Words by mwafkowski [Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:54:33PM -0400]:
> Legal characters for BIND are a-z, 0-9 and "-". Nothing else.
>
BIND is not DNS. Bind is a DNS implementation, not a DNS reference. For
a reference check RFC952.
> MRW
> - Original Message -
>
> I thought that DNS was getting "internationalized" and migrating towards
> unicode
Yes. DNS is a general purpose distributed database.
There are restrictions on which characters are legal in hostnames but those
restrictions don't apply to other DNS record types.
> > Is an underscore ' _ ' a legal character in a DNS name? Is there an
> > document that someone can point me to with a definitive answer as to
which
> > characters are legal and not?
>
> Being strictly pedantic: underscores are allowed in DNS entries
>
At 15:29 9/30/2003, you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:21:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Speaking of "far from the correct way to do things", right now I'm
using Cron!
I use the zoneclient script [...]
Just for another data point, I'm using DynDNS at www.dyndns.org and I use
the ddclie
> Is an underscore ' _ ' a legal character in a DNS name? Is there an
> document that someone can point me to with a definitive answer as to which
> characters are legal and not?
Being strictly pedantic: underscores are allowed in DNS entries
but not in hostnames. The relev
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:22:10PM -0400, Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
> I believe they used to be legal but now you should use a '-' dash.
I'm not sure that the underscore was ever legal. However, it was not
rejected by the bind software so many people used it anyway. Eventually
the software was
Legal characters for BIND are a-z, 0-9 and "-". Nothing else.
MRW
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Staudenmayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:22 PM
Subject: RE: Legal Characters in DNS
> I believ
3:22 PM
To: Red Hat Listserv (E-mail)
Subject: Legal Characters in DNS
Is an underscore ' _ ' a legal character in a DNS name? Is there an
document that someone can point me to with a definitive answer as to which
characters are legal and not?
Thanks,
Christian
Christian P. Campb
Is an underscore ' _ ' a legal character in a DNS name? Is there an
document that someone can point me to with a definitive answer as to which
characters are legal and not?
Thanks,
Christian
Christian P. Campbell
Systems Engineer
Information Technology Department
Bruegger's E
Thanks too everybody for there help. I still don't know what the problem
is. I now do know the query is only going to, two of the DNS servers. I
don't know why, everything looks good.
I did learn more and now have a couple good sites for helping.
thanks again to everybody
david
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:21:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Speaking of "far from the correct way to do things", right now I'm using Cron!
I use the zoneclient script to keep my dynamic DNS info current. I run
it hourly but you could run it more often than that. z
Speaking of "far from the correct way to do things", right now I'm using Cron!
Ugh!
That's interesting to here about the pinging from comcast. I'm still vunerable
in the case of an unforseen outage timed just so.
I appreciate your feedback. I'm still hoping that someone here has something.
her (NAT, ip_forward, ipchains,
> etc.) and have the thing working pretty well. I have 2 questions however.
>
> 1) As my front end IP is dynamically assigned, it can make it tough to maintain
> an accurate DNS entry. W/ Zoneedit, I'm able to do the following:
>
> wget
ave 2 questions however.
1) As my front end IP is dynamically assigned, it can make it tough to maintain
an accurate DNS entry. W/ Zoneedit, I'm able to do the following:
wget -O - --http-user=username --http-
passwd=password 'http://dynamic.zoneedit.com/auth/dynamic.html?
host=www.mydo
72800 ip-network2.1 ( on second network)
An attempted to lookup "computer". It never goes to the third dns sever.
Searching for A record for computer.domain.com at
D.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.: Got referral to dns-server1.com. [took 101 ms]
Searching for A record for computer.domain.com at
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 14:36, Lists wrote:
> You never mentioned WHICH domain was having problems.
>
> FWIW, tcn.net only has TWO authoritative DNS servers listed:
He never said this was for tcn.net. Obviously, this is not the domain.
How do I know? Most Root servers use a 2 day TTL.
ns3.yahoo.com.
