On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Jason Williams wrote:
> Let me correct really quick. this happened when I attempted to install the
> daemontools.
>
> Jason
>
> At 01:51 PM 7/21/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >Well, I seem to be having a rough day today.
> >
> >I was installing djbdns today on one of our test Re
Alternate for BIND.
But I was having some problems with the daemontools that are required in
order to use djbdns.
At 02:28 PM 7/21/2003 -0700, you wrote:
what does this program do?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-l
what does this program do?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Let me correct really quick. this happened when I attempted to install the
daemontools.
Jason
At 01:51 PM 7/21/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Well, I seem to be having a rough day today.
I was installing djbdns today on one of our test Red Hat 9.0 servers.
I've installed djbdns before on *BSD and RH 7.
Well, I seem to be having a rough day today.
I was installing djbdns today on one of our test Red Hat 9.0 servers.
I've installed djbdns before on *BSD and RH 7.3 with no problems.
When I go to install the program, this is what I get:
make: *** [envdir] Error 1
Copying commands into ./command...
Thank you for the reply, unfortunately, tho, I still get the same errors.
On Sunday 30 March 2003 06:49 pm, you wrote:
> Try setting all of your environment variables first:
>
> I think the one that is giving you problems is the JAVA_HOME one
> Just do:
> export JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/j2sdk-1.4.1_02
Try setting all of your environment variables first:
I think the one that is giving you problems is the JAVA_HOME one
Just do:
export JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/j2sdk-1.4.1_02 (your path will not be exacly that
but just have a look at where your java is installed )
Then try again. You will want to set
I've been using the oracle howto for oracle 8.1 and RH 7.2 and when I go to
install I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux]$ ./runInstaller
Initializing Java Virtual Machine from /usr/local/jre/bin/jre. Please wait...
java_vm process: could not find Java VM symbols
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanx
I've had issues with their JRE. Unless they fixed it I don't recommend it.
Below was my inspiration for Oracle installs with RedHat.
http://staff.in2.hr/denis/oracle
Yes, there are settings in the Oracle environment which must be set prior to
installation including changes to the kernel per Ora
Jon Haugsand wrote:
* Dan Dobbs
Make sure you have Java 1.1.8 installed. It's rather picky about the
version. You should be able to download an RPM or tarball from Sun.
Doesn't that follow with Oracle?
There is a *GREAT* howto at:
http://jordan.fortwayne.com/oracle/
--
redhat-list
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 09:06:08AM -0700, sentinel wrote:
> Unless Oracle fixed it I wouldn't recommend using their own JRE. When I
> started installing Oracle on Linux servers I had all sorts of problems.
> When I replaced their JRE most of the problems went away.
>
>
> > Every Oracle installa
Unless Oracle fixed it I wouldn't recommend using their own JRE. When I
started installing Oracle on Linux servers I had all sorts of problems.
When I replaced their JRE most of the problems went away.
> Every Oracle installation package I've seen (admittedly not a huge
> number) contains its o
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:44:23AM +0100, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> * Dan Dobbs
> > Make sure you have Java 1.1.8 installed. It's rather picky about the
> > version. You should be able to download an RPM or tarball from Sun.
>
> Doesn't that follow with Oracle?
Every Oracle installation package I've
* Dan Dobbs
> Make sure you have Java 1.1.8 installed. It's rather picky about the
> version. You should be able to download an RPM or tarball from Sun.
Doesn't that follow with Oracle?
--
Jon Haugsand, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.norges-bank.no
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mai
Make sure you have Java 1.1.8 installed. It's rather picky about the
version. You should be able to download an RPM or tarball from Sun.
-dd
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/24/03 09:12AM >>>
When I go to install Oracle 8i I get this problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux]$ ./runIns.sh
java_vm process: could
When I go to install Oracle 8i I get this problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux]$ ./runIns.sh
java_vm process: could not find Java VM symbols
How would I fix this?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I'm currently running RH 6.2 on a server I have, using the perl-5.00503-10 rpm
that shipped with 6.2. I'm trying to install the GD, DBI, and DBD::mysql perl
modules but am not having any luck. I'm getting the following errors when
trying to install DBI:
/usr/include/bits/local_lim.h:27: linux/l
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
>
> > Well I did a check and found that glibc-devel was also installed. Why don't I
> > give you some more accurate information. I've attached a log of the make
> > process. Maybe this will give you some ideas.
