>>>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote: >> One idea could be to merge these into a single status attribute, and >> maybe salvage the "core" value. That is: >> >> - core: Only the Gentoo repository (for the time being) >> - official: Repositories maintained by a project or a developer >> (maybe opt-in or opt-out, i.e. allow devs to have unofficial >> repositories?) >> - unofficial: everything else
> WFM. Not sure we can remove the "quality" attribute without breaking > stuff, but we can at least clean "status" a bit. Yeah, that may be an obstacle. If we must keep the quality attribute, then how about using quality="core" for the Gentoo repo, and quality="experimental" for everything else? Very few repos use the values "stable" or "testing", and we don't seem to have any criteria for them. Also arguably, a repository with quality="graveyard" shouldn't be in repositories.xml at all. > Perhaps as a first step, downgrade all user repositories to > "unofficial". Then ask the owners of the remaining ones if they want > them to stay official. +1 Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
