. very easy and fast :-)
-Original Message-
From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux - Win Xp home network - shared files
Campbell, Michael (Contractor) wrote:
> Where do you get the softwares SAMBA
Campbell, Michael (Contractor) wrote:
Where do you get the softwares SAMBA or Webmin?
Samba is on your Red Hat CD's (if not already installed on your machine).
Google --> Webmin
--
By-Tor.com
It's all about the Rush
http://www.by-tor.com
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Where do you get the softwares SAMBA or Webmin?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Linux - Win Xp home network - shared files
What these guys said is correct but it is easier for a
into Konquorer
and you could browse to your Windose machine a few different way. Good luck.
-Original Message-
From: truc nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux - Win Xp home network - shared files
Thank you a
Thank you all. I am working on it and go figure the
document
--- John Nichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> truc nguyen wrote:
>
> > After I edit smb.conf. Can you tell me
> > - What linux commands to view the shared files in
> XP
> > (C:\network)
> > - What linux commands to enable the shared file
On 14-Oct-2003/20:18 -0700, truc nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After I edit smb.conf. Can you tell me
>- What linux commands to view the shared files in XP
>(C:\network)
IF you're running Nautilus or Konqueror, try typing "smb:///" in the
address bar.
>- What linux commands to enable the sh
T or something like that:
>
> I also recommend very highly the documentation at http://www.samba.org.
> When I was messing with my home network, that site helped tremendously.
> The documentation is available in several different languages.
>
> Also, any good thick tome
n at http://www.samba.org.
When I was messing with my home network, that site helped tremendously.
The documentation is available in several different languages.
Also, any good thick tome on Red Hat Linux should provide some good
information about Samba as well.
--
Slainte,
Richard S. Crawford
AIM: Buff
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 22:34, John Nichel wrote:
> truc nguyen wrote:
> You can mount the remote filesystem
>
> mount -t smbfs -o usename=WindowsUser,password=WindowPass
> //WinXPmachine/sharename /mnt/mountpoint
>
> Or you can use smbclient to see the shares, and access them (like
> comman
truc nguyen wrote:
After I edit smb.conf. Can you tell me
- What linux commands to view the shared files in XP
(C:\network)
- What linux commands to enable the shared file
/home/net/temp
- How Win XP view shared files in /home/net/temp
Thanks,
You can mount the remote filesystem
mount -t sm
yen wrote:
>
> > I have a Linux and a Win XP on home network.
> > I also enabled the file sharing C:\network
> > On the Linux machine, I have user /home/net
> > How is Win XP able to see /home/net/temp ?
> > How can Linux share C:\network from Win XP?
> >
>
truc nguyen wrote:
I have a Linux and a Win XP on home network.
I also enabled the file sharing C:\network
On the Linux machine, I have user /home/net
How is Win XP able to see /home/net/temp ?
How can Linux share C:\network from Win XP?
Samba should be a solution but what command do I use
I have a Linux and a Win XP on home network.
I also enabled the file sharing C:\network
On the Linux machine, I have user /home/net
How is Win XP able to see /home/net/temp ?
How can Linux share C:\network from Win XP?
Samba should be a solution but what command do I use ?
Any suggestion
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, chris wrote:
> Yes traceroute is installed. It works fine if I plug directly into the
> cable-modem. It's only while sitting behind the linksys with a private
> IP that it won't function. Starting with the first hop, I just get
> "*"s. It seems to me that it doesn't know h
Yes traceroute is installed. It works fine if I plug directly into the
cable-modem. It's only while sitting behind the linksys with a private IP that
it won't function. Starting with the first hop, I just get "*"s. It seems to
me that it doesn't know how to route from the private IP out the lin
les and resources internally?
> In simple terms, put a NIC in each machine, give them IP's for a single
> subnet, plug them all into the switch and you have a home network. If
> you want them to share files and some of them are Windows machines,
> install Samba on the Linux box.
Eddie,
It sounds like you might be better served making a trip down to one of the
book stores and picking up a book on running Red Hat Linux. You are going
to have a lot of questions that you will find answers for without sending
thousands of emails to ask very basic questions. The quest
That's an open-ended question. Do you want all PC's on the network to go
out to the Internet or just share files and resources internally?
In simple terms, put a NIC in each machine, give them IP's for a single
subnet, plug them all into the switch and you have a home network. If
y
How do you set up a home network on RH 7.2?
I have the RJ45 cables and ethernet switch. What's next?
