[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz opened a new pull request, #1019: Synchronize FieldInfos#verifyFieldInfos.

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
jpountz opened a new pull request, #1019: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1019 This method is called from `addIndexes` and should be synchronized so that it would see consistent data structures in case of concurrent indexing that would be introducing new fields. I hit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10471) Increase the number of dims for KNN vectors to 2048

2022-07-13 Thread Robert Muir (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566212#comment-17566212 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10471: -- My questions are still unanswered. Please

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10577) Quantize vector values

2022-07-13 Thread Robert Muir (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566220#comment-17566220 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10577: -- {quote} I tried looking at how DocValues a

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10577) Quantize vector values

2022-07-13 Thread Robert Muir (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566223#comment-17566223 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10577: -- By the way, if the right answer is that re

[GitHub] [lucene] jtibshirani commented on a diff in pull request #992: LUCENE-10592 Build HNSW Graph on indexing

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
jtibshirani commented on code in PR #992: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#discussion_r919842519 ## lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/perfield/PerFieldKnnVectorsFormat.java: ## @@ -102,9 +104,22 @@ private class FieldsWriter extends KnnVectorsWriter {

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta opened a new pull request, #41: Allow to specify number of worker processes for jira2github_import.py

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mocobeta opened a new pull request, #41: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/41 Close #36 `jira2github_import.py` processes Jira dump files one by one and does not call any HTTP APIs. It should be able to parallelize it with [multiprocessing](https://docs.python.

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta opened a new pull request, #42: fix missed f-strings' "f"

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mocobeta opened a new pull request, #42: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/42 This is a small follow-up for #40. ![Screenshot from 2022-07-13 21-16-51](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1825333/178731400-485ced98-1ca2-4d9b-b7e3-01ff91f78ed6.png) sh

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta merged pull request #42: fix missed f-strings' "f"

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mocobeta merged PR #42: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/42 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lu

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10397) KnnVectorQuery doesn't tie break by doc ID

2022-07-13 Thread Lu Xugang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566298#comment-17566298 ] Lu Xugang commented on LUCENE-10397: It seems like this issue has been resolved aft

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10397) KnnVectorQuery doesn't tie break by doc ID

2022-07-13 Thread Lu Xugang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566298#comment-17566298 ] Lu Xugang edited comment on LUCENE-10397 at 7/13/22 12:33 PM: ---

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mikemccand opened a new pull request, #43: More polishing, add a link for each migrated comment back to the 'final inch' comment in Jira

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mikemccand opened a new pull request, #43: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/43 More PNP polishing: * Make Linked Issues more compact so it's just LUCENE-NNN as a link * The "Legacy Jira" footer in each migrated comment is now a link back to the exact comment

[GitHub] [lucene] dsmiley commented on a diff in pull request #821: LUCENE-10523: factor out UnifiedHighlighter.newFieldHighlighter() method

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
dsmiley commented on code in PR #821: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/821#discussion_r920037120 ## lucene/highlighter/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/uhighlight/UnifiedHighlighter.java: ## @@ -1091,6 +1091,24 @@ protected FieldHighlighter getFieldHighlighter(

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mikemccand commented on pull request #43: More polishing, add a link for each migrated comment back to the 'final inch' comment in Jira

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mikemccand commented on PR #43: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/43#issuecomment-1183200274 Now the comment looks like this: ![Screen Shot 2022-07-13 at 9 04 42 AM](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/796508/178740337-e59b9736-5c03-423a-ab28-78b09a34f5d4.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10397) KnnVectorQuery doesn't tie break by doc ID

2022-07-13 Thread Alessandro Benedetti (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566315#comment-17566315 ] Alessandro Benedetti commented on LUCENE-10397: --- Hi Lu, I was not aware o

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10397) KnnVectorQuery doesn't tie break by doc ID

2022-07-13 Thread Alessandro Benedetti (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566315#comment-17566315 ] Alessandro Benedetti edited comment on LUCENE-10397 at 7/13/22 1:15 PM: -

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta commented on a diff in pull request #43: More polishing, add a link for each migrated comment back to the 'final inch' comment in Jira

