Re: [gentoo-dev] New email list and alias for the musl project --- a note for bug wranglers

2015-07-03 Thread Alex Xu
On 03/07/15 08:20 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This one is mostly for the bug wranglers. There is a new email list and > alias for the musl (sub?)project [1]. > > List: gentoo-m...@lists.gentoo.org > alias: m...@gentoo.org > > musl is a new C standard lib [2]. It adheres scr

Re: [gentoo-dev] oops: "portage-latest.tar.*" are off-by-one.

2015-06-04 Thread Alex Xu
On 04/06/15 11:46 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > В письме от Чт, 4 июня 2015 11:17:01 пользователь Mike Frysinger написал: >> if you have a bug to report, please use bugs.gentoo.org >> -mike > > I bet, "bug" will deprecate itself before even bug wranglers takes a look on > it. > excelle

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib amd64 news item for review

2015-03-15 Thread Alex Xu
On 15/03/15 10:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > In case of issues, blockers especially, the users users are recommended looks OK otherwise. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] new bitcoin eclass

2015-02-05 Thread Alex Xu
On 05/02/15 07:11 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I proxy a set of bitcoin ebuilds for Luke-jr. Currently several ebuilds > make use of the same codebase, so its probably a good idea to migrate > that code to an eclass. Can we have the following eclass reviewed > before committin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-11-23 Thread Alex Xu
On 23/11/14 08:17 PM, hasufell wrote: > packages up for grab: > > I didn't change metadata.xml, nor bug reports for any of those, because > I was too lazy. If you grab one, please do so yourself. how will bug-wranglers know where to assign packages then? > app-misc/trash-cli > > co-maintained b

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] >=udev-217 or >=eudev-2.1 upgrade news item

2014-11-07 Thread Alex Xu
On 07/11/14 07:13 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > On 29/10/14 13:42, Alex Xu wrote: >> On 29/10/14 07:28 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>> request for review before committing, suggestions welcome since it's >>> rather short what >>> i got to say >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in "scrypt" USE-Flag

2014-11-02 Thread Alex Xu
On 02/11/14 11:41 AM, Marco Ziebell wrote: > There's a typo in the "scrypt" USE-FLAG. A bug-report seemed to big for > that. > Correct would be "scrypt: Use libscrypt for the scrypt > algorithm" so... instead of emailing 4 people (three bug-wranglers plus one maintainer), you email around 300 peop

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] >=udev-217 or >=eudev-2.1 upgrade news item

2014-10-29 Thread Alex Xu
On 29/10/14 07:28 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > request for review before committing, suggestions welcome since it's > rather short what > i got to say > > thanks, > Samuli > typical news items are in the format " no longer/now do . [ is >.] if you need , do . if you do not need , do ." [blah bl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11

2014-10-24 Thread Alex Xu
On 24/10/14 10:31 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > HI everyone, > > I've update the c++ news item for your consideration. I incorporated > suggestions, in particular a note about incompatibility between c++11 > compiled with different version of gcc differing in minor number (eg 4.7 > and 4.8). >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11

2014-10-19 Thread Alex Xu
On 19/10/14 06:53 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > the default is still gnu++98 what does this mean, how does it differ from c++98? > in the older ABI, can lead to a crippled system. what do you mean, will other packages break too? maybe "may lead to non-functioning or possibly broken packages". a

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-14 Thread Alex Xu
On 13/10/14 03:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > Hi, > > In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a > virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and > dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put > virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEND. Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item review: bash-completion-2.1-r90

2014-10-13 Thread Alex Xu
On 13/10/14 05:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Please review the following news item. > > - > > Title: bash-completion-2.1-r90 > Author: Michał Górny > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: -MM-DD > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: > Starting with app-shells/bash-c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add gcc-specs-stack-check() to toolchain-funcs.eclass

2014-10-12 Thread Alex Xu
On 12/10/14 05:22 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > # @FUNCTION: tc-export_build_env > @@ -578,37 +578,37 @@ > gcc-specs-relro() { > local directive > directive=$(gcc-specs-directive link_command) > -return $([[ "${directive/\{!norelro:}" != "${directive}" ]]) > +[[ "${directive/\{

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why masks are being used for security issues instead of GLSA?