>
> Well, from your
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
> Well I did a check and found that glibc-devel was also installed. Why don't I
> give you some more accurate information. I've attached a log of the make
> process. Maybe this will give you some ideas.
Well, from your output it really looks like the ker
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
>
> > Gordon,
> > I did an rpm -q kernel-headers and this package is installed. Do you have
> > any other ideas? Thanks for your insight.
> > Best Regards,
> > Art
>
> The only other package that should have a required "socket.h
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
> Gordon,
> I did an rpm -q kernel-headers and this package is installed. Do you have
> any other ideas? Thanks for your insight.
> Best Regards,
> Art
The only other package that should have a required "socket.h" is
glibc-devel.
--
If I had a doll
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
>
> > When I repeated this process on another RH6.2 box on the home network,
> > (Originally was a canned Gnome install for RH6.0 with a RH6.2 upgrade) I
> > encountered some problems with the 'make' step. There were some
> > difficult
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Art Ross wrote:
> When I repeated this process on another RH6.2 box on the home network,
> (Originally was a canned Gnome install for RH6.0 with a RH6.2 upgrade) I
> encountered some problems with the 'make' step. There were some
> difficults with finding 'socket.h'. My hun
I've successfully installed SSH 1.2.31 on a RH6.2 box that I'm going to
use for my home network router and gateway. I conducted the canned
Server install for this box. This box will have no peripherals
connected to it, so I need to do remote adminstration with SSH. I had
no problems with the th
At 09:27 AM 11/22/01 +0800, you wrote:
>> Someone on the list said that Adaptec had problems making the CD's for
>some
>> reason, I forget why. The poster said that burning the discs using Nero
>> with the DAO (Disc-At-Once) option selected enabled him to burn the CD's
>> successfully.
>>
>> HTH,
At 11/22/2001 09:27 AM +0800, you wrote:
>That MR. SOMEONE to you Rodolfo - LOL
Beggin' yer pardon, massa... ain't nobody here but us chickens so long ah
dern near fergit meself.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[
> Someone on the list said that Adaptec had problems making the CD's for
some
> reason, I forget why. The poster said that burning the discs using Nero
> with the DAO (Disc-At-Once) option selected enabled him to burn the CD's
> successfully.
>
> HTH,
That MR. SOMEONE to you Rodolfo - LOL
It was
At 11/20/2001 12:36 PM -0600, you wrote:
>Once I get 6.2 installed, it reads my homemade cd's just fine. It's pretty
>much got to be pilot error on my part, I think, either in the way I'm doing
>the installation or in the way I'm burning the cd's. I'm making the cd's on
>a Windoze box (I've trie
I left something else out, sorry, here are more details... I DID
successfully install RH 6.2 from a boot floppy made from rawrite on that cd,
and I had a book with 7.0 cd's in it, I also successfully installed from
that using the boot floppy. (All on this same machine.) I think the cd is
worki
At 05:44 PM 11/20/01 +, you wrote:
>I didn't install from the floppy so I'm not sure, but I think 7.2 uses a
>different floppy image than 7.1 so you'll have to recreate your floppy.
>Also, I think the normal boot image for 7.2 is a 2.88MB format (rather than
>the normal 1.44MB); you want t
At 11/20/2001 11:40 AM -0600, you wrote:
>I forgot to mention - the machine I'm using is an older Pentium Pro 200 and
>won't boot from the cd.
I didn't install from the floppy so I'm not sure, but I think 7.2 uses a
different floppy image than 7.1 so you'll have to recreate your floppy.
Also, I
I forgot to mention - the machine I'm using is an older Pentium Pro 200 and
won't boot from the cd.
Tnx,
Kerry
Network Administrator
Info-Power International, Inc.
3315 Silverstone
Plano, TX 75023
972-424-4447 ext. 281
___
Redhat-list mailing list
Luke C Gavel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the following HTML link from linuxdoc.org to be
> straight-forward enough to help me temporarily enable NFS on my
> system. Check it out at:
>
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/LDP/lame/LAME/linux-admin-made-easy/x1273.html
Good page!