Thanks you all RH gurus.
Ed.
--
___
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[
on home network
You are telling your XP box to get DNS from your ISP, so these
have to get MASQ'ed or NATted. Make sure you are forwarding and
masquerading UDP port 53. (and allowing the replies back).
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
re is something more wrong with the firewall.
Cameron.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2002 01:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: internet sharing on home network
>
>
> Glenn Goodspeed wro
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for the help, Glenn. But it still does not work:
>
> At the XP machine the ethernet card has
>
> IP address 192.168.1.2
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> default gateway 192.168.1.1 ( = eth1 at Linux machine)
> DNS is what I got from my ISP
>
> Even
> > How do I tell the XP-box to find my ADSL connetion on the Linux machine?
> > My external connection goes through eth0, while the internal network is
> > through eth1.
>
> Specify the internal interface of your linux box as the default gateway
> for your XP machine. If you're serving DHCP, jus
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I tell the XP-box to find my ADSL connetion on the Linux machine?
> My external connection goes through eth0, while the internal network is
> through eth1.
Specify the internal interface of your linux box as the default gateway
for your XP ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-Dec-2002/16:54 +0100, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> How do I tell the XP-box to find my ADSL connetion on the Linux machine?
>> My external connection goes through eth0, while the internal network is
>> through eth1.
>>
>Th
Title: RE: internet sharing on home network
Glenn,
On your RH box, do you have IP_forwarding turned
on and you have setup the rule for ip masquerading in the
iptables?
Doug
- Original Message -
From:
Glenn
Goodspeed
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent:
n.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 4:56 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: internet sharing on home network
> >
> > How do I tell the XP-box to find my
ctive.
I don't know about the firewall settings. -Glenn.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 4:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: internet sharing on home network
How do I tell the XP-box to find my ADSL connet
Title: RE: internet sharing on home network
Pepijn - If you're not running a DHCP server, give your XP machine a static IP address on the local subnet, such as 192.168.1.50, net mask 255.255.255.0. Make the Gateway address on the XP machine 192.168.1.1. You might have to reboot to
Hi all,
I have a smal home network with my PC (Redhat 7.3) and my notebook
(Win.-XP).
I have Samba running and can share Linux files and printer. (Cool!)
The question is:
How do I tell the XP-box to find my ADSL connetion on the Linux machine?
My external connection goes through eth0, while
sendmail process the queue in your ifup script.
Ed,
Are you fetching from a single ISP mailbox? Does that mailbox contain mail
for multiple users on your home network?
...Jake
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467
Harborside Financial Cent
> I'm not set on how to achieve dial on demand functionality. Might pick up
on advice from Edward Dekkers to use a combination of wvdial and pppd,
although diald looks good in principle.
Like I said, don't get me wrong - I LOVE diald.
Just haven't been able to get it working on recent versions of
From: Gary [mailto:gary-list-redhat@;mygirlfriday.info]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2002 6:24 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote:
> Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeab
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote:
> Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to
>those of us who are trying to get up to speed.
>
> Now for the implementation phase.
Well, what did you finally select ?
Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to
those of us who are trying to get up to speed.
Now for the implementation phase.
Regards,
Roland Hill
#
This e-mail me
Do you have a static IP with your dial-up connection? You need a static
so that you can point the MX record for your domain to your Linux box.
(unless you are queing the mail somewhere else and sucking it downstream)
Once past this hurdle, it is pretty straight forward: Configure your MTA
to a
> -Diald to have dial on demand functionality with the modem
OK, every man and his dog has tackled your main problems, I'll tackle this
one.
I used diald way back on 5.2 and loved it. Upgraded to 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 and it
broke at every step and I had to change heaps of configuration. I haven't
manage
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote:
>
> Being a new user, I would appreciate if you could kick me in the right direction on
>the following issue.
> I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I would like to
>receive email, filter the c
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300, Roland Hill wrote:
> My simple peer to peer network consists of 1 x RH7.3 box and 2 x Win98 boxes. SAMBA
>is configured and operational.
>
> I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I would like to
>receive email, filter the content,
[Oops, in my first attempt at sending this I didn't use my subscribed
address. Second try...]
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300, Roland Hill wrote:
> -MTA (sendmail, postfix, qmail etc) to deliver
> [...]
> If some applications are more new user friendly than others then
> please advise.
Hi List,
Being a new user, I would appreciate if you could kick me in the right direction on
the following issue.
