two 36GB
> RAID 1 SCSI hard dr
Hi,
I have installed a RH9 box on a Dual XEON 3Ghz, with 1GB of memory and two 36GB
RAID 1 SCSI hard drive.
The kernel is 2.4.20-19.9smp
I have a big problem. I have today only one local sendmail running, and mrtg.
Afer one week, I have a little message on the console:
(CRON) error (can&#
> Not all memory work in all machines. The 128 you added maybe
> wrong for your machine. Parity, no parity, oem,...etc. Check
> with the manufacturer to see what kind of memory you need
True. They were closed when I got home this evening. I plan on calling
them tomorrow. It cam
> through a loop of stuffing characters into an array.
> I wrote the Perl script. We are going to create a C++
> version of the Perl script. However, we do not think
> that Perl is the problem.
Hmmm, do not be so sure. Think for a moment. How is the array indexed?
It is almost assuredly a l
Not all memory work in all machines. The 128 you added maybe wrong for
your machine. Parity, no parity, oem,...etc. Check with the
manufacturer to see what kind of memory you need
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > I am running a RedHat 8.0 sytem w/ all updates. I have an old
> > PIII-450 with an Intel SE440BX-2 MB. It's the one with 3 memory
> > slots. I installed an 128MB stick of ram for a whopping
> total of 256.
>
> Does the BIOS show 256 now?
Ye
I was under the impression that only 2GB was mapped to userspace, and the
other 2GB was mapped for kernel data, although I could be wrong.
Jon
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Robert Vaughn wrote:
> During some tests we have observed some odd memory
> behavior in Linux. It appears that our Linux
Help!!
I am running a RedHat 8.0 sytem w/ all updates. I have an old PIII-450
with an Intel SE440BX-2 MB. It's the one with 3 memory slots. I
installed an 128MB stick of ram for a whopping total of 256.
Can't boot due to kernel panic. I read the archives and there is a ton
of stuff
Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
Help!!
I am running a RedHat 8.0 sytem w/ all updates. I have an old PIII-450
with an Intel SE440BX-2 MB. It's the one with 3 memory slots. I
installed an 128MB stick of ram for a whopping total of 256.
Does the BIOS show 256 now?
Can't boot due to kernel
During some tests we have observed some odd memory
behavior in Linux. It appears that our Linux server
with 10 GB of RAM will only allocate a maximum of 2.8
GB per process. When we try to exceed 2.8 GB per
process the process dies. We are interested in
finding why and how to fix the behavior
ring some tests we have observed some odd memory
behavior in Linux. It appears that our Linux server
with 10 GB of RAM will only allocate a maximum of 2.8
GB per process. When we try to exceed 2.8 GB per
process the process dies. We are interested in
finding why and how to fix the behavior.
Ou
hi,
top can display how much the ratio of memory occupied by the processes, but it cannot
display the distribution of all memory distribution.
am i right? need your comments. THX
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Scottaline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMA
Dear Edson Manners,
Thanx for your response
Edson Manners wrote:
>You may have done too much work in this case. I simply use the 'top'
>command. If, under normal circumstances, you ar using swap memory then I
>usually think it it time to upgrade. You know that you really need
..
free shows that I have a total of 121 MB memory (I cant seem to figure out
why it shows 121 when it should be 128) and I have used up 117
My question is Is there a benchmark, a kind of threshold, which will warn me
additional RAM is required? Should I wait till the used up portion shows
12
.brainbench.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Dear List.
>
> I did not find any interface to search this list, so please
> pardon me if this question has already been asked.
>
> I have Redhat 8.0 installed on a machine which has 128 MB RAM
> and 40 GB hard disk space.
>
Dear List.
I did not find any interface to search this list, so please
pardon me if this question has already been asked.
I have Redhat 8.0 installed on a machine which has 128 MB RAM
and 40 GB hard disk space.
How do I determine that my system is running low on RAM memory?
Meaning which
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:23:39 +0800
"wm7cv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> insightfully noted:
>which command can display all the memory distribution and its related
>procee?
>
>is it ipcs, or is there some other better command?
>
>THX
Try top
Mike
top
Regards
Suart Clark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of wm7cv
Sent: Wednesday, 30 July 2003 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: which command can display all the memory distribution and its
related procee?
which command can display
which command can display all the memory distribution
and its related procee?
is it ipcs, or is there some other better
command?