Bret
_
Justin Zygmont wrote:
> thanks, I actually got it to go a little farther, I found out (the hard
> way) that if your IP information is wrong you can't just go back and
> change it, you have to reboot over and over well, now it's hanging
> where it says Loading /mnt/runtime ramdisk... Have
Hi,
I found the following HTML link from linuxdoc.org to be
straight-forward enough to help me temporarily enable NFS on my
system. Check it out at:
http://www.linuxdoc.org/LDP/lame/LAME/linux-admin-made-easy/x1273.html
G'luck,
LG
-- Generated Signature --
Q: How many Marxists does it tak
thanks, I actually got it to go a little farther, I found out (the hard
way) that if your IP information is wrong you can't just go back and
change it, you have to reboot over and over well, now it's hanging
where it says Loading /mnt/runtime ramdisk... Have you ever heard of
this one?
th
Nah, you don't need DNS if you are specifying IP's. It's probably an issue
with the NFS setup.
Stew Benedict
At 09:29 AM 12/21/00 -0600, you wrote:
>Justin Zygmont wrote:
>
>> it didn't work at all, said it couldn't find a server. If you got to the
>> point where it had permission problems, th
Justin Zygmont wrote:
> it didn't work at all, said it couldn't find a server. If you got to the
> point where it had permission problems, then you got a lot farther than I
> did. I'm wondering of the correct information is in the right place, What
> were the 4 IP addresses that you used?
>
> t
it didn't work at all, said it couldn't find a server. If you got to the
point where it had permission problems, then you got a lot farther than I
did. I'm wondering of the correct information is in the right place, What
were the 4 IP addresses that you used?
thanks..
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Bre
Justin Zygmont wrote:
> Hello, I have been unsucessful at getting an install through FTP or NFS
> with RH 7 even though I was always able to access my server this way from
> linux. Do you need to have bind running on the server to act as the
> nameserver? My PC has an IP of 192.168.0.2 and the
Hello, I have been unsucessful at getting an install through FTP or NFS
with RH 7 even though I was always able to access my server this way from
linux. Do you need to have bind running on the server to act as the
nameserver? My PC has an IP of 192.168.0.2 and the server is 192.186.0.1.
The CD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Chuck Mead spewed into the bitstream:
CM>On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Steve Borho spewed into the bitstream:
CM>
CM>SB>On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 08:30:56AM -0600, Chuck Mead wrote:
CM>SB>> On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Steve Borho spewed into the bits
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 10:36:49AM -0600, Chuck Mead wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Steve Borho spewed into the bitstream:
> SB>Doesn't work here. Strange. Which shell do you use?
> SB>
> SB>ix% mcopy a:* .
> SB>zsh: no matches found: a:*
> SB>ix%
>
> bash
ix% bash
[steve@ix steve]$ mcopy a:* .
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Steve Borho spewed into the bitstream:
SB>On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 08:30:56AM -0600, Chuck Mead wrote:
SB>> On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Steve Borho spewed into the bitstream:
SB>> SB>> mcopy a:* .
SB>> SB>>
SB>> SB>> Then type: ls
SB>> SB>>
SB>> SB>> Voila! It's magic... :-)
SB>> SB>
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 08:30:56AM -0600, Chuck Mead wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Steve Borho spewed into the bitstream:
> SB>> mcopy a:* .
> SB>>
> SB>> Then type: ls
> SB>>
> SB>> Voila! It's magic... :-)
> SB>
> SB>Two stipulations:
> SB>1) mtools is installed
>
> Agreed.
>
> SB>2) You put
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Steve Borho spewed into the bitstream:
SB>On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 04:39:55PM -0600, Chuck Mead wrote:
SB>> Format the floppy on Windoze.
SB>> Copy the file to the floppy.
SB>> Boot Linux.
SB>> In your home directory type the following:
SB>>
SB>> mcopy a:* .
SB>>
SB>> Then ty
e sure to unmount it before you
>take it out. I don't know if it causes as much trouble
>on Linux but my old unix system went loco if you forgot
>and it was a pain to fix.
> Linda Hanigan
>~
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Benoit Cordoba
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>So how do I exchange files between Win and Linux on floppies??!!
Put in the floppy in and use mcopy a:filename /tmp/wherever
You might need to be root, depending on the setup.
Vik :v)
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL P
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 04:39:55PM -0600, Chuck Mead wrote:
> Format the floppy on Windoze.
> Copy the file to the floppy.
> Boot Linux.
> In your home directory type the following:
>
> mcopy a:* .
