Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
dev-python/uv-build/uv-build-0.6.9.ebuild | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dev-python/uv-build/uv-build-0.6.9.ebuild
b/dev-python/uv-build/uv-build-0.6.9.ebuild
index a93405a17200..39fada98c1d0 100644
--- a/dev-python/
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
> I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
> That is, by quality:
> core: gentoo [official]
> stable: opentransactions (?) [official (?!)]
> testing: hyprland-overlay, moexiami
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-03-30)
# Depends on dev-python/python-poppler-qt5, stuck on py3.12, painful to
# package. Use media-gfx/inkscape or app-text/pdfarranger alternatively.
# Removal on 2025-04-29. Bugs #947726, #952250
app-text/krop
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed m
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 08:57:38AM +0100, Nowa Ammerlaan wrote:
> On 19/03/2025 02:07, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:34:43PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:14:13AM -, Duncan wrote:
> >>> Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:11:06 +0100
21.03.2025 13:32, Michał Górny пишет:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
> except for gentoo and guru.
>
>
> Over 10 years ago, I've started the repository mirror & CI project.
> What started as a bunch of shell scripts on a user-donated serv
On Sun, 2025-03-23 at 08:39 +0100, Alfredo Tupone wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 06:56:24 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > > Bug fixed, and python team removed
> >
> > The tests still fail:
> >
> > FAILED (failures=3, errors=1)
> >
> Here they are not. Maybe I miss further dependency.
> Mind
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-03-23)
# No revdeps after net-im/psi treecleaning. Depends on Qt5.
# Removal on 2025-04-22. Bug #951936
dev-build/qconf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
>> One idea could be to merge these into a single status attribute, and
>> maybe salvage the "core" value. That is:
>>
>> - core: Only the Gentoo repository (for the time being)
>> - official: Repositories maintained by a project or a developer
>>
Hello, everyone.
TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
except for gentoo and guru.
Over 10 years ago, I've started the repository mirror & CI project.
What started as a bunch of shell scripts on a user-donated server, has
organically grown into a bigger bunch of s
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-04-04)
# Depends on Qt5WebEngine, and upstream seem to be having a hard time
# porting to Qt6 with an unknown ETA likely well beyond the time we want
# to keep dev-qt/qtwebengine:5 in ::gentoo.
# Removal on 2025-04-31. Bug #92
media-video/jellyfin-media-player
sig
# Matt Turner (2025-04-04)
# Package is dead (last release in 1999).
# Not relevant today: purpose is to not overload a very slow system with
# multiple X11 clients starting at the same time. SRC_URI is long dead.
# Removal on 2025-05-04. Bug #953120.
x11-misc/xtoolwait
signature.asc
Descriptio
Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:11:06 +0100 as excerpted:
> I had really hoped to receive more comments on my earlier RFC. [...]
> I really do want to know what others think so I can
> make a better judgment on whether or not my idea is really this crazy
> and if I should just shut up
From: Eli Schwartz
Eveywhere, we use ${CARGO} as set by the rust toolchain setup, except
one place. This caused issues such as erroring out in at least one
reported case with "cargo: command not found" (when using --root,
apparently). It would also certainly not respect RUST_MIN_VER /
RUST_MAX_VE
Eveywhere, we use ${CARGO} as set by the rust toolchain setup, except
one place. This caused issues such as erroring out in at least one
reported case with "cargo: command not found" (when using --root,
apparently). It would also certainly not respect RUST_MIN_VER /
RUST_MAX_VER.
Ensure we consist
# Matt Turner (2025-04-04)
# Package is dead and has a pile of patches to make it compile.
# SRC_URI is long gone. Many alternative image viewers.
# Removal on 2025-05-04. Bug #953119.
media-gfx/xloadimage
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-04-02)
# No release since 2021, no commit in 3 years, depends on Qt5WebEngine.
# Use app-text/uchmviewer instead. Bug #823008
app-text/kchmviewer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
# Matt Turner (2025-04-01)
# Very dead. Last release in 2007. Many open bugs (#712894, #882169, #894620,
# #907400, #920478, #932284, #943891).
# Removal on 2025-05-01. Bug #949960.
x11-terms/aterm
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki (2025-03-31)
# Depends on broken dev-java/rxtx, bugs #761103, #867409, #87, #898170
# #927898.
# Depends on dev-java/jgoodies-{common,looks} which are no longer available
# "at no charge". https://www.jgoodies.com/downloads/libraries/#post-63
# Removal on 2025-04-30.
sci
Hey,
app-containers/lxd and its dependency dev-libs/dqlite are up for grabs.