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mocobeta commented on code in PR #43: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/43#discussion_r920069683 ## migration/src/jira2github_import.py: ## @@ -146,8 +146,10 @@ def comment_author(author_name, author_dispname): logger.error(f"Failed to conv

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mikemccand commented on a diff in pull request #43: More polishing, add a link for each migrated comment back to the 'final inch' comment in Jira

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mikemccand commented on code in PR #43: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/43#discussion_r920071047 ## migration/src/jira2github_import.py: ## @@ -146,8 +146,10 @@ def comment_author(author_name, author_dispname): logger.error(f"Failed to co

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta commented on pull request #41: Allow to specify number of worker processes for jira2github_import.py

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mocobeta commented on PR #41: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/41#issuecomment-1183234776 Works fine for me - it now processes the whole Jira dump in about 80 minutes with four workers. ``` python src/jira2github_import.py --min 1 --max 10648 --num_workers 4

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta commented on pull request #41: Allow to specify number of worker processes for jira2github_import.py

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mocobeta commented on PR #41: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/41#issuecomment-1183240812 @mikemccand just to let you know, I'm going to merge this tomorrow (in JST) so that we are able to iterate conversion tests more often. -- This is an automated message from th

[GitHub] [lucene] luyuncheng commented on a diff in pull request #987: LUCENE-10627: Using CompositeByteBuf to Reduce Memory Copy

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
luyuncheng commented on code in PR #987: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987#discussion_r920106561 ## lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/compressing/CompressionMode.java: ## @@ -257,9 +270,13 @@ private static class DeflateCompressor extends Compressor {

[GitHub] [lucene] luyuncheng commented on pull request #987: LUCENE-10627: Using CompositeByteBuf to Reduce Memory Copy

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
luyuncheng commented on PR #987: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987#issuecomment-1183266339 > we prefer to fork the code so that old codecs still rely on the unchanged code (which should move to lucene/backward-codecs) Thanks for the your advice @jpountz , i think it is

[GitHub] [lucene] luyuncheng commented on a diff in pull request #987: LUCENE-10627: Using CompositeByteBuf to Reduce Memory Copy

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
luyuncheng commented on code in PR #987: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/987#discussion_r920106561 ## lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/compressing/CompressionMode.java: ## @@ -257,9 +270,13 @@ private static class DeflateCompressor extends Compressor {

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta commented on pull request #41: Allow to specify number of worker processes for jira2github_import.py

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mocobeta commented on PR #41: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/41#issuecomment-1183303117 This code shares a Logger object between workers, that seems to work on Linux but might not work on windows. ``` # The worker configuration is done at the start of the work

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mikemccand commented on a diff in pull request #43: More polishing, add a link for each migrated comment back to the 'final inch' comment in Jira

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mikemccand commented on code in PR #43: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/43#discussion_r920189990 ## migration/src/jira2github_import.py: ## @@ -146,8 +146,10 @@ def comment_author(author_name, author_dispname): logger.error(f"Failed to co

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10650) "after_effect": "no" was removed what replaces it?

2022-07-13 Thread Nathan Meisels (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566410#comment-17566410 ] Nathan Meisels commented on LUCENE-10650: - For future reference seems like if y

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10650) "after_effect": "no" was removed what replaces it?

2022-07-13 Thread Nathan Meisels (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566410#comment-17566410 ] Nathan Meisels edited comment on LUCENE-10650 at 7/13/22 4:45 PM: ---

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10650) "after_effect": "no" was removed what replaces it?

2022-07-13 Thread Nathan Meisels (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566410#comment-17566410 ] Nathan Meisels edited comment on LUCENE-10650 at 7/13/22 4:45 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10650) "after_effect": "no" was removed what replaces it?