My simple peer to peer network consists of 1 x RH7.3 box and 2 x Win98 boxes. SAMBA is
configured and operational.
I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I w
as the net e-mail connection, not the Linux server.
Dan Sabo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bret Hughes
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Linux 7.2 server on a home network with Linksys router
-can
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 08:56, Dan Sabo wrote:
> HI Ed,
>
> Thanks, The problem seemsto be that no matter which changes I attempt to
> save in the network config window in Linux, Linux will not allow me to make
> the changes and reverts back to the original IP settings. So no matter
> which gatewa
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: Linux 7.2 server on a home network with Linksys router -
can'tconnect
> HI Ed,
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan Sabo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL P
> But I am just trying to set up my server on my home network so I can
connect
> to either the internet from the server, or from another PC on my home
> network to my server. I'm not trying to manage the server or the router
or
> network from outside the home network. Would I
what would cause
this?
Thanks,
Dan Sabo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux 7.2 server on a home network with Linksys router -
can'tconnect
On Sun, Jul 1
OK Thanks for the info Chris,
But I am just trying to set up my server on my home network so I can connect
to either the internet from the server, or from another PC on my home
network to my server. I'm not trying to manage the server or the router or
network from outside the home ne
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:31:51AM -0400, Dan Sabo wrote:
> Thanks Ed,
>
> So is this why I can't access my server on my home network? Because I don't
> have the correct port enabled for that server? How would I go about
> enabling the correct port for that server? A
ase anyone cares.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 12:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux 7.2 server on a home network with Linksys router -
can'tconnect
> Thanks for info. It&
Thanks Ed,
So is this why I can't access my server on my home network? Because I don't
have the correct port enabled for that server? How would I go about
enabling the correct port for that server? And how can I check to see which
port I need to enable?
I'll also definitely t
> Thanks for info. It's a Befsr41 router. I've got the Block WAN Request
> enabled so I guess my home network is set up with a firewall.
Even without that enabled, you're still firewalled. By default, the BEFSR41
(I've got the BEFSR81) disables all incoming traffic.
Hi,
Thanks for info. It's a Befsr41 router. I've got the Block WAN Request
enabled so I guess my home network is set up with a firewall.
I'll try out your suggestion. Thanks,
Dan Sabo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
onfig" and check the dhcp box.
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 15:18, Dan Sabo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to connect my new Dell/Linux 7.2 server to my Linksys router/home
> network. My other two PC's are windows machines and they work fine on the
> router and on my DSL connectio
Hi,
I'm trying to connect my new Dell/Linux 7.2 server to my Linksys router/home
network. My other two PC's are windows machines and they work fine on the
router and on my DSL connection to the net. I'm trying to set up my server
so I can access it from my two PC's and
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Adahma wrote:
> I feel like I must be missing something really stupid/simple, so I
> feel a little better since it wasn't immediatly obvious to everyone
> else.
This sounds depressingly familiar. I bet your eth1 card does not want to play nice
with your hub. When going t
If I understand what you are saying, the problem is you can't use the same
hub for both networks. (local network and out to the internet) This would
explain the errors on the network card (eth1)
david
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Adahma wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:52:50PM -0500, Randy Perkins
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:55:17PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> This is a problem. Untill you get this fixed, nothing is going to
> work. Double check your cabling. Make sure you didn't plug the cable
> from the Linux machine into the uplink port on the hub. Also, check if
> you can pin
so you used a crossover from your cable modem to the linux machine?
> Yes, I just verified that each client machine can ping the other. I
> then changed so that my cable modem went straight into the hub, and
> then out to my linux machine and out to one of the windows machines
> seperately(I hav
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Adahma wrote:
>
> Yes, I just verified that each client machine can ping the other. I
> then changed so that my cable modem went straight into the hub, and
> then out to my linux machine and out to one of the windows machines
> seperately(I have 2 legit IP's from my ISP). Thi
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:52:50PM -0500, Randy Perkins wrote:
> well i am almost out of things to try.
>
> maybe you could switch eth0 and eth1 and move the cables.
> i think this is in the file /etc/modules.conf
>
> --or--
>
> try it with just one card to remove a chance of conflicts
> get yo
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:21:16PM -0700, Drew Hunt wrote:
> What is 24.14.246.1 the IP of? The cable modem? The company?
>
> My modem has its own IP, which I had to add to my routing table with this
> command:
> route add default gw xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>
> Maybe that's the problem.
