_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
/\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
UNIX Services Manager
Title: RE: Dual Boot for Linux RH and Windows NT
You
will also want a boot loader. I use Bootpart with LILO. There
are others, but this one has worked for me.
Regards,
Rob
-Original Message-From: Brad Bonkoski
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 4:25
Hello Redhat community! I am new to this list and hope it's the right
list for the question I have.
I just reinstalled Redhat 7.0 after a system crash and just finished
patching my box. I am now having problems umounting my zip disks.
Every flavor of umount that I use, even -f, gives me a 'busy
I recommend having a look on freshmeat.net and sourceforge. You may find
something that can tide you over while waiting for the Quicken move to
Linux.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack Gillis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
You need to create a Win9X environment for this to work. You can look at
VMWare and WINE. There is also an open-source version of VMWare available I
believe.
Good luck.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack Gillis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 5:25 AM
>
It's hard to say. You shouldn't be able to see some of those ports at all.
Either they have been hacked or they are a script kiddie with no sense at
all (which characterizes most of them anyway.
Find out who owns the IP.
> -Original Message-
> From: eric clover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
FWIW, I do not recall commenting on how long you've been doing this, what
your capabilities are or what your mindset might be and I can't see how
these are relevant. Nor do I support the implied assertion that having more
experience is some sort of excuse for an agressive and insulting
over-react
I actually wasn't being a smartass (ok, maybe a little). However, I don't
see that encouraging you to develop your own research skills warrants such a
harsh response. If you didn't find my suggestion helpful, it's because
you'd rather be spoonfed than do it yourself, in which case maybe Linux
is
Do you have a web browser? If so, look it up on your favourite search
engine. Something is bound to pop up.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Critz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 4:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: UML tools in Redhat
>
I think http://www.openssh.org is a good place to start.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Fan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:28 PM
> To: John Aldrich; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: root remote login
>
>
> Hi John
>
> Thanks for your reply. But
This is a shot in the dark, but how about the perms on the directory? Would
that affect anything?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: printer problems
>
>
> Ok, this is th
If using SSH, it is a good idea to disable telnet and r* (rsh, rlogin, etc)
services altogether.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 11:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: root remote login
>
>
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2
Oh, goodness.
Our firewall is set to deny all inbound connection requests (SYN packets?).
Am I right in assuming that the worm couldn't get in?
Also, where should I subscribe for updates to the firewalling software that
ships with Linux? As this is the first line of defence, I should like to be
Sorry to be a pain, I'm coming in on this discussion half way through. I
was just wondering, this worm has to be executed to infect, right? It
relies on social engineering?
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Hal Burgiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 9:50 A
You think so? Who would download that source code? I think the only people
interested in looking at it would simply do so to criticize it. Well, that
and to grab the odd bit of code to make Linux more interoperable with it :)
As far as adding to the code base, I think sometimes you just have t
It would all be so much easier if you ignored daylight savings time like we
do here in Saskatchewan. Queensland, Australia has followed our lead. Much
less hassle :)
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikkel L. Ellertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 9:21 A
Not having access to the source is more reliable? Yikes. It worries me
that this guy is an IT instructor.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OHH NO! My employer just got
I believe the latest firewall that ships in RH7.x is iptables, which is an
upper class version of ipchains.
Haven't used it myself, but I've heard the name.
Cheers,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Silviu Cojocaru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL
> It's usually not the intensity of your argument that counts in
> business. It's the objective arguing of the merits.
Or, to paraphrase, the presentation thereof. "Open source rocks" vs a
thought-out argument you may put forward is an obvious example. What I
suggest is that endorsing Linux in
>
> i suggest we just ignore surveys like this in the future. let them
> have the results they want. the best revenge is just having
> a better operating system.
Which is why Windows is so popular to begin with, because it is the "better"
O/S. If you are a Linux advocate, show your support a
Whatever anyone thinks, I just voted and Linux is ahead by 6%. I think ANY
opportunity to show support should be encouraged. Linux is not going to
gain more mainstream interest from a mediocre group of proponents.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Ihnat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Who do you think rally wrote the virus? ;)
Rob
> >
> >
> How long before the anti-virus companys start selling a Linux
> version of
> their software, and virus signiture update service? It looks
> like they
> are laying the groundwork now.
>
> Mikkel
> --
>
> Do not meddle in the a
Has someone contacted abcnews and told them not to be so hasty? If they are
proliferating BS, they ought to be made aware of it. The fact that
"McAfee.com Corp., said it had not seen the virus and could not confirm
reports of W32.Winux" should be a bit of a tipoff.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original
I am quite interested in trying that out. I have RedHat 6.0 installed on a
PIII-450. How would I set this up just for testing. I have a variety of
other PC's I can try it out on. I just don't know how to configure it.