THX
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:54:49AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On my new RedHat 9 web server I see the physical memory is pretty much
> always shown as 99% used, disk swap 0%. I have 768 megs ram, AMD 600mhz
> Athlon cpu.
> Is this normal? Should I reboot it when it gets li
On my new RedHat 9 web server I see the physical memory is pretty much
always shown as 99% used, disk swap 0%. I have 768 megs ram, AMD 600mhz
Athlon cpu.
Is this normal? Should I reboot it when it gets like this?
--
Chip Wiegand
Computer Services
Simrad, Inc
www.simradusa.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Do these entries with RH 9 indicate memory problems?
Jul 11 17:03:30 www kernel: memory : c1566d80
Jul 11 17:03:30 www kernel: memory :
Jul 11 17:03:30 www kernel: memory : c1566b00
Jul 12 13:44:15 www kernel: memory : c1566d80
Jul 12 13:44:15 www kernel: memory :
Jul 12 13:44
When I right click on a word not in the dictionary in oowrite, memory
usage for soffice.bin goes from about 48MB to 210MB. I'm wondering if
anybody else is having this problem, could this be a bug?
Tom
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redha
I would check the mobo manual and see if you have to reset a jumper
somewhere. Also, the voltage on the pc100 RAM may not be compatible with
the mobo. If all else fails, take the memory to a shop that has a
tester and get it tested. It may have gotten zapped.
BTW, if you get into Crucial&#
Silkk - Try here:
http://www2.driverguide.com/uploads/uploads6/15171.html
Good Luck
Mike Wafkowski
- Original Message -
From: "Silkk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:39 AM
Subject: Re: RedHat Wont Reconize my DIMM ram (M
will
> not help you.
>
> That board is simply too old.
>
> Silkk, one thing I detest on this list is lazy people. Please make sure
> when you say you've searched you really have. You said your BIOS date
> was: 07/04/97. The BIOS available is 04/09/1997. The beta BIOSs s
your BIOS date
was: 07/04/97. The BIOS available is 04/09/1997. The beta BIOSs seem
even later as say are said to support drives over 8Gb.
Also, that memory seems a little weird - some posts on the net say it is
SoDIMM memory, some say it is used by Apple in PowerBook G3s.
It's a weird com
Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
I ran into the same problem here. I have a Intel SE440BX-2 board. I
bought the cheapo stick of 128 MB SDRAM. It won't work. Have to buy
the more expensive one that is "guaranteed". It won't use the PC100/133
memory has to be strictly PC100. These (
I have been "searching" for a BIOS update for the BIOS running Linux but couldnt find
anything? Any HELP???
Is updating the BIOS would even help? What do you guys think?
"Motherboard" is:
PC Chips
Model M537
And the "BIOS" info is:
Award Modular BIOS v4.51PG
Award Bios id string 07/04/97-VXPro
The memory i put in and tryed is:
Hyundai
HYM7V65801
PC100-322-620
--- Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Wafkowski wrote:
>
> > Follow Up - That board is from '97. It's possible that it won't work with
> > PC100 ram and certainly won
I ran into the same problem here. I have a Intel SE440BX-2 board. I
bought the cheapo stick of 128 MB SDRAM. It won't work. Have to buy
the more expensive one that is "guaranteed". It won't use the PC100/133
memory has to be strictly PC100. These (this) board has onl
that PC100 and PC133 clock back to 66/100 just fine.
Are you sure some motherboards specifically deny memory rated higher
than the required clock speed?
If so I need a new way of thinking.
Regards,
Ed.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
It's an old Socket 7 VX MB that has both Simm and Dimm slots so I think you
hit it on the head. It only supports double sided memory I do believe.
Regards,
MRW
- Original Message -
From: "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tues
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:50 PM
Subject: RedHat Wont Reconize my DIMM ram (Memory not even on POST)
> Hii...im running RedHat 7.3. (2.4.20) I was using 64mb (2) 32 pin simm
Ram. But then i
> took that out and added 1 64mb 168 pin Dimm Ram but then when my system
boots up
If your PC BIOS won't see it NOTHING!!! will see it.
Forget your Linux problems - get the BIOS to see it first.
