well i got around the problem by temporarily installing a PCI graphics card.
after that, the RH installer ran fine. so i think it has to do with the
motherboard, since the same (AGP) graphics card works fine with the RH
installer on other machines.
thanks,
-- christopher
On Friday 05
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of christopher j bottaro
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: redhat 9 install problem (graphics card related)
hello,
i've installed redhat 9 on 2 systems already, but the 3rd system is
nitor is blank (and off).
i know its not the graphics card because i pulled it out and put it in another
computer and the redhat installer ran fine.
my friend suggested that it might be because of some bios settings on my
motherboard. could this be possible?
btw, i have redhat 8 installed o
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone successfully runs Red Hat 8.0 (psyche) with the
NVIDIA Quadro4 700 XGL graphics card ?? I recently installed RedHat 8.0
(kernel release "2.4.18-24.8.0smp", version "#1 SMP Fri Jan 31 06:03:47
EST 2003") on an i686 Dell PC containing this car
> I also tried updating the XFree86 Driver set, but the same problem
continues.
>From memory - the 845 chipset isn't well supported (yet).
If you have a decent AGP card, I suggest, for Linux at least, running that
instead.
Regards,
---
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Computer Services P/L
Hi all,
I have installed RHL 8.0 on my system (I downloaded all five CDs from the net). My
problem comes when i try to set the display properties to 1024x768 at "Millions of
Colours(24 Bit)" option.
When I do this, XServer does not start and the system keeps trying to load XServer
with a fesh co
Hi all,
I have installed RHL 8.0 on my system (I downloaded all five CDs from the net). My
problem comes when i try to set the display properties to 1024x768 at "Millions of
Colours(24 Bit)" option.
When I do this, XServer does not start and the system keeps trying to load XServer
with a fesh co
Toni Guedes wrote:
>
> Can someone sugest me a good 2D/3D card (U$100~200) for use with Linux?
> Ati's Rage Fury and Radeon, Matrox G400/450...
>
I have been using AGP Matrox G400 single head with 16 MB memory. Works
fine, configuration program found it without problem during RH
installation...
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Toni Guedes wrote:
> There are any recommended flavor (Creative Labs Riva TNT2, Diamond Viper
> 770, ASUS V3800...)?
>
All I can tell you is I'm using a Graphics Blaster TNT
(original TNT) under RH 6.2 just fine. I'm *not* using X4,
though and I don't have any acceleratio
]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 5:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RES: RES: Good 2D/3D graphics card for Linux
'Toni Guedes' wrote:
> There are any recommended flavor (Creative Labs Riva TNT2, Diamond Viper
> 770, ASUS V3800...)?
I've had an NVidia Gloria II for nea
'Toni Guedes' wrote:
> There are any recommended flavor (Creative Labs Riva TNT2, Diamond Viper
> 770, ASUS V3800...)?
I've had an NVidia Gloria II for nearly 4 months now, and it's still
not cooperating fully -- xlock and tuxracer won't go with the 0.95
driver. You might save a few bucks by goi
; -Original Message-
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 4:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RES: Good 2D/3D graphics card for Linux
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Toni Guedes wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000
re need to
be some patience in getting it configured.
Jamin W. Collins
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RES: Good 2D/3D graphics card for Linux
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Toni Guedes wro
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Toni Guedes wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Toni Guedes wrote:
> > > Can someone sugest me a good 2D/3D card (U$100~200) for use with Linux?
> > > Ati's Rage Fury and Radeon, Matrox G400/450...
> > >
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 de John Aldrich wrote:
> > Graphics Blaster TNT (TNT1,
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Toni Guedes wrote:
> > Can someone sugest me a good 2D/3D card (U$100~200) for use with Linux?
> > Ati's Rage Fury and Radeon, Matrox G400/450...
> >
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 de John Aldrich wrote:
> Graphics Blaster TNT (TNT1, btw.) Should be pretty cheap to
> find these days. O
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Toni Guedes wrote:
> Can someone sugest me a good 2D/3D card (U$100~200) for use with Linux?
> Ati's Rage Fury and Radeon, Matrox G400/450...
>
Graphics Blaster TNT (TNT1, btw.) Should be pretty cheap to
find these days. Or, if you only have PCI, (the non-AGP
TNT1 is pretty d
-Original Message-
From: Toni Guedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:44 AM
Subject: Good 2D/3D graphics card for Linux
>Can someone sugest me a good 2D/3D card (U$100~200) for use with Linux?
>Ati'
Can someone sugest me a good 2D/3D card (U$100~200) for use with Linux?
Ati's Rage Fury and Radeon, Matrox G400/450...
Thanks in advance,
Toni Guedes
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-l
e's the url at Red Hat for the 6.0 hardware compatibility list:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/support/hardware/intel/60/rh6.0-hcl-i.ld-11.html
>
> On 05/27/00, 10:20:41AM -0700, Mohmooda Mian wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I recently had my PC
On Sat, 27 May 2000, Mohmooda Mian wrote:
> I recently had my PC built with an ATI-Pro-Rage Graphics card. However,
> after installing Linux 6.0 I was disappointed when it did not load and the
> error appears to be my graphics card.
> I am unsure where I can find out a list
Here's the url at Red Hat for the 6.0 hardware compatibility list:
http://www.redhat.com/support/hardware/intel/60/rh6.0-hcl-i.ld-11.html
On 05/27/00, 10:20:41AM -0700, Mohmooda Mian wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I recently had my PC built with an ATI-Pro-Rage Graphics car
"Mohmooda Mian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi All,
>
> I recently had my PC built with an ATI-Pro-Rage Graphics card. However,
> after installing Linux 6.0 I was disappointed when it did not load and the
> error appears to be my graphics card.