You're speculating. Without the proper information, we're speculating
as well. Not only is this OT, but folks are guessing. DNS, while a
black art, is not conducive to guessing.
--
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
--
redha
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 13:09, dbrett wrote:
> The computers in the domain were all up. So even if the entries were
> cached shouldn't the requests still work. (I thought the zone entries were
> cached not the DNS)
>
> I though with the first two servers down, the request wou
What was done to fix the issue was to switch the second and third servers
in the list. Now it appears to be working. It almost looks like there is
a limit on how many servers can be listed.
david
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, dbrett wrote:
> This is more of an Internet DNS question. We have three
You never mentioned WHICH domain was having problems.
FWIW, tcn.net only has TWO authoritative DNS servers listed:
1)
host -t NS tcn.net
tcn.net name server titan.tcn.net.
tcn.net name server ns.mt.sfl.net.
2)
whois tcn.net
[Querying whois.internic.net]
[Redirected to
Sounds like a registration issue. Since as you say it is possible to
perform dns requests directly to the working server a la "dig @server request"
it seems like this third server has no NS record registered for your domain.
Suggest you have a look at www.dnsstuff.com (which, by t
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 14:26, dbrett wrote:
> Unfortunately the DNS servers are back up. I would like solve this so I
> don't run into this problem again.
> Delegation is handled by Networksolutions; probably ok
> missing glue not sure what this is
> bad set-up on the third
Unfortunately the DNS servers are back up. I would like solve this so I
don't run into this problem again.
Delegation is handled by Networksolutions; probably ok
missing glue not sure what this is
bad set-up on the third server doesn't make sense to me because if the
query is done d
The computers in the domain were all up. So even if the entries were
cached shouldn't the requests still work. (I thought the zone entries were
cached not the DNS)
I though with the first two servers down, the request would go to the
third server. What am I missing?
david
On Tue, 30 Sep
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:52:32PM -0400, dbrett wrote:
> This is more of an Internet DNS question. We have three DNS servers
> registered for our domain. Unfortuantely two of the servers are down and
> the third one is up and operational.
> If someone were to do a query for t
This has to do with how long you primary and secondary dns servers have
been down. Since most dns servers operate a cache it will take awhile
for all the correct settings to propagate around the ether world. If
they have been down for more than a couple of days I would say your dns
server isn&#
This is more of an Internet DNS question. We have three DNS servers
registered for our domain. Unfortuantely two of the servers are down and
the third one is up and operational.
If someone were to do a query for the domain it would fail. If the query
was done to the third DNS directly it
Harish pravi:
Hi All,
I was jist going thru the Redhat Howtos for a building a caching name
server on my LAN which has 50 nodes connected to the Internet thru a
Linux Box, in the howtos they have mentioned about making a file
/var/named/root.hints and which has the lists of all the root
server
Hi All,
I was jist going thru the Redhat Howtos for a building a caching name
server on my LAN which has 50 nodes connected to the Internet thru a
Linux Box, in the howtos they have mentioned about making a file
/var/named/root.hints and which has the lists of all the root servers,my
directory
R P Herrold wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Harish wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to build by DNS server and I get a very vague error when I
check the zone that I have made.The error is at line 8, my zone file
details are listed below, pls have a look at it and tell me where I am
going wrong
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Harish wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to build by DNS server and I get a very vague error when I
> check the zone that I have made.The error is at line 8, my zone file
> details are listed below, pls have a look at it and tell me where I am
> go
Hi All,
I am trying to build by DNS server and I get a very vague error when I
check the zone that I have made.The error is at line 8, my zone file
details are listed below, pls have a look at it and tell me where I am
going wrong.
dns_rdata_fromtext: sabnanis.com.zone:8: near eol: unexpected
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 22:52, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> I need help finding the IP address of a Domain Name Server.
>
> Thanks
>
Use your own caching name server. Very simple to set up.
>
> --
--
Hart's PGP Key: 0x7BFF655E - http
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:57:36PM -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> I assume you know the canonical name; try "dig any -x xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx".
-want. I meant WANT.