It just got bumped to latest version but there are few bugs open.
Overall in good state.
The two current maintainers have moved to incus and we don't use lxd at
all anymore. It's better for someone actually using it to t
Dear all,
Because of the continued opposition to implementing DKMS support in the
replies to my patchset. And because I feel the discussion is going
nowhere. I have decided to (for now) move the dkms.eclass and the
modified ebuilds to my ::natinst overlay.
This is obviously not what I would
Am Freitag, 28. März 2025, 09:23:42 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Duncan:
> Michał Górny posted on Fri, 28 Mar 2025 05:27:40 +0100 as excerpted:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> > don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
> >
> >
On 30/03/2025 10.11, Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote:
On 2025-03-21 14:32, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
except for gentoo and guru.
Hi,
I guess i'm a bit late in this discussion but i wanted to let you know
this woul
On 2025-03-30 Sun 02:11, Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote:
I guess i'm a bit late in this discussion but i wanted to let you know
this would also affect my gentoo qa scripts.
(https://gentooqa.levelnine.at). Right now i'm checking the gentoo,
guru, kde, science and pentoo repositories, syncing the
On 2025-03-21 14:32, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
except for gentoo and guru.
Over 10 years ago, I've started the repository mirror & CI project.
What started as a bunch of shell scripts on a user-donated server, has
I'm going to drop myself from this package. I'm not using it anymore,
and it keeps bumping into build issues with newer/alternative
toolchains. It's one of those annoying Debian-as-de-facto-upstream
packages, but it's ok with garden-path compilers/libc's.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
James Le Cuirot writes:
> This avoids the build host vs target flag separation issue. Sometimes it
> is important for the build host to use the right flags. We cannot fix
> this for cross-compiling now, but it should at least work for native
> builds.
>
LGTM.
> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/9
There was a discussion in #gentoo-pms if we should drop the "domo"
install function in EAPI 9:
- It is not much used, only 6 packages (13 ebuilds) in the Gentoo
repository.
- Could you explain (e.g. to a new developer) what the function does,
without looking it up in the spec? :)
- The funct
Set the "quality" of all repositories but ::gentoo to "experimental".
The quality tag has not been used consistently in the past, and at this
point it is entirely meaningless.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
files/overlays/repositories.xml | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions
Lower the status of a bunch of repositories to unofficial status.
The remaining "official" repositories are:
a. Gentoo developer overlays (of active developers)
b. project repositories of active Gentoo projects
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
files/overlays/repositories.xml | 26 +-
On Fri, 2025-03-28 at 17:51 +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > > One idea could be to merge these into a single status attribute, and
> > > maybe salvage the "core" value. That is:
> > >
> > > - core: Only the Gentoo repository (for the time bei
On Fri, 2025-03-28 at 12:59 +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> > don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
>
> > That is, by quality:
>
> > core: gentoo [official]
> > stabl
Michał Górny posted on Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:04:32 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Fri, 2025-03-28 at 08:23 +, Duncan wrote:
>> Status:
>>
>> * "Official" status meant managed by an official Gentoo project or
>> developer (who had gone thru the usual vetting process), […]
>>
>> * "Unofficial" status
On Fri, 2025-03-28 at 08:23 +, Duncan wrote:
> Status:
>
> * "Official" status meant managed by an official Gentoo project or
> developer (who had gone thru the usual vetting process), […]
>
> * "Unofficial" status had rather less security-trust and was intended for
> "ordinary users". […]
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 01:15:44PM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote:
> On 2025-03-28, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> > don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
> >
> > That is, by quality:
> >
> > core: gentoo [official]
>
On 21/03/2025 14.32, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
except for gentoo and guru.
Somewhat related: we may want to consider slightly raising the bar for
adding new (user) overlays. When mangling the overlay addition requ
Michał Górny posted on Fri, 28 Mar 2025 05:27:40 +0100 as excerpted:
> Hello,
>
> I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
>
> That is, by quality:
>
> core: gentoo [official]
> stable: opentransactions (?) [official (?!)]
On 2025-03-28, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
>
> That is, by quality:
>
> core: gentoo [official]
> stable: opentransactions (?) [official (?!)]
> testing: hyprland-overlay, moexia
Hello,
I no longer use it: app-text/txt2tags
No open bugs, but upstream is inactive for 2 years. It uses legacy
pre-PEP517 setuptools with some warnings.
Thank you,
Viorel.