>
> Then type: ls
>
> Voila! It's magic... :-)
Two stipulations:
1) mtools is installed
2) You p
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Benoit Cordoba spewed into the bitstream:
BC>Hi everyone.
BC>
BC>I am brand new to RH and Linux. I just did an install of RH 6.1 on a new
BC>Dell. I have problems with the sound card. I went to the mail server
BC>archives and got some answers. The Montego cards needs the n
You're
not alone. :) I just installed RH6.1 after a dismal failure on Win2K upgrade.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benoit
CordobaSent: Monday, August 07, 2000 6:00 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Install
pro
Thanks for the help, I'll try it
now...
I have much to learn on this new
OS.
Thanks.
Benoit
- Original Message -
From:
John
Blackmore
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 2:54
PM
Subject: RE: Install problems!
format floppy in win 98,
Thank you very much for the info.
Sincerely,
Benoit
- Original Message -
From: linda hanigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Install problems!
> Hi,
> Make sure the directory /mnt/floppy exists
> the
Cordoba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 3:39 PM
Subject: Install problems!
Hi everyone.
I am brand new to RH and Linux. I just did an install of RH 6.1 on a new
Dell. I have problems with the sound card. I went to the mail server
ar
enoit
CordobaSent: Monday, August 07, 2000 4:39 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Install
problems!
Hi everyone.
I am brand new to RH and Linux. I just did
an install of RH 6.1 on a new Dell. I have problems with the sound
card. I went to the mail server archives and got some answers.
Hi everyone.
I am brand new to RH and Linux. I just did an
install of RH 6.1 on a new Dell. I have problems with the sound
card. I went to the mail server archives and got some answers. The
Montego cards needs the new drivers from aureal. So I downloaded them
using win98. I copied th
Hi there,
I would like to add my voice to that ever-increasing chorus of
newbies with "I'm just trying my first install".
I require that it been done over the LAN (NFS, FTP, HTTP, doesn't
matter) due to their being no CD-ROM. I used rawrite to create a floppy of
bootnet.im
I have just downloaded and burned the 6.2 image file. I then boot off the
CD and started a New install on a PC with RH 6.1. I choose to delete and
format the existing Linux Native partition and use the existing swap and
install everything. This is a 3 GIG partition. I go through the
install...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any suggestions on how I might proceed?
1) Reinstall && put /boot on it's own partition ~= 30 MB at the
beginning of the drive.
2) Update your kernel (for the IDE controller). I've got rpms with IDE
updates that may work for you. Check
ftp://duke.eburg.com/pub/linux/
I'm having some major install problems due to the fact that some of my
hardware
is pretty new. I have an nVidia GeForce AGP256 Video card and a 34 gig hard
drive, Ultra-Dma 66 Controller with a Pentium III 733. I can install Red Hat
6.1, but it doesn't recognize my video card or my
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Disk Druid Install Problems
Forwarded by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The 1024 cylinder is not around 1.4GB on most drives - it's closer to
> 8G
Giraffes!
on4hu wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> let me know wat is "8g" is 8 Gigabytes
> if this is correct
> linux must be installed, all version below the 1024 sector
> (around below 1.4Gb) and can never above this value
>
> At 09:22 29/01/2000 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have the following p
Hi,
I deleted my 2nd partition (hda2) and created an extended partion. In
that partion I created a 3 logical partitions (swap, root, and boot).
After I did this DD let me proceed.
It was misleading since Redhat helps states they "RECOMMEND" and not
"REQUIRE.
Thanks for all your help. I real
Where is your SWAP partition? DD requires at least 1.
-Manuel.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, John S. Muller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following partitions:
>
> hda18g Windoze 98
> hda21g Linux (slackware)
> hda31g Linux (slackware)
> hda44g
The 1024 cylinder is not around 1.4GB on most drives - it's closer to
8GB and only the /boot partition has to be completely below the 1024
cylinder - the rest of the system can be anywhere on the disk. The
reason for the 1024 cylinder limit for /boot is that most BIOS can't
load anything above t
Hello
let me know wat is "8g" is 8 Gigabytes
if this is correct
linux must be installed, all version below the 1024 sector
(around below 1.4Gb) and can never above this value
At 09:22 29/01/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have the following partitions:
>
> hda18g Windoze 9
Hi,
I have the following partitions:
hda18g Windoze 98
hda21g Linux (slackware)
hda31g Linux (slackware)
hda44g BeOS
I am trying to install the redhat distribution to hda2, but disk druid
will not let me proceede.