2022-07-13 Thread Adrien Grand (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566422#comment-17566422 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10650: --- Indeed Elasticsearch would change the af

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller opened a new pull request, #1020: Add #scoreSupplier support to DocValuesRewriteMethod along with singleton doc value opto

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
gsmiller opened a new pull request, #1020: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1020 ### Description (or a Jira issue link if you have one) I'm coming back to work on LUCENE-10207, and one thing I found while working on that is that DocValuesRewriteMethod doesn't support `scoreS

[GitHub] [lucene] cpoerschke merged pull request #821: LUCENE-10523: factor out UnifiedHighlighter.newFieldHighlighter() method

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
cpoerschke merged PR #821: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/821 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apac

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10523) facilitate UnifiedHighlighter extension w.r.t. FieldHighlighter

2022-07-13 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566441#comment-17566441 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10523: -- Co

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10523) facilitate UnifiedHighlighter extension w.r.t. FieldHighlighter

2022-07-13 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566443#comment-17566443 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10523: -- Co

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-10523) facilitate UnifiedHighlighter extension w.r.t. FieldHighlighter

2022-07-13 Thread Christine Poerschke (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke resolved LUCENE-10523. -- Fix Version/s: 10.0 (main) 9.3 Resolution: Fixed >

[GitHub] [lucene] mikemccand merged pull request #1012: LUCENE-10648: Fix failures in TestAssertingPointsFormat.testWithExceptions

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mikemccand merged PR #1012: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1012 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10592) Should we build HNSW graph on the fly during indexing

2022-07-13 Thread Julie Tibshirani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566445#comment-17566445 ] Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10592: --- This change makes sense to me to

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10648) Fix TestAssertingPointsFormat.testWithExceptions failure

2022-07-13 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566444#comment-17566444 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10648: -- Co

[GitHub] [lucene] jtibshirani commented on a diff in pull request #992: LUCENE-10592 Build HNSW Graph on indexing

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
jtibshirani commented on code in PR #992: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#discussion_r920371282 ## lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/KnnVectorsWriter.java: ## @@ -24,28 +24,40 @@ import org.apache.lucene.index.DocIDMerger; import org.apache.lucene.in

[GitHub] [lucene] jtibshirani commented on pull request #992: LUCENE-10592 Build HNSW Graph on indexing

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
jtibshirani commented on PR #992: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/992#issuecomment-1183533308 👍 I resolved comments about `flush`. I don't have remaining high-level comments. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on t

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10592) Should we build HNSW graph on the fly during indexing

2022-07-13 Thread Julie Tibshirani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566445#comment-17566445 ] Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-10592 at 7/13/22 6:16 PM: -

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller commented on pull request #1020: Add #scoreSupplier support to DocValuesRewriteMethod along with singleton doc value opto

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
gsmiller commented on PR #1020: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1020#issuecomment-1183535216 Hmm... looks like a test failed but it looks unrelated? Unlucky random test? Will look a bit more. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mikemccand merged pull request #43: More polishing, add a link for each migrated comment back to the 'final inch' comment in Jira

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mikemccand merged PR #43: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/43 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10577) Quantize vector values

2022-07-13 Thread Julie Tibshirani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566481#comment-17566481 ] Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10577: --- I don't feel strongly about havi

[GitHub] [lucene] nknize commented on a diff in pull request #1017: LUCENE-10654: Add new ShapeDocValuesField for LatLonShape and XYShape

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
nknize commented on code in PR #1017: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1017#discussion_r920466302 ## lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/document/ShapeDocValuesField.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,844 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or mor

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10577) Quantize vector values

2022-07-13 Thread Michael Sokolov (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566498#comment-17566498 ] Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-10577: -- I'm also not sure about Codec para

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller opened a new pull request, #1021: LUCENE-10603: Remove SSDV#NO_MORE_ORDS definition

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
gsmiller opened a new pull request, #1021: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1021 ### Description (or a Jira issue link if you have one) This is the last bit of work needed in LUCENE-10603 to actually remove the definition of `SSDV#NO_MORE_ORDS` and stop returning it from `SS

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] msokolov commented on issue #37: Why are some Jira issues completely missing?