OpenPGP_0x67992BD27934AEA4.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
Hello,
I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
That is, by quality:
core: gentoo [official]
stable: opentransactions (?) [official (?!)]
testing: hyprland-overlay, moexiami [both unofficial]
experimental: everything else
grav
The kernel build system expects the module signing key and
certificate in one file. In order to accommodate this we merge the
MODULES_SIGN_KEY and MODULES_SIGN_CERT into a temporary key in $T.
However, in doing so we override the MODULES_SIGN_KEY variable (but
not the MODULES_SIGN_CERT variable).
# Michał Górny (2025-03-22)
# Depends on deprecated notmuch bindings. The migration to new bindings
# have not been finished in 5 years already. Still uses legacy
# distutils-r1.eclass mode.
# Removal on 2025-04-21. Bug #751541.
mail-filter/afew
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
On 3/25/25 11:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 2025-03-25 at 16:15 -0700, Jay Faulkner wrote:
On 3/25/2025 1:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 08:46 -0400, Mitchell Dorrell wrote:
I've been following the discussion, but I still don't know enough to have
an opinion. Why was t
Add a safety check to verify that distutils_wheel_install is being
(usually indirectly) called in python_compile(), when using PEP517
build. If it weren't, this usually indicates that
distutils-r1_python_compile (or distutils_pep517_install) was not
called.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclas
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
> # Michał Górny (2025-03-26)
> # PyCXX and PySVN have no Gentoo maintainer since 2019, and they have
> # been effectively abandoned years earlier. PyCXX no longer installs
> # correctly, and the hacks to workaround upstream bugs are piling up.
> #
# Michał Górny (2025-03-26)
# PyCXX and PySVN have no Gentoo maintainer since 2019, and they have
# been effectively abandoned years earlier. PyCXX no longer installs
# correctly, and the hacks to workaround upstream bugs are piling up.
# PySVN ebuild has faked PEP517 support. The packages don't
On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:37 +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:27 +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > 5. We now make it easier to override the PEP517 backend
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:27 +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
>> > > > > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> > 5. We now make it easier to override the PEP517 backend used. You set
>> > DISTUTILS_UPSTREAM_PEP517 to the backend used upstr
On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:27 +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > 5. We now make it easier to override the PEP517 backend used. You set
> > DISTUTILS_UPSTREAM_PEP517 to the backend used upstream, and
> > DISTUTILS_USE_PEP517 to the backend yo
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
> 5. We now make it easier to override the PEP517 backend used. You set
>DISTUTILS_UPSTREAM_PEP517 to the backend used upstream, and
>DISTUTILS_USE_PEP517 to the backend you want to use -- and you don't
>have to edit build-backend in pypr
Set `FLIT_ALLOW_INVALID` to prevent license validation from breaking
builds.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index ef5f85349299..21a2c79c1f71 100644
--- a/eclass
On Tue, 2025-03-25 at 16:15 -0700, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> On 3/25/2025 1:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 08:46 -0400, Mitchell Dorrell wrote:
> > > I've been following the discussion, but I still don't know enough to have
> > > an opinion. Why was this infrastructure created in
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 11:17:20AM +0100, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> Am Freitag, 21. März 2025, 14:32:31 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb
> Michał Górny:
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
> > except for gentoo and guru.
> >
> >
> >
On 3/25/2025 1:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 08:46 -0400, Mitchell Dorrell wrote:
I've been following the discussion, but I still don't know enough to have
an opinion. Why was this infrastructure created in the first place?
There's a number of reasons, and they are still vali
Hi,
Here's another batch of patches to distutils-r1. Aside from some
refactoring, it includes the following changes:
1. Lower bounds for most of the build systems were bumped to the lowest
stable versions in ::gentoo. This should match upstream requirements
better, especially that a few b
Add a DISTUTILS_UPSTREAM_PEP517 variable that drives the build backend
check, and can be used to override it when it is desirable to override
the backend used.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/951944
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 30 ++
1
On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 08:46 -0400, Mitchell Dorrell wrote:
> I've been following the discussion, but I still don't know enough to have
> an opinion. Why was this infrastructure created in the first place?
There's a number of reasons, and they are still valid today:
1. Syncing against a mirror wit
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 100 +++--
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index 02245424bff6..2eb6e3208082 100644
--- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index e011502c01e6..8fc9ec5f568b 100644
--- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
+++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
@@ -
Reflow distutils-r1_python_compile() to remove duplicate conditions
and improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 117 ++---
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass
Invert the eclass logic to map DISTUTILS_USE_PEP517 values to backends
rather than the other way around. This is in preparation for making
it possible to override the backend used. One side effect of this
is that in case of DISTUTILS_USE_PEP517 mismatch, we no longer provide
the "correct" value,
Add a dynamic component to the build directory used by setuptools,
to enable calling distutils-r1_python_compile multiple times without
having the builds share the same build directory (and therefore end up
being combined).
