Sorry, then I must be as confused as Kelly
I'll shut-up now
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/13/03 12:29PM >>>
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 12:25, Leonard Miller wrote:
> or you could look at getting a remote X display using
> something like Putty and an X client. Somebody here
> knows about them, I've seen th
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 13:11, kelly wrote:
> I didn´t get offended at all. It´s just that this is all too new for me...
> but it´s ok, i figured out what i have to do.
Glad to hear it, but that was directed at Leonard. Kelly, please step
away from the keyboard before you hurt somebody. (jk!) :
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 01:26:52PM -0300, kelly wrote:
> Sorry for the lack of information
> I´ll try to make it better
> I have a linux box which has samba running on it. The windows boxes
> autenticate on samba and can "see" each other perfectly. What i´m trying to
> do is: i have a lin
Sorry for the lack of information
I´ll try to make it better
I have a linux box which has samba running on it. The windows boxes
autenticate on samba and can "see" each other perfectly. What i´m trying to
do is: i have a linux desktop which is not the one that has the samba
server, is a
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 12:36, Leonard Miller wrote:
> Sorry, then I must be as confused as Kelly
> I'll shut-up now
Please don't be offended. I only wished to "corral" the thread back in
before it gets out of focus (as if that's possible). ;-)
--
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consulting
http://w
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:04, Kelly Goedert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a samba server configured and running nicely. All the desktops
> that run windows 9x can be accessed without problem. But, i can't access
> the desktops that run linux RH9. I'm sure i missed something but can't
> figure it out.
> Sorry, then I must be as confused as Kelly
> I'll shut-up now
>
Not really; it's just that the work desktop is overloaded to the point of confusion.
Does it mean desktop as in a computer form factor, or desktop as a graphical user
interface metaphor? However, I think that in this case it is in
I didn´t get offended at all. It´s just that this is all too new for me...
but it´s ok, i figured out what i have to do.
Thanks to all that tried to help... sorry the confusion...
Jason Dixon writes:
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 12:36, Leonard Miller wrote:
Sorry, then I must be as confused as Kell
Hello,
I have a samba server configured and running nicely. All the desktops
that run windows 9x can be accessed without problem. But, i can't access
the desktops that run linux RH9. I'm sure i missed something but can't
figure it out.
Can anybody help?
Thanks.
Kelly.
--
redhat-list mailing
Look at VNC
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
Leonard
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/13/03 12:26PM >>>
Sorry for the lack of information
I ll try to make it better
I have a linux box which has samba running on it. The windows boxes
autenticate on samba and can "see" each other perfectly. W
or you could look at getting a remote X display using
something like Putty and an X client. Somebody here
knows about them, I've seen the threads.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/13/03 12:26PM >>>
Sorry for the lack of information
I ll try to make it better
I have a linux box which has samba ru
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 12:26, kelly wrote:
> Sorry for the lack of information
> I´ll try to make it better
> I have a linux box which has samba running on it. The windows boxes
> autenticate on samba and can "see" each other perfectly. What i´m trying to
> do is: i have a linux desktop wh
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 12:25, Leonard Miller wrote:
> or you could look at getting a remote X display using
> something like Putty and an X client. Somebody here
> knows about them, I've seen the threads.
Please stop. Kelly is looking for a way to view SMB shares between
systems. Neither VNC no
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Linux Desktops
>
>
> Does anyone know of a way to lock down Linux desktop? I have
> a friend who wanted to know if Linux could be locked down
> similar to Windows NT & Windows 2K.
>
> 1) L
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Art Ross wrote:
> Does anyone know of a way to lock down Linux desktop? I have a friend
> who wanted to
> know if Linux could be locked down similar to Windows NT & Windows 2K.
Along with the other suggestions given to you it would probably be a good
idea to look at which she
Art Ross said:
> Does anyone know of a way to lock down Linux desktop? I have a friend who
> wanted to
> know if Linux could be locked down similar to Windows NT & Windows 2K.
linux is lightyears more "lockable" then any MS system. Though it can
take a bit of work to setup depending on what your
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:03:13PM -0500, Art Ross wrote:
> Does anyone know of a way to lock down Linux desktop? I have a friend
> who wanted to
> know if Linux could be locked down similar to Windows NT & Windows 2K.
I believe it can, but I haven't tried to confirm this. You'll need to
disable
Does anyone know of a way to lock down Linux desktop? I have a friend
who wanted to
know if Linux could be locked down similar to Windows NT & Windows 2K.
1) Limit applications that they can run.
2) Standardize everything on the desktop.
3) Never allow them to load any applications.
Can you for
18 matches
Mail list logo