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
msokolov commented on issue #37: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/37#issuecomment-1183704949 Maybe somebody did this https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirakb/how-to-set-the-starting-issue-number-for-a-project-318669643.html -- This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] [lucene] jpountz commented on a diff in pull request #1021: LUCENE-10603: Remove SSDV#NO_MORE_ORDS definition

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
jpountz commented on code in PR #1021: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1021#discussion_r920549702 ## lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/index/AssertingLeafReader.java: ## @@ -1055,12 +1051,9 @@ public long cost() { @Override public long n

[GitHub] [lucene] shahrs87 commented on pull request #907: LUCENE-10357 Ghost fields and postings/points

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
shahrs87 commented on PR #907: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/907#issuecomment-1183747929 Thank you @jpountz for being so patient with me. I tried your above suggestion and hit the following problem. Locally I removed the following check from BloomFilteringPostingsFormat.java

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10632) Change getAllChildren to return all children regardless of the count

2022-07-13 Thread Greg Miller (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566560#comment-17566560 ] Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10632: -- Bringing a conversation about this issue w

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-10632) Change getAllChildren to return all children regardless of the count

2022-07-13 Thread Greg Miller (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Greg Miller updated LUCENE-10632: - Component/s: modules/facet > Change getAllChildren to return all children regardless of the cou

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller commented on a diff in pull request #1021: LUCENE-10603: Remove SSDV#NO_MORE_ORDS definition

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
gsmiller commented on code in PR #1021: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1021#discussion_r920598336 ## lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/index/AssertingLeafReader.java: ## @@ -1055,12 +1051,9 @@ public long cost() { @Override public long

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta merged pull request #41: Allow to specify number of worker processes for jira2github_import.py

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mocobeta merged PR #41: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/pull/41 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lu

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta closed issue #36: Can we parallelize the converter script?

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
mocobeta closed issue #36: Can we parallelize the converter script? URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/36 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

[GitHub] [lucene] gsmiller merged pull request #1021: LUCENE-10603: Remove SSDV#NO_MORE_ORDS definition

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
gsmiller merged PR #1021: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1021 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apac

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10603) Improve iteration of ords for SortedSetDocValues

2022-07-13 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566614#comment-17566614 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10603: -- Co

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-10603) Improve iteration of ords for SortedSetDocValues

2022-07-13 Thread Greg Miller (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Greg Miller resolved LUCENE-10603. -- Resolution: Fixed > Improve iteration of ords for SortedSetDocValues > --

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10603) Improve iteration of ords for SortedSetDocValues

2022-07-13 Thread Greg Miller (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566615#comment-17566615 ] Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10603: -- Shouldn't be any more to do on this now. R

[GitHub] [lucene] LuXugang closed pull request #873: LUCENE-10397: KnnVectorQuery doesn't tie break by doc ID

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
LuXugang closed pull request #873: LUCENE-10397: KnnVectorQuery doesn't tie break by doc ID URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/873 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specifi

[GitHub] [lucene] LuXugang commented on pull request #873: LUCENE-10397: KnnVectorQuery doesn't tie break by doc ID

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
LuXugang commented on PR #873: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/873#issuecomment-1184023833 This issue has been resolved after https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926 merged . -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [lucene] Yuti-G commented on a diff in pull request #1013: LUCENE-10644: Facets#getAllChildren testing should ignore child order

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
Yuti-G commented on code in PR #1013: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1013#discussion_r920790457 ## lucene/facet/src/test/org/apache/lucene/facet/FacetTestCase.java: ## @@ -254,14 +254,38 @@ protected void assertFloatValuesEquals(FacetResult a, FacetResult b) {

[GitHub] [lucene] Yuti-G commented on a diff in pull request #1013: LUCENE-10644: Facets#getAllChildren testing should ignore child order

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
Yuti-G commented on code in PR #1013: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1013#discussion_r920793487 ## lucene/facet/src/test/org/apache/lucene/facet/FacetTestCase.java: ## @@ -254,14 +254,38 @@ protected void assertFloatValuesEquals(FacetResult a, FacetResult b) {

[GitHub] [lucene] Yuti-G commented on a diff in pull request #1013: LUCENE-10644: Facets#getAllChildren testing should ignore child order

2022-07-13 Thread GitBox
Yuti-G commented on code in PR #1013: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1013#discussion_r920790457 ## lucene/facet/src/test/org/apache/lucene/facet/FacetTestCase.java: ## @@ -254,14 +254,38 @@ protected void assertFloatValuesEquals(FacetResult a, FacetResult b) {

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10577) Quantize vector values

2022-07-13 Thread Julie Tibshirani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17566481#comment-17566481 ] Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-10577 at 7/14/22 6:56 AM: -