2014-09-25 Thread Alex Xu
On 25/09/14 08:42 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hello, > > many packages in tree are masked due to security issues instead of > issuing GLSA for them. Why? At this moment I counted 56 such > packages in package.mask. > > Some of these packages have GLSAs issued (e.g. nethack and friends) > and ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set

2014-09-05 Thread Alex Xu
On 05/09/14 01:34 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the > system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has > become just adding iproute2. > > If no one objects, I would like to do this sometime in the next 7

Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd profiles

2014-08-29 Thread Alex Xu
On 29/08/14 07:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a simple question: why do we have systemd subprofiles only in gnome > and kde profiles? > > Could we add systemd subprofiles also to default/linux/$arch/13.0/ and > desktop (and any other profiles where it makes sense)? > > Th

tl;dr: [gentoo-dev] Fw: reviewboard and its bugs

2014-08-19 Thread Alex Xu
tl;dr: python package has nodejs dependencies, we don't have a mechanism like distutils.eclass to install those system-wide. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread Alex Xu
On 12/08/14 01:29 AM, Duncan wrote: > Follow the instructions, as found in the headers of every mail on the > list including the one you replied to, or the ones on the site you > presumably signed up from? Seriously: s/presumably //, this list is closed-loop. signature.asc Description: OpenP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/x265: x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild x265-0.8.ebuild

2014-07-28 Thread Alex Xu
On 28/07/14 08:15 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Samuli Suominen > wrote: >> x265-1.2.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~x86" >> x265-1.3.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86" >> x265-.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86" >> >> As in... You forgot to add ~arm to -.e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: app-crypt/opencdk, net-dialup/gnome-ppp, media-plugins/vdr-dxr3, media-video/dxr3config, media-video/em8300-libraries, net-misc/xsupplicant, sys-cluster/util-vserver, www-a

2014-07-27 Thread Alex Xu
On 27/07/14 08:32 PM, James Cloos wrote: >> "PR" == Pacho Ramos writes: > > PR> # Pacho Ramos (27 Jul 2014) > PR> # Doesn't build on non-selinux setups (#498032) > PR> # Removal in a month. > PR> dev-lang/gforth > > Did you even try 0.7.3 before coming to that conclusion? > > It needs a bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Using LINGUAS

2014-07-21 Thread Alex Xu
On 21/07/14 12:23 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote: > Hi, > > the OCR software tesseract has many different plugins for > language packs used for OCR for different languages. The ebuild > uses the LINGUAS variable to pass the choice of which packages to > install to the user. > > A reverse dependency is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Changes in installed ebuilds

2014-06-25 Thread Alex Xu
On 25/06/14 06:42 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Except if they're locally hard masked ... ;-) there's nothing we can do if you intentionally break your own system >> In that case I think revbump is not warranted since it should continue >> to work for existing installation and new installations shou

Re: [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration

2014-06-11 Thread Alex Xu
On 10/06/14 06:59 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > [snip] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 > The current state is almost usable, but it is still obscenely slow > (e.g. initial clone taking ~10 CPU-minutes just to figure out what to > do), but we can just throw more hardware at it. https:

Re: [gentoo-dev] /sys/fs/cgroup/openrc/???/tasks sometimes missing

2014-06-03 Thread Alex Xu
On 03/06/14 02:08 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > If I boot a 32 bit stable Gentoo Linux as a user mode linux guest with > current kernels (host is a 32 bit stable Gentoo too), then I do observe > sometimes during the boot process error messages from the init system of > Gentoo (OpenRC) like the fol

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass

2014-05-19 Thread Alex Xu
On 19/05/14 07:17 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 19 May 2014, Alex Xu wrote: > >> On 18/05/14 02:13 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> if [[ ${EBUILD_PHASE} = *rm && ! -e ${sitelisp}/site-gentoo.el ]]; then >>> ewarn "Refusing to cre

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass

2014-05-19 Thread Alex Xu
On 18/05/14 02:13 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > if [[ ${EBUILD_PHASE} = *rm && ! -e ${sitelisp}/site-gentoo.el ]]; then > ewarn "Refusing to create site-gentoo.el in ${EBUILD_PHASE} > phase." > return 0 > fi > > + [[ -d ${sitelisp} ]] \ > + |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: LTO use in the tree

2014-04-26 Thread Alex Xu
On 26/04/14 08:34 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote: > Pragmatically nobody gives a f* if grep has been optimized to the max > since it's usually not the bottleneck. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-August/019310.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-04-14 Thread Alex Xu
On 14/04/14 04:41 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > There are still other Gentoo Developers listed in some of them, for > example owncloud and wpa_supplicant; are they really up for grabs? $ equery -N m $(cat) | grep '^[ HM]' * app-text/fbreader [gentoo] Maintainer: ale...@gentoo.org (Alexey Shvetsov) Ho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Change or revert the "30 days maintainer timeout" stabilization policy

2014-04-02 Thread Alex Xu
On 02/04/14 04:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > Another option might be to have a tag in metadata.xml that flags > packages as never-stable Arguments have been made that such packages do not belong in g-x86. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ?