My bet is you've put single sided memory in, and the BIOS isn't designed
to see sigle sided memory.
Best you can do is look for a BIOS upgrade (this sometimes works -
Does the Mobo recognize the ram on boot up? If not, how would RH recognize
it?
Try reinserting it in a different memory slot. Is is compatible memory (not
ECC, etc)?
MRW
- Original Message -
From: "Silkk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesd
Hii...im running RedHat 7.3. (2.4.20) I was using 64mb (2) 32 pin simm Ram. But then i
took that out and added 1 64mb 168 pin Dimm Ram but then when my system boots up it
wont
recognize it on the BOOT SCREEN (POST) or when i run the command "free" when i boot
into
linux prompt. I was wondering wh
It's beacuse of the Linux memory management. Almost all your RAM is filled
up with cache files. When a process needs more memory, Linux simply frees
what is needed by cleaning up some of that cache.
At work, I run pretty much the same services, plus an ICQ server (Iserverd,
wich
just upgraded my RH9 box to 1Gb DDR.. I thought, rather
presumptuously that this might give me a little more space to play
with memory wise.. but after looking through 'top' I get the
following:
-
108 processes: 107 s
I just went through the exact same issue. I used my System Monitor program
via my start menu -> System Tools(I think thats the path) to examine what
services were munching up memory. Im guessing you have gnome installed?
Try using the System Monitor Program to see what your Memory consumption
Kelerion wrote:
> Hi guys.. hoping someone can explain something to me here..
>
> I have just upgraded my RH9 box to 1Gb DDR.. I thought, rather
> presumptuously that this might give me a little more space to play
> with memory wise.. but after looking through 'top&#x
Hi guys.. hoping someone can explain something to me here..
I have just upgraded my RH9 box to 1Gb DDR.. I thought, rather
presumptuously that this might give me a little more space to play with
memory wise.. but after looking through 'top' I get the
Hi,
I am using Redhat 9.0 and I have a memory problem. I have a parent process
and child processes which are created on demand by forking at the main
process. They use a shared memory to share some data. I monitor the memory
usage by Redhat 9.0's own "system monitor" tool. It h
Hi all!
I have a system with 1 Gig of memory. I have a Progress (similar to Oracle)
database on this system. I want to optimize the shared memory for my
database, yet I don't want to starve the OS. Question one: What percentage
of the system memory needs to be available to the s
ubject:RedHat 7.1 cannot see all physical memory
I have 256M memory, but RedHat 7.1 can see only 64M.
I have tried boot: linux mem=256M and in
/etc/lilo.conf
append="mem=256M", but both are no luck.
Any suggestions will highly appreciated.
Shawn
_
I have 256M memory, but RedHat 7.1 can see only 64M.
I have tried boot: linux mem=256M and in
/etc/lilo.conf
append="mem=256M", but both are no luck.
Any suggestions will highly appreciated.
Shawn
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Eas
Hi All,
I've just been looking for the Bugzilla reports about the above problem. It
seems that there may be a fix, but I'm not too sure. Some of the bug reports
have been assigned, one is closed, with a reference to a fix I don't really
understand how to use (i.e. which rpm do I need from the list
cholas Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31/03/2003 16:33
Please respond to redhat-list
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Memory: Bios total 262144K - top total 14332K
For lilo try this:
mem=256M
at the lilo prompt.
nick
For lilo try this:
mem=256M
at the lilo prompt.
nick
Nicholas Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31/03/2003 11:26
Please respond to redhat-list
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Memory: Bios total 262144K - top total 14332K
If you are using grub as you
ubject: Re: Memory: Bios total 262144K - top total 14332K
If you are using grub as your boot loader, try this:
http://www.gnu.org/manual/grub-0.90/html_node/grub_100.html
FYI> It helps to know what version of Red Hat you are using.
Message: 10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Memory: B
If you are using grub as your boot loader, try this:
http://www.gnu.org/manual/grub-0.90/html_node/grub_100.html
FYI> It helps to know what version of Red Hat you are using.
Message: 10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Memory: Bios total 262144K - top total 14332K
From: "John-Paul
Hello List...
I appear to have a memory configuration problem. The difference between
the system bios and what free/top reports as total memory seems very odd.
free -m reports 13 as total mem!