--
Dave "end of a LONG day at the end of a LONGER week" Ihnat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing l
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 10:52, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> I need help finding the IP address of a Domain Name Server.
You appear to be a customer of bellsouth.net.
Probably you should be using
NS.BELLSOUTH.NET has address 205.152.0.5
or
NS.ATL.BELLSOUTH.NET has address 205.152.0.20
Or ask your ISP..
from the command prompt you can type
nslookup name.of.machine.com and it will give you the IP address.
Ian
At 07:52 PM 9/12/2003, you wrote:
I need help finding the IP address of a Domain Name Server.
Thanks
--
Cheers,
Trey
---
At a given moment I open my eyes and exist.
And before that, durin
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:52:41PM -0400, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> I need help finding the IP address of a Domain Name Server.
I assume you know the canonical name; try "dig any -x xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx".
Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
I need help finding the IP address of a Domain Name Server.
Thanks
--
Cheers,
Trey
---
At a given moment I open my eyes and exist.
And before that, during all eternity, what was there?
Nothing.
- Ugo Betti
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.c
boxes and after
rebuilding them to newer rh versions I never got around to portsentry.
I'll take a look at your HOWTO.
> >The host name is set to webserver1.maindomain.com and I have
> >mail1.maindomain.com setup in dns as the mx record for each of the
> >domains.
> &
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 05:17, Steve Phillips wrote:
> At 00:00 8/09/2003 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> [snippage]
> >Maybe you can do it if reverse-round-robin-DNS exists, but so far as I
> >know it doesn't and, in any case, you would get any name at random from
> &g
eport.com
> > where it said that the host name in the greeting was not the same as
> > that reported in dns (webserver1 vs mail1) by adding
> >
> > define(`confSMTP_LOGIN_MSG',`mail1.$m')
> >
> > to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc. Greeting is fine but
Bret Hughes wrote:
[snip]
> The first question I have is how can I get sendmail to use the name
> mail1 instead of webserver1.
>
> I was able to fix (workaround ) an error reported by dnsreport.com
> where it said that the host name in the greeting was not the same as
> th
At 00:00 8/09/2003 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
[snippage]
Maybe you can do it if reverse-round-robin-DNS exists, but so far as I
know it doesn't and, in any case, you would get any name at random from
that list for every request anyway, which is not what you want. Simply set
the revers
to poke at me don't get locked out forever, ensures that
less hand-maintenance is necessary, and ensures that my iptables rules
don't scale rapidly to infinity.
The host name is set to webserver1.maindomain.com and I have
mail1.maindomain.com setup in dns as the mx record for each of th
I have been working on a box for a guy that will serve as a webserver
dns server and very limited mail (forward a couple of virtualusers to
outside addresses) for 10-15 small domains.
I currently have rh 9 setup with all the latest updates and everything
is working as expected but I still have a
At 02:10 6/09/2003, you wrote:
Steve Phillips wrote:
Anybody heard of Akadns before? Anyone know why a Redhat v9 box cannot
resolve their queries specifically?
This is Akamai - a world wide distributed web system that runs primarily
via DNS and some fancy layer4 routing.
I figured that it might
Steve Phillips wrote:
Anybody heard of Akadns before? Anyone know why a Redhat v9 box cannot
resolve their queries specifically?
This is Akamai - a world wide distributed web system that runs primarily
via DNS and some fancy layer4 routing.
I figured that it might be Akamai, but whois linked
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 09:42, Graham Leggett wrote:
> David Hart wrote:
>
> > I would think that your problem is with your NS provider (The Internet Solution).
> >
> > Have you tried a caching name server with the ISP as backup?
>
> I have tried about 5 or 6 different nameservers, some on the ISP
A bad routing table on this Redhat v9 box, or a bad routing table on the
next hop router?
I don't see how routing could be an issue: All other services (web, ssh,
etc) work 100% from and to this box. The only problem is with DNS, and
_only_ with www.apple.com, and www.yahoo.com.
Something so
David Hart wrote:
I would think that your problem is with your NS provider (The Internet Solution).
Have you tried a caching name server with the ISP as backup?