2014-03-31 Thread Alex Xu
On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there > any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292932 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693424

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ?

2014-03-29 Thread Alex Xu
On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote: > WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list again : > > "Since the Debian debakel with "fixing" an uninitialized memeory I'm > very skeptical to distribution specif

Re: [gentoo-dev] GSoC proposal: cp --reflink support for zfs.

2014-03-12 Thread Alex Xu
On 12/03/14 03:15 AM, Yuxuan Shui wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to implement cp --reflink support for ZFSOnLinux as my GSoC > project. > > cp --reflink is used to create a COW copy of a file, so the file will not > take any disk space if it's not modified. This feature is very useful for > cases

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Removal of Ruby MRI 1.8; Ruby MRI 1.9 and 2.0 now default

2014-03-08 Thread Alex Xu
On 08/03/14 05:37 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 01:46:52 + (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> 0 1 2 3 4 >> 012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234 >> Ruby MRI 1.8 removal; 1.9 recommended default >> >> (The latter is GLEP 42's

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type.

2014-02-26 Thread Alex Xu
On 26/02/14 10:29 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > This is part of normal operation, so maybe downgrade these ewarns to > elog? There's nothing the user can do to suppress these warnings, > apart from changing his global setting for the clone type, which we > won't want him to do. You can put EGIT_CLON

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 07/10] Support shallow clones.

2014-02-26 Thread Alex Xu
On 26/02/14 06:59 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Implementation-wise 'shallow' mode differs only when starting a new > branch. In that case, '--depth 1' is used to avoid fetching earlier > commits. Further updates are done through plain 'git fetch'. So this fetches all a..b commits. If the package hasn

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Alex Xu
Title: >=sys-fs/udev-210 upgrade Author: Samuli Suominen Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2014-02-25 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udev/upgrade#udev_208_to_210 [2] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceN

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types

2014-02-24 Thread Alex Xu
On 24/02/14 04:00 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 21:13:15 > Peter Stuge napisał(a): > >> Michał Górny wrote: >>> Shallow clone >>> - >>> - EGIT_COMMIT can only name tags (using a hash auto-forces higher mode), >> >> Hm, why is that? This seems like an unfortunate a

Re: AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-24 Thread Alex Xu
On 24/02/14 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote: > This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated into > systemd! > > In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just > use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds > > - still

Re: [gentoo-dev] February 2014 QA policy updates

2014-02-20 Thread Alex Xu
On 20/02/14 04:46 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Chris Reffett wrote: >> This does not affect sys-boot/grub's USE=multislot, as that >> does not mangle the SLOT value like the others (as I understand it). > > Right. USE=multislot on grub just toggles the renaming of th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-30 Thread Alex Xu
On 29/01/14 10:36 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Matt Turner wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto >> wrote: >>> +Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst >> >> Display-If-Installed: >=dev-util/catalyst- > > Matt, > > my plan wa

Re: [gentoo-dev] dropping redundant stable keywords

2014-01-28 Thread Alex Xu
On 28/01/14 11:33 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Here's a proposal that may address concerns from the long "rfc: > revisiting our stabilization policy" thread. > > It seems at least one of the problems is that with old ebuilds being > stable on slow arches but not the more recent ebuilds, it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] A few packages up for grabs

2014-01-22 Thread Alex Xu
On 21/01/14 10:54 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > x11-misc/x11vnc I can proxy this if nobody wants. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: overlays.gentoo.org restoration & post-mortem

2014-01-18 Thread Alex Xu
On 18/01/14 05:57 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> >> FYI: The following repos contained dangling commits/tags/blobs >> [...] you are encouraged to push again [...] >> user/mv.git (+blobs) > > I cannot imagine that the suggested "git push" removed orphaned blobs: > AFAIK it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Hosting daily gx86 squashfs images and deltas

