Art Ross said:
> Does anyone know of a way to lock down Linux desktop? I have a friend who
> wanted to
> know if Linux could be locked down similar to Windows NT & Windows 2K.


linux is lightyears more "lockable" then any MS system. Though it can
take a bit of work to setup depending on what your trying to do. Linux
isn't alone in this regaurd though, this pretty much applies to any
unix. About a year and a half ago I setup a solaris 8 system that
had to allow anonymous users access to CDE from the internet. Took
several days to fully secure, with a host-based firewall, automated
scripts to check/repair permissions, delete & re-create home directories,
and test. But it is solid as a rock(and still runs today).

by contrast, we had win32 systems(NT and 2000) which had to allow
anonymous access to MS word, excel and a few other apps via the
internet as well. I don't know if it was the admin who set them up,
but they were repeatedly compromised. They tried installing group
policies and such but the end result wasn't very effective(they had
to lock out everyone including administrator for some reason). During
some tests I was able to setup an anonymous ftp on one of my home
servers, drag & drop executables to the remote system's disk and
execute programs. Kinda funny that MS word provides full access to
IE, and even a seemingly locked down IE it was pretty easy to bypass
(and I haven't used much MS stuff since '99). The admin of the win32
systems was my co worker, and had a good deal of knowledge about MS
systems, and worked in an office with a dozen win32 developers(including
kernel developers), so he's not some idiot off the street. Though
he may not be as good at win32 as some of the experts out there.

only downside to my solaris locking was that when I next installed a
patch cluster the machine kernel paniced on boot, took about 30
minutes to fix though. I guess I flipped one or 2 too many switches :)
(I even removed suid bits from every program on the system except
the 2 that required it, normal users could not load a shell, not
run ls, cd or mkdir or cp or mv etc.) Took a lot of testing since
CDE has a TON of dependencies. Same for staroffice, acrobat reader,
netscape, openwindows etc.

having ipf running on the box helped too, all outbound traffic was
blocked except for a few ips(local DNS, local webserver, a few
websites so users could use netscape).

so in short, yes you can lock a linux box down tighter then most..
BUT, it can take a good amount of knowledge and experience to do
it(once it's done it's easy to mirror the enviornment to other
systems). But with the problems my co worker had locking down his
systems I think it's probably easier since unix/linux is more
transparent(easier to see whats going on).

nate





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to