Also, is it possible to run the XServer on one box and the Font Server on
an
I admit to half a smile to your idea.
The question I have is, will it percieved as "turn-about is fair play" or
that we are "sinking to their level" and becoming what we despise.
Tough call...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael R. Jinks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: The Truth: Server Shipments in Y2K
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Also, since we're talking aggregates and versions, sh
Also, since we're talking aggregates and versions, should we not be breaking
down the Linux numbers by distribution in the same way the windows stat was
broken out by version?
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: David Talkington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9
Excellent. I was looking for a number of different methods to give proof
regarding this assertion. You sure provided it.
Thanks to all who contributed.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Hank Wethington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 4:26 PM
> To:
That's a good start, but it came out in 1998. In computer terms, a lifetime
ago. Is there any more recent evidence?
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Thornton Prime [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 3:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT:
How do we verify that HotMail is running Apache on
FreeBSD/Solaris/Linux/Win2K/DOS/whatever? Again, I'm looking to
substantiate the claim.
Cheers,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacob Killian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 3:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do you know that hotmail.com is running on Linux/Apache? I'm not
challenging you on it. I'm just curious how I would substantiate such a
claim. For that matter, is there some sort of command I can use to find out
the type of O/S at the end of an ip address. Dig, nslookup and host don't
rea
IPCHAINS is one. Comes with your distribution. The HOWTO is pretty
straightforward. There are others, depending on what you want to do.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Ouimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: Chad W. Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 8:44 PM
> To: Redhat-List
> Subject: Ximian (gnome), Nautilus and KDE
>
>
> Also, One area that I feel linux is currently lacking in the
> area of desktop
> use is simply general
Hey waddya' know? I moved the drive to primary slave, changed the fstab and
managed to get it working.
Cheers and thanks for the tip.
> -Original Message-
> From: Statux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 7:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: q&[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [
I have two HD's
/dev/hda and /dev/hdd. HDA consists of two partitions; a FAT acting
as a WinNT system disk and an NTFS for file storage. HDD is a RedHat
Linux 6.0 installation on an Intel PIII-450 mHz.
Problem #1:
LILO is intalled in the boot record of HDD and I tried to refer to it usi
HylaFax.
> -Original Message-
> From: Simone Lucarelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 4:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: fax server
>
>
> I'm looking for a fax server based on the http protocol. Any
> suggestion?
>
> ++ SIMONE LUCARELLI
All workstations should use that box as their default gateway. You could
plug the Cisco router directly into one of the interfaces to keep it
separate from the rest of your subnets. Keep in mind the other interfaces
should be subnetted accordingly.
Cheers,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> F
FYI,
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/
-
Robby Tanner B.E., B.Sc.
Project Engineer
Wardrop Engineering, Inc.
203-2121 Airport Dr.
Saskatoon, SK
Canada
S7L 6W5
Phone: (306) 244-4712
Fax: (306) 244-4754
___
Redhat
to pay Redmond regardless of whether they
> ship a Windoze O/S or not. I think a sales person actually admitted
> that to me when I called a few months ago.
>
> But what do I know?
>
>
>
>
> "Tanner, Robby" wrote:
> >
> > Is that the case e
Is that the case even when you choose Linux as the O/S?
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Herman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ibm's (very real) commitment to linux And Dell
>
>
> Warren Melnick wrote:
> >
Easy now. While I agree with you, it seems a bit agressive. Remember, most
of us here are Linux advocates. At the same time, I don't want to see yet
another MS vs Linux debate. The fact that we're on this list means we must
have already heard one or two.
I don't like the concept that we have
setup
> before. A few of
> them. Now I want to do a bit more "advanced" setup. I'm just
> asking, is it
> possible to use the linux box as a switch. And wondering if I
> got my routing
> right.
>
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
>
>
> "Tanner,
;
>
> Did you "insmod ip_masq_ftp" ?
>
> -Adam
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Tanner, Robby wrote:
>
> > I am using IPCHAINS and IPMASQ to provide internet access to our
> > LAN. I am sure you've all seen THIS before. The windows
>
Strange, it works with ACTIVE transfers quite nicely. Passive transfers are
failing.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Tanner, Robby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 5:03 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Redhat-list dige
Good idea.
Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Glover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 3:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #1116 - 17 msgs
>
>
> Maybe you should see what rule #13 in the input chain is. From your
>
Great, thanks.