> I am uns
Hi All,
I recently had my PC built with an ATI-Pro-Rage Graphics card. However,
after installing Linux 6.0 I was disappointed when it did not load and the
error appears to be my graphics card.
I am unsure where I can find out a list of supported Graphics cards for
Linux6.0. Does anyone have
Nick wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've got an ATI Rage Fury graphics card. 32 MB RAM. Does anybody know if
> there's a Linux Driver for it. Got SUSE on the machine at the
> moment. Couldn't get X configured. I'm thinking of going for RedHat
> 6.0/1/2 ! D
Hi
I've got an ATI Rage Fury graphics card. 32 MB RAM. Does anybody know if
there's a Linux Driver for it. Got SUSE on the machine at the
moment. Couldn't get X configured. I'm thinking of going for RedHat
6.0/1/2 ! Does anybody know if this graphics card is suppo
Nick wrote:
> 6.0/1/2 ! Does anybody know if this graphics card is supported?
Last time I install Red Hat linux, that card was correctly detected and
configured. It should be a no-brainer :)
MSG
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Hi
I've got an ATI Rage Fury graphics card. 32 MB RAM. Does anybody know if
there's a Linux Driver for it. Got SUSE on the machine at the
moment. Couldn't get X configured. I'm thinking of going for RedHat
6.0/1/2 ! Does anybody know if this graphics card is suppo
nly thing is that you
> > need to get the rage128 x server from suse. i cant remember off the top
> > of my head where at on the site.
> >
> > "Michael J. McGillick" wrote:
> > >
> > > Evening Everyone:
> > >
> > > Just brought hom
gt; of my head where at on the site.
>
> "Michael J. McGillick" wrote:
> >
> > Evening Everyone:
> >
> > Just brought home an ATI Xpert 128 graphics card with 16 MB of memory.
> > Anyone had any good or bad experiences using this card? I
ive had no problems with it here at work. the only thing is that you
need to get the rage128 x server from suse. i cant remember off the top
of my head where at on the site.
"Michael J. McGillick" wrote:
>
> Evening Everyone:
>
> Just brought home an ATI Xpert 128 graph
Evening Everyone:
Just brought home an ATI Xpert 128 graphics card with 16 MB of memory.
Anyone had any good or bad experiences using this card? I'm asking now
before I open and install it, just in case.
Comments welcome. :)
- Mike
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using the Matrox Mystique 220 card ($85) with Linux and Win95 and it
works beautifully. Heartily recommended.
> this list that he had experienced some problems with it, something about his
> screen loosing an inch for some reason, so I have been looking some more at
> some Diamond cards.
>
Hi
Well, initially I wanted to buy the Millennium II card, but someone posted to
this list that he had experienced some problems with it, something about his
screen loosing an inch for some reason, so I have been looking some more at
some Diamond cards.
Anyway, I would really appreciate it if so
ard in june which will be much
> better than the Millennium II. How fast can I expect support for this card
> under RH5.0
I'm not sure how long the millII's been out, but I'd say near a year
(maybe?), and it just got good support.
> 6) If I install a driver for a graphi
uestion. I really have no idea.
>6) If I install a driver for a graphics card, can I use it for any WM. I'm
using
>KDE, is that a problem
Yes. Should not be an issue, or at least I've never heard of it being one.
>Well, thats just about it, maby I'll have to ask s
run Xconfigurator, or can I access the properties another
way.
5) Someone wrote that matrox will ship a new card in june which will be much
better than the Millennium II. How fast can I expect support for this card
under RH5.0
6) If I install a driver for a graphics card, can I use it
>I have been looking at Matrox Millennium II, but maby there are better
choises ?
>This is what I demand of the graphics card:
>
>1) I have to be able to use it with Redhat Linux 5.0 without problems with
> drivers etc.
>2) It should be possible to use all the features th
I just got a matrox mill II (w/ 4mb's of ram for now) for $120, which is
easily the best way to go for most people. It does do 3d, but is not
(currently) supported by linux. It is the fastest card for x, so that's
always nice ;-) I would suggest getting the rpms for xfree the newer
xfree, as they
On Fri, 1 May 1998, Michael wrote:
> 3) Todays GUI's are very heavy, so I want to speed up my comp. and therefore
> want a card which work fast. A 220 MHz Dac or above and 8-16 MB of
> RAM.
Actually the DAC doesn't have any effect on the speed of the card. All
the speed of the DAC d
>
> Hi all !
> I'm going to buy a 17" Sony screen soon and in connection with that I also want
> to buy a new graphics card. Only problem is that I'm not exactly sure which one
> to buy, so I'm turning to you for advice.
You might also check out the PS400.
Hi all !
I'm going to buy a 17" Sony screen soon and in connection with that I also want
to buy a new graphics card. Only problem is that I'm not exactly sure which one
to buy, so I'm turning to you for advice.
I have been looking at Matrox Millennium II, but maby there are b
Hi all !
I'm going to buy a 17" Sony screen soon and in connection with that I also want
to buy a new graphics card. Only problem is that I'm not exactly sure which one
to buy, so I'm turning to you for advice.
I have been looking at Matrox Millennium II, but maby there are b
42 matches
Mail list logo