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/951853
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
e
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 16
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index 21a2c79c1f71..e011502c01e6 100644
--- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
+++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
@@ -13
Add a hacky patched uv-build package that installs the upstream Python
modules without building another copy of uv.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
dev-python/uv-build/Manifest | 1 +
.../files/uv-build-0.6.9-use-uv.patch | 18
dev-python/uv-build/metadata.xml
This includes some important new features that packages are already
relying on -- PEP 639 licenses, PEP 621 metadata support in poetry-core.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 31 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --
It is possible Gentoo could be hit by "legal" action when having this
package. Very unstable development, switches upstream to avoid "legal"
trouble. See also: bug #948196 bug #927392
Removal on 2025-04-25.
--
Have a great day!
~ Maciej Barć
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Xgqt
9B0A 4C5D 0
On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 13:08 +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote:
> On 2025-03-18, Michał Górny wrote:
> > +Other Python implementations
> > +
> > +At the same time, we are also going to remove the target support
> > +for Python 3.10 (python3_10) and PyPy 3.10 (pypy3). If you wer
On Sat, 2025-03-22 at 08:20 -0700, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> On 3/21/2025 6:42 PM, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Hello, everyone.
> > >
> > > TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
> > > except for gentoo and
On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 14:12 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> Hi, if you just disable it, it'll break setup of everyone who uses
> /etc/portage/repos.conf/eselect-repo.conf, right?
Sounds about right. Which is probably preferable over the current state
of mirrors silently stopping to update, and pe
Just a heads up, without package.mask.
The following packages are backports for Python 3.10 and are not used in
any newer Python implementations. They will be removed simultaneously
with eclass support for Python 3.10, around 2025-05-01.
dev-python/backports-strenum
dev-python/taskgroup
--
Bes
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 9:33 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
> except for gentoo and guru.
>
>
> Over 10 years ago, I've started the repository mirror & CI project.
> What started as a bunch of shell scripts on a u
On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:22:30 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2025-03-23 at 08:39 +0100, Alfredo Tupone wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 06:56:24 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > > Bug fixed, and python team removed
> > >
> > > The tests still fail:
> > >
> > > FAILED (failures=
This avoids the build host vs target flag separation issue. Sometimes it
is important for the build host to use the right flags. We cannot fix
this for cross-compiling now, but it should at least work for native
builds.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/951740
Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot
---
ec
Eli Schwartz writes:
> On 3/14/25 11:31 AM, orbea wrote:
>> Changing it as you suggested I think would be significantly more
>> complicated and would require refactoring the eclass.
>
>
> Yes, it's unfortunately the type of thing that would be a somewhat
> involved change. :(
>
>
>> However I won
# Michał Górny (2025-03-23)
# dev-python/pip-run is a NIH package with significant number of NIH
# deps. New versions require "coherent" build system that's designed
# to be completely incompatible with downstream packaging.
# No revdeps left.
#
# Includes a number of NIH dependencies, some of th
On 2025-03-21, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
> except for gentoo and guru.
>
>
> Over 10 years ago, I've started the repository mirror & CI project.
> What started as a bunch of shell scripts on a user-donated ser
Am Freitag, 21. März 2025, 14:32:31 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Michał
Górny:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
> except for gentoo and guru.
>
>
> Over 10 years ago, I've started the repository mirror & CI project.
> What star
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 06:56:24 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Bug fixed, and python team removed
>
> The tests still fail:
>
> FAILED (failures=3, errors=1)
>
Here they are not. Maybe I miss further dependency.
Mind to share the log ?
Alfredo
On 3/14/25 11:31 AM, orbea wrote:
> Changing it as you suggested I think would be significantly more
> complicated and would require refactoring the eclass.
Yes, it's unfortunately the type of thing that would be a somewhat
involved change. :(
> However I wonder if my patch still has merit sinc
On 3/22/2025 11:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 2025-03-22 at 08:20 -0700, Jay Faulkner wrote:
In the OpenStack community, we will put a final commit on HEAD of the
primary branch removing all the content and putting an EOL notice in the
readme (e.g. https://opendev.org/openstack/ironic-lib )
# Arthur Zamarin (2025-03-22)
# EAPI=7, uses legacy distutils non-PEP517 build, no reverse
# dependencies, missing python compat bumps. Unmaintained in
# Gentoo for more than 3 years.
# Removal on 2025-04-21. Bugs #951854, #909910, #929427.
dev-libs/pigpio
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: Op
Add the "sync" sources for ::gentoo and ::guru repositories
that provide the extra combined metadata and md5-cache. While arguably
this is not the same thing, the list already includes rsync source
which is actually closer to the "sync" repositories than the upstream
repositories.