That another
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Randy Perkins wrote:
> i have the same provider
>
> i was under the impresssion that those other ip address wouldnt get
> routed back thru the gateway. i recieve probes on those addresses also.
>
> if they are usable addresses, that would be great
>
Well, I'll let you know af
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Drew Hunt wrote:
> What is 24.14.246.1 the IP of? The cable modem? The company?
>
> My modem has its own IP, which I had to add to my routing table with this
> command:
> route add default gw xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>
> Maybe that's the problem.
>
> Drew
>
Nope. If that were the pr
D]]On Behalf Of Adahma
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 8:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Routing problems (home network setup)
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 08:35:46PM -0500, Randy Perkins wrote:
> i am not an expert but my system is working
> do you have forwarding turned on
>
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: Routing problems (home network setup)
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Randy Perkins wrote:
>
> > that netmask of .252 sure looks familiar :)
> >
> DSL connection. The funning part is
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Randy Perkins wrote:
> that netmask of .252 sure looks familiar :)
>
DSL connection. The funning part is I get connection attempts on the
network and broadcast addresses. One ot these days I'll hook up a spare
machine on one of them and let the hackers play. A system booti
that netmask of .252 sure looks familiar :)
- Original Message -
From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Randy Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: Routing problems
Randy,
You and I are thinking alike on this one. I have a fealing that the
problem will turn out to be a bad cable between the Linux machine and
the hub, a bad port on the hub, or a bad driver for the NIC.
The telling part is that he can not ping between the Windows machines
and the Linux box, a
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Adahma wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:56:10PM -0500, Randy Perkins wrote:
> > did you see the message from the person who commented on all of your errors
> > on eth1.
> > i think they might be on to something as far as eth1 not having the correct
> > driver?
> > remember
: Re: Routing problems (home network setup)
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:56:10PM -0500, Randy Perkins wrote:
> > did you see the message from the person who commented on all of your
errors
> > on eth1.
> > i think they might be on to something as far as eth1 not having the
correct
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:56:10PM -0500, Randy Perkins wrote:
> did you see the message from the person who commented on all of your errors
> on eth1.
> i think they might be on to something as far as eth1 not having the correct
> driver?
> remember i am no expert and am just fumbling along with
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 08:35:46PM -0500, Randy Perkins wrote:
> i am not an expert but my system is working
> do you have forwarding turned on
> /etc/sysconfig/network
> ...
> FORWARD_IPV4="YES"
> ...
>
With the later kernels, you need more then this. You may want to add
some of these commands t
your not plugged into an uplink port on your
hub?
- Original Message -
From: "Adahma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: Routing problems (home network setup)
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:03:24PM -0
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 08:35:46PM -0500, Randy Perkins wrote:
> i am not an expert but my system is working
> do you have forwarding turned on
> /etc/sysconfig/network
> ...
> FORWARD_IPV4="YES"
> ...
Yup, just as it shows here...
> also , what is the output of the 'route' command.
> mine shows
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Adahma wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:03:24PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> > Do the computers on your internel network have routable IP addresses, or
> > are you using one of the private IP ranges for your internel network?
> > Unless you are getting extra IP addre
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Adahma wrote:
> I have a cable modem connected to my Red Hat 7 box on eth0, and eth1
> connecting to a 5 port hub which I'd like to setup on the 192.168
> private ip's and do masqerading for. Here's my applicable files:
... snip ... (looks fine)
> I do have masqerading rul
i was hacked into once already
randy
- Original Message -
From: "Adahma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: Routing problems (home network setup)
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:03:24PM -0600, Mikkel L.
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:03:24PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> Do the computers on your internel network have routable IP addresses, or
> are you using one of the private IP ranges for your internel network?
> Unless you are getting extra IP address from your cable company, you
> should be
Thanks to all, we're in business.
resolv.conf on my Linux box was set up incorrectly.
Frank Reichenbacer
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Reichenbacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:48 AM
Subject: Re:
PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Home Network w/DSL
> I presume you have IP masquerading set up in IP chains in the Linux box.
>
> I have a very similar setup. The Win98 boxes are set up as:
> WINS resolution off.
>
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Nic Steussy wrote:
> I presume you have IP masquerading set up in IP chains in the Linux box.
>
> I have a very similar setup. The Win98 boxes are set up as:
> WINS resolution off.