2014-01-17 Thread Alex Xu
On 17/01/14 08:08 PM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: > Michał Górny writes: > >> However, it may be actually beneficial to provide other durations, like >> weekly deltas. In my tests, the daily updates for this week summed up >> to almost 50M while the weekly was barely 20M. > > Is there a way to mer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Feature Request: making thirdpartymirrors easier to manage

2014-01-08 Thread Alex Xu
On 08/01/14 10:11 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:12:59 + > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > >> I was also asked by a user to make it possible to adjust the priority >> of some mirror URLs, instead of only random choice. > > While we are at it, we could add keywords for (global)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Feature Request: making thirdpartymirrors easier to manage

2014-01-06 Thread Alex Xu
On 06/01/14 03:20 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > This is a small feature request, but it will require a modification to > PMS, so I describe it here. > > The present thirdpartymirrors file is unwieldy, and difficult to manage > due to it's format with very long lines. It also doesn't permit easy >

Re: [gentoo-dev] OCSP was: friendly reminder wrt net virtual in init scripts

2013-11-06 Thread Alex Xu
On 06/11/13 08:00 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/06/2013 02:11 PM, Thomas D. wrote: > >> This is going OT but I cannot leave this statement uncommented, >> because from my knowledge this is wrong/you are hiding important >> information everyone should know about: > > I figure everyone here i

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass add support for gdk-pixbuf cache update

2013-09-09 Thread Alex Xu
On 09/09/13 08:29 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > Index: gdk-pixbuf-2.28.2.ebuild > === > RCS file: > /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-2.28.2.ebuild,v > retriev

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass add support for gdk-pixbuf cache update

2013-08-31 Thread Alex Xu
On 31/08/13 09:00 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: >> > And please ensure to remove it in pkg_postrm() when last version >> > of gdk-pixbuf is unmerged. > I am not clear on this last sentence. Could you reformulate it please ? Ensure that the loaders.cache file is removed correctly when all versio

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Alex Xu
On 29/08/13 06:29 AM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > I would like to add arcconf (binary to manage aacraid-based controllers) > to the tree, which is protected by a mandatory clickthrough witch the > attached text. > > The license would be named "Adaptec" and added to the NON-FREE license > group. > > O

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving more arches to dev profiles

2013-08-21 Thread Alex Xu
On 21/08/13 12:23 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: >> Imho the situation is that agos intensive work displaced all the other >> ones, or they at least rely on ago doing the work and loose focus. >> > At one point before Ago came along, stabilisation of Qt was taking so > long we had to start masking rev

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer features in portage: cgroup, network-sandbox, ipc-sandbox

2013-08-20 Thread Alex Xu
On 20/08/13 11:42 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > It's a feature; all features are optional. It's just not going to be > able to be enabled along with FEATURES="distcc" is all. I'm sure we > have other features that collide with one-another too, so i don't see > this being a big issue. FEATURES="n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-08 Thread Alex Xu
On 08/08/13 11:26 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > Honestly, we're probably getting to the point where we should offer a > choice of init systems in our handbook. It doesn't make sense for > Gnome users to go configuring openrc in the handbook only to throw out > all that work and start over with systemd

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61)

2013-08-06 Thread Alex Xu
On 06/08/13 10:02 AM, hasufell wrote: > It seems none of them (except the overview GLEP 57) are implemented yet, > although they are roughly 6-8 years old. > > What is holding it back? Is it just that we don't have a PM > implementation yet or is it some political nonsense and PMS blocking > progr

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: Kernel Team vanilla-sources policy

2013-08-04 Thread Alex Xu
On 04/08/13 11:29 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > On Sunday, August 04, 2013 07:24:23 PM Alex Xu wrote: > >> wat. Possibly intended: >>> For the latest upstream kernel unpatched by Gentoo > > Not intended > --- > > > Title: vanilla-sources stabilization polic

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: Kernel Team vanilla-sources policy

2013-08-04 Thread Alex Xu
Further minor grammar/typographical errata: On 04/08/13 11:16 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > Title: vanilla-sources stabilization policy > Author: Mike Pagano > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2013-08-07 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: sys-kernel/vanilla-sources > > Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: Kernel Team vanilla-sources policy

2013-08-03 Thread Alex Xu
Minor grammar/typographical errata: On 04/08/13 12:53 AM, Mike Pagano wrote: > The Gentoo Kernel Team will no longer be providing stable vanilla-sources > kernels. All currently stabilized vanilla-sources versions will be dropped > to ~arch. The Arch teams, via normal requests of the Kernel Team,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [New eclass] twisted-r1.eclass