---
files/overl
On Sat, 2025-03-22 at 15:38 +, Sam James wrote:
> Jay Faulkner writes:
>
> > On 3/21/2025 6:42 PM, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > Hello, everyone.
> > > >
> > > > TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror reposito
Jay Faulkner writes:
> On 3/21/2025 6:42 PM, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Hello, everyone.
>>>
>>> TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
>>> except for gentoo and guru.
>> Unfortunate, but just to say that
On 3/21/2025 6:42 PM, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
except for gentoo and guru.
Unfortunate, but just to say that I have nothing to say against
dropping th
On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:01:58 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:50 -0700, orbea wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:44:04 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 07:12 -0700, orbea wrote:
> > > > What does this mean for the libressl overlay? People use
Hello, everyone.
TL;DR: should we expose "syncing" mirrors directly in our base
repositories.xml?
Per my previously announcement, I'd like to wind down the "public"
service of mirroring all Gentoo repositories, and limit it to the few
repositories we have control over -- at least ::gentoo and ::
# Michał Górny (2025-03-22)
# Stuck on Python 3.10, no reply from maintainer. No revdeps.
# Removal on 2025-04-21. Bug #896608.
app-office/gtg
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:50 -0700, orbea wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:44:04 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 07:12 -0700, orbea wrote:
> > > What does this mean for the libressl overlay? People use that so
> > > please don't remove it.
> >
> > It means people will hav
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
> except for gentoo and guru.
Unfortunate, but just to say that I have nothing to say against
dropping these if it's a maintenance burden.
> S
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:44:04 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 07:12 -0700, orbea wrote:
> > What does this mean for the libressl overlay? People use that so
> > please don't remove it.
>
> It means people will have to sync straight from the upstream
> repository. Also, we won'
On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 14:47 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> 21.03.2025 14:44, Michał Górny пишет:
> > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 14:12 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> > > Hi, if you just disable it, it'll break setup of everyone who uses
> > > /etc/portage/repos.conf/eselect-repo.conf, right?
> > Sounds a
21.03.2025 14:44, Michał Górny пишет:
> On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 14:12 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
>> Hi, if you just disable it, it'll break setup of everyone who uses
>> /etc/portage/repos.conf/eselect-repo.conf, right?
> Sounds about right. Which is probably preferable over the current state
> of
On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 07:12 -0700, orbea wrote:
> What does this mean for the libressl overlay? People use that so please
> don't remove it.
It means people will have to sync straight from the upstream repository.
Also, we won't be reporting bugs when things break hard.
--
Best regards,
Michał G
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:32:31 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
> except for gentoo and guru.
>
>
> Over 10 years ago, I've started the repository mirror & CI project.
> What started as a bunch of shell scripts
On 19/03/2025 23:37, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 3/19/25 6:10 PM, Sam James wrote:
If we're doing it orphaned, it should be done as hooks instead rather
than with any integration in the ebuild, though. postinst / orphaned
files are broadly a hack. Orphaned files break a bunch of invariants
including
On 19/03/2025 23:10, Sam James wrote:
Nowa Ammerlaan writes:
On 19/03/2025 02:07, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:34:43PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:14:13AM -, Duncan wrote:
Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:11:06 +0100 as excerpted
On 2025-03-18, Michał Górny wrote:
> +Other Python implementations
> +
> +At the same time, we are also going to remove the target support
> +for Python 3.10 (python3_10) and PyPy 3.10 (pypy3). If you were using
> +the pypy3 target before, now you will need to explicitl
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 08:32:54PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:18:49PM +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> > There was a discussion in #gentoo-pms if we should drop the "domo"
> > install function in EAPI 9:
> >
> > - It is not much used, only 6 packages (13 ebuilds) in the
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:18:49PM +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> There was a discussion in #gentoo-pms if we should drop the "domo"
> install function in EAPI 9:
>
> - It is not much used, only 6 packages (13 ebuilds) in the Gentoo
> repository.
>
> - Could you explain (e.g. to a new developer)
Nowa Ammerlaan writes:
> On 19/03/2025 02:07, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:34:43PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:14:13AM -, Duncan wrote:
Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:11:06 +0100 as excerpted:
> I had really hope
1 - 100 of 37825 matches
Mail list logo
