jpountz commented on code in PR #12111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12111#discussion_r1086310610
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/BufferingKnnVectorsWriter.java:
##
@@ -39,79 +37,81 @@
* @lucene.experimental
*/
public abstract class BufferingK
javanna commented on code in PR #12111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12111#discussion_r1086409971
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/BufferingKnnVectorsWriter.java:
##
@@ -39,79 +37,81 @@
* @lucene.experimental
*/
public abstract class BufferingK
javanna merged PR #12111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12111
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
javanna merged PR #12110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12110
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
javanna opened a new pull request, #12112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12112
A recent test failure signaled that when the simple text codec was randomly
selected, byte vectors could not be written. This commit addressed that by
adding support for writing byte vectors to Simpl
javanna merged PR #12112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12112
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
alessandrobenedetti commented on PR #12048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12048#issuecomment-1403387891
@msokolov do you see any reason why we shouldn't do it? because I reviewed
the pull request Daniele is going to publish (Word2Vec for synonyms generation:
https://www.youtub
msokolov commented on PR #12048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12048#issuecomment-1403475767
I would say let's make the changes when we can see the purpose of doing it?
So, if Daniele is planning to make use of this in an upcoming PR, let's
just incorporate the change into
benwtrent commented on code in PR #12111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12111#discussion_r1086603790
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/BufferingKnnVectorsWriter.java:
##
@@ -161,77 +161,113 @@ public int advance(int target) throws IOException {
}
alessandrobenedetti commented on PR #12048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12048#issuecomment-1403736061
Ok, that's fine! @dantuzi you can cancel this PR and just include the change
in the final PR.
Thanks @msokolov for the suggestion!
--
This is an automated message fr
dnhatn commented on issue #11428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11428#issuecomment-1404033931
@zacharymorn Thank you for looking into the issue.
The first proposals of the API:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8198 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
11 matches
Mail list logo