> Gateway to LOCALNET address of Linux box. i.e. 192.168.xxx.xxx
> DNS set to ISP's DNS addre
> I have a home network with 4 Win98 desktops and a linux RH6.2 box networked
> through a Linksys 10/100 switch using Samba (I forget which version but it's
> recent). Two NICs on the linux box, eth1 for the inside network and eth0 for
> the outside. An Xpeed DSL bridge is
don't know why you need this,
but you do)
and Bob's your uncle.
Good luck,
Nic Steussy.
Frank Reichenbacher wrote:
>
> I have a home network with 4 Win98 desktops and a linux RH6.2 box networked
> through a Linksys 10/100 switch using Samba (I forget which version but it'
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Red Hat List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 12:14 PM
Subject: Home Network w/DSL
> I have a home network with 4 Win98 desktops and a linux RH6.2 box
networked
> through a Linksys 10/100 switch using Samba (I forget whic
I have a home network with 4 Win98 desktops and a linux RH6.2 box networked
through a Linksys 10/100 switch using Samba (I forget which version but it's
recent). Two NICs on the linux box, eth1 for the inside network and eth0 for
the outside. An Xpeed DSL bridge is plugged into eth0. Th
All,
I have recently installed a DSL line. It is connected to a Linux (RH
6.2, up to date patches) box that firewalls (ipchains) the home network
of 3 Win98/ME PCs. The PCs are all assigned static IP numbers in the
192.168.xxx.xxx non-routable range and are MASQed through Linux to the
net
esday, July 04, 2000 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: Home network
> > From: "E. Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 18:30:42 -0500
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> > X-Priori
> From: "E. Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 18:30:42 -0500
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
> Content-Length: 3244
>
> Dave:
2000 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: Home network
> > Resent-Cc:
> > MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 4 17:31:41 2000
> > From: "E. Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 16:31:45 -0500
> >
> > Hello:
> >
> > I am
Have a look at
http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/tips/PPP-Client-Tips/PPP-Client-Tips.html
John
On 07/04/00, 04:31:45PM -0500, E. Stroh wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am trying to connect a home network via a ppp connection to the net and
> was wondering if anyone knew of a good tutori
.
"E. Stroh" wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am trying to connect a home network via a ppp connection to the net and
> was wondering if anyone knew of a good tutorial out there that I could
> follow. I had this same network, (RH 6.0, RH 6.2, and win98 boxes) connected
> to a cisc
2000 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: Home network
> > Resent-Cc:
> > MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 4 17:31:41 2000
> > From: "E. Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 16:31:45 -0500
> >
> > Hello:
> >
> > I am
> From: "E. Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hello:
>
> I am trying to connect a home network via a ppp connection to the net and
> was wondering if anyone knew of a good tutorial out there that I could
> follow. I had this same network, (RH 6.0, RH 6.2, an
Hello:
I am trying to connect a home network via a ppp connection to the net and
was wondering if anyone knew of a good tutorial out there that I could
follow. I had this same network, (RH 6.0, RH 6.2, and win98 boxes) connected
to a cisco 2501 router and had no problems configuring that but now
At 03:39 AM 4/27/00 GMT, you wrote:
>Good morning all.
>
>I have a 3 machine home network connected to the ISP by modem .
>
>After lots of problems which turned out to be caused by
>mostly 'bad hardware'... 2 bad Nics and a bad cable
>I am finally getting close to
Good morning all.
I have a 3 machine home network connected to the ISP by modem .
After lots of problems which turned out to be caused by
mostly 'bad hardware'... 2 bad Nics and a bad cable
I am finally getting close to a working solution on
my home network.
This network has a Wi
Hi Brian [and all the others who helped],
Thanks very much to all who gave me advice the last
couple of days.
The problems turned out to be mostly 'bad hardware'...
2 bad Nics and a bad cable.
Routing seems to work ok on two of the machines but I'm
having problems pinging between BOX-1 and
First of all I have to ask - what's happened to this list? It's pretty
sad when I have to try answer routing questions! Maybe you are all as
dumbstruck as I am that the Caldera IPO tanked.
Ok, Johnnio, lets take this one step at a time.
How about we get box 3 and 4 talking to each other, and the
Thanks to all of you for the good advice.
Here is what I'm planning to...
Hopefully it is consistent with 'good practice' which I am trying to
learn.
Sorry for the length of the posting.
Let me know please if I can improve this plan in any way as
even though this is a home ne
John,
I suggest you number each box uniquely, starting with .1, .2, .3, etc.
This way, if you change your mind, or need to mix the boxes around, they
will still be unique.
You can also try 10.0.0.x series instead. (fewer keystrokes)
--
Tony Pearson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