The
Hello List Members
I'm trying to install Linux 6.1 on a 486 DX4-100 Mhz with a Adaptec
SCSI AHA-1542CF/1540GF device. But when I try to install it parts of
a message appears in the background(I really can't see the message
just parts of it), and the process returns to were I have to select
th
ok .. Ihave 1.5 gigs left on my hd after a win95 install. The root
partition is under the 1024th cylander.
I install it and with fdisk it gets to about halfway through the rpm
installs.. then it dies.. this happened every damn time I tried an
install. Disk Druid just messes up in the formatt
On 24 Jun, Scott shaped the bitstream to say:
> I forgot to mention that I did the kernel upgrade via compiling the source
> not thru Redhat's RPM's. If I use the RPM's do I get a dual boot or does
> it do a complete upgarde without a way to go back?
>
> Scott
>
>
I just did 'em last night.
I forgot to mention that I did the kernel upgrade via compiling the source
not thru Redhat's RPM's. If I use the RPM's do I get a dual boot or does
it do a complete upgarde without a way to go back?
Scott
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www
Hmm. Just noticed an errata on mkinitrd. I'lll try that. :) not sure if
my adaptec 1540 fall sinto the catagory of this fix but it cant hurt
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 6/24/98, at 9:40 AM, Scott wrote:
>Greetings Gurus -
>
>I ran into a problem with my 2.0.34 upgrade. Here
Greetings Gurus -
I ran into a problem with my 2.0.34 upgrade. Here is my current setup for
reference:
RH 5.0
2.0.31 kernel
lilo boot off scsi drive (not MBR, first sector of root partition. Master
boot partition is 100% NTFS)
All steps went as planned up to the step where I have to make the
On 20-May-98 Van Tate wrote:
> Well, I have made the attempt of installing redhat 5.0 via ftp over 20
> times now and I keep getting failed rpm installs during the
> installations because for some reason it says it is for the wrong
> architecture. I am using the correct ftp directory and I am abl
Well, I have made the attempt of installing redhat 5.0 via ftp over 20
times now and I keep getting failed rpm installs during the
installations because for some reason it says it is for the wrong
architecture. I am using the correct ftp directory and I am able to
install 4.2 just fine with no pro
At 09:52 PM 4/27/98 -0400, you wrote:
>> Of course, I don't know where this "script error" could be...and may only
>> be in a single executable which installs the many packages in /Rpms. (Or,
>> it may be a damaged pressing of the CD.) Anyway, let's see what's up with
>> these I sent.
>
>Well, the
> >Unfortunately you would have great difficulty using the bash shell during
> >the install.
>
> I don't seem to have difficulty...other than having to contort my fingers
> to press ALT-F2. If there is such difficulty, why would the installation
> routine provide access to the bash shell? Isn't
>> Dave, I don't have access to a Linux system...however, I do have access to
>> the bash# shell, as it is a small version created in RAM, for the
>> installation process. Just selecting keys Alt-F2 will jump you from the
>Unfortunately you would have great difficulty using the bash shell during
>> Using "nopgp", like so:
>>
>> rpm -K --nopgp package.i386.rpm
>>
>> Gives this result:
>>
>> open of package.i386.rpm failed: No such file or directory
>
>You did substitute the correct package name for the word `package' here,
>correct? And the package is in the currect directory?
Sorry for
> Using "nopgp", like so:
>
> rpm -K --nopgp package.i386.rpm
>
> Gives this result:
>
> open of package.i386.rpm failed: No such file or directory
You did substitute the correct package name for the word `package' here,
correct? And the package is in the currect directory?
Dave
At 10:03 AM 4/27/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Well, I really hate to suggest this, but perhaps you might consider
>purcashing another one of those $1.95 versions from www.cheapbytes.com, as
>I really do think you have a case of bad media.
Since there's a shipping charge, too, tack on an additional $5.00
> >That almost definately looks like problems with the RPMs.
>
> I don't really even know what an RPM is...except that I need them for
> installation! Does it mean something like "Redhat Package Module"?
Oops, sorry about that. It stands for RedHat Package Manager, and these
files have a .rpm
> > # rpm -qvvpl package.i386.rpm | more
>
> Why not just do rpm -K --nopgp package.i386.rpm?
