Giovanni Bechis wrote:
LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
p.s.: There is a russian language patch in the patches directory, but
I couldn't make an udpate for that. Is that even in use anymore?
Russian version is not available anymore, ${PKGNAME} removed (so use
patch -E to apply the diff), the port works we
slurm - yet another network traffic monitor
attached is a port for this simple curses-based traffic monitor 'for a
friend'.
tested on i386. comments?
-ryan
slurm.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
2008/9/17 Stefan Sperling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 03:48:04PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:06:47AM -0600, Brad Walker wrote:
>> > I've attached a patch that solves the bindings issue and another issue
>> > with building the apache v2.2 modules. I
here is the modified version of prboom, known as prboom-plus. again, don't
want people to think this should replace games/prboom, as the doom community
just happens to have a very diverse and interesting array of ports that do
various nifty things and can't be blobbed into a 'one for all' port.
o
On 2008/09/16 20:29, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> Matthias Kilian wrote:
>> Porters, *please* prepend some comments to the patches included in
>> your ports, unless the purpose of a patch is obvious.
>>
>> And if you're committing security patches, just don't name the thing
>> in the cvs commit message
Matthias Kilian wrote:
Porters, *please* prepend some comments to the patches included in
your ports, unless the purpose of a patch is obvious.
And if you're committing security patches, just don't name the thing
in the cvs commit message but also in the patch file (a simple
CVE-whatever is enou
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:21:47AM -0700, Ryan Freeman wrote:
> hello ports@,
>
> here is another doom engine ;) this one is again complete different goals
> this time from prboom and from chocolate-doom; it concentrates on nice
> eye-candy (thus requiring opengl). It is heavily modified from the
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:59:54PM -0700, Ryan Freeman wrote:
> hello ports@
>
> attached is a port of the conservative doom sourceport chocolate-doom.
>
> from DESCR:
>
> Chocolate Doom is a portable branch of the classic doom.exe experience
> from the days of DOS. The author, Simon Howard, has
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Ryan Freeman wrote:
> here is a port of BSP, a portable Doom nodes builder, as promised, as
> it will be needed to render makes created with the games/yadex port that
> i submitted useful.
>
makes? make that maps! as I said to Paul off-list, time for me t
here is a port of BSP, a portable Doom nodes builder, as promised, as
it will be needed to render makes created with the games/yadex port that
i submitted useful.
pkg/DESCR:
BSP is a portable nodes builder for Doom. A nodes builder is needed for
creating your own PWADs, for example after you crea
more doom toys! to go with my deutex port, here is an actual map editor;
pkg/DESCR:
Yadex is a Doom level (wad) editor for Unix systems running X. It is
originally derived from the DOS editor, DEU 5.21. Yadex supports Doom
alpha, Doom beta, Doom, Ultimate Doom, Doom II, Final Doom, and
Heretic.
*blush* .. Thanks for noticing, Claudio...
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
>[<++>-]<+++.>+++[<-->-]<.>+++[<+
+++>-]<.>++[<>-]<+.--.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
doomdata.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:34:28PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 06:02:48AM -0700, Ryan Freeman wrote:
| | i have fixed this by simply adding a post-install: directive in the port's
| | Makefile to copy the manpages which are pregenerated in the tarball anyhow,
| | avoiding
I'd like to drop my maintainer status from the Erlang port, I don't have
the time for maintaining it.
Cheers,
Jon
Sven Wolf-2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the solution is "Either wait, or build from ports." Currently I build my
> own packages from the ports. Because the offical snapshot packages
> haven't been updated since august.
>
> Best regards,
> Sven
>
> zm0 wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sven Wolf-2 wrote:
>>> Hello,
>
Hi,
the solution is "Either wait, or build from ports." Currently I build my
own packages from the ports. Because the offical snapshot packages
haven't been updated since august.
Best regards,
Sven
zm0 wrote:
>
>
> Sven Wolf-2 wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've tried to install the bash package
>> (P
Sven Wolf-2 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've tried to install the bash package
> (PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/)
> on a -current system (4.4 GENERIC#1050 i386) but I get following error:
>
> pkg_add -v bash
> parsing bash-3.2.39
> Dependencies for bash-3.2.39 r
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 03:48:04PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:06:47AM -0600, Brad Walker wrote:
> > I've attached a patch that solves the bindings issue and another issue
> > with building the apache v2.2 modules. It's also available @
> > http://bradmwalker.com/
hello ports@,
attached is a port for the DeuTex wad authoring tools, useful helpers for
those that want to also create pwads for Doom games :)
from pkg/DESCR:
>From the DeuTex website:
DeuTex is a wad composer for Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife. It can be
used to extract the lumps of a wad and
hello ports@,
here is another doom engine ;) this one is again complete different goals
this time from prboom and from chocolate-doom; it concentrates on nice
eye-candy (thus requiring opengl). It is heavily modified from the original
Doom source while you can play the game just fine and it 'feels
I just keep replying to myself...
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:34:28PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| I've made a port
| of the "shareware" episode 'Knee-Deep in the Dead' (attached) for use
| with this port (and possibly prboom). It'll do until I can locate my
| original Doom datafiles.
This doomda
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:34:28PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| This one builds, packages and installs fine on amd64. I've made a port
| of the "shareware" episode 'Knee-Deep in the Dead' (attached) for use
| with this port (and possibly prboom). It'll do until I can locate my
| original Doom data
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 06:02:48AM -0700, Ryan Freeman wrote:
| i have fixed this by simply adding a post-install: directive in the port's
| Makefile to copy the manpages which are pregenerated in the tarball anyhow,
| avoiding python once again and now working on my compaq that does not have
| pyt
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:06:47AM -0600, Brad Walker wrote:
> I've attached a patch that solves the bindings issue and another issue
> with building the apache v2.2 modules. It's also available @
> http://bradmwalker.com/ports/subversion-1.5.2.diff
> The port fixes SWIG bindings by regenerati
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:07:19PM -0600, Brad Walker wrote:
I'm running a slightly modified version of this (updated for 1.5.2).
Running Trac-0.11.1 segfaults for me on loading py-subversion.
Does any of these commands segfault anyone's machine?
import libsvn.wc
impor
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:31:22PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/09/16 03:52, Ryan Freeman wrote:
> > thanks for having a look Paul, odd you had that problem. on my laptop,
> > (of course), it packaged fine, i also got a friend who also has i386 and
> > a newer snapshot than mine that wa
On 2008/09/16 03:52, Ryan Freeman wrote:
> thanks for having a look Paul, odd you had that problem. on my laptop,
> (of course), it packaged fine, i also got a friend who also has i386 and
> a newer snapshot than mine that was able to package and repackage.
obtain configure output (or better, conf
hello!
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:28:06PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> Your port doesn't seem to package, apparently because the make fake
> step doesn't install the manpages.
>
thanks for having a look Paul, odd you had that problem. on my laptop,
(of course), it packaged fine, i
hello ports@
attached is a port of the conservative doom sourceport chocolate-doom.
from DESCR:
Chocolate Doom is a portable branch of the classic doom.exe experience
from the days of DOS. The author, Simon Howard, has worked to insure
Chocolate Doom, which is nothing more than a directly modifi
Added post-install target that install sample files to examples directory.
I'm using libconfig daily on i386 and amd64, haven't noticed any issues yet.
Please test. Any comments on SHARE_LIBS bump?
Commit?
/Markus
Markus Bergkvist wrote:
Diff below updates libconfig to 1.3..1
Builds and runs on
30 matches
Mail list logo