I have tried about 5 or 6 different nameservers, some on the ISP's
network, some on external networks. As a control, I have run the sam
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 09:10, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a Redhat v9 box that is incapable of resolving certain specific
> DNS addresses, but it can resolve others. Addresses that work:
>
> www.google.com
> www.is.co.za
> www.anazi.co.za
>
I would thin
9 box, or a bad routing table on the
next hop router?
I don't see how routing could be an issue: All other services (web, ssh,
etc) work 100% from and to this box. The only problem is with DNS, and
_only_ with www.apple.com, and www.yahoo.com.
Something someone else picked up:
Both www.app
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS problems from the twilight zone
Hi all,
I have a Redhat v9 box that is incapable of resolving certain specific
DNS addresses, but it can resolve others. Addresses that work:
www.google.com
www.is.
Hi all,
I have a Redhat v9 box that is incapable of resolving certain specific
DNS addresses, but it can resolve others. Addresses that work:
www.google.com
www.is.co.za
www.anazi.co.za
Addresses that do not work:
www.yahoo.com
www.apple.com
An attempt to resolve the packet looks like this
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 22:26, Budi Febrianto wrote:
> >> I installed Bind-9 in RHL 8.0. Bind is act as internal DNS and also act
> as caching DNS for external DNS server to query internet DNS.
> I want that only specific users who can query to external DNS, and the
> rest is restr
>> I installed Bind-9 in RHL 8.0. Bind is act as internal DNS and also act
as
>> caching DNS for external DNS server to query internet DNS.
>> I want that only specific users who can query to external DNS, and the
rest
>> is restricted.
>> Is that possible?
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:46:22AM +0700, Budi Febrianto wrote:
> I installed Bind-9 in RHL 8.0. Bind is act as internal DNS and also act as
> caching DNS for external DNS server to query internet DNS.
> I want that only specific users who can query to external DNS, and the rest
> i
Hi,
I installed Bind-9 in RHL 8.0. Bind is act as internal DNS and also act as
caching DNS for external DNS server to query internet DNS.
I want that only specific users who can query to external DNS, and the rest
is restricted.
Is that possible?
Thanks
--
redhat-list mailing list
List fellows:
Recently my DNS (bind 9.2.2) has been flaky. Working perfectly until
recently where I now must sometimes refresh or request resources a
second time, the first time failing with DNS timeouts.
I'm running a older box with Psyche (RHL 8.0). The drive is partitioned
and &
Thanks a lot Michael! That completely solved it.
--
Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
ontrol I can easily activate the connection, but I can't browse
> to provider authentication or ping anywhere; nothing resolves.. I've
> tried copying the DNS addresses of the ADSL service to the default DNS,
> which didn't help. "Automatically obtain DNS information from pro
x27;ve
tried copying the DNS addresses of the ADSL service to the default DNS,
which didn't help. "Automatically obtain DNS information from provider"
is set, as is "Make this connection the default route". I've got the
SStream connected to eth1 and local home netwo
Title: RE: getting dns ip automatically
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 6:00 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: getting dns ip automatically
>
>
>In Red Hat 8, when I connect to ISP via w
Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> Tuesday, July 22, 2003, 5:04:14 AM, Thomas wrote:
>> Why can't thr person use ddclient to do this? I missed a lot of this
>> thread but rather than use ddclient to update an IP at dynamic DNS
>> provide, point it where he wants it.
>
> I&
Tuesday, July 22, 2003, 5:04:14 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Why can't thr person use ddclient to do this? I missed a lot of this
> thread but rather than use ddclient to update an IP at dynamic DNS
> provide, point it where he wants it.
I'm sorry, but I cannot parse this. Is this te
Jonathan M. Slivko wrote:
> Earthlink accepts DNS from anywhere, AceDSL (company in NYC),
> Netvision in Israel does, Speakeasy does, so do many others.
I'm well aware of the fact that certain ISP's accept requests from anywhere
on the planet. Why they do so is either by design -
Earthlink accepts DNS from anywhere, AceDSL (company in NYC), Netvision in
Israel does, Speakeasy does, so do many others.
-- Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: "Cowles, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
Subje
Jonathan M. Slivko wrote:
> Thats not needed, DNS servers aren't really ISP specific.
Huh???
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your reply, but if an ISP has properly configured
their DNS server(s), it will not allow (accept) recursion requests from ip
addresses outside the ISP's
Thats not needed, DNS servers aren't really ISP specific.
-- Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: getting dns ip automatically
> I have left blank in /etc/resolv.conf cons
I have left blank in /etc/resolv.conf considering that the dns will be different for
different ISPs. I want to automatically assign DNS informatiion when I connect to
ISP.
Nabin Limbu
On 28 Jul 2003 at 12:00, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote:
> What do you have in /etc/resolv.conf? You might want
What do you have in /etc/resolv.conf? You might want to try and set your DNS
information manually.
-- Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: getting dns ip automatically
> In Red Hat 8,
In Red Hat 8, when I connect to ISP via wvdial, I can ping with ip address but can't
ping domain name. It seems that my linux computer is not accepting dns ip.
/etc/ppp/options contains = lock, noauth
/etc/ppp/options.ttyS0 contains == -detach, defaultroute, asyncmap 0, crtscts,
modem
--- "Cowles, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Paulo Schopf wrote:
> > I have redhat 9 and im in trouble to fix a reverse
> dns lookup problem.
> >
> > file /etc/nsswitch.conf:
> > hosts: files dns
> >
> > file /etc/host.conf:
&g
Paulo Schopf wrote:
> I have redhat 9 and im in trouble to fix a reverse dns lookup problem.
>
> file /etc/nsswitch.conf:
> hosts: files dns
>
> file /etc/host.conf:
> order hosts,bind
>
> file /etc/hosts:
> 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
> 192
--- Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On
Fri, 2003-07-25 at 23:58, Paulo Schopf wrote:
>
> > The problem is not that. I can put any nameserver
> in
> > there. The problem is when the link is down. RH
> does a
> > reverse dns lookup using /etc/resol
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 23:58, Paulo Schopf wrote:
> The problem is not that. I can put any nameserver in
> there. The problem is when the link is down. RH does a
> reverse dns lookup using /etc/resolv.conf, instead of
> /etc/hosts first. Please, take a look in this to see
> the pro
--- Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On
Fri, 2003-07-25 at 23:37, Paulo Schopf wrote:
> > I have redhat 9 and im in trouble to fix a reverse
> dns
> > lookup problem.
>
> > file /etc/resolv.conf:
> > nameserver 192.168.1.1 <-- adsl modem
>
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 23:37, Paulo Schopf wrote:
> I have redhat 9 and im in trouble to fix a reverse dns
> lookup problem.
> file /etc/resolv.conf:
> nameserver 192.168.1.1 <-- adsl modem
Why are you using your DSL modem as your DNS server? You haven't given
us enough infor
I have redhat 9 and im in trouble to fix a reverse dns
lookup problem.
file /etc/nsswitch.conf:
hosts: files dns
file /etc/host.conf:
order hosts,bind
file /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
192.168.0.25 machine1
file /etc/resolv.conf:
nameserver 192.168.1.1 <-- adsl mo
Why can't thr person use ddclient to do this? I missed a lot of this
thread but rather than use ddclient to update an IP at dynamic DNS
provide, point it where he wants it.
Palmetto Shopper
http://www.palmettoshopper.com
Serving all of South Carolina and beyond!
Palmetto Politics
Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Is this the thing that tells the Linux box to attempt to get itself
inserted into the DNS for the domain?
I've got a RH 8 box doing DHCP serving and DNS serving for my local
network. The DNS is also set up to cache and forward qu
itself
inserted into the DNS for the domain?
I've got a RH 8 box doing DHCP serving and DNS serving for my local
network. The DNS is also set up to cache and forward queries for hosts
outside my network.