I'll let you know how things turn out.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikkel L. Ellertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 10:56 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: FTP Through Firewall
>
>
> O
; check out the firewall script at http://tomii.erols.com/firewall.txt
>
> The ftp to the server is disallowed, but ws_ftp works fine on
> my windows
> box.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tanner, Robby [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monda
Yup.
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward Dekkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FTP Through Firewall
>
>
> > I am using WS_FTP LE.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rob
>
> Have you tried with a passive (PASV) connectio
Agreed, but while we're making a wish list, it would be nice if people would
read the FAQ's, HOWTO's and search the archives before posting questions
too. No offence intended, I'm guilty too :)
Closing the loop with the solution would actually make the archives more
valuable.
> -Original M
ject: Re: FTP Through Firewall
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Tanner, Robby wrote:
>
> > I am using IPCHAINS and IPMASQ to provide internet access to our
> > LAN. I am sure you've all seen THIS before. The windows
> FTP clients are
> > having a difficult ti
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Curious Log Entries
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Tanner, Robby wrote:
>
> > I moved my firewall which required a reboot.
> >
> > I found the following line in my log, and my firewall does
> not seem to work.
> >
>
For starters, I would recommend purchasing a hub. All your LAN PC's are on
the same subnet, so you don't need to run the configuration below. You can
get the architecture to work, but it just doesn't follow, for lack of a
better term, common practice. The sort of setup you show is often used,
w
I am using IPCHAINS and IPMASQ to provide internet access to our
LAN. I am sure you've all seen THIS before. The windows FTP clients are
having a difficult time retrieving the folder listing. I have the
ip_masq_ftp loaded but I am still getting the following log messages:
"
Feb 19 11:1
is 24.68.176.193 trying to connect to itself fro
port 3 to port 1?
-
Robby Tanner B.E., B.Sc.
Project Engineer
Wardrop Engineering, Inc.
203-2121 Airport Dr.
Saskatoon, SK
Canada
S7L 6W5
Phone: (306) 244-4712
Fax: (306) 244-4754
ort 554 -j
MASQ
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 204.112.40.0/24 -i eth0 -p udp --dport 554 -j
MASQ
How should I configure for RealAudio?
-----
Robby Tanner B.E., B.Sc.
Project Engineer
Wardrop Engineering, Inc.
203-2121 Airport Dr.
Saskatoon, SK
Canada
S7L 6W5
Phone:
Hello all,
I am looking for feedback on the various versions of SSH.
Specifically, I would like a comparison of the commercial vs free version(s)
wrt functionality, security, stability and ease of configuration/deployment.
Regards,
Rob
___
Re
(#12)
Feb 2 14:53:10 weisktsv03 kernel: Packet log: input DENY lo PROTO=6
204.112.40.
3:1026 204.112.40.3:21 L=60 S=0x00 I=13146 F=0x4000 T=64 SYN (#12)
Feb 2 14:53:22 weisktsv03 inetd[3748]: execv /usr/sbin/in.identd: No such
file
or directory
-
Robby Tanner B.E
I have the following in my log file.
Feb 2 03:37:23 weisktsv03 kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6
202.64.65.202:1619 24.68.176.193:98 L=60 S=0x00 I=41281 F=0x4000 T=45 SYN
(#12)
Feb 2 03:37:26 weisktsv03 kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=6
202.64.65.202:1619 24.68.176.193:98 L=
According to the HOWTO, all I need to do is echo "1" >
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/rp_filter to enable source address verification
(see page 38).
"The best way to protect from IP spoofing is called Source Address
Verification, and it is done by the routing code, and not firewalling at
all."
__
've really done a lot to that page since my last visit!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Ashe [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 1:31 PM
> > To: Tanner, Robby
> > Subject:Re: Applications through firewa
have ip spoof proofing rules in my firewall?
-
Robby Tanner B.E., B.Sc.
Project Engineer
Wardrop Engineering, Inc.
203-2121 Airport Dr.
Saskatoon, SK
Canada
S7L 6W5
Phone: (306) 244-4712
Fax: (306) 244-4754
ure someone is really coming from where
> they say they
> are...
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tanner, Robby [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:31 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Linux Grou
I had seen a web page not to long ago that listed applications known to work
through ipchains. I think it also contained a little blurb on how to let
them through.
Specifically, I would like to know the mimimum requirement to let pcAnywhere
out of our system. In the long term though, it would b
Okey-dokey. I have a linux router/firewall set up in our Saskatoon office.
The logons seem to take a little long so I was wondering if I could speed it
up through some sort of redirection (i.e. anything coming in on port 137-139
sent to WAN router?). We have an NT PDC.