2013-08-03 Thread Alex Xu
On 03/08/13 03:37 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > On 03/08/13 02:29 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2013-08-03, o godz. 17:54:42 >> Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 3 Aug 2013, Michał Górny wrote: >>> >>>> 2. The eclass comes w

Re: [gentoo-dev] [New eclass] twisted-r1.eclass

2013-08-03 Thread Alex Xu
On 03/08/13 02:29 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-08-03, o godz. 17:54:42 > Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > >>> On Sat, 3 Aug 2013, Michał Górny wrote: >> >>> 2. The eclass comes with a pure bash-3.2 CamelCase converter for >>> changing PNs like 'twisted-foo' into 'TwistedFoo'. The relevant

Re: [gentoo-dev] PYTHON flags grammar? why?

2013-07-28 Thread Alex Xu
On 28/07/13 05:07 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:59:38AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote >>> On Sat, 27 Jul 2013, Leho Kraav wrote: >> >>> php5-5 vs python2_7 >>> Why, how did that happen? >> >> Using the hyphen is cleaner, because the underscore is used as the >> separator for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] default bashrc value suggestion

2013-07-27 Thread Alex Xu
On 27/07/13 10:36 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > Unfortunately, gentoo.org's archive seems to be broken/frozen, while it > is a bit hard to grep 3party archives to find already discussed topics :-/ > > 27.07.2013 18:31, Jeroen Roovers пишет: >> We've been over this plenty of times in the p

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] default bashrc value suggestion

2013-07-27 Thread Alex Xu
On 27/07/13 08:09 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > Hi, list! > > Many times somebody post buildlogs — they're translated to user's native > language due to system's /etc/env.d/02locale. > > What about adding "export LC_ALL=POSIX" (or, at least, LC_MESSAGES) to > /etc/portage/bashrc by defau

Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla sources stabilization policy change

2013-07-24 Thread Alex Xu
On 24/07/13 01:49 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Alex Xu wrote: >>> Maybe it would make sense to automatically stabilize every v-s kernel >>> right away? >> >> As has been stated, this implies that Gentoo QA has tested the packages >> and found them to be reasonabl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla sources stabilization policy change

2013-07-24 Thread Alex Xu
On 24/07/13 01:37 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Mike Pagano wrote: >> Team members working alongside upstream (and downstream) developer Greg k-h >> have decided to no longer request stabilization of the vanilla sources >> kernel. >> Team members and arch teams (understandably) are unable to keep up

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH systemd.eclass] Introduce systemd_is_booted().

2013-07-24 Thread Alex Xu
On 24/07/13 10:33 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:17 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Michał Górny wrote: >> >>> Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages that >>> do not work anymore without systemd. >> >> Why is the host wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?

2013-07-21 Thread Alex Xu
On 21/07/13 02:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/21/2013 03:53 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> El mar, 03-07-2012 a las 10:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: >>> On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:45:26 -0700 >>> Zac Medico wrote: >>> On 07/02/2012 01:36 PM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: > Il 02/07/2012 22:01, Zac

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/base: ChangeLog package.use.force

2013-07-19 Thread Alex Xu
On 19/07/13 11:46 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-07-19, o godz. 16:11:52 > Markos Chandras napisał(a): > >> On 19 July 2013 16:04, Ian Delaney (idella4) wrote: >>> idella4 13/07/19 15:04:28 >>> >>> Modified: ChangeLog package.use.force >>> Log: >>> Add entry to force u

Re: [gentoo-dev] [1/3] Automatic *XML->Wiki wiki.gentoo.org

2013-07-09 Thread Alex Xu
On 09/07/13 08:29 PM, Alex Legler wrote: > On 10.07.2013 01:53, Alex Xu wrote: >>> >>> I don't really like the default MW table style here; it doesn't really >>> look... Gentoo, if you will. I hacked around the CSS a bit and I'd say >>> the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [1/3] Automatic *XML->Wiki wiki.gentoo.org

2013-07-09 Thread Alex Xu
(Delayed due to list servers being down) On 08/07/13 06:48 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > On 08/07/13 04:02 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:54:47PM +0200, Alex Legler wrote: >> I keep track of the stuff at [1], an example output can already be found at >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year