Is it possible to tell the OS how much memory is available?
thanks
/j-p.
--
redhat-list
> Hi there
>
> On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) memory usage is increasing up to 440MB
> (available RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than
> 50MB. We checked all running processes and could not find a process using
> extremely much memory. As well a reb
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) is memory usage increasing up to 440MB
> (available RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than
> 50MB. We checked all running processes and could not find a process using
> extremely
LINUX uses up memory for buffers and cache, but will
release that memory for programs if needed.
What do free and/or vmstat tell you?
Remember, the values in the -/+ buffers/cache: can be
available.
In my experience, you are only low on memory if you are
actually seeing swap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linux uses memory as swap space, until processes want enough physical
memory that the system must swap to disk. I'd say don't worry about
it, as it's probably normal operation.
- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Oh yeah, I also have this behaviour. I even bought more RAM because of that
:-).
The process in cause was one of the children of the X process. But I don't
think it really consumme all this memory. It looks for me more as a shared
memory pool.
Does anybody here has more information?
Hi there
On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) is memory usage increasing up to 440MB
(available RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than
50MB. We checked all running processes and could not find a process using
extremely much memory. As well a reboot has not helped to bring
Hi there On our Linux Server (OS RedHat 7.3) memory usage is increasing up to 440MB(available
RAM capacity 512MB). Usually it should not be any higher than50MB. We
checked all running processes and could not find a process usingextremely
much memory. As well a reboot has not helped to bring
I got it.
Thank you very much!
- Original Message -
From: "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: Is there a way to set memory size in LILO file
> Charlie Song said:
> > Hi all,
> >
Charlie Song said:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a way to set memory size in LILO file?
>
> For example, mem=128M.
append="mem=128M"
be sure to run lilo after changing lilo.conf
nate
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.re
Hi all,
Is there a way to set memory size in LILO
file?
For example, mem=128M.
Thanks,
Charlie
Hi All,
Does anyone know which command can be used to fix
memory size in boot loader file GRUB.conf ? I know a "append" command can be
used at lilo.conf.
thanks,
Charlie
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> >Hi all,
>
> >I'm working memory test program based on the linux. As my
> >understanding, linux provides the virtual memory for user program to
> >access. Does anyone know how to make linux allow user program to
> &
>Hi all,
>I'm working memory test program based on the linux. As my understanding,
linux provides the virtual memory for user program to access. Does anyone
know >how to make linux allow user program to access real memory space
instead of the virtual memory?
I would go to www
Hi all,
I'm working memory test program based on the
linux. As my understanding, linux provides the virtual memory for user
program to access. Does anyone know how to make linux allow user program to
access real memory space instead of the virtual memory?
Thanks,
Charlie
param at the kernel to see if it will
allow you to see the memory you've installed? In the
/usr/src/Documnetation/kernel-parameters.txt, there is a param that you
can pass to the kernel:
mem=nn[KMG] [KNL,BOOT] force use of a specific amount of
memory; to be used when the kernel is not
el to see if it will
allow you to see the memory you've installed? In the
/usr/src/Documnetation/kernel-parameters.txt, there is a param that you
can pass to the kernel:
mem=nn[KMG] [KNL,BOOT] force use of a specific amount of
memory; to be used when the kernel is
Yes ! a previous install had this !
Rgds
Lars
On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 09:38 AM, Cannon, Andrew wrote:
Will your mobo support this amount of memory?
-Original Message-
From: Lars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Will your mobo support this amount of memory?
-Original Message-
From: Lars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Memory missing on RH 7.3
Hi all,
My RH 7.3 is reporting 512mb ram but has 1.5gb installed
does anybody know
Hi all,
My RH 7.3 is reporting 512mb ram but has 1.5gb installed
does anybody know how to solve this issue ?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Rgds
Lars
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I have a dual P3 500mhz with 880MB ram running RH80. I am running a program
that consumes large amounts of memory, but it never touches the swap. For
this reason, the program crashes due to insufficient memory. Why is this and
how can I correct this? If anyone knows, please help, I'm a st
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I prevent lack of memory, mobo doesn't hold much more, will
> increasing swap space fix this, and how do i do it?
Fix the program. Read the documentation. Add more swap of you think it
will help (I rather doubt it, if the progra
1 - 100 of 567 matches
Mail list logo