Also, some of the Win9x c
Hello,
I got ipchains and forwarding working nicely together and am
currently working on a set of rules for the firewall. I am planning on
submitting a list of these rules to the lists in the hopes that some of you
will review and comment on them.
Effectively, we now have two rout
I have nothing specific to offer except to suggest that you check XF86's
website for docs and possibly a newslist (if you haven't already). The
originators of the system should be the first stop for problems.
Look through your local NNTP server for newsgroups with ".x".
Hope this might help you
greately appreciated.
-----
Robby Tanner B.E., B.Sc.
Project Engineer
Wardrop Engineering, Inc.
203-2121 Airport Dr.
Saskatoon, SK
Canada
S7L 6W5
Phone: (306) 244-4712
Fax: (306) 244-4754
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EM
setup at home. I have a firewall box directly
> connected to the internet through a cable modem.
>
> Heman
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tanner, Robby
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001
ig
> /sbin/route
> /sbin/ipchains -L (just the masq rules)
>
> With this info we should be better able to help.
>
> Drew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tanner, Robby
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24
Wait a minute, I think I failed to mention that I am connected via cable
modem to the internet, so my default gateway on the Linux box is
24.68.176.1, while for the LAN it is 204.112.40.3. Does this change things?
My "external" card is not directly connected to the internet, but is routed
through
E: More Firewall Problems
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tanner, Robby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:49 PM
> > To: 'Linux (LOSURS Q&A)'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Linux Group
> > (Saskatoon)'
> >
ot.
Thanks,
Robby Tanner B.E., B.Sc.
Project Engineer
Wardrop Engineering, Inc.
203-2121 Airport Dr.
Saskatoon, SK
Canada
S7L 6W5
Phone: (306) 244-4712
Fax: (306) 244-4754
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.
ore likely.
Finally, let me say that I am still somewhat uninitiated with respect to
both Linux and this level of TCP/IP networking, so if some of the questions
seem a bit stupid please be patient. I'll get it sorted out in time.
Cheers and thanks,
Robby Tanner
-
n time.
Cheers and thanks,
Robby Tanner
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
There is GIMP and Dia for diagramming. Dia claims to be a good replacement
for Visio. Haven't tried it myself though.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marco Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Network diagram tool?
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: large filesystem under Linux
>
>
> "Tanner, Robby" wrote:
>
> > According to
> >
> http://www.infocom.cqu.edu.au/Units/aut2000/85321/Resources/Le
> ctures/2000/10
> > /21/index.html there is a 4TB limit on ext
According to
http://www.infocom.cqu.edu.au/Units/aut2000/85321/Resources/Lectures/2000/10
/21/index.html there is a 4TB limit on ext2 partitions and a 2GB size limit
on files.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:53
Do a search from google.com or the like. Also, try the vendor website and
check the Redhat mail archive list for possible insight.
> -Original Message-
> From: Penelope L. McFadin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 9:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Sc
You can get Sleeman's in any major centre in Canada. We even have it in the
"bald" prairies.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Forrister [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OT - beers] (was: Re: name of curren
--On 09/28/00 05:57:46 PM -0500 Jeff Hogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:49 AM
> Subject: Re: smbmount problem(
_
/\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/
\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville, Oregon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
(Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville, Oregon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
_ _ _ _ _
/\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville, Oregon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
iple host/domain names and I'm
>>> not sure what to do :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>JW
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Redhat-list mailing list
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
how will it know to put "from:
>>> *@newdomain.com" on outgoing mail?
>>>
>>> Basically I've never dealt with multiple host/domain names and I'm
>>> not sure what to do :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>JW
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Redhat-list mailing list
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_\_\_\_\_\
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/
_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville, Oregon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
t
_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
/\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_/ /\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/
/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville, Oregon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
ID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville, Orego
/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville, Oregon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville, Oregon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
#x27;d suggest you look there to see what the
problem is.
-- Rob
_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
/\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __ /\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/
/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/
's not.
> you can get a nice tour of the linux kernel, even if you don't plan
> on installing a custom one yourself, by installing the source code
> for the kernel version you're running, cd'ing to the base directory,
> and typing "make xconfig".
>
> hth,
&
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville, Oregon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
ix it?
>
> Chad
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tanner, Robby
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 5:40 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: XDCMP for Linux?
>
>
> If you talking about r
UIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
McMinnville,
If you talking about running an X-Session via XWin32 or something like that,
than yes I have. It's really easy and really slick.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Carreiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 1:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: XDCMP for
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