> If that says anything but OK at the end of the line something is wrong.
> If you have pgp and the redhat pgp key installed leave out the --nopgp.
Ah, good, I couldn't remember that one..
> > D:
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Ezekiel J. Krahlin wrote:
> Dave, I don't have access to a Linux system...however, I do have access to
> the bash# shell, as it is a small version created in RAM, for the
> installation process. Just selecting keys Alt-F2 will jump you from the
> installation menu, to bash#.
At 06:42 PM 4/26/98 -0400, you wrote:
>> What kind of problems are indicated by statement: "exection of script
>> failed", "unpacking of archive ailed", and "read failed: Input/output error
>> (5)"?
>
>That almost definately looks like problems with the RPMs.
I don't really even know what an RPM
At 11:12 PM 4/26/98 -0400, you wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Dave Wreski wrote:
>> If you have access to a Linux box, try running the following on one of
>> those RPMs that failed in your list:
>>
>> # rpm -qvvpl package.i386.rpm | more
>
>Why not just do rpm -K --nopgp package.i386.rpm?
>If
On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Dave Wreski wrote:
>
> > What kind of problems are indicated by statement: "exection of script
> > failed", "unpacking of archive ailed", and "read failed: Input/output error
> > (5)"?
>
> That almost definately looks like problems with the RPMs.
>
> If you have access to
> What kind of problems are indicated by statement: "exection of script
> failed", "unpacking of archive ailed", and "read failed: Input/output error
> (5)"?
That almost definately looks like problems with the RPMs.
If you have access to a Linux box, try running the following on one of
those RP
>I'm sure [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be interested in this, as well as
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], as he is the author.
I have just posted the problems people are having installing Red Hat 5.0,
to those addresses...thanks much for the info, as I did not know where to
report a possible glitch in a distributi
>> I have been trying to install redhat 5.0
>>
>> That is why I cannot figure out why when I tried to install
>> Redhat5.0 to my machine, it began to produce many errors.
>
>What kind of errors exactly?
>
>> install program hung. Sometimes the program would give error warning
>> signs a
Howdy,
I had the exact same problem yesterday. I have a modest 486 box that
I had 4.1 working on perfectly. I decided to load up 5.0 and instead
of upgrading, I thought for the fun of it, I would do a fresh
install.
I got the install program running, went off to get a cup of coffee
and fou
> 1.The media I am installing from is a local cdrom. I have not
> registered my copy of redhat at this point. I did purchase the copy from a
> local best buy.
Hmm.. Not sure that you can register a copy not purchased from RH, can
you?
> Do you know if ultra dma is accessed in the bios sett
Ok,
1. The media I am installing from is a local cdrom. I have not
registered my copy of redhat at this point. I did purchase the copy from a
local best buy. Do you know if ultra dma is accessed in the bios settings
or processed by the software? If ultra dma is set then it may be messing
up
> > I was lucky to get the hard drive back to a functional state, being that
> > disk druid would not allow me to completly delete the / and swap
> > partitions.
>
> I'm sure [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be interested in this, as well as
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], as he is the author.
Ooops, that's [EMAI
On 26-Apr-98 Dan Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been trying to install redhat 5.0 on a p233mmx machine. It has
> a
> 4.0 gb Western Digital hard drive, that supports UltraDMA. It also has a
> Teac 24X cdrom, 33.6 modem that I know works with Redhat because I am
> using it on another machine tha
> I have been trying to install redhat 5.0 on a p233mmx machine. It has a
> 4.0 gb Western Digital hard drive, that supports UltraDMA. It also has a
> Teac 24X cdrom, 33.6 modem that I know works with Redhat because I am
> using it on another machine that runs redhat 5.0. It would be a dual
Hi,
I have been trying to install redhat 5.0 on a p233mmx machine. It has a
4.0 gb Western Digital hard drive, that supports UltraDMA. It also has a
Teac 24X cdrom, 33.6 modem that I know works with Redhat because I am
using it on another machine that runs redhat 5.0. It would be a dual boot
I tried to install RH4.2 (from the infomagic developer's resource) on a
i486dx2-66 via an ftp connection to a w95 computer with personal web
server loaded (and ftp service started)
-
The first steps of the installation is ok, when i have entered a ip
address i can ping the machine from the win95 c
98 matches
Mail list logo