When a Windows box (2000, NT, ME, or XP) comes along, it gets assigned
an IP address
n't this taken care of by "customermailhost.com". Remember,
I'm not managing, maintaining or otherwise associated with the mail
server. It is a seperate entity altogether (quite literally "over the
hills and through the woods"). If I were to put an A record:
mail.customer
ermailhost.com". Remember,
I'm not managing, maintaining or otherwise associated with the mail
server. It is a seperate entity altogether (quite literally "over the
hills and through the woods"). If I were to put an A record:
mail.customermailhost.com IN A 172.16.0.10
at m
Timothy Stone wrote:
> Here's a slow pitch:
>
[snip]
> imagine if you will:
>
> www.customersite.com. IN A 192.168.0.5
> www.customersite.com. IN A 192.168.0.6
> www.customersite.com. IN A 192.168.0.7
> www.customersite.com. IN A 192.168.0.8
I'm hoping your asking us to imagine that you actual
Here's a slow pitch:
I have been recently instructed to move a web domain to internally
hosted servers.
In so doing I added 4 A records with our external DNS host (for round
robin load sharing) to move the domain for web hosting. In so doing,
partly because I missed the part abou
don't understand how does a router help here? The server needs to
> > record it's host name and IP address in the target DNS.
>
> The router is configured to link to and send the changed IP to the
> DynDNS server instead of running software. There is ample information
&g
5:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dynamic DNS
>
> Is there a way to get my Red Hat Linux boxes to send dunamic DNS
updates to a Windoze 2000 DNS server?
>
See if this helps. It does not directly apply but might get you going
in the right direction
http://www.nanog.org/dns.html
Try to set variable DHCP_HOSTNAME=name1 in the configuration file
/etc/sysconfig/network if you configure the NIC to use DHCP.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Marsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003?7?18? 5:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dynamic DNS
Is there a way to get my Red Hat
he server can then contact the Windows DNS servers
and register the new server name and IP address in the Windows controlled
DNS.
So I really do need a piece of software that will allow a Linux server on
a network to register it's presence in the remote DNS for that network
using DNS
oes a router help here? The server needs to
> record it's host name and IP address in the target DNS.
The router is configured to link to and send the changed IP to the
DynDNS server instead of running software. There is ample information
available at Netgear, Linksys and others about this
> I'm no expert but I suspect that the best solution is a router that is
> DynDNS compat - many are. If you don't have one, it's really a good
> small investment anyway.
I don't understand how does a router help here? The server needs to
record it's host nam
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 17:19, Nick Marsh wrote:
> Is there a way to get my Red Hat Linux boxes to send dunamic DNS updates to a
> Windoze 2000 DNS server?
>
>
> nick marsh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm no expert but I suspect that the best solution is a router that is
DynDNS compa
> Is there a way to get my Red Hat Linux boxes to send dunamic DNS updates to a
> Windoze 2000 DNS server?
You just beat me to that. I need to know this as well as I have just
been setting up some Red Hat 7.3 Linux servers that need to register
themselves against Windows DNS servers runn
Is there a way to get my Red Hat Linux boxes to send dunamic DNS updates to a Windoze
2000 DNS server?
nick marsh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Check the config for you DNS server and see if it needs to bound to an
address
bind interface = eth0
Or something like that. Then run whatever the cmd is for stopping
it(/etc/rc.d/init.d/named stop)
And then start it up and see if it's listening with netstat -an
-Original Message-
Ok. It's kinda big. You're right. It's not listening which seems to be
my problem. named is not listd in my services list for me to enable. The
server is a slave. It waits for the primary DNS to send it the data.
Brent.
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Prot
I still didn't see it listening on any port. Show me the full netstat -an
-Original Message-
From: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Changing the security level configuration to allow port 53
(DNS
rver configured to be a zone slave?
-Original Message-
From: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Changing the security level configuration to allow port 53
(DNS)
I need assistance in allowing my Redhat 9.0 se
the security
level configuration to allow port 53 (DNS)
I need assistance in allowing my Redhat 9.0 server to allow DNS traffic on
port 53.
I have RedHat 9.0 installed and everything is fine except I can't seem to
change the security level configuration to allow traffic on port 53.
1 - 100 of 1000 matches
Mail list logo