2013-06-21 Thread Alex Xu
On 21/06/13 03:27 PM, Sergey Popov wrote: > 21.06.2013 23:22, Sergey Popov пишет: >> 2) package has dead upstream, does not build with current >> gcc/glibc/binutils/whatever and can not be fixed - bug is closed as >> OBSOLETE. >> > > Of course i am talking about long-standing bugs, that assigned t

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org

2013-06-16 Thread Alex Xu
On 16/06/13 04:36 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Hi Kent, >> >> IMHO, the criteria for being able to edit the wiki should be lower than the >> present requirements on "being a Gentoo Dev". > > Only a small subset of official pages is locked, everything else is free to > edit for anyone who sign

Re: [gentoo-dev] [2&3]/3 API & files

2013-06-16 Thread Alex Xu
On 16/06/13 03:44 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Image resources: > >> These can be uploaded to the Wiki. >>> > > How can we ensure later that the media files don't get deleted? >> > Deletion is restricted to administrators, mediawiki also keeps old >> > versions around in case someone reupl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Draft news item: MySQL/MariaDB packages dropping support for PrimeBase (PBXT) engine

2013-06-01 Thread Alex Xu
On 01/06/13 06:36 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Robin H Johnson wrote: > >> Title: MySQL/MariaDB packages dropping support for PrimeBase (PBXT) engine > > Too long, maximum 44 characters according to GLEP 42. The above will even > be truncated by eselect news. > > Ulrich >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switchup-mode and boottime selector? Was: eselect init

2013-05-27 Thread Alex Xu
Funny. This is starting to sound familiar... almost like some other software that runs at boot, every boot. Hm, what was the name... Oh, a *bootloader*! Something that *loads* different *boot* configurations! But seriously. For people that can install a bootloader, is there really any "reconfigur

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Usage of dev-utils/ninja in ebuilds

2013-05-25 Thread Alex Xu
On 25/05/13 09:53 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > Is NINJAOPTS a variable recognized by ninja or something that would be Gentoo > specific? MAKEOPTS is Gentoo-specific anyways. MAKEFLAGS is parsed by at least GNU make. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-05-25 Thread Alex Xu
On 25/05/13 03:55 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: >> > I don't have "init=" set on my machines and it seems to >> > start /sbin/init. So that should be correct. > Ah yeah, a quick `ps axjf | grep bin/[i]nit` indeed confirms that. > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/init

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-01 Thread Alex Xu
On 01/05/13 10:11 PM, Duncan wrote as excerpted: > Steven J. Long posted on Wed, 01 May 2013 19:52:03 +0100 as excerpted: > >>> Gentoo is about choice, which to me also means "embrace diversitiy". >>> If you want to keep living in your little world, fine, you can and >>> you're very welcome, but a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-24 Thread Alex Xu
Any reason why a pre-commit hook can't be used? Assuming that `git push -f` is never used and that every committer uses it, pre-commit is guaranteed to be executed on all commits that are pushed to the remote. pre-commit can check QA and even automate changelog, so instead of: $ cvs update $ cvs

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item -- baselayout-1.x deprecation final warning

2013-04-07 Thread Alex Xu
Notably, NetworkManager generates old-style net files. On 07/04/13 04:13 PM, Roy Bamford wrote: > On 2013.04.07 20:36, William Hubbs wrote: >> All, >> >> We have continued support for baselayout-1 to baselayout-2/OpenRc >> migration for almost two years now, so I think it is about time we >> kill

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item -- baselayout-1.x deprecation final warning

2013-04-07 Thread Alex Xu
On 07/04/13 03:36 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > According to Gentoo policy, the support for migration from baselayout-1 > to baselayout-2 could end on 28 Jun 2012, a year after OpenRc became > stable. "could end" sounds a bit awkward. Try "was slated to end" or perhaps "could have ended". Be more co

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Establishing Gentoo patch policy to keep our patches consistent and clean

2013-04-06 Thread Alex Xu
On 06/04/13 03:02 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Are there any other formats than unified and context diff? If not, it'd > be like another "for indoor or outdoor use only" or "home or office use" > - i.e. no need to explicitly list all possible options. From the man page: > -c, -C NUM, --contex

Re: [gentoo-dev] Global useflags zeroconf and avahi

2013-04-01 Thread Alex Xu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kill zeroconf and use "dnssd", "upnp", "ssdp". Problem solved? On 01/04/13 06:43 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher > Nguyễn: >>> I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use