Hello, I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
That is, by quality: core: gentoo [official] stable: opentransactions (?) [official (?!)] testing: hyprland-overlay, moexiami [both unofficial] experimental: everything else graveyard: unused By status: official: ago, alexxy, anarchy, andrey_utkin, cj-overlay, dilfridge, emacs, EmilienMottet, fordfrog, gentoo, gnome, gnustep, graaff, guru, haskell, java, jmbsvicetto, kde, libressl, maekke, masterlay, mschiff, multilib-portage, musl, mysql, opentransactions, pentoo, pinkbyte, qemu-init, qt, R_Overlay, rich0, riscv, rnp, ruby, science, sping, swegener, tex-overlay, toolchain, ukui, ulm, vGist, voyageur, x11 unofficial: everything else Which brings the significant question: are these attributes in any way meaningful? Is there a point in keeping them at all? Should we set some ground rules and make them used consistently? Of them all, only "core" makes sense right now. "stable" and "testing" are used only by random user overlays, with no apparent features. Similarly, "official" is used by a mix of developer and ex-developer repositories, developer and user project repositories, and a bunch of user repositories with no clearly distinct features